How to recover deleted files?












120















Are there any tools, methods, incantations to recover recently deleted files on Ubuntu?



If it makes any difference, I want to recover a Keepass 2.x database file. But would be better to have a method/tool that works on any kind of file.










share|improve this question

























  • Related, but not really a duplicate: Can files/directories deleted from terminal be restored?

    – Seth
    Nov 6 '14 at 3:59
















120















Are there any tools, methods, incantations to recover recently deleted files on Ubuntu?



If it makes any difference, I want to recover a Keepass 2.x database file. But would be better to have a method/tool that works on any kind of file.










share|improve this question

























  • Related, but not really a duplicate: Can files/directories deleted from terminal be restored?

    – Seth
    Nov 6 '14 at 3:59














120












120








120


51






Are there any tools, methods, incantations to recover recently deleted files on Ubuntu?



If it makes any difference, I want to recover a Keepass 2.x database file. But would be better to have a method/tool that works on any kind of file.










share|improve this question
















Are there any tools, methods, incantations to recover recently deleted files on Ubuntu?



If it makes any difference, I want to recover a Keepass 2.x database file. But would be better to have a method/tool that works on any kind of file.







data-recovery






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '13 at 15:22









Braiam

51.8k20136221




51.8k20136221










asked Sep 9 '10 at 1:40









Decio LiraDecio Lira

4,686103241




4,686103241













  • Related, but not really a duplicate: Can files/directories deleted from terminal be restored?

    – Seth
    Nov 6 '14 at 3:59



















  • Related, but not really a duplicate: Can files/directories deleted from terminal be restored?

    – Seth
    Nov 6 '14 at 3:59

















Related, but not really a duplicate: Can files/directories deleted from terminal be restored?

– Seth
Nov 6 '14 at 3:59





Related, but not really a duplicate: Can files/directories deleted from terminal be restored?

– Seth
Nov 6 '14 at 3:59










11 Answers
11






active

oldest

votes


















65














TestDisk can sometimes recover recently deleted files.






share|improve this answer



















  • 4





    May be important to someone to know that specific for camera's cards, on TestDisk exists PhotoRec

    – Luis Siquot
    Oct 7 '15 at 19:34






  • 1





    At this moment, TestDisk does not have a graphical user interface and the help (man) pages are not enough informative for me.

    – silviubogan
    Dec 4 '15 at 14:52






  • 3





    PhotoRec (cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec) worked great for me to recover accidentally deleted files (on Ubuntu 14.04 with ext4). I first tried with TestDisk but it wasn't able to recover them. Anyway, I found both tools crafted in the same folder.

    – Andrea
    Jan 14 '16 at 14:00






  • 1





    @silviubogan actually TestDisk has a pretty good Textual User Interface with menus and explanations along the way. All actions have an associated key to perform them and they are clearly written on every screen for easier access.

    – Andrea Lazzarotto
    Jun 24 '16 at 12:30



















25














I have used foremost to recover damaged hard disk both under NTFS (windows), FAT32 (Flash card from a Nokia phone) and ext3 with great results. Command line only, but quite it's easy, something like this:



sudo foremost -i /dev/sda -o <dir where recovered files will be stored>


It will order the recovered files on folders by file-type. Openoffice docs are recovered as zip files. As you need to execute it as root (in order to direct access the hardware), output files are also owned by root, so you will likely need to change their ownership afterwards.






share|improve this answer
























  • This is probably too old question but, how does GIMP files look like after recovery?

    – wakeup
    Oct 3 '13 at 21:04











  • I don't know, I have never tried to recover them.

    – Javier Rivera
    Oct 4 '13 at 6:28











  • @JavierRivera - I do not believe that foremost can recover .xcf files. See the man page it can only deal with these file types: (jpg, gif, png, bmp, avi, exe, mpg, mp4, wav, riff, wmv, mov, pdf, ole, doc, zip, rar, htm, and cpp).

    – slm
    Mar 31 '14 at 0:48











  • already running...let me wait for results. Will share.

    – Patrick Mutwiri
    Apr 15 '16 at 5:09











  • how much time does it take to finish?? for a 32GB usb memory

    – Mina Michael
    Mar 23 '17 at 23:17





















25














extundelete is really great if your file system is ext3 or ext4.



Note: extundelete requires you to unmount your drive to work properly (this is a good idea to do ASAP anyway, to avoid potentially overwriting the hopefully-recoverable bytes in the deleted files).



Unmounting the drive on a live system can be tricky... you'll often get the 'device is busy' message. To clear this 'properly' requires shutting down all processes accessing the file system. But... you were likely working in your home directory, and a zillion processes are hooked into your home directory, so good luck with that.



The trick to getting around this is to do a 'lazy' unmount:



$ mount
/dev/sda7 on /home type ext4 (rw)
$ sudo umount -l /home


where:




  • that example is for me prepping my /home mount for use with extundelete. You obviously need to replace /home with your mount of interest

  • I did the mount command first to figure out what device (/dev/sda7) I need to pass to extundelete (output is truncated for brevity)

  • that is a lower case L in the -l option






share|improve this answer



















  • 4





    A lazy unmount doesn't really help since the fs remains mounted until all files on it are closed. You just need to shut down the system as soon as you delete the files, and run extundelete from a livecd.

    – psusi
    Jul 7 '11 at 1:52











  • @psusi - It is absolutely untrue to say that it doesn't help!! umount -l prevents any new files from being opened/created and written (web caches and such). However, it does not prevent existing opened files from still being written to (ie: it does not close existing files). You suggest shutting down, but I think a lazy unmount will (most of the time) result in less written files, depending on the partition in question. On that note, it is best is to have extundelete installed already, and if not, make sure to install it to some partition other than the one you are trying to recover!

    – Russ
    Jul 11 '11 at 15:30











  • As long as the fs is still mounted, attempting to access it will result in corruption. That is the reason that extundelete requires you unmount the fs in the first place. The lazy unmount simply fools it into thinking it is not mounted, and therefore, that it is safe to proceed with manipulating the disk, when that is not true. Proceeding with extundelete before the fs is actually dismounted can hose the whole disk.

    – psusi
    Jul 11 '11 at 18:15








  • 1





    @psusi - "can hose the whole disk"??! With a read-only operation? I don't get your argument, or what has you so paranoid. extundelete does not "manipulate the disk". The worst possible thing I can imagine happening is that extundelete expects an unmounted/static partitition and if, while reading the journal info, the lazily unmounted disk changes due to processes that had files open, extundelete may get confused and the recovery may fail. "possibly failed recovery" != "hosed disk". If it does fail, shut down, pray shutdown doesn't trash your lost data, and use a livecd as you suggest.

    – Russ
    Jul 12 '11 at 16:55






  • 1





    God bless this program! And you @Russ. Recovered all my files!

    – Vladimir Kovalchuk
    May 1 '17 at 4:10



















12














If you deleted some file by accident but still know some strings which were written in that file you can use:



grep -a -B 25 -A 100 'containing string' /dev/sda1 > result.txt





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    what if the file is binary and not text?

    – Decio Lira
    Sep 9 '10 at 12:11











  • Assuming it was text, how can he recover the file with result.txt? I'm not getting it..

    – sergio91pt
    Jul 2 '11 at 11:40











  • I tried several other prior answers. None of them worked. This simple trick did! Thanks!

    – JamesThomasMoon1979
    Jul 15 '15 at 17:41













  • Its really worked, awesome stuff. Thanks a lot.

    – Snehal Parmar
    Nov 24 '15 at 9:13






  • 2





    It should be noted that 25 and 100 are just some magic numbers that probably need to be tweaked for the specific case.

    – Andrea Lazzarotto
    Jun 24 '16 at 12:32



















12














To recover the directory you can use extundelete





  1. Install extundelete



    sudo apt-get install extundelete



  2. Command to recover



    sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1



Note: In place of dev/sda1 put your hardisk partition name.



/home/Documents/ is your path to deleted directiory.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

    – Raphael
    Dec 7 '14 at 13:05











  • My results looks .....~/Books$ sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX /dev/sda2 WARNING: Extended attributes are not restored. Loading filesystem metadata ... 522 groups loaded. Loading journal descriptors ... 32242 descriptors loaded. Writing output to directory RECOVERED_FILES/ Failed to restore file /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX Could not find correct inode number past inode 2621441.

    – alhelal
    May 3 '17 at 2:51











  • I want to send confirmation in the command. How?

    – alhelal
    May 8 '18 at 14:01











  • sudo extundelete -y --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1 like this.

    – alhelal
    May 8 '18 at 14:02



















10














R-Linux(Recovery studio) is one of the best. I have used this tool many times before. I worked at a company where they used the commercial version, 9/10 times it recovers everything you want. Truly superb application. Saved mine, and friends behinds many times before.




R-Linux is a free file recovery utility for the Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS
file system used in the Linux OS and several Unixes. R-Linux uses the
same InteligentScan technology as R-Studio, and flexible parameter
settings to provide the fastest and most reliable file recovery for
the Linux platform. However, unlike R-Studio, R-Linux cannot recover
data over network or reconstruct RAIDs, or provide object copy.




Features (from their website):



R-Linux recover files:




  • Removed by virus attack, power failure or system crash;

  • After the partition with the files was re-formatted, damaged, or deleted;

  • When the partition structure on a disk was changed or damaged. In this case, R-Linux can scan the disk trying to find previously existing partitions and restore files from found partitions.

  • From disks with bad sectors. In this case, R-Linux can first copy the entire disk or its part into an image file and then process the image file. This is especially useful when new bad sectors are constantly appearing on the disk, and remaining information must be immediately saved.


R-Linux Advanced features:




  • Standard "Windows Explorer" - style interface.

  • Host OS:

    • Linux variant: Linux, kernel 2.6 and above

    • Windows variant: Win2000, XP, 2003, Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8



  • Supported file systems: Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS (Linux) only.

  • Recognition and parsing Dynamic (Windows 2000/XP/Vista/Win7), Basic, GPT and BSD (UNIX) partitions layout schema and Apple partition map. Dynamic partitions over GPT are supported as well as dynamic partitions over MBR.


  • Creates image files for an entire hard drive, logical disk, or its part. Such image files can be processed like regular disks. Images can be either simple exact object copies (Plain images) compatible with the old versions of R-Linux, or compressed images that can be compressed, split into several parts, and password-protected. Such images are fully compatible with the images created by R-Drive Image, but incompatible with the old versions of R-Linux.


  • Recognizes localized names.


  • Recovered files can be saved on any (including network) disks accessible by the host operating system.






share|improve this answer


























  • I didn't expect this to be free for Linux. I already know R-Studio and it is a fabulous software. Great that it's free for Linux filesystems.

    – 0x01
    Jun 12 '18 at 15:37






  • 1





    This tool is only free for recovering files less than 256kb

    – Tik0
    Aug 16 '18 at 8:38



















6














If using secondary internal HD (suspect the same for external HD) for recovered file import (from main HD, where the files originally were), it’s necessary to make a directory, into which the files will be put in on secondary HD.
To do it, you need to have BIOS setting for booting from CD first!
1. Start Live Ubuntu Rescue-Remix CD, give command to boot, then when it boots into terminal, check your HDs by command – Code: sudo fdisk -l



Realize what HD is main, and which is secondary, and what partition to check for files and into which to recover them – linux ext3 or Windows NTFS! Mine was Linux. Have enough room on it!
(Then you can try to run Photorec (“sudo photorec”) and hopefully you’ll be able to see all your HDs. I was not that lucky, so I had to make directory and mount sec. HD.)




  1. Make directory for recovered files first, e.g. – media/disk. Give command – Code: sudo mkdir /media/disk


If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.




  1. Must mount secondary HD, or it’ll be invisible, even if “sudo fdisk -l” does show it. Give command for your secondary HD –
    Code: sudo mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb2 /media/disk


If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.





  1. Run Photorec by command – Code:



    sudo photorec




Go thru settings, and only choose file types that you want, otherwise you’ll have thousands of files to sift thru!



For more details you may please visit: http:/www..ubuntumanual.org/posts/357/recover-your-deleted-files-in-ubuntu






share|improve this answer

































    5














    Try Scalpel



    sudo apt-get install scalpel


    for more info




    man scalpel







    share|improve this answer


























    • trying it now. I don't quite understand how to add new files to the conf file. Do you have nay source with details?

      – Decio Lira
      Sep 9 '10 at 2:30






    • 2





      I found howtoforge.com/recover-deleted-files-with-scalpel which is better than nothing. Good luck, this ain't no MS-DOS.

      – msw
      Sep 9 '10 at 2:58











    • see also ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/2596/… I use a relatively heavy system backup, but have "Back in Time" set up to dup selected directories from /home/msw (including .config which also catches .config/keepassx/* (your locations may vary)) to a spare partition nightly. I've also been using Unix since forever and you usually become pretty careful after the second time you blow away the-really-critical.file ;)

      – msw
      Sep 9 '10 at 3:06













    • Scalpel seems to be doing the same as foremost but while scalpel is no longer developed since 10 years, foremost got many updates in recent years.

      – sebix
      Aug 1 '15 at 18:41



















    3














    Autopsy and the Sleuthkit tools are great for recovering deleted files, with a user-friendly UI, as well as being available in the repos.






    share|improve this answer
























    • good to know. will take a look at them. ;)

      – Decio Lira
      Oct 12 '10 at 19:03






    • 1





      I'd upvote it if you would have added some links.

      – MadMike
      Nov 14 '13 at 10:48











    • I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

      – Raphael
      Dec 7 '14 at 13:03



















    2














    Install scalpel



    sudo apt-get install scalpel


    Edit the scalpel.conf file and uncomment the file types you want to recover.
    Create an empty folder (eg:recovered_data)
    Find the partition your data was. You can use lsblk to get the partition map.



    sudo lsblk


    Run scalpel (assume the data was in sda1)



    sudo scalpel -o recovered_data/ /dev/sda1





    share|improve this answer































      1














      Recently I used ext3grep to recover a large SQLite 3 file that was deleted from an ext3 file system.



      I had tried many other undelete tools, all which couldn't recover the file (from a dd image of the disk).



      In order to use ext3grep, I needed to download and compile the source. Carefully reading http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html from top to bottom in order to understand how the ext3 file system works and how to use the journal to find where deleted files use to be on the disk was also required.



      This is not a simple solution, but very, very powerful. If you're prepared to invest a few hours to study the document and compile the program, it's well worth it.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Thanks, I maybe try that. will this only work with ext3 file systems? What about ext4?

        – Decio Lira
        Sep 23 '10 at 17:28











      • I'm not sure about ext4 but I think ext4 is backward compatible to ext3. I would assume it would work but have never tried.

        – Stacey Richards
        Oct 21 '10 at 10:55










      protected by Community Oct 9 '14 at 7:36



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      11 Answers
      11






      active

      oldest

      votes








      11 Answers
      11






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      65














      TestDisk can sometimes recover recently deleted files.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 4





        May be important to someone to know that specific for camera's cards, on TestDisk exists PhotoRec

        – Luis Siquot
        Oct 7 '15 at 19:34






      • 1





        At this moment, TestDisk does not have a graphical user interface and the help (man) pages are not enough informative for me.

        – silviubogan
        Dec 4 '15 at 14:52






      • 3





        PhotoRec (cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec) worked great for me to recover accidentally deleted files (on Ubuntu 14.04 with ext4). I first tried with TestDisk but it wasn't able to recover them. Anyway, I found both tools crafted in the same folder.

        – Andrea
        Jan 14 '16 at 14:00






      • 1





        @silviubogan actually TestDisk has a pretty good Textual User Interface with menus and explanations along the way. All actions have an associated key to perform them and they are clearly written on every screen for easier access.

        – Andrea Lazzarotto
        Jun 24 '16 at 12:30
















      65














      TestDisk can sometimes recover recently deleted files.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 4





        May be important to someone to know that specific for camera's cards, on TestDisk exists PhotoRec

        – Luis Siquot
        Oct 7 '15 at 19:34






      • 1





        At this moment, TestDisk does not have a graphical user interface and the help (man) pages are not enough informative for me.

        – silviubogan
        Dec 4 '15 at 14:52






      • 3





        PhotoRec (cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec) worked great for me to recover accidentally deleted files (on Ubuntu 14.04 with ext4). I first tried with TestDisk but it wasn't able to recover them. Anyway, I found both tools crafted in the same folder.

        – Andrea
        Jan 14 '16 at 14:00






      • 1





        @silviubogan actually TestDisk has a pretty good Textual User Interface with menus and explanations along the way. All actions have an associated key to perform them and they are clearly written on every screen for easier access.

        – Andrea Lazzarotto
        Jun 24 '16 at 12:30














      65












      65








      65







      TestDisk can sometimes recover recently deleted files.






      share|improve this answer













      TestDisk can sometimes recover recently deleted files.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Sep 9 '10 at 6:05









      vh1vh1

      1,09376




      1,09376








      • 4





        May be important to someone to know that specific for camera's cards, on TestDisk exists PhotoRec

        – Luis Siquot
        Oct 7 '15 at 19:34






      • 1





        At this moment, TestDisk does not have a graphical user interface and the help (man) pages are not enough informative for me.

        – silviubogan
        Dec 4 '15 at 14:52






      • 3





        PhotoRec (cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec) worked great for me to recover accidentally deleted files (on Ubuntu 14.04 with ext4). I first tried with TestDisk but it wasn't able to recover them. Anyway, I found both tools crafted in the same folder.

        – Andrea
        Jan 14 '16 at 14:00






      • 1





        @silviubogan actually TestDisk has a pretty good Textual User Interface with menus and explanations along the way. All actions have an associated key to perform them and they are clearly written on every screen for easier access.

        – Andrea Lazzarotto
        Jun 24 '16 at 12:30














      • 4





        May be important to someone to know that specific for camera's cards, on TestDisk exists PhotoRec

        – Luis Siquot
        Oct 7 '15 at 19:34






      • 1





        At this moment, TestDisk does not have a graphical user interface and the help (man) pages are not enough informative for me.

        – silviubogan
        Dec 4 '15 at 14:52






      • 3





        PhotoRec (cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec) worked great for me to recover accidentally deleted files (on Ubuntu 14.04 with ext4). I first tried with TestDisk but it wasn't able to recover them. Anyway, I found both tools crafted in the same folder.

        – Andrea
        Jan 14 '16 at 14:00






      • 1





        @silviubogan actually TestDisk has a pretty good Textual User Interface with menus and explanations along the way. All actions have an associated key to perform them and they are clearly written on every screen for easier access.

        – Andrea Lazzarotto
        Jun 24 '16 at 12:30








      4




      4





      May be important to someone to know that specific for camera's cards, on TestDisk exists PhotoRec

      – Luis Siquot
      Oct 7 '15 at 19:34





      May be important to someone to know that specific for camera's cards, on TestDisk exists PhotoRec

      – Luis Siquot
      Oct 7 '15 at 19:34




      1




      1





      At this moment, TestDisk does not have a graphical user interface and the help (man) pages are not enough informative for me.

      – silviubogan
      Dec 4 '15 at 14:52





      At this moment, TestDisk does not have a graphical user interface and the help (man) pages are not enough informative for me.

      – silviubogan
      Dec 4 '15 at 14:52




      3




      3





      PhotoRec (cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec) worked great for me to recover accidentally deleted files (on Ubuntu 14.04 with ext4). I first tried with TestDisk but it wasn't able to recover them. Anyway, I found both tools crafted in the same folder.

      – Andrea
      Jan 14 '16 at 14:00





      PhotoRec (cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec) worked great for me to recover accidentally deleted files (on Ubuntu 14.04 with ext4). I first tried with TestDisk but it wasn't able to recover them. Anyway, I found both tools crafted in the same folder.

      – Andrea
      Jan 14 '16 at 14:00




      1




      1





      @silviubogan actually TestDisk has a pretty good Textual User Interface with menus and explanations along the way. All actions have an associated key to perform them and they are clearly written on every screen for easier access.

      – Andrea Lazzarotto
      Jun 24 '16 at 12:30





      @silviubogan actually TestDisk has a pretty good Textual User Interface with menus and explanations along the way. All actions have an associated key to perform them and they are clearly written on every screen for easier access.

      – Andrea Lazzarotto
      Jun 24 '16 at 12:30













      25














      I have used foremost to recover damaged hard disk both under NTFS (windows), FAT32 (Flash card from a Nokia phone) and ext3 with great results. Command line only, but quite it's easy, something like this:



      sudo foremost -i /dev/sda -o <dir where recovered files will be stored>


      It will order the recovered files on folders by file-type. Openoffice docs are recovered as zip files. As you need to execute it as root (in order to direct access the hardware), output files are also owned by root, so you will likely need to change their ownership afterwards.






      share|improve this answer
























      • This is probably too old question but, how does GIMP files look like after recovery?

        – wakeup
        Oct 3 '13 at 21:04











      • I don't know, I have never tried to recover them.

        – Javier Rivera
        Oct 4 '13 at 6:28











      • @JavierRivera - I do not believe that foremost can recover .xcf files. See the man page it can only deal with these file types: (jpg, gif, png, bmp, avi, exe, mpg, mp4, wav, riff, wmv, mov, pdf, ole, doc, zip, rar, htm, and cpp).

        – slm
        Mar 31 '14 at 0:48











      • already running...let me wait for results. Will share.

        – Patrick Mutwiri
        Apr 15 '16 at 5:09











      • how much time does it take to finish?? for a 32GB usb memory

        – Mina Michael
        Mar 23 '17 at 23:17


















      25














      I have used foremost to recover damaged hard disk both under NTFS (windows), FAT32 (Flash card from a Nokia phone) and ext3 with great results. Command line only, but quite it's easy, something like this:



      sudo foremost -i /dev/sda -o <dir where recovered files will be stored>


      It will order the recovered files on folders by file-type. Openoffice docs are recovered as zip files. As you need to execute it as root (in order to direct access the hardware), output files are also owned by root, so you will likely need to change their ownership afterwards.






      share|improve this answer
























      • This is probably too old question but, how does GIMP files look like after recovery?

        – wakeup
        Oct 3 '13 at 21:04











      • I don't know, I have never tried to recover them.

        – Javier Rivera
        Oct 4 '13 at 6:28











      • @JavierRivera - I do not believe that foremost can recover .xcf files. See the man page it can only deal with these file types: (jpg, gif, png, bmp, avi, exe, mpg, mp4, wav, riff, wmv, mov, pdf, ole, doc, zip, rar, htm, and cpp).

        – slm
        Mar 31 '14 at 0:48











      • already running...let me wait for results. Will share.

        – Patrick Mutwiri
        Apr 15 '16 at 5:09











      • how much time does it take to finish?? for a 32GB usb memory

        – Mina Michael
        Mar 23 '17 at 23:17
















      25












      25








      25







      I have used foremost to recover damaged hard disk both under NTFS (windows), FAT32 (Flash card from a Nokia phone) and ext3 with great results. Command line only, but quite it's easy, something like this:



      sudo foremost -i /dev/sda -o <dir where recovered files will be stored>


      It will order the recovered files on folders by file-type. Openoffice docs are recovered as zip files. As you need to execute it as root (in order to direct access the hardware), output files are also owned by root, so you will likely need to change their ownership afterwards.






      share|improve this answer













      I have used foremost to recover damaged hard disk both under NTFS (windows), FAT32 (Flash card from a Nokia phone) and ext3 with great results. Command line only, but quite it's easy, something like this:



      sudo foremost -i /dev/sda -o <dir where recovered files will be stored>


      It will order the recovered files on folders by file-type. Openoffice docs are recovered as zip files. As you need to execute it as root (in order to direct access the hardware), output files are also owned by root, so you will likely need to change their ownership afterwards.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Sep 9 '10 at 7:15









      Javier RiveraJavier Rivera

      29.9k977101




      29.9k977101













      • This is probably too old question but, how does GIMP files look like after recovery?

        – wakeup
        Oct 3 '13 at 21:04











      • I don't know, I have never tried to recover them.

        – Javier Rivera
        Oct 4 '13 at 6:28











      • @JavierRivera - I do not believe that foremost can recover .xcf files. See the man page it can only deal with these file types: (jpg, gif, png, bmp, avi, exe, mpg, mp4, wav, riff, wmv, mov, pdf, ole, doc, zip, rar, htm, and cpp).

        – slm
        Mar 31 '14 at 0:48











      • already running...let me wait for results. Will share.

        – Patrick Mutwiri
        Apr 15 '16 at 5:09











      • how much time does it take to finish?? for a 32GB usb memory

        – Mina Michael
        Mar 23 '17 at 23:17





















      • This is probably too old question but, how does GIMP files look like after recovery?

        – wakeup
        Oct 3 '13 at 21:04











      • I don't know, I have never tried to recover them.

        – Javier Rivera
        Oct 4 '13 at 6:28











      • @JavierRivera - I do not believe that foremost can recover .xcf files. See the man page it can only deal with these file types: (jpg, gif, png, bmp, avi, exe, mpg, mp4, wav, riff, wmv, mov, pdf, ole, doc, zip, rar, htm, and cpp).

        – slm
        Mar 31 '14 at 0:48











      • already running...let me wait for results. Will share.

        – Patrick Mutwiri
        Apr 15 '16 at 5:09











      • how much time does it take to finish?? for a 32GB usb memory

        – Mina Michael
        Mar 23 '17 at 23:17



















      This is probably too old question but, how does GIMP files look like after recovery?

      – wakeup
      Oct 3 '13 at 21:04





      This is probably too old question but, how does GIMP files look like after recovery?

      – wakeup
      Oct 3 '13 at 21:04













      I don't know, I have never tried to recover them.

      – Javier Rivera
      Oct 4 '13 at 6:28





      I don't know, I have never tried to recover them.

      – Javier Rivera
      Oct 4 '13 at 6:28













      @JavierRivera - I do not believe that foremost can recover .xcf files. See the man page it can only deal with these file types: (jpg, gif, png, bmp, avi, exe, mpg, mp4, wav, riff, wmv, mov, pdf, ole, doc, zip, rar, htm, and cpp).

      – slm
      Mar 31 '14 at 0:48





      @JavierRivera - I do not believe that foremost can recover .xcf files. See the man page it can only deal with these file types: (jpg, gif, png, bmp, avi, exe, mpg, mp4, wav, riff, wmv, mov, pdf, ole, doc, zip, rar, htm, and cpp).

      – slm
      Mar 31 '14 at 0:48













      already running...let me wait for results. Will share.

      – Patrick Mutwiri
      Apr 15 '16 at 5:09





      already running...let me wait for results. Will share.

      – Patrick Mutwiri
      Apr 15 '16 at 5:09













      how much time does it take to finish?? for a 32GB usb memory

      – Mina Michael
      Mar 23 '17 at 23:17







      how much time does it take to finish?? for a 32GB usb memory

      – Mina Michael
      Mar 23 '17 at 23:17













      25














      extundelete is really great if your file system is ext3 or ext4.



      Note: extundelete requires you to unmount your drive to work properly (this is a good idea to do ASAP anyway, to avoid potentially overwriting the hopefully-recoverable bytes in the deleted files).



      Unmounting the drive on a live system can be tricky... you'll often get the 'device is busy' message. To clear this 'properly' requires shutting down all processes accessing the file system. But... you were likely working in your home directory, and a zillion processes are hooked into your home directory, so good luck with that.



      The trick to getting around this is to do a 'lazy' unmount:



      $ mount
      /dev/sda7 on /home type ext4 (rw)
      $ sudo umount -l /home


      where:




      • that example is for me prepping my /home mount for use with extundelete. You obviously need to replace /home with your mount of interest

      • I did the mount command first to figure out what device (/dev/sda7) I need to pass to extundelete (output is truncated for brevity)

      • that is a lower case L in the -l option






      share|improve this answer



















      • 4





        A lazy unmount doesn't really help since the fs remains mounted until all files on it are closed. You just need to shut down the system as soon as you delete the files, and run extundelete from a livecd.

        – psusi
        Jul 7 '11 at 1:52











      • @psusi - It is absolutely untrue to say that it doesn't help!! umount -l prevents any new files from being opened/created and written (web caches and such). However, it does not prevent existing opened files from still being written to (ie: it does not close existing files). You suggest shutting down, but I think a lazy unmount will (most of the time) result in less written files, depending on the partition in question. On that note, it is best is to have extundelete installed already, and if not, make sure to install it to some partition other than the one you are trying to recover!

        – Russ
        Jul 11 '11 at 15:30











      • As long as the fs is still mounted, attempting to access it will result in corruption. That is the reason that extundelete requires you unmount the fs in the first place. The lazy unmount simply fools it into thinking it is not mounted, and therefore, that it is safe to proceed with manipulating the disk, when that is not true. Proceeding with extundelete before the fs is actually dismounted can hose the whole disk.

        – psusi
        Jul 11 '11 at 18:15








      • 1





        @psusi - "can hose the whole disk"??! With a read-only operation? I don't get your argument, or what has you so paranoid. extundelete does not "manipulate the disk". The worst possible thing I can imagine happening is that extundelete expects an unmounted/static partitition and if, while reading the journal info, the lazily unmounted disk changes due to processes that had files open, extundelete may get confused and the recovery may fail. "possibly failed recovery" != "hosed disk". If it does fail, shut down, pray shutdown doesn't trash your lost data, and use a livecd as you suggest.

        – Russ
        Jul 12 '11 at 16:55






      • 1





        God bless this program! And you @Russ. Recovered all my files!

        – Vladimir Kovalchuk
        May 1 '17 at 4:10
















      25














      extundelete is really great if your file system is ext3 or ext4.



      Note: extundelete requires you to unmount your drive to work properly (this is a good idea to do ASAP anyway, to avoid potentially overwriting the hopefully-recoverable bytes in the deleted files).



      Unmounting the drive on a live system can be tricky... you'll often get the 'device is busy' message. To clear this 'properly' requires shutting down all processes accessing the file system. But... you were likely working in your home directory, and a zillion processes are hooked into your home directory, so good luck with that.



      The trick to getting around this is to do a 'lazy' unmount:



      $ mount
      /dev/sda7 on /home type ext4 (rw)
      $ sudo umount -l /home


      where:




      • that example is for me prepping my /home mount for use with extundelete. You obviously need to replace /home with your mount of interest

      • I did the mount command first to figure out what device (/dev/sda7) I need to pass to extundelete (output is truncated for brevity)

      • that is a lower case L in the -l option






      share|improve this answer



















      • 4





        A lazy unmount doesn't really help since the fs remains mounted until all files on it are closed. You just need to shut down the system as soon as you delete the files, and run extundelete from a livecd.

        – psusi
        Jul 7 '11 at 1:52











      • @psusi - It is absolutely untrue to say that it doesn't help!! umount -l prevents any new files from being opened/created and written (web caches and such). However, it does not prevent existing opened files from still being written to (ie: it does not close existing files). You suggest shutting down, but I think a lazy unmount will (most of the time) result in less written files, depending on the partition in question. On that note, it is best is to have extundelete installed already, and if not, make sure to install it to some partition other than the one you are trying to recover!

        – Russ
        Jul 11 '11 at 15:30











      • As long as the fs is still mounted, attempting to access it will result in corruption. That is the reason that extundelete requires you unmount the fs in the first place. The lazy unmount simply fools it into thinking it is not mounted, and therefore, that it is safe to proceed with manipulating the disk, when that is not true. Proceeding with extundelete before the fs is actually dismounted can hose the whole disk.

        – psusi
        Jul 11 '11 at 18:15








      • 1





        @psusi - "can hose the whole disk"??! With a read-only operation? I don't get your argument, or what has you so paranoid. extundelete does not "manipulate the disk". The worst possible thing I can imagine happening is that extundelete expects an unmounted/static partitition and if, while reading the journal info, the lazily unmounted disk changes due to processes that had files open, extundelete may get confused and the recovery may fail. "possibly failed recovery" != "hosed disk". If it does fail, shut down, pray shutdown doesn't trash your lost data, and use a livecd as you suggest.

        – Russ
        Jul 12 '11 at 16:55






      • 1





        God bless this program! And you @Russ. Recovered all my files!

        – Vladimir Kovalchuk
        May 1 '17 at 4:10














      25












      25








      25







      extundelete is really great if your file system is ext3 or ext4.



      Note: extundelete requires you to unmount your drive to work properly (this is a good idea to do ASAP anyway, to avoid potentially overwriting the hopefully-recoverable bytes in the deleted files).



      Unmounting the drive on a live system can be tricky... you'll often get the 'device is busy' message. To clear this 'properly' requires shutting down all processes accessing the file system. But... you were likely working in your home directory, and a zillion processes are hooked into your home directory, so good luck with that.



      The trick to getting around this is to do a 'lazy' unmount:



      $ mount
      /dev/sda7 on /home type ext4 (rw)
      $ sudo umount -l /home


      where:




      • that example is for me prepping my /home mount for use with extundelete. You obviously need to replace /home with your mount of interest

      • I did the mount command first to figure out what device (/dev/sda7) I need to pass to extundelete (output is truncated for brevity)

      • that is a lower case L in the -l option






      share|improve this answer













      extundelete is really great if your file system is ext3 or ext4.



      Note: extundelete requires you to unmount your drive to work properly (this is a good idea to do ASAP anyway, to avoid potentially overwriting the hopefully-recoverable bytes in the deleted files).



      Unmounting the drive on a live system can be tricky... you'll often get the 'device is busy' message. To clear this 'properly' requires shutting down all processes accessing the file system. But... you were likely working in your home directory, and a zillion processes are hooked into your home directory, so good luck with that.



      The trick to getting around this is to do a 'lazy' unmount:



      $ mount
      /dev/sda7 on /home type ext4 (rw)
      $ sudo umount -l /home


      where:




      • that example is for me prepping my /home mount for use with extundelete. You obviously need to replace /home with your mount of interest

      • I did the mount command first to figure out what device (/dev/sda7) I need to pass to extundelete (output is truncated for brevity)

      • that is a lower case L in the -l option







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Jul 6 '11 at 22:18









      RussRuss

      464511




      464511








      • 4





        A lazy unmount doesn't really help since the fs remains mounted until all files on it are closed. You just need to shut down the system as soon as you delete the files, and run extundelete from a livecd.

        – psusi
        Jul 7 '11 at 1:52











      • @psusi - It is absolutely untrue to say that it doesn't help!! umount -l prevents any new files from being opened/created and written (web caches and such). However, it does not prevent existing opened files from still being written to (ie: it does not close existing files). You suggest shutting down, but I think a lazy unmount will (most of the time) result in less written files, depending on the partition in question. On that note, it is best is to have extundelete installed already, and if not, make sure to install it to some partition other than the one you are trying to recover!

        – Russ
        Jul 11 '11 at 15:30











      • As long as the fs is still mounted, attempting to access it will result in corruption. That is the reason that extundelete requires you unmount the fs in the first place. The lazy unmount simply fools it into thinking it is not mounted, and therefore, that it is safe to proceed with manipulating the disk, when that is not true. Proceeding with extundelete before the fs is actually dismounted can hose the whole disk.

        – psusi
        Jul 11 '11 at 18:15








      • 1





        @psusi - "can hose the whole disk"??! With a read-only operation? I don't get your argument, or what has you so paranoid. extundelete does not "manipulate the disk". The worst possible thing I can imagine happening is that extundelete expects an unmounted/static partitition and if, while reading the journal info, the lazily unmounted disk changes due to processes that had files open, extundelete may get confused and the recovery may fail. "possibly failed recovery" != "hosed disk". If it does fail, shut down, pray shutdown doesn't trash your lost data, and use a livecd as you suggest.

        – Russ
        Jul 12 '11 at 16:55






      • 1





        God bless this program! And you @Russ. Recovered all my files!

        – Vladimir Kovalchuk
        May 1 '17 at 4:10














      • 4





        A lazy unmount doesn't really help since the fs remains mounted until all files on it are closed. You just need to shut down the system as soon as you delete the files, and run extundelete from a livecd.

        – psusi
        Jul 7 '11 at 1:52











      • @psusi - It is absolutely untrue to say that it doesn't help!! umount -l prevents any new files from being opened/created and written (web caches and such). However, it does not prevent existing opened files from still being written to (ie: it does not close existing files). You suggest shutting down, but I think a lazy unmount will (most of the time) result in less written files, depending on the partition in question. On that note, it is best is to have extundelete installed already, and if not, make sure to install it to some partition other than the one you are trying to recover!

        – Russ
        Jul 11 '11 at 15:30











      • As long as the fs is still mounted, attempting to access it will result in corruption. That is the reason that extundelete requires you unmount the fs in the first place. The lazy unmount simply fools it into thinking it is not mounted, and therefore, that it is safe to proceed with manipulating the disk, when that is not true. Proceeding with extundelete before the fs is actually dismounted can hose the whole disk.

        – psusi
        Jul 11 '11 at 18:15








      • 1





        @psusi - "can hose the whole disk"??! With a read-only operation? I don't get your argument, or what has you so paranoid. extundelete does not "manipulate the disk". The worst possible thing I can imagine happening is that extundelete expects an unmounted/static partitition and if, while reading the journal info, the lazily unmounted disk changes due to processes that had files open, extundelete may get confused and the recovery may fail. "possibly failed recovery" != "hosed disk". If it does fail, shut down, pray shutdown doesn't trash your lost data, and use a livecd as you suggest.

        – Russ
        Jul 12 '11 at 16:55






      • 1





        God bless this program! And you @Russ. Recovered all my files!

        – Vladimir Kovalchuk
        May 1 '17 at 4:10








      4




      4





      A lazy unmount doesn't really help since the fs remains mounted until all files on it are closed. You just need to shut down the system as soon as you delete the files, and run extundelete from a livecd.

      – psusi
      Jul 7 '11 at 1:52





      A lazy unmount doesn't really help since the fs remains mounted until all files on it are closed. You just need to shut down the system as soon as you delete the files, and run extundelete from a livecd.

      – psusi
      Jul 7 '11 at 1:52













      @psusi - It is absolutely untrue to say that it doesn't help!! umount -l prevents any new files from being opened/created and written (web caches and such). However, it does not prevent existing opened files from still being written to (ie: it does not close existing files). You suggest shutting down, but I think a lazy unmount will (most of the time) result in less written files, depending on the partition in question. On that note, it is best is to have extundelete installed already, and if not, make sure to install it to some partition other than the one you are trying to recover!

      – Russ
      Jul 11 '11 at 15:30





      @psusi - It is absolutely untrue to say that it doesn't help!! umount -l prevents any new files from being opened/created and written (web caches and such). However, it does not prevent existing opened files from still being written to (ie: it does not close existing files). You suggest shutting down, but I think a lazy unmount will (most of the time) result in less written files, depending on the partition in question. On that note, it is best is to have extundelete installed already, and if not, make sure to install it to some partition other than the one you are trying to recover!

      – Russ
      Jul 11 '11 at 15:30













      As long as the fs is still mounted, attempting to access it will result in corruption. That is the reason that extundelete requires you unmount the fs in the first place. The lazy unmount simply fools it into thinking it is not mounted, and therefore, that it is safe to proceed with manipulating the disk, when that is not true. Proceeding with extundelete before the fs is actually dismounted can hose the whole disk.

      – psusi
      Jul 11 '11 at 18:15







      As long as the fs is still mounted, attempting to access it will result in corruption. That is the reason that extundelete requires you unmount the fs in the first place. The lazy unmount simply fools it into thinking it is not mounted, and therefore, that it is safe to proceed with manipulating the disk, when that is not true. Proceeding with extundelete before the fs is actually dismounted can hose the whole disk.

      – psusi
      Jul 11 '11 at 18:15






      1




      1





      @psusi - "can hose the whole disk"??! With a read-only operation? I don't get your argument, or what has you so paranoid. extundelete does not "manipulate the disk". The worst possible thing I can imagine happening is that extundelete expects an unmounted/static partitition and if, while reading the journal info, the lazily unmounted disk changes due to processes that had files open, extundelete may get confused and the recovery may fail. "possibly failed recovery" != "hosed disk". If it does fail, shut down, pray shutdown doesn't trash your lost data, and use a livecd as you suggest.

      – Russ
      Jul 12 '11 at 16:55





      @psusi - "can hose the whole disk"??! With a read-only operation? I don't get your argument, or what has you so paranoid. extundelete does not "manipulate the disk". The worst possible thing I can imagine happening is that extundelete expects an unmounted/static partitition and if, while reading the journal info, the lazily unmounted disk changes due to processes that had files open, extundelete may get confused and the recovery may fail. "possibly failed recovery" != "hosed disk". If it does fail, shut down, pray shutdown doesn't trash your lost data, and use a livecd as you suggest.

      – Russ
      Jul 12 '11 at 16:55




      1




      1





      God bless this program! And you @Russ. Recovered all my files!

      – Vladimir Kovalchuk
      May 1 '17 at 4:10





      God bless this program! And you @Russ. Recovered all my files!

      – Vladimir Kovalchuk
      May 1 '17 at 4:10











      12














      If you deleted some file by accident but still know some strings which were written in that file you can use:



      grep -a -B 25 -A 100 'containing string' /dev/sda1 > result.txt





      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        what if the file is binary and not text?

        – Decio Lira
        Sep 9 '10 at 12:11











      • Assuming it was text, how can he recover the file with result.txt? I'm not getting it..

        – sergio91pt
        Jul 2 '11 at 11:40











      • I tried several other prior answers. None of them worked. This simple trick did! Thanks!

        – JamesThomasMoon1979
        Jul 15 '15 at 17:41













      • Its really worked, awesome stuff. Thanks a lot.

        – Snehal Parmar
        Nov 24 '15 at 9:13






      • 2





        It should be noted that 25 and 100 are just some magic numbers that probably need to be tweaked for the specific case.

        – Andrea Lazzarotto
        Jun 24 '16 at 12:32
















      12














      If you deleted some file by accident but still know some strings which were written in that file you can use:



      grep -a -B 25 -A 100 'containing string' /dev/sda1 > result.txt





      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        what if the file is binary and not text?

        – Decio Lira
        Sep 9 '10 at 12:11











      • Assuming it was text, how can he recover the file with result.txt? I'm not getting it..

        – sergio91pt
        Jul 2 '11 at 11:40











      • I tried several other prior answers. None of them worked. This simple trick did! Thanks!

        – JamesThomasMoon1979
        Jul 15 '15 at 17:41













      • Its really worked, awesome stuff. Thanks a lot.

        – Snehal Parmar
        Nov 24 '15 at 9:13






      • 2





        It should be noted that 25 and 100 are just some magic numbers that probably need to be tweaked for the specific case.

        – Andrea Lazzarotto
        Jun 24 '16 at 12:32














      12












      12








      12







      If you deleted some file by accident but still know some strings which were written in that file you can use:



      grep -a -B 25 -A 100 'containing string' /dev/sda1 > result.txt





      share|improve this answer













      If you deleted some file by accident but still know some strings which were written in that file you can use:



      grep -a -B 25 -A 100 'containing string' /dev/sda1 > result.txt






      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Sep 9 '10 at 11:39







      NewProggie















      • 1





        what if the file is binary and not text?

        – Decio Lira
        Sep 9 '10 at 12:11











      • Assuming it was text, how can he recover the file with result.txt? I'm not getting it..

        – sergio91pt
        Jul 2 '11 at 11:40











      • I tried several other prior answers. None of them worked. This simple trick did! Thanks!

        – JamesThomasMoon1979
        Jul 15 '15 at 17:41













      • Its really worked, awesome stuff. Thanks a lot.

        – Snehal Parmar
        Nov 24 '15 at 9:13






      • 2





        It should be noted that 25 and 100 are just some magic numbers that probably need to be tweaked for the specific case.

        – Andrea Lazzarotto
        Jun 24 '16 at 12:32














      • 1





        what if the file is binary and not text?

        – Decio Lira
        Sep 9 '10 at 12:11











      • Assuming it was text, how can he recover the file with result.txt? I'm not getting it..

        – sergio91pt
        Jul 2 '11 at 11:40











      • I tried several other prior answers. None of them worked. This simple trick did! Thanks!

        – JamesThomasMoon1979
        Jul 15 '15 at 17:41













      • Its really worked, awesome stuff. Thanks a lot.

        – Snehal Parmar
        Nov 24 '15 at 9:13






      • 2





        It should be noted that 25 and 100 are just some magic numbers that probably need to be tweaked for the specific case.

        – Andrea Lazzarotto
        Jun 24 '16 at 12:32








      1




      1





      what if the file is binary and not text?

      – Decio Lira
      Sep 9 '10 at 12:11





      what if the file is binary and not text?

      – Decio Lira
      Sep 9 '10 at 12:11













      Assuming it was text, how can he recover the file with result.txt? I'm not getting it..

      – sergio91pt
      Jul 2 '11 at 11:40





      Assuming it was text, how can he recover the file with result.txt? I'm not getting it..

      – sergio91pt
      Jul 2 '11 at 11:40













      I tried several other prior answers. None of them worked. This simple trick did! Thanks!

      – JamesThomasMoon1979
      Jul 15 '15 at 17:41







      I tried several other prior answers. None of them worked. This simple trick did! Thanks!

      – JamesThomasMoon1979
      Jul 15 '15 at 17:41















      Its really worked, awesome stuff. Thanks a lot.

      – Snehal Parmar
      Nov 24 '15 at 9:13





      Its really worked, awesome stuff. Thanks a lot.

      – Snehal Parmar
      Nov 24 '15 at 9:13




      2




      2





      It should be noted that 25 and 100 are just some magic numbers that probably need to be tweaked for the specific case.

      – Andrea Lazzarotto
      Jun 24 '16 at 12:32





      It should be noted that 25 and 100 are just some magic numbers that probably need to be tweaked for the specific case.

      – Andrea Lazzarotto
      Jun 24 '16 at 12:32











      12














      To recover the directory you can use extundelete





      1. Install extundelete



        sudo apt-get install extundelete



      2. Command to recover



        sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1



      Note: In place of dev/sda1 put your hardisk partition name.



      /home/Documents/ is your path to deleted directiory.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

        – Raphael
        Dec 7 '14 at 13:05











      • My results looks .....~/Books$ sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX /dev/sda2 WARNING: Extended attributes are not restored. Loading filesystem metadata ... 522 groups loaded. Loading journal descriptors ... 32242 descriptors loaded. Writing output to directory RECOVERED_FILES/ Failed to restore file /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX Could not find correct inode number past inode 2621441.

        – alhelal
        May 3 '17 at 2:51











      • I want to send confirmation in the command. How?

        – alhelal
        May 8 '18 at 14:01











      • sudo extundelete -y --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1 like this.

        – alhelal
        May 8 '18 at 14:02
















      12














      To recover the directory you can use extundelete





      1. Install extundelete



        sudo apt-get install extundelete



      2. Command to recover



        sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1



      Note: In place of dev/sda1 put your hardisk partition name.



      /home/Documents/ is your path to deleted directiory.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

        – Raphael
        Dec 7 '14 at 13:05











      • My results looks .....~/Books$ sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX /dev/sda2 WARNING: Extended attributes are not restored. Loading filesystem metadata ... 522 groups loaded. Loading journal descriptors ... 32242 descriptors loaded. Writing output to directory RECOVERED_FILES/ Failed to restore file /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX Could not find correct inode number past inode 2621441.

        – alhelal
        May 3 '17 at 2:51











      • I want to send confirmation in the command. How?

        – alhelal
        May 8 '18 at 14:01











      • sudo extundelete -y --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1 like this.

        – alhelal
        May 8 '18 at 14:02














      12












      12








      12







      To recover the directory you can use extundelete





      1. Install extundelete



        sudo apt-get install extundelete



      2. Command to recover



        sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1



      Note: In place of dev/sda1 put your hardisk partition name.



      /home/Documents/ is your path to deleted directiory.






      share|improve this answer















      To recover the directory you can use extundelete





      1. Install extundelete



        sudo apt-get install extundelete



      2. Command to recover



        sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1



      Note: In place of dev/sda1 put your hardisk partition name.



      /home/Documents/ is your path to deleted directiory.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 8 '14 at 8:45

























      answered Feb 23 '14 at 15:01









      Aatish SaiAatish Sai

      777616




      777616








      • 1





        I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

        – Raphael
        Dec 7 '14 at 13:05











      • My results looks .....~/Books$ sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX /dev/sda2 WARNING: Extended attributes are not restored. Loading filesystem metadata ... 522 groups loaded. Loading journal descriptors ... 32242 descriptors loaded. Writing output to directory RECOVERED_FILES/ Failed to restore file /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX Could not find correct inode number past inode 2621441.

        – alhelal
        May 3 '17 at 2:51











      • I want to send confirmation in the command. How?

        – alhelal
        May 8 '18 at 14:01











      • sudo extundelete -y --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1 like this.

        – alhelal
        May 8 '18 at 14:02














      • 1





        I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

        – Raphael
        Dec 7 '14 at 13:05











      • My results looks .....~/Books$ sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX /dev/sda2 WARNING: Extended attributes are not restored. Loading filesystem metadata ... 522 groups loaded. Loading journal descriptors ... 32242 descriptors loaded. Writing output to directory RECOVERED_FILES/ Failed to restore file /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX Could not find correct inode number past inode 2621441.

        – alhelal
        May 3 '17 at 2:51











      • I want to send confirmation in the command. How?

        – alhelal
        May 8 '18 at 14:01











      • sudo extundelete -y --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1 like this.

        – alhelal
        May 8 '18 at 14:02








      1




      1





      I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

      – Raphael
      Dec 7 '14 at 13:05





      I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

      – Raphael
      Dec 7 '14 at 13:05













      My results looks .....~/Books$ sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX /dev/sda2 WARNING: Extended attributes are not restored. Loading filesystem metadata ... 522 groups loaded. Loading journal descriptors ... 32242 descriptors loaded. Writing output to directory RECOVERED_FILES/ Failed to restore file /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX Could not find correct inode number past inode 2621441.

      – alhelal
      May 3 '17 at 2:51





      My results looks .....~/Books$ sudo extundelete --restore-directory /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX /dev/sda2 WARNING: Extended attributes are not restored. Loading filesystem metadata ... 522 groups loaded. Loading journal descriptors ... 32242 descriptors loaded. Writing output to directory RECOVERED_FILES/ Failed to restore file /home/newubuntu/Books/LaTeX Could not find correct inode number past inode 2621441.

      – alhelal
      May 3 '17 at 2:51













      I want to send confirmation in the command. How?

      – alhelal
      May 8 '18 at 14:01





      I want to send confirmation in the command. How?

      – alhelal
      May 8 '18 at 14:01













      sudo extundelete -y --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1 like this.

      – alhelal
      May 8 '18 at 14:02





      sudo extundelete -y --restore-directory /home/Documents/ /dev/sda1 like this.

      – alhelal
      May 8 '18 at 14:02











      10














      R-Linux(Recovery studio) is one of the best. I have used this tool many times before. I worked at a company where they used the commercial version, 9/10 times it recovers everything you want. Truly superb application. Saved mine, and friends behinds many times before.




      R-Linux is a free file recovery utility for the Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS
      file system used in the Linux OS and several Unixes. R-Linux uses the
      same InteligentScan technology as R-Studio, and flexible parameter
      settings to provide the fastest and most reliable file recovery for
      the Linux platform. However, unlike R-Studio, R-Linux cannot recover
      data over network or reconstruct RAIDs, or provide object copy.




      Features (from their website):



      R-Linux recover files:




      • Removed by virus attack, power failure or system crash;

      • After the partition with the files was re-formatted, damaged, or deleted;

      • When the partition structure on a disk was changed or damaged. In this case, R-Linux can scan the disk trying to find previously existing partitions and restore files from found partitions.

      • From disks with bad sectors. In this case, R-Linux can first copy the entire disk or its part into an image file and then process the image file. This is especially useful when new bad sectors are constantly appearing on the disk, and remaining information must be immediately saved.


      R-Linux Advanced features:




      • Standard "Windows Explorer" - style interface.

      • Host OS:

        • Linux variant: Linux, kernel 2.6 and above

        • Windows variant: Win2000, XP, 2003, Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8



      • Supported file systems: Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS (Linux) only.

      • Recognition and parsing Dynamic (Windows 2000/XP/Vista/Win7), Basic, GPT and BSD (UNIX) partitions layout schema and Apple partition map. Dynamic partitions over GPT are supported as well as dynamic partitions over MBR.


      • Creates image files for an entire hard drive, logical disk, or its part. Such image files can be processed like regular disks. Images can be either simple exact object copies (Plain images) compatible with the old versions of R-Linux, or compressed images that can be compressed, split into several parts, and password-protected. Such images are fully compatible with the images created by R-Drive Image, but incompatible with the old versions of R-Linux.


      • Recognizes localized names.


      • Recovered files can be saved on any (including network) disks accessible by the host operating system.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I didn't expect this to be free for Linux. I already know R-Studio and it is a fabulous software. Great that it's free for Linux filesystems.

        – 0x01
        Jun 12 '18 at 15:37






      • 1





        This tool is only free for recovering files less than 256kb

        – Tik0
        Aug 16 '18 at 8:38
















      10














      R-Linux(Recovery studio) is one of the best. I have used this tool many times before. I worked at a company where they used the commercial version, 9/10 times it recovers everything you want. Truly superb application. Saved mine, and friends behinds many times before.




      R-Linux is a free file recovery utility for the Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS
      file system used in the Linux OS and several Unixes. R-Linux uses the
      same InteligentScan technology as R-Studio, and flexible parameter
      settings to provide the fastest and most reliable file recovery for
      the Linux platform. However, unlike R-Studio, R-Linux cannot recover
      data over network or reconstruct RAIDs, or provide object copy.




      Features (from their website):



      R-Linux recover files:




      • Removed by virus attack, power failure or system crash;

      • After the partition with the files was re-formatted, damaged, or deleted;

      • When the partition structure on a disk was changed or damaged. In this case, R-Linux can scan the disk trying to find previously existing partitions and restore files from found partitions.

      • From disks with bad sectors. In this case, R-Linux can first copy the entire disk or its part into an image file and then process the image file. This is especially useful when new bad sectors are constantly appearing on the disk, and remaining information must be immediately saved.


      R-Linux Advanced features:




      • Standard "Windows Explorer" - style interface.

      • Host OS:

        • Linux variant: Linux, kernel 2.6 and above

        • Windows variant: Win2000, XP, 2003, Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8



      • Supported file systems: Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS (Linux) only.

      • Recognition and parsing Dynamic (Windows 2000/XP/Vista/Win7), Basic, GPT and BSD (UNIX) partitions layout schema and Apple partition map. Dynamic partitions over GPT are supported as well as dynamic partitions over MBR.


      • Creates image files for an entire hard drive, logical disk, or its part. Such image files can be processed like regular disks. Images can be either simple exact object copies (Plain images) compatible with the old versions of R-Linux, or compressed images that can be compressed, split into several parts, and password-protected. Such images are fully compatible with the images created by R-Drive Image, but incompatible with the old versions of R-Linux.


      • Recognizes localized names.


      • Recovered files can be saved on any (including network) disks accessible by the host operating system.






      share|improve this answer


























      • I didn't expect this to be free for Linux. I already know R-Studio and it is a fabulous software. Great that it's free for Linux filesystems.

        – 0x01
        Jun 12 '18 at 15:37






      • 1





        This tool is only free for recovering files less than 256kb

        – Tik0
        Aug 16 '18 at 8:38














      10












      10








      10







      R-Linux(Recovery studio) is one of the best. I have used this tool many times before. I worked at a company where they used the commercial version, 9/10 times it recovers everything you want. Truly superb application. Saved mine, and friends behinds many times before.




      R-Linux is a free file recovery utility for the Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS
      file system used in the Linux OS and several Unixes. R-Linux uses the
      same InteligentScan technology as R-Studio, and flexible parameter
      settings to provide the fastest and most reliable file recovery for
      the Linux platform. However, unlike R-Studio, R-Linux cannot recover
      data over network or reconstruct RAIDs, or provide object copy.




      Features (from their website):



      R-Linux recover files:




      • Removed by virus attack, power failure or system crash;

      • After the partition with the files was re-formatted, damaged, or deleted;

      • When the partition structure on a disk was changed or damaged. In this case, R-Linux can scan the disk trying to find previously existing partitions and restore files from found partitions.

      • From disks with bad sectors. In this case, R-Linux can first copy the entire disk or its part into an image file and then process the image file. This is especially useful when new bad sectors are constantly appearing on the disk, and remaining information must be immediately saved.


      R-Linux Advanced features:




      • Standard "Windows Explorer" - style interface.

      • Host OS:

        • Linux variant: Linux, kernel 2.6 and above

        • Windows variant: Win2000, XP, 2003, Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8



      • Supported file systems: Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS (Linux) only.

      • Recognition and parsing Dynamic (Windows 2000/XP/Vista/Win7), Basic, GPT and BSD (UNIX) partitions layout schema and Apple partition map. Dynamic partitions over GPT are supported as well as dynamic partitions over MBR.


      • Creates image files for an entire hard drive, logical disk, or its part. Such image files can be processed like regular disks. Images can be either simple exact object copies (Plain images) compatible with the old versions of R-Linux, or compressed images that can be compressed, split into several parts, and password-protected. Such images are fully compatible with the images created by R-Drive Image, but incompatible with the old versions of R-Linux.


      • Recognizes localized names.


      • Recovered files can be saved on any (including network) disks accessible by the host operating system.






      share|improve this answer















      R-Linux(Recovery studio) is one of the best. I have used this tool many times before. I worked at a company where they used the commercial version, 9/10 times it recovers everything you want. Truly superb application. Saved mine, and friends behinds many times before.




      R-Linux is a free file recovery utility for the Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS
      file system used in the Linux OS and several Unixes. R-Linux uses the
      same InteligentScan technology as R-Studio, and flexible parameter
      settings to provide the fastest and most reliable file recovery for
      the Linux platform. However, unlike R-Studio, R-Linux cannot recover
      data over network or reconstruct RAIDs, or provide object copy.




      Features (from their website):



      R-Linux recover files:




      • Removed by virus attack, power failure or system crash;

      • After the partition with the files was re-formatted, damaged, or deleted;

      • When the partition structure on a disk was changed or damaged. In this case, R-Linux can scan the disk trying to find previously existing partitions and restore files from found partitions.

      • From disks with bad sectors. In this case, R-Linux can first copy the entire disk or its part into an image file and then process the image file. This is especially useful when new bad sectors are constantly appearing on the disk, and remaining information must be immediately saved.


      R-Linux Advanced features:




      • Standard "Windows Explorer" - style interface.

      • Host OS:

        • Linux variant: Linux, kernel 2.6 and above

        • Windows variant: Win2000, XP, 2003, Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8



      • Supported file systems: Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 FS (Linux) only.

      • Recognition and parsing Dynamic (Windows 2000/XP/Vista/Win7), Basic, GPT and BSD (UNIX) partitions layout schema and Apple partition map. Dynamic partitions over GPT are supported as well as dynamic partitions over MBR.


      • Creates image files for an entire hard drive, logical disk, or its part. Such image files can be processed like regular disks. Images can be either simple exact object copies (Plain images) compatible with the old versions of R-Linux, or compressed images that can be compressed, split into several parts, and password-protected. Such images are fully compatible with the images created by R-Drive Image, but incompatible with the old versions of R-Linux.


      • Recognizes localized names.


      • Recovered files can be saved on any (including network) disks accessible by the host operating system.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Oct 9 '14 at 15:27









      Seth

      34.5k27112164




      34.5k27112164










      answered Oct 9 '14 at 8:10









      blade19899blade19899

      17.6k18100161




      17.6k18100161













      • I didn't expect this to be free for Linux. I already know R-Studio and it is a fabulous software. Great that it's free for Linux filesystems.

        – 0x01
        Jun 12 '18 at 15:37






      • 1





        This tool is only free for recovering files less than 256kb

        – Tik0
        Aug 16 '18 at 8:38



















      • I didn't expect this to be free for Linux. I already know R-Studio and it is a fabulous software. Great that it's free for Linux filesystems.

        – 0x01
        Jun 12 '18 at 15:37






      • 1





        This tool is only free for recovering files less than 256kb

        – Tik0
        Aug 16 '18 at 8:38

















      I didn't expect this to be free for Linux. I already know R-Studio and it is a fabulous software. Great that it's free for Linux filesystems.

      – 0x01
      Jun 12 '18 at 15:37





      I didn't expect this to be free for Linux. I already know R-Studio and it is a fabulous software. Great that it's free for Linux filesystems.

      – 0x01
      Jun 12 '18 at 15:37




      1




      1





      This tool is only free for recovering files less than 256kb

      – Tik0
      Aug 16 '18 at 8:38





      This tool is only free for recovering files less than 256kb

      – Tik0
      Aug 16 '18 at 8:38











      6














      If using secondary internal HD (suspect the same for external HD) for recovered file import (from main HD, where the files originally were), it’s necessary to make a directory, into which the files will be put in on secondary HD.
      To do it, you need to have BIOS setting for booting from CD first!
      1. Start Live Ubuntu Rescue-Remix CD, give command to boot, then when it boots into terminal, check your HDs by command – Code: sudo fdisk -l



      Realize what HD is main, and which is secondary, and what partition to check for files and into which to recover them – linux ext3 or Windows NTFS! Mine was Linux. Have enough room on it!
      (Then you can try to run Photorec (“sudo photorec”) and hopefully you’ll be able to see all your HDs. I was not that lucky, so I had to make directory and mount sec. HD.)




      1. Make directory for recovered files first, e.g. – media/disk. Give command – Code: sudo mkdir /media/disk


      If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.




      1. Must mount secondary HD, or it’ll be invisible, even if “sudo fdisk -l” does show it. Give command for your secondary HD –
        Code: sudo mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb2 /media/disk


      If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.





      1. Run Photorec by command – Code:



        sudo photorec




      Go thru settings, and only choose file types that you want, otherwise you’ll have thousands of files to sift thru!



      For more details you may please visit: http:/www..ubuntumanual.org/posts/357/recover-your-deleted-files-in-ubuntu






      share|improve this answer






























        6














        If using secondary internal HD (suspect the same for external HD) for recovered file import (from main HD, where the files originally were), it’s necessary to make a directory, into which the files will be put in on secondary HD.
        To do it, you need to have BIOS setting for booting from CD first!
        1. Start Live Ubuntu Rescue-Remix CD, give command to boot, then when it boots into terminal, check your HDs by command – Code: sudo fdisk -l



        Realize what HD is main, and which is secondary, and what partition to check for files and into which to recover them – linux ext3 or Windows NTFS! Mine was Linux. Have enough room on it!
        (Then you can try to run Photorec (“sudo photorec”) and hopefully you’ll be able to see all your HDs. I was not that lucky, so I had to make directory and mount sec. HD.)




        1. Make directory for recovered files first, e.g. – media/disk. Give command – Code: sudo mkdir /media/disk


        If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.




        1. Must mount secondary HD, or it’ll be invisible, even if “sudo fdisk -l” does show it. Give command for your secondary HD –
          Code: sudo mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb2 /media/disk


        If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.





        1. Run Photorec by command – Code:



          sudo photorec




        Go thru settings, and only choose file types that you want, otherwise you’ll have thousands of files to sift thru!



        For more details you may please visit: http:/www..ubuntumanual.org/posts/357/recover-your-deleted-files-in-ubuntu






        share|improve this answer




























          6












          6








          6







          If using secondary internal HD (suspect the same for external HD) for recovered file import (from main HD, where the files originally were), it’s necessary to make a directory, into which the files will be put in on secondary HD.
          To do it, you need to have BIOS setting for booting from CD first!
          1. Start Live Ubuntu Rescue-Remix CD, give command to boot, then when it boots into terminal, check your HDs by command – Code: sudo fdisk -l



          Realize what HD is main, and which is secondary, and what partition to check for files and into which to recover them – linux ext3 or Windows NTFS! Mine was Linux. Have enough room on it!
          (Then you can try to run Photorec (“sudo photorec”) and hopefully you’ll be able to see all your HDs. I was not that lucky, so I had to make directory and mount sec. HD.)




          1. Make directory for recovered files first, e.g. – media/disk. Give command – Code: sudo mkdir /media/disk


          If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.




          1. Must mount secondary HD, or it’ll be invisible, even if “sudo fdisk -l” does show it. Give command for your secondary HD –
            Code: sudo mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb2 /media/disk


          If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.





          1. Run Photorec by command – Code:



            sudo photorec




          Go thru settings, and only choose file types that you want, otherwise you’ll have thousands of files to sift thru!



          For more details you may please visit: http:/www..ubuntumanual.org/posts/357/recover-your-deleted-files-in-ubuntu






          share|improve this answer















          If using secondary internal HD (suspect the same for external HD) for recovered file import (from main HD, where the files originally were), it’s necessary to make a directory, into which the files will be put in on secondary HD.
          To do it, you need to have BIOS setting for booting from CD first!
          1. Start Live Ubuntu Rescue-Remix CD, give command to boot, then when it boots into terminal, check your HDs by command – Code: sudo fdisk -l



          Realize what HD is main, and which is secondary, and what partition to check for files and into which to recover them – linux ext3 or Windows NTFS! Mine was Linux. Have enough room on it!
          (Then you can try to run Photorec (“sudo photorec”) and hopefully you’ll be able to see all your HDs. I was not that lucky, so I had to make directory and mount sec. HD.)




          1. Make directory for recovered files first, e.g. – media/disk. Give command – Code: sudo mkdir /media/disk


          If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.




          1. Must mount secondary HD, or it’ll be invisible, even if “sudo fdisk -l” does show it. Give command for your secondary HD –
            Code: sudo mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb2 /media/disk


          If alright, terminal prompt simply returns.





          1. Run Photorec by command – Code:



            sudo photorec




          Go thru settings, and only choose file types that you want, otherwise you’ll have thousands of files to sift thru!



          For more details you may please visit: http:/www..ubuntumanual.org/posts/357/recover-your-deleted-files-in-ubuntu







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Oct 9 '14 at 8:14









          blade19899

          17.6k18100161




          17.6k18100161










          answered Jul 2 '11 at 11:23









          AbhilashAbhilash

          6911




          6911























              5














              Try Scalpel



              sudo apt-get install scalpel


              for more info




              man scalpel







              share|improve this answer


























              • trying it now. I don't quite understand how to add new files to the conf file. Do you have nay source with details?

                – Decio Lira
                Sep 9 '10 at 2:30






              • 2





                I found howtoforge.com/recover-deleted-files-with-scalpel which is better than nothing. Good luck, this ain't no MS-DOS.

                – msw
                Sep 9 '10 at 2:58











              • see also ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/2596/… I use a relatively heavy system backup, but have "Back in Time" set up to dup selected directories from /home/msw (including .config which also catches .config/keepassx/* (your locations may vary)) to a spare partition nightly. I've also been using Unix since forever and you usually become pretty careful after the second time you blow away the-really-critical.file ;)

                – msw
                Sep 9 '10 at 3:06













              • Scalpel seems to be doing the same as foremost but while scalpel is no longer developed since 10 years, foremost got many updates in recent years.

                – sebix
                Aug 1 '15 at 18:41
















              5














              Try Scalpel



              sudo apt-get install scalpel


              for more info




              man scalpel







              share|improve this answer


























              • trying it now. I don't quite understand how to add new files to the conf file. Do you have nay source with details?

                – Decio Lira
                Sep 9 '10 at 2:30






              • 2





                I found howtoforge.com/recover-deleted-files-with-scalpel which is better than nothing. Good luck, this ain't no MS-DOS.

                – msw
                Sep 9 '10 at 2:58











              • see also ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/2596/… I use a relatively heavy system backup, but have "Back in Time" set up to dup selected directories from /home/msw (including .config which also catches .config/keepassx/* (your locations may vary)) to a spare partition nightly. I've also been using Unix since forever and you usually become pretty careful after the second time you blow away the-really-critical.file ;)

                – msw
                Sep 9 '10 at 3:06













              • Scalpel seems to be doing the same as foremost but while scalpel is no longer developed since 10 years, foremost got many updates in recent years.

                – sebix
                Aug 1 '15 at 18:41














              5












              5








              5







              Try Scalpel



              sudo apt-get install scalpel


              for more info




              man scalpel







              share|improve this answer















              Try Scalpel



              sudo apt-get install scalpel


              for more info




              man scalpel








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Apr 28 '12 at 19:08









              Jorge Castro

              36.4k105422617




              36.4k105422617










              answered Sep 9 '10 at 2:13









              RojanRojan

              3,52421214




              3,52421214













              • trying it now. I don't quite understand how to add new files to the conf file. Do you have nay source with details?

                – Decio Lira
                Sep 9 '10 at 2:30






              • 2





                I found howtoforge.com/recover-deleted-files-with-scalpel which is better than nothing. Good luck, this ain't no MS-DOS.

                – msw
                Sep 9 '10 at 2:58











              • see also ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/2596/… I use a relatively heavy system backup, but have "Back in Time" set up to dup selected directories from /home/msw (including .config which also catches .config/keepassx/* (your locations may vary)) to a spare partition nightly. I've also been using Unix since forever and you usually become pretty careful after the second time you blow away the-really-critical.file ;)

                – msw
                Sep 9 '10 at 3:06













              • Scalpel seems to be doing the same as foremost but while scalpel is no longer developed since 10 years, foremost got many updates in recent years.

                – sebix
                Aug 1 '15 at 18:41



















              • trying it now. I don't quite understand how to add new files to the conf file. Do you have nay source with details?

                – Decio Lira
                Sep 9 '10 at 2:30






              • 2





                I found howtoforge.com/recover-deleted-files-with-scalpel which is better than nothing. Good luck, this ain't no MS-DOS.

                – msw
                Sep 9 '10 at 2:58











              • see also ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/2596/… I use a relatively heavy system backup, but have "Back in Time" set up to dup selected directories from /home/msw (including .config which also catches .config/keepassx/* (your locations may vary)) to a spare partition nightly. I've also been using Unix since forever and you usually become pretty careful after the second time you blow away the-really-critical.file ;)

                – msw
                Sep 9 '10 at 3:06













              • Scalpel seems to be doing the same as foremost but while scalpel is no longer developed since 10 years, foremost got many updates in recent years.

                – sebix
                Aug 1 '15 at 18:41

















              trying it now. I don't quite understand how to add new files to the conf file. Do you have nay source with details?

              – Decio Lira
              Sep 9 '10 at 2:30





              trying it now. I don't quite understand how to add new files to the conf file. Do you have nay source with details?

              – Decio Lira
              Sep 9 '10 at 2:30




              2




              2





              I found howtoforge.com/recover-deleted-files-with-scalpel which is better than nothing. Good luck, this ain't no MS-DOS.

              – msw
              Sep 9 '10 at 2:58





              I found howtoforge.com/recover-deleted-files-with-scalpel which is better than nothing. Good luck, this ain't no MS-DOS.

              – msw
              Sep 9 '10 at 2:58













              see also ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/2596/… I use a relatively heavy system backup, but have "Back in Time" set up to dup selected directories from /home/msw (including .config which also catches .config/keepassx/* (your locations may vary)) to a spare partition nightly. I've also been using Unix since forever and you usually become pretty careful after the second time you blow away the-really-critical.file ;)

              – msw
              Sep 9 '10 at 3:06







              see also ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/2596/… I use a relatively heavy system backup, but have "Back in Time" set up to dup selected directories from /home/msw (including .config which also catches .config/keepassx/* (your locations may vary)) to a spare partition nightly. I've also been using Unix since forever and you usually become pretty careful after the second time you blow away the-really-critical.file ;)

              – msw
              Sep 9 '10 at 3:06















              Scalpel seems to be doing the same as foremost but while scalpel is no longer developed since 10 years, foremost got many updates in recent years.

              – sebix
              Aug 1 '15 at 18:41





              Scalpel seems to be doing the same as foremost but while scalpel is no longer developed since 10 years, foremost got many updates in recent years.

              – sebix
              Aug 1 '15 at 18:41











              3














              Autopsy and the Sleuthkit tools are great for recovering deleted files, with a user-friendly UI, as well as being available in the repos.






              share|improve this answer
























              • good to know. will take a look at them. ;)

                – Decio Lira
                Oct 12 '10 at 19:03






              • 1





                I'd upvote it if you would have added some links.

                – MadMike
                Nov 14 '13 at 10:48











              • I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

                – Raphael
                Dec 7 '14 at 13:03
















              3














              Autopsy and the Sleuthkit tools are great for recovering deleted files, with a user-friendly UI, as well as being available in the repos.






              share|improve this answer
























              • good to know. will take a look at them. ;)

                – Decio Lira
                Oct 12 '10 at 19:03






              • 1





                I'd upvote it if you would have added some links.

                – MadMike
                Nov 14 '13 at 10:48











              • I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

                – Raphael
                Dec 7 '14 at 13:03














              3












              3








              3







              Autopsy and the Sleuthkit tools are great for recovering deleted files, with a user-friendly UI, as well as being available in the repos.






              share|improve this answer













              Autopsy and the Sleuthkit tools are great for recovering deleted files, with a user-friendly UI, as well as being available in the repos.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 12 '10 at 3:24









              nathwillnathwill

              2,2151017




              2,2151017













              • good to know. will take a look at them. ;)

                – Decio Lira
                Oct 12 '10 at 19:03






              • 1





                I'd upvote it if you would have added some links.

                – MadMike
                Nov 14 '13 at 10:48











              • I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

                – Raphael
                Dec 7 '14 at 13:03



















              • good to know. will take a look at them. ;)

                – Decio Lira
                Oct 12 '10 at 19:03






              • 1





                I'd upvote it if you would have added some links.

                – MadMike
                Nov 14 '13 at 10:48











              • I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

                – Raphael
                Dec 7 '14 at 13:03

















              good to know. will take a look at them. ;)

              – Decio Lira
              Oct 12 '10 at 19:03





              good to know. will take a look at them. ;)

              – Decio Lira
              Oct 12 '10 at 19:03




              1




              1





              I'd upvote it if you would have added some links.

              – MadMike
              Nov 14 '13 at 10:48





              I'd upvote it if you would have added some links.

              – MadMike
              Nov 14 '13 at 10:48













              I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

              – Raphael
              Dec 7 '14 at 13:03





              I used autopsy to find the inodes I needed and then extundelete to restore them. Worked well!

              – Raphael
              Dec 7 '14 at 13:03











              2














              Install scalpel



              sudo apt-get install scalpel


              Edit the scalpel.conf file and uncomment the file types you want to recover.
              Create an empty folder (eg:recovered_data)
              Find the partition your data was. You can use lsblk to get the partition map.



              sudo lsblk


              Run scalpel (assume the data was in sda1)



              sudo scalpel -o recovered_data/ /dev/sda1





              share|improve this answer




























                2














                Install scalpel



                sudo apt-get install scalpel


                Edit the scalpel.conf file and uncomment the file types you want to recover.
                Create an empty folder (eg:recovered_data)
                Find the partition your data was. You can use lsblk to get the partition map.



                sudo lsblk


                Run scalpel (assume the data was in sda1)



                sudo scalpel -o recovered_data/ /dev/sda1





                share|improve this answer


























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  Install scalpel



                  sudo apt-get install scalpel


                  Edit the scalpel.conf file and uncomment the file types you want to recover.
                  Create an empty folder (eg:recovered_data)
                  Find the partition your data was. You can use lsblk to get the partition map.



                  sudo lsblk


                  Run scalpel (assume the data was in sda1)



                  sudo scalpel -o recovered_data/ /dev/sda1





                  share|improve this answer













                  Install scalpel



                  sudo apt-get install scalpel


                  Edit the scalpel.conf file and uncomment the file types you want to recover.
                  Create an empty folder (eg:recovered_data)
                  Find the partition your data was. You can use lsblk to get the partition map.



                  sudo lsblk


                  Run scalpel (assume the data was in sda1)



                  sudo scalpel -o recovered_data/ /dev/sda1






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 10 '18 at 9:21









                  KasunKasun

                  313




                  313























                      1














                      Recently I used ext3grep to recover a large SQLite 3 file that was deleted from an ext3 file system.



                      I had tried many other undelete tools, all which couldn't recover the file (from a dd image of the disk).



                      In order to use ext3grep, I needed to download and compile the source. Carefully reading http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html from top to bottom in order to understand how the ext3 file system works and how to use the journal to find where deleted files use to be on the disk was also required.



                      This is not a simple solution, but very, very powerful. If you're prepared to invest a few hours to study the document and compile the program, it's well worth it.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • Thanks, I maybe try that. will this only work with ext3 file systems? What about ext4?

                        – Decio Lira
                        Sep 23 '10 at 17:28











                      • I'm not sure about ext4 but I think ext4 is backward compatible to ext3. I would assume it would work but have never tried.

                        – Stacey Richards
                        Oct 21 '10 at 10:55
















                      1














                      Recently I used ext3grep to recover a large SQLite 3 file that was deleted from an ext3 file system.



                      I had tried many other undelete tools, all which couldn't recover the file (from a dd image of the disk).



                      In order to use ext3grep, I needed to download and compile the source. Carefully reading http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html from top to bottom in order to understand how the ext3 file system works and how to use the journal to find where deleted files use to be on the disk was also required.



                      This is not a simple solution, but very, very powerful. If you're prepared to invest a few hours to study the document and compile the program, it's well worth it.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • Thanks, I maybe try that. will this only work with ext3 file systems? What about ext4?

                        – Decio Lira
                        Sep 23 '10 at 17:28











                      • I'm not sure about ext4 but I think ext4 is backward compatible to ext3. I would assume it would work but have never tried.

                        – Stacey Richards
                        Oct 21 '10 at 10:55














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      Recently I used ext3grep to recover a large SQLite 3 file that was deleted from an ext3 file system.



                      I had tried many other undelete tools, all which couldn't recover the file (from a dd image of the disk).



                      In order to use ext3grep, I needed to download and compile the source. Carefully reading http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html from top to bottom in order to understand how the ext3 file system works and how to use the journal to find where deleted files use to be on the disk was also required.



                      This is not a simple solution, but very, very powerful. If you're prepared to invest a few hours to study the document and compile the program, it's well worth it.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Recently I used ext3grep to recover a large SQLite 3 file that was deleted from an ext3 file system.



                      I had tried many other undelete tools, all which couldn't recover the file (from a dd image of the disk).



                      In order to use ext3grep, I needed to download and compile the source. Carefully reading http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html from top to bottom in order to understand how the ext3 file system works and how to use the journal to find where deleted files use to be on the disk was also required.



                      This is not a simple solution, but very, very powerful. If you're prepared to invest a few hours to study the document and compile the program, it's well worth it.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Sep 23 '10 at 8:00









                      Stacey RichardsStacey Richards

                      385127




                      385127













                      • Thanks, I maybe try that. will this only work with ext3 file systems? What about ext4?

                        – Decio Lira
                        Sep 23 '10 at 17:28











                      • I'm not sure about ext4 but I think ext4 is backward compatible to ext3. I would assume it would work but have never tried.

                        – Stacey Richards
                        Oct 21 '10 at 10:55



















                      • Thanks, I maybe try that. will this only work with ext3 file systems? What about ext4?

                        – Decio Lira
                        Sep 23 '10 at 17:28











                      • I'm not sure about ext4 but I think ext4 is backward compatible to ext3. I would assume it would work but have never tried.

                        – Stacey Richards
                        Oct 21 '10 at 10:55

















                      Thanks, I maybe try that. will this only work with ext3 file systems? What about ext4?

                      – Decio Lira
                      Sep 23 '10 at 17:28





                      Thanks, I maybe try that. will this only work with ext3 file systems? What about ext4?

                      – Decio Lira
                      Sep 23 '10 at 17:28













                      I'm not sure about ext4 but I think ext4 is backward compatible to ext3. I would assume it would work but have never tried.

                      – Stacey Richards
                      Oct 21 '10 at 10:55





                      I'm not sure about ext4 but I think ext4 is backward compatible to ext3. I would assume it would work but have never tried.

                      – Stacey Richards
                      Oct 21 '10 at 10:55





                      protected by Community Oct 9 '14 at 7:36



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                      Mangá

                       ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕