If $f$ is holomorphic on a domain $D$, and satisfies $aoperatorname{Re}(f(z))+boperatorname{Im}(f(z))=c$ for...











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












The proposition that I am required to prove is the following




Let $D subset mathbb{C}$ be a domain and suppose $f(x, y)=u(x,
y)+iv(x, y)$
is holomorphic on $D$. Let $a, b, cin mathbb{R}$ such
that $a^2+b^2>0$ and $$au(x, y)+bv(x, y)=c quad forall z=(x, y)in D$$



Prove $f$ is constant




I will write $u(x, y)$ as $u$ in short, and similarly for $v(x, y)$.
My attempt is as follows:
Since f is holomorphic we have:
$$dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{partial v}{partial y}qquad dfrac{partial u}{partial y}=-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}$$
If $a=0neq b$, then $bv=c implies v=Kinmathbb{R}$



$$implies dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{partial v}{partial y}=dfrac{partial u}{partial y}=-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0$$
$$implies f'(z)=0 quad forall zin D$$
Similarly for $aneq 0=b$
Now the remaining case to check is if $aneq 0neq b$



Taking partial derivatives both sides of the given relation we get:



$$adfrac{partial u}{partial x}+bdfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0$$
$$implies dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{b}{a}bigg(-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}bigg)=dfrac{b}{a}dfrac{partial u}{partial y}$$
Similarly taking partial derivatives w.r.t $y$ we get:
$$dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=-dfrac{a}{b}dfrac{partial u}{partial y}$$
$$implies dfrac{a}{b}=dfrac{-b}{a}$$
$$implies a^2+b^2=0$$
This is a contradiction, so it is not possible that $aneq 0neq b$. Therefore for all possible values of $a$ and $b$, the function $f$ is constant.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite












    The proposition that I am required to prove is the following




    Let $D subset mathbb{C}$ be a domain and suppose $f(x, y)=u(x,
    y)+iv(x, y)$
    is holomorphic on $D$. Let $a, b, cin mathbb{R}$ such
    that $a^2+b^2>0$ and $$au(x, y)+bv(x, y)=c quad forall z=(x, y)in D$$



    Prove $f$ is constant




    I will write $u(x, y)$ as $u$ in short, and similarly for $v(x, y)$.
    My attempt is as follows:
    Since f is holomorphic we have:
    $$dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{partial v}{partial y}qquad dfrac{partial u}{partial y}=-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}$$
    If $a=0neq b$, then $bv=c implies v=Kinmathbb{R}$



    $$implies dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{partial v}{partial y}=dfrac{partial u}{partial y}=-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0$$
    $$implies f'(z)=0 quad forall zin D$$
    Similarly for $aneq 0=b$
    Now the remaining case to check is if $aneq 0neq b$



    Taking partial derivatives both sides of the given relation we get:



    $$adfrac{partial u}{partial x}+bdfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0$$
    $$implies dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{b}{a}bigg(-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}bigg)=dfrac{b}{a}dfrac{partial u}{partial y}$$
    Similarly taking partial derivatives w.r.t $y$ we get:
    $$dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=-dfrac{a}{b}dfrac{partial u}{partial y}$$
    $$implies dfrac{a}{b}=dfrac{-b}{a}$$
    $$implies a^2+b^2=0$$
    This is a contradiction, so it is not possible that $aneq 0neq b$. Therefore for all possible values of $a$ and $b$, the function $f$ is constant.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite











      The proposition that I am required to prove is the following




      Let $D subset mathbb{C}$ be a domain and suppose $f(x, y)=u(x,
      y)+iv(x, y)$
      is holomorphic on $D$. Let $a, b, cin mathbb{R}$ such
      that $a^2+b^2>0$ and $$au(x, y)+bv(x, y)=c quad forall z=(x, y)in D$$



      Prove $f$ is constant




      I will write $u(x, y)$ as $u$ in short, and similarly for $v(x, y)$.
      My attempt is as follows:
      Since f is holomorphic we have:
      $$dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{partial v}{partial y}qquad dfrac{partial u}{partial y}=-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}$$
      If $a=0neq b$, then $bv=c implies v=Kinmathbb{R}$



      $$implies dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{partial v}{partial y}=dfrac{partial u}{partial y}=-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0$$
      $$implies f'(z)=0 quad forall zin D$$
      Similarly for $aneq 0=b$
      Now the remaining case to check is if $aneq 0neq b$



      Taking partial derivatives both sides of the given relation we get:



      $$adfrac{partial u}{partial x}+bdfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0$$
      $$implies dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{b}{a}bigg(-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}bigg)=dfrac{b}{a}dfrac{partial u}{partial y}$$
      Similarly taking partial derivatives w.r.t $y$ we get:
      $$dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=-dfrac{a}{b}dfrac{partial u}{partial y}$$
      $$implies dfrac{a}{b}=dfrac{-b}{a}$$
      $$implies a^2+b^2=0$$
      This is a contradiction, so it is not possible that $aneq 0neq b$. Therefore for all possible values of $a$ and $b$, the function $f$ is constant.










      share|cite|improve this question















      The proposition that I am required to prove is the following




      Let $D subset mathbb{C}$ be a domain and suppose $f(x, y)=u(x,
      y)+iv(x, y)$
      is holomorphic on $D$. Let $a, b, cin mathbb{R}$ such
      that $a^2+b^2>0$ and $$au(x, y)+bv(x, y)=c quad forall z=(x, y)in D$$



      Prove $f$ is constant




      I will write $u(x, y)$ as $u$ in short, and similarly for $v(x, y)$.
      My attempt is as follows:
      Since f is holomorphic we have:
      $$dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{partial v}{partial y}qquad dfrac{partial u}{partial y}=-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}$$
      If $a=0neq b$, then $bv=c implies v=Kinmathbb{R}$



      $$implies dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{partial v}{partial y}=dfrac{partial u}{partial y}=-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0$$
      $$implies f'(z)=0 quad forall zin D$$
      Similarly for $aneq 0=b$
      Now the remaining case to check is if $aneq 0neq b$



      Taking partial derivatives both sides of the given relation we get:



      $$adfrac{partial u}{partial x}+bdfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0$$
      $$implies dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=dfrac{b}{a}bigg(-dfrac{partial v}{partial x}bigg)=dfrac{b}{a}dfrac{partial u}{partial y}$$
      Similarly taking partial derivatives w.r.t $y$ we get:
      $$dfrac{partial u}{partial x}=-dfrac{a}{b}dfrac{partial u}{partial y}$$
      $$implies dfrac{a}{b}=dfrac{-b}{a}$$
      $$implies a^2+b^2=0$$
      This is a contradiction, so it is not possible that $aneq 0neq b$. Therefore for all possible values of $a$ and $b$, the function $f$ is constant.







      complex-analysis proof-verification holomorphic-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 2 at 9:32









      Asaf Karagila

      300k32422752




      300k32422752










      asked Dec 2 at 8:33









      Dylan Zammit

      8681316




      8681316






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, it is correct.



          Note that, after having proved it for the case in which $a=0$ or $b=0$, you could use that to prove it in the general case, since$$au+bv=operatorname{Re}bigl((a-bi)(u+vibigr).$$






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 2




            Interesting observation, Thanks!
            – Dylan Zammit
            Dec 2 at 8:41


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          In the case $a ne 0 ne b$ you obtained the identities
          $$
          frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac ba frac{partial u}{partial y} \
          frac{partial u}{partial x} = -frac ab frac{partial u}{partial y}
          $$

          At that point you should conclude that
          $ frac{a}{b}=frac{-b}{a}$ or $frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0$. The first case leads to a contradiction, therefore $f'(z)=0$.





          You don't have to consider the cases $a=0$ or $b=0$ separately if you proceed
          as follows: Differentiating with respect to $x$ gives



          $$
          afrac{partial u}{partial x}+bfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
          $$



          Differentiating with respect to $y$ and applying the Cauchy-Riemann
          equations gives
          $$
          bfrac{partial u}{partial x}-afrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
          $$



          That is a linear equation system, and its coefficient determinant is $-a^2-b^2 ne 0$. It follows that it only has the trivial solution
          $$
          frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022402%2fif-f-is-holomorphic-on-a-domain-d-and-satisfies-a-operatornamerefzb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            Yes, it is correct.



            Note that, after having proved it for the case in which $a=0$ or $b=0$, you could use that to prove it in the general case, since$$au+bv=operatorname{Re}bigl((a-bi)(u+vibigr).$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 2




              Interesting observation, Thanks!
              – Dylan Zammit
              Dec 2 at 8:41















            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            Yes, it is correct.



            Note that, after having proved it for the case in which $a=0$ or $b=0$, you could use that to prove it in the general case, since$$au+bv=operatorname{Re}bigl((a-bi)(u+vibigr).$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 2




              Interesting observation, Thanks!
              – Dylan Zammit
              Dec 2 at 8:41













            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted






            Yes, it is correct.



            Note that, after having proved it for the case in which $a=0$ or $b=0$, you could use that to prove it in the general case, since$$au+bv=operatorname{Re}bigl((a-bi)(u+vibigr).$$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Yes, it is correct.



            Note that, after having proved it for the case in which $a=0$ or $b=0$, you could use that to prove it in the general case, since$$au+bv=operatorname{Re}bigl((a-bi)(u+vibigr).$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 2 at 14:22

























            answered Dec 2 at 8:39









            José Carlos Santos

            146k22116215




            146k22116215








            • 2




              Interesting observation, Thanks!
              – Dylan Zammit
              Dec 2 at 8:41














            • 2




              Interesting observation, Thanks!
              – Dylan Zammit
              Dec 2 at 8:41








            2




            2




            Interesting observation, Thanks!
            – Dylan Zammit
            Dec 2 at 8:41




            Interesting observation, Thanks!
            – Dylan Zammit
            Dec 2 at 8:41










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            In the case $a ne 0 ne b$ you obtained the identities
            $$
            frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac ba frac{partial u}{partial y} \
            frac{partial u}{partial x} = -frac ab frac{partial u}{partial y}
            $$

            At that point you should conclude that
            $ frac{a}{b}=frac{-b}{a}$ or $frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0$. The first case leads to a contradiction, therefore $f'(z)=0$.





            You don't have to consider the cases $a=0$ or $b=0$ separately if you proceed
            as follows: Differentiating with respect to $x$ gives



            $$
            afrac{partial u}{partial x}+bfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
            $$



            Differentiating with respect to $y$ and applying the Cauchy-Riemann
            equations gives
            $$
            bfrac{partial u}{partial x}-afrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
            $$



            That is a linear equation system, and its coefficient determinant is $-a^2-b^2 ne 0$. It follows that it only has the trivial solution
            $$
            frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              In the case $a ne 0 ne b$ you obtained the identities
              $$
              frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac ba frac{partial u}{partial y} \
              frac{partial u}{partial x} = -frac ab frac{partial u}{partial y}
              $$

              At that point you should conclude that
              $ frac{a}{b}=frac{-b}{a}$ or $frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0$. The first case leads to a contradiction, therefore $f'(z)=0$.





              You don't have to consider the cases $a=0$ or $b=0$ separately if you proceed
              as follows: Differentiating with respect to $x$ gives



              $$
              afrac{partial u}{partial x}+bfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
              $$



              Differentiating with respect to $y$ and applying the Cauchy-Riemann
              equations gives
              $$
              bfrac{partial u}{partial x}-afrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
              $$



              That is a linear equation system, and its coefficient determinant is $-a^2-b^2 ne 0$. It follows that it only has the trivial solution
              $$
              frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                In the case $a ne 0 ne b$ you obtained the identities
                $$
                frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac ba frac{partial u}{partial y} \
                frac{partial u}{partial x} = -frac ab frac{partial u}{partial y}
                $$

                At that point you should conclude that
                $ frac{a}{b}=frac{-b}{a}$ or $frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0$. The first case leads to a contradiction, therefore $f'(z)=0$.





                You don't have to consider the cases $a=0$ or $b=0$ separately if you proceed
                as follows: Differentiating with respect to $x$ gives



                $$
                afrac{partial u}{partial x}+bfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
                $$



                Differentiating with respect to $y$ and applying the Cauchy-Riemann
                equations gives
                $$
                bfrac{partial u}{partial x}-afrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
                $$



                That is a linear equation system, and its coefficient determinant is $-a^2-b^2 ne 0$. It follows that it only has the trivial solution
                $$
                frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer














                In the case $a ne 0 ne b$ you obtained the identities
                $$
                frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac ba frac{partial u}{partial y} \
                frac{partial u}{partial x} = -frac ab frac{partial u}{partial y}
                $$

                At that point you should conclude that
                $ frac{a}{b}=frac{-b}{a}$ or $frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0$. The first case leads to a contradiction, therefore $f'(z)=0$.





                You don't have to consider the cases $a=0$ or $b=0$ separately if you proceed
                as follows: Differentiating with respect to $x$ gives



                $$
                afrac{partial u}{partial x}+bfrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
                $$



                Differentiating with respect to $y$ and applying the Cauchy-Riemann
                equations gives
                $$
                bfrac{partial u}{partial x}-afrac{partial v}{partial x}=0
                $$



                That is a linear equation system, and its coefficient determinant is $-a^2-b^2 ne 0$. It follows that it only has the trivial solution
                $$
                frac{partial u}{partial x} = frac{partial v}{partial x} = 0
                $$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 2 at 9:00

























                answered Dec 2 at 8:48









                Martin R

                26.4k33148




                26.4k33148






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022402%2fif-f-is-holomorphic-on-a-domain-d-and-satisfies-a-operatornamerefzb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                    Mangá

                    Eduardo VII do Reino Unido