How does this shebang that starts with a double hyphen (--) work?











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












I have found the following kind of shebang in the RosettaCode page:



--() { :; }; exec db2 -txf "$0"


It works for Db2, and a similar thing for Postgres. However, I do not understand the whole line.



I know the double dash is a comment in SQL, and after that it calls the Db2 executable with some parameters passing the file itself as file. But what about the parenthesis, the curly brakets, the colon and semi-colon, and how can replace a real shebang #! ?



https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Multiline_shebang#PostgreSQL










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I have found the following kind of shebang in the RosettaCode page:



    --() { :; }; exec db2 -txf "$0"


    It works for Db2, and a similar thing for Postgres. However, I do not understand the whole line.



    I know the double dash is a comment in SQL, and after that it calls the Db2 executable with some parameters passing the file itself as file. But what about the parenthesis, the curly brakets, the colon and semi-colon, and how can replace a real shebang #! ?



    https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Multiline_shebang#PostgreSQL










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I have found the following kind of shebang in the RosettaCode page:



      --() { :; }; exec db2 -txf "$0"


      It works for Db2, and a similar thing for Postgres. However, I do not understand the whole line.



      I know the double dash is a comment in SQL, and after that it calls the Db2 executable with some parameters passing the file itself as file. But what about the parenthesis, the curly brakets, the colon and semi-colon, and how can replace a real shebang #! ?



      https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Multiline_shebang#PostgreSQL










      share|improve this question















      I have found the following kind of shebang in the RosettaCode page:



      --() { :; }; exec db2 -txf "$0"


      It works for Db2, and a similar thing for Postgres. However, I do not understand the whole line.



      I know the double dash is a comment in SQL, and after that it calls the Db2 executable with some parameters passing the file itself as file. But what about the parenthesis, the curly brakets, the colon and semi-colon, and how can replace a real shebang #! ?



      https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Multiline_shebang#PostgreSQL







      shell-script scripting sql shebang db2






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 37 mins ago









      muru

      35.4k582157




      35.4k582157










      asked 5 hours ago









      AngocA

      1458




      1458






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          Related: Which shell interpreter runs a script with no shebang?



          The script does not have a shebang line. A double dash is no shebang.



          However, the script will be executed by a shell (see above linked question and answers), and in that shell, if - is a valid character in a function name, the line declares a shell function called -- that does nothing (well, it runs :, which does nothing) and which is never called.



          The function, in the more common multi-line notation:



          -- () {
          :
          }


          The purpose of the function definition is to provide a way of inserting a ; and another command on the same line. After declaring the bogus shell function, the script uses exec to replace the current shell with the process resulting from running db2 -txf "$0", which would be the same as using db2 -txf on the script pathname from the command line.



          This trick would probably not work reliably on systems where dash is used as /bin/sh, as that shell does not accept functions whose names contain dashes.



          Also related:




          • Shell valid function name characters

          • Will it be bad that a function or script name contains dash `-` instead of underline `_`?




          I suppose the following would also work (not really tested):



          --() { exec db2 -txf "$0"; }; --





          share|improve this answer






























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            As @Kusalananda has already said, that trick is broken and it won't work in all shells.



            Here is my take at doing it portably:



            --/.. 2>/dev/null; exec db2 -txf "$0"


            The first command should fail even if a file/directory named -- exists in the current directory and any errors will be shut up by the 2>/dev/null; the shell will then proceed with the second command, the exec.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "106"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488068%2fhow-does-this-shebang-that-starts-with-a-double-hyphen-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              5
              down vote













              Related: Which shell interpreter runs a script with no shebang?



              The script does not have a shebang line. A double dash is no shebang.



              However, the script will be executed by a shell (see above linked question and answers), and in that shell, if - is a valid character in a function name, the line declares a shell function called -- that does nothing (well, it runs :, which does nothing) and which is never called.



              The function, in the more common multi-line notation:



              -- () {
              :
              }


              The purpose of the function definition is to provide a way of inserting a ; and another command on the same line. After declaring the bogus shell function, the script uses exec to replace the current shell with the process resulting from running db2 -txf "$0", which would be the same as using db2 -txf on the script pathname from the command line.



              This trick would probably not work reliably on systems where dash is used as /bin/sh, as that shell does not accept functions whose names contain dashes.



              Also related:




              • Shell valid function name characters

              • Will it be bad that a function or script name contains dash `-` instead of underline `_`?




              I suppose the following would also work (not really tested):



              --() { exec db2 -txf "$0"; }; --





              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                5
                down vote













                Related: Which shell interpreter runs a script with no shebang?



                The script does not have a shebang line. A double dash is no shebang.



                However, the script will be executed by a shell (see above linked question and answers), and in that shell, if - is a valid character in a function name, the line declares a shell function called -- that does nothing (well, it runs :, which does nothing) and which is never called.



                The function, in the more common multi-line notation:



                -- () {
                :
                }


                The purpose of the function definition is to provide a way of inserting a ; and another command on the same line. After declaring the bogus shell function, the script uses exec to replace the current shell with the process resulting from running db2 -txf "$0", which would be the same as using db2 -txf on the script pathname from the command line.



                This trick would probably not work reliably on systems where dash is used as /bin/sh, as that shell does not accept functions whose names contain dashes.



                Also related:




                • Shell valid function name characters

                • Will it be bad that a function or script name contains dash `-` instead of underline `_`?




                I suppose the following would also work (not really tested):



                --() { exec db2 -txf "$0"; }; --





                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote









                  Related: Which shell interpreter runs a script with no shebang?



                  The script does not have a shebang line. A double dash is no shebang.



                  However, the script will be executed by a shell (see above linked question and answers), and in that shell, if - is a valid character in a function name, the line declares a shell function called -- that does nothing (well, it runs :, which does nothing) and which is never called.



                  The function, in the more common multi-line notation:



                  -- () {
                  :
                  }


                  The purpose of the function definition is to provide a way of inserting a ; and another command on the same line. After declaring the bogus shell function, the script uses exec to replace the current shell with the process resulting from running db2 -txf "$0", which would be the same as using db2 -txf on the script pathname from the command line.



                  This trick would probably not work reliably on systems where dash is used as /bin/sh, as that shell does not accept functions whose names contain dashes.



                  Also related:




                  • Shell valid function name characters

                  • Will it be bad that a function or script name contains dash `-` instead of underline `_`?




                  I suppose the following would also work (not really tested):



                  --() { exec db2 -txf "$0"; }; --





                  share|improve this answer














                  Related: Which shell interpreter runs a script with no shebang?



                  The script does not have a shebang line. A double dash is no shebang.



                  However, the script will be executed by a shell (see above linked question and answers), and in that shell, if - is a valid character in a function name, the line declares a shell function called -- that does nothing (well, it runs :, which does nothing) and which is never called.



                  The function, in the more common multi-line notation:



                  -- () {
                  :
                  }


                  The purpose of the function definition is to provide a way of inserting a ; and another command on the same line. After declaring the bogus shell function, the script uses exec to replace the current shell with the process resulting from running db2 -txf "$0", which would be the same as using db2 -txf on the script pathname from the command line.



                  This trick would probably not work reliably on systems where dash is used as /bin/sh, as that shell does not accept functions whose names contain dashes.



                  Also related:




                  • Shell valid function name characters

                  • Will it be bad that a function or script name contains dash `-` instead of underline `_`?




                  I suppose the following would also work (not really tested):



                  --() { exec db2 -txf "$0"; }; --






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 3 hours ago

























                  answered 4 hours ago









                  Kusalananda

                  120k16225367




                  120k16225367
























                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      As @Kusalananda has already said, that trick is broken and it won't work in all shells.



                      Here is my take at doing it portably:



                      --/.. 2>/dev/null; exec db2 -txf "$0"


                      The first command should fail even if a file/directory named -- exists in the current directory and any errors will be shut up by the 2>/dev/null; the shell will then proceed with the second command, the exec.






                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        As @Kusalananda has already said, that trick is broken and it won't work in all shells.



                        Here is my take at doing it portably:



                        --/.. 2>/dev/null; exec db2 -txf "$0"


                        The first command should fail even if a file/directory named -- exists in the current directory and any errors will be shut up by the 2>/dev/null; the shell will then proceed with the second command, the exec.






                        share|improve this answer










                        New contributor




                        Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          As @Kusalananda has already said, that trick is broken and it won't work in all shells.



                          Here is my take at doing it portably:



                          --/.. 2>/dev/null; exec db2 -txf "$0"


                          The first command should fail even if a file/directory named -- exists in the current directory and any errors will be shut up by the 2>/dev/null; the shell will then proceed with the second command, the exec.






                          share|improve this answer










                          New contributor




                          Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          As @Kusalananda has already said, that trick is broken and it won't work in all shells.



                          Here is my take at doing it portably:



                          --/.. 2>/dev/null; exec db2 -txf "$0"


                          The first command should fail even if a file/directory named -- exists in the current directory and any errors will be shut up by the 2>/dev/null; the shell will then proceed with the second command, the exec.







                          share|improve this answer










                          New contributor




                          Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 3 hours ago





















                          New contributor




                          Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          answered 4 hours ago









                          Uncle Billy

                          462




                          462




                          New contributor




                          Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                          New contributor





                          Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          Uncle Billy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488068%2fhow-does-this-shebang-that-starts-with-a-double-hyphen-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                              Mangá

                               ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕