Spivak (sequence)












3














I'm reading through Spivak Ch.22 (Infinite Sequences) right now. He mentioned in the written portion that it's often not a trivial matter to determine the boundedness of sequences. With that in mind, he gave us a sequence to chew on before we learn more about boundedness. That sequence is:



$$1, 1+1/2, 1+1/2+1/3, 1+1/2+1/3+1/4, . . .$$



I know that a sequence is bounded above if there is a number $M$ such that $a_nleq M$ for all $n$. Any hints here? I just started sequences the other day, so forgive me if this is an easy problem.






calculus







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    It is good that you are attending to the definition of boundedness. So, can you write down a suitable $M$ with $a_nle M$ for all $n$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    2 hours ago










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I'm not too sure what that $M$ would be. Can you give a hint?
    – kyle campbell
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Those aren't subsequences. In any case, are you sure you have transcribed Spivak's sequence correctly?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    It is just divergence of harmonic series. You can search the net for 'divergence of harmonic series'.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    A classic estimate: for each $n$, consider estimating $a_{2^n}$.
    – xbh
    1 hour ago
















3














I'm reading through Spivak Ch.22 (Infinite Sequences) right now. He mentioned in the written portion that it's often not a trivial matter to determine the boundedness of sequences. With that in mind, he gave us a sequence to chew on before we learn more about boundedness. That sequence is:



$$1, 1+1/2, 1+1/2+1/3, 1+1/2+1/3+1/4, . . .$$



I know that a sequence is bounded above if there is a number $M$ such that $a_nleq M$ for all $n$. Any hints here? I just started sequences the other day, so forgive me if this is an easy problem.






calculus







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    It is good that you are attending to the definition of boundedness. So, can you write down a suitable $M$ with $a_nle M$ for all $n$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    2 hours ago










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I'm not too sure what that $M$ would be. Can you give a hint?
    – kyle campbell
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Those aren't subsequences. In any case, are you sure you have transcribed Spivak's sequence correctly?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    It is just divergence of harmonic series. You can search the net for 'divergence of harmonic series'.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    A classic estimate: for each $n$, consider estimating $a_{2^n}$.
    – xbh
    1 hour ago














3












3








3


1





I'm reading through Spivak Ch.22 (Infinite Sequences) right now. He mentioned in the written portion that it's often not a trivial matter to determine the boundedness of sequences. With that in mind, he gave us a sequence to chew on before we learn more about boundedness. That sequence is:



$$1, 1+1/2, 1+1/2+1/3, 1+1/2+1/3+1/4, . . .$$



I know that a sequence is bounded above if there is a number $M$ such that $a_nleq M$ for all $n$. Any hints here? I just started sequences the other day, so forgive me if this is an easy problem.






calculus







share|cite|improve this question















I'm reading through Spivak Ch.22 (Infinite Sequences) right now. He mentioned in the written portion that it's often not a trivial matter to determine the boundedness of sequences. With that in mind, he gave us a sequence to chew on before we learn more about boundedness. That sequence is:



$$1, 1+1/2, 1+1/2+1/3, 1+1/2+1/3+1/4, . . .$$



I know that a sequence is bounded above if there is a number $M$ such that $a_nleq M$ for all $n$. Any hints here? I just started sequences the other day, so forgive me if this is an easy problem.






calculus




calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







kyle campbell

















asked 2 hours ago









kyle campbellkyle campbell

414




414








  • 2




    It is good that you are attending to the definition of boundedness. So, can you write down a suitable $M$ with $a_nle M$ for all $n$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    2 hours ago










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I'm not too sure what that $M$ would be. Can you give a hint?
    – kyle campbell
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Those aren't subsequences. In any case, are you sure you have transcribed Spivak's sequence correctly?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    It is just divergence of harmonic series. You can search the net for 'divergence of harmonic series'.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    A classic estimate: for each $n$, consider estimating $a_{2^n}$.
    – xbh
    1 hour ago














  • 2




    It is good that you are attending to the definition of boundedness. So, can you write down a suitable $M$ with $a_nle M$ for all $n$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    2 hours ago










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I'm not too sure what that $M$ would be. Can you give a hint?
    – kyle campbell
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Those aren't subsequences. In any case, are you sure you have transcribed Spivak's sequence correctly?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    It is just divergence of harmonic series. You can search the net for 'divergence of harmonic series'.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    A classic estimate: for each $n$, consider estimating $a_{2^n}$.
    – xbh
    1 hour ago








2




2




It is good that you are attending to the definition of boundedness. So, can you write down a suitable $M$ with $a_nle M$ for all $n$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
2 hours ago




It is good that you are attending to the definition of boundedness. So, can you write down a suitable $M$ with $a_nle M$ for all $n$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
2 hours ago












@LordSharktheUnknown I'm not too sure what that $M$ would be. Can you give a hint?
– kyle campbell
2 hours ago




@LordSharktheUnknown I'm not too sure what that $M$ would be. Can you give a hint?
– kyle campbell
2 hours ago




1




1




Those aren't subsequences. In any case, are you sure you have transcribed Spivak's sequence correctly?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
1 hour ago




Those aren't subsequences. In any case, are you sure you have transcribed Spivak's sequence correctly?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
1 hour ago




1




1




It is just divergence of harmonic series. You can search the net for 'divergence of harmonic series'.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
1 hour ago




It is just divergence of harmonic series. You can search the net for 'divergence of harmonic series'.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
1 hour ago




1




1




A classic estimate: for each $n$, consider estimating $a_{2^n}$.
– xbh
1 hour ago




A classic estimate: for each $n$, consider estimating $a_{2^n}$.
– xbh
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














This is a classic example of how our intuition can be wrong concerning infinities. As @Kavi said in the comments, this is the harmonic series and indeed diverges. I believe that Spivak provided this as an example to “chew on” in order to show how non trivial boundedness can be, as on first glance many people believe this sequence should be bounded.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Indeed! Thank you for that input.
    – kyle campbell
    1 hour ago



















2














Indeed, you can notice that



$$a_1=1,a_4>2(=1+frac{1}{2}+frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{4}), a_8>frac{5}{2}(=a_4+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}),a_{16}>3(=a_{8}+frac{1}{16}+frac{1}{16}+..8times)$$, so the general pattern is $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1$, so given an upper bound M, you can find a natural number n s.t. $ngeq M$ by archimedian property and so $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1>M$ and hence it can't be bounded.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068257%2fspivak-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    This is a classic example of how our intuition can be wrong concerning infinities. As @Kavi said in the comments, this is the harmonic series and indeed diverges. I believe that Spivak provided this as an example to “chew on” in order to show how non trivial boundedness can be, as on first glance many people believe this sequence should be bounded.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Indeed! Thank you for that input.
      – kyle campbell
      1 hour ago
















    4














    This is a classic example of how our intuition can be wrong concerning infinities. As @Kavi said in the comments, this is the harmonic series and indeed diverges. I believe that Spivak provided this as an example to “chew on” in order to show how non trivial boundedness can be, as on first glance many people believe this sequence should be bounded.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Indeed! Thank you for that input.
      – kyle campbell
      1 hour ago














    4












    4








    4






    This is a classic example of how our intuition can be wrong concerning infinities. As @Kavi said in the comments, this is the harmonic series and indeed diverges. I believe that Spivak provided this as an example to “chew on” in order to show how non trivial boundedness can be, as on first glance many people believe this sequence should be bounded.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    This is a classic example of how our intuition can be wrong concerning infinities. As @Kavi said in the comments, this is the harmonic series and indeed diverges. I believe that Spivak provided this as an example to “chew on” in order to show how non trivial boundedness can be, as on first glance many people believe this sequence should be bounded.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    Tyler6Tyler6

    699212




    699212








    • 1




      Indeed! Thank you for that input.
      – kyle campbell
      1 hour ago














    • 1




      Indeed! Thank you for that input.
      – kyle campbell
      1 hour ago








    1




    1




    Indeed! Thank you for that input.
    – kyle campbell
    1 hour ago




    Indeed! Thank you for that input.
    – kyle campbell
    1 hour ago











    2














    Indeed, you can notice that



    $$a_1=1,a_4>2(=1+frac{1}{2}+frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{4}), a_8>frac{5}{2}(=a_4+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}),a_{16}>3(=a_{8}+frac{1}{16}+frac{1}{16}+..8times)$$, so the general pattern is $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1$, so given an upper bound M, you can find a natural number n s.t. $ngeq M$ by archimedian property and so $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1>M$ and hence it can't be bounded.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      Indeed, you can notice that



      $$a_1=1,a_4>2(=1+frac{1}{2}+frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{4}), a_8>frac{5}{2}(=a_4+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}),a_{16}>3(=a_{8}+frac{1}{16}+frac{1}{16}+..8times)$$, so the general pattern is $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1$, so given an upper bound M, you can find a natural number n s.t. $ngeq M$ by archimedian property and so $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1>M$ and hence it can't be bounded.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        Indeed, you can notice that



        $$a_1=1,a_4>2(=1+frac{1}{2}+frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{4}), a_8>frac{5}{2}(=a_4+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}),a_{16}>3(=a_{8}+frac{1}{16}+frac{1}{16}+..8times)$$, so the general pattern is $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1$, so given an upper bound M, you can find a natural number n s.t. $ngeq M$ by archimedian property and so $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1>M$ and hence it can't be bounded.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Indeed, you can notice that



        $$a_1=1,a_4>2(=1+frac{1}{2}+frac{1}{4}+frac{1}{4}), a_8>frac{5}{2}(=a_4+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}+frac{1}{8}),a_{16}>3(=a_{8}+frac{1}{16}+frac{1}{16}+..8times)$$, so the general pattern is $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1$, so given an upper bound M, you can find a natural number n s.t. $ngeq M$ by archimedian property and so $a_{2^{2n}}>n+1>M$ and hence it can't be bounded.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 41 mins ago









        MustangMustang

        2927




        2927






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068257%2fspivak-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

            Image
            0 I recently upgraded an Ubuntu 16.04 virtual machine to 18.04. I regularly use this VM to run apt-mirror at school on their high-speed internet, then rsync these files to my rack-mount server at home for updating multiple computers at home without wasting the tiny amount of bandwidth I have there. Since updating I can't get apt-mirror to run on my VM. It keeps giving the error: flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror line 214 immediately followed by: apt-mirror is already running, exiting at /usr/bin/apt-mirror line 217 apt-mirror is NOT running, and does not have a cron job. I've tried rebooting, and even looked for the old-style lockfile to delete, but I guess that method is no longer used. Is there some way to force unlock this so I can run apt-mirror? UPDATE: So... I f
            Read more

            Mangá

            Image
              Nota:  Não confundir com Manga. Mangás e Animes Mangá Mangaká • Tankōbon Film comic La nouvelle manga Mangá original em inglês Anime História Animação influenciada por animes • Filler • OVA • Seiyū Públicos Kodomo • Shōjo • Shōnen Josei • Seinen Gêneros Mahō shōjo • Mecha • Harém Ecchi • Hentai ( Yaoi • Yuri Futanari • Shotacon • Lolicon Toddlercon ) Termos Bishōjo • Chibi • Fan service Gaiden • Kawaii • Kaitō • Light novel Mahō shōnen • Moe (antropomorfismo • Kemonomimi Nekomimi ) • Super deformed Omake • Tsundere • Yonkoma Listas Mangás • Animes • Ecchi • Mangaka • Estúdios • Revistas Fãs ( otaku ) Anime Music Video Convenções • Cosplay Dōjinshi • Fansub • Fandub • Fujoshi OS-tan • Scanlation Portal de Anime e mangá v d e O mangá (português brasileiro) ou manga (português europeu) [ 1 ] (em japonês: 漫画 , manga ? , lit. “história em quadrinhos”) , é a
            Read more

             ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕

            ⁉…‧ ⁩,“⁡‹⁃‽⁞•,⁠‚  ⁓⁎  ⁜ ‴ ⁥⁡⁎‭,‍‑⁁⁌⁦ ⁁‟⁙‥‒“⁈ ,‪⁧ ⁙‿⁇⁦,⁝‘ ⁎“⁘‫‪,‗‹‛‹⁒  ⁇⁄‗‒•“⁇   ‐ ⁂
‘‛, ‶⁦ ⁇ ​⁞‧ 
,⁏ …‹–⁗⁡⁘⁄ ‏‿‬‟″ ‏⁢⁦⁗⁚⁝‬⁢⁏,⁧″⁍′‖⁂※⁄‘– ‵⁡ ‭⁢⁚,⁅‧,‼‛⁗,⁡⁗“⁔⁃⁍‷⁏‗‱⁌‚  
•⁝ ‚‒ ‥‰  ′⁌, ⁄, ⁛—‭‑”⁂,⁑ ‡⁨‴⁖⁙…,‑, ,⁎,․‣‥  ‴‎⁎,″‛⁎‭‿ ⁤ ‷‾‼‖,⁠⁊‾,⁦“‗‑‌†,⁙,†⁝′ 
,―‚․‘, ⁢  ‿‌,⁀„‣,⁌,‭‖ ⁆“‪,―  ⁀ ⁃,
‷⁥,​,‟‗⁄⁉⁐⁗―
,‮⁢⁩⁆⁣‹‭⁅ ⁝‾‏‭⁖ ⁕⁄‷,†‟‒ ⁣‹,​…​,⁤⁂⁨‮⁎⁙–‟‼ ⁍‱‱,‽,‫‽‣ ⁒,⁨ ⁄ ⁝”„‿‑‎⁈‿
 ⁀‛‼‟ ⁑“,⁩​ ‒
–⁡…⁢ ⁂ ⁈⁎,‵‡,⁛,,‱⁧⁋,․‬⁄ “,⁄‴⁊  ‗―,‵⁙⁔—⁀ —  ⁀‬‬ ‒⁋‼⁀― ,⁌′ ‍‶ ’
            Read more