Do I need to turn on VT-x in order to make a virtual machine using Oracle VM?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Do I really have to turn on VT-x in BIOS to make a virtual machine? I keep
getting the error about VT-x not being turned on but I feel like turning it
on could have a negative impact on my computer. I heard it can be a security risk.



Is there any way I can make a VM without using VT-x?










share|improve this question
























  • What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
    – Allen Howard
    Dec 4 at 16:11










  • Windows 10 32-bit version
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:17






  • 1




    VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
    – Ramhound
    Dec 4 at 16:20










  • I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:30










  • Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:37















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Do I really have to turn on VT-x in BIOS to make a virtual machine? I keep
getting the error about VT-x not being turned on but I feel like turning it
on could have a negative impact on my computer. I heard it can be a security risk.



Is there any way I can make a VM without using VT-x?










share|improve this question
























  • What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
    – Allen Howard
    Dec 4 at 16:11










  • Windows 10 32-bit version
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:17






  • 1




    VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
    – Ramhound
    Dec 4 at 16:20










  • I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:30










  • Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:37













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Do I really have to turn on VT-x in BIOS to make a virtual machine? I keep
getting the error about VT-x not being turned on but I feel like turning it
on could have a negative impact on my computer. I heard it can be a security risk.



Is there any way I can make a VM without using VT-x?










share|improve this question















Do I really have to turn on VT-x in BIOS to make a virtual machine? I keep
getting the error about VT-x not being turned on but I feel like turning it
on could have a negative impact on my computer. I heard it can be a security risk.



Is there any way I can make a VM without using VT-x?







virtualbox virtual-machine virtualization vmware vt-x






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 5 at 1:22









phuclv

8,88063788




8,88063788










asked Dec 4 at 16:05









Yokool

31




31












  • What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
    – Allen Howard
    Dec 4 at 16:11










  • Windows 10 32-bit version
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:17






  • 1




    VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
    – Ramhound
    Dec 4 at 16:20










  • I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:30










  • Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:37


















  • What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
    – Allen Howard
    Dec 4 at 16:11










  • Windows 10 32-bit version
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:17






  • 1




    VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
    – Ramhound
    Dec 4 at 16:20










  • I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:30










  • Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
    – Yokool
    Dec 4 at 16:37
















What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
– Allen Howard
Dec 4 at 16:11




What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
– Allen Howard
Dec 4 at 16:11












Windows 10 32-bit version
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:17




Windows 10 32-bit version
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:17




1




1




VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
– Ramhound
Dec 4 at 16:20




VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
– Ramhound
Dec 4 at 16:20












I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:30




I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:30












Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:37




Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:37










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted











Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?




Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance



32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower




I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer




That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?






share|improve this answer





















  • They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
    – Ramhound
    Dec 5 at 1:28











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380755%2fdo-i-need-to-turn-on-vt-x-in-order-to-make-a-virtual-machine-using-oracle-vm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted











Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?




Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance



32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower




I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer




That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?






share|improve this answer





















  • They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
    – Ramhound
    Dec 5 at 1:28















up vote
0
down vote



accepted











Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?




Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance



32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower




I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer




That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?






share|improve this answer





















  • They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
    – Ramhound
    Dec 5 at 1:28













up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted







Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?




Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance



32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower




I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer




That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?






share|improve this answer













Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?




Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance



32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower




I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer




That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 4 at 17:14









phuclv

8,88063788




8,88063788












  • They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
    – Ramhound
    Dec 5 at 1:28


















  • They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
    – Ramhound
    Dec 5 at 1:28
















They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28




They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380755%2fdo-i-need-to-turn-on-vt-x-in-order-to-make-a-virtual-machine-using-oracle-vm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

 ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕