Two VirtualBox VMs running in parallel assigned same IP
I had one VM in my VirtualBox and wanted to use it as a template/image so I cloned it. Then I launched both the original and the clone simultaneously (to simulate a server cluster for something I was working on), however, both instances were assigned the same IP address. Is this perhaps a bug in our DHCP, which I think VirtualBox uses to get IP addresses? Or perhaps something in the way I set up my VMs? Anyway, I am ultimately interested in resolving this issue so that I can two VMs of the same image concurrently.
virtualbox virtual-machine ip dhcp
add a comment |
I had one VM in my VirtualBox and wanted to use it as a template/image so I cloned it. Then I launched both the original and the clone simultaneously (to simulate a server cluster for something I was working on), however, both instances were assigned the same IP address. Is this perhaps a bug in our DHCP, which I think VirtualBox uses to get IP addresses? Or perhaps something in the way I set up my VMs? Anyway, I am ultimately interested in resolving this issue so that I can two VMs of the same image concurrently.
virtualbox virtual-machine ip dhcp
On VMWare, if you started a previously used VM from a different path, it asked if you copied it or moved the VM to be able to avoid such situations... How did you clone the VM?
– ppeterka
Oct 7 '13 at 20:51
i'm afraid this is not the situation here...
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 20:52
1
It is possible that you copied the machine with the MAC (Ethernet) address. That is one of differences between copying and moving in VMware as mentioned by ppeterka. Could you please check the addresses? Could you also please describe how exactly did you clone the machine?
– pabouk
Oct 7 '13 at 21:12
yes, when i ranifconfig -a, it showed the same MAC address for both (displayed asHWaddr)
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:34
but the way i cloned it was in UI, just right-clicked the VM and hitClone
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:36
add a comment |
I had one VM in my VirtualBox and wanted to use it as a template/image so I cloned it. Then I launched both the original and the clone simultaneously (to simulate a server cluster for something I was working on), however, both instances were assigned the same IP address. Is this perhaps a bug in our DHCP, which I think VirtualBox uses to get IP addresses? Or perhaps something in the way I set up my VMs? Anyway, I am ultimately interested in resolving this issue so that I can two VMs of the same image concurrently.
virtualbox virtual-machine ip dhcp
I had one VM in my VirtualBox and wanted to use it as a template/image so I cloned it. Then I launched both the original and the clone simultaneously (to simulate a server cluster for something I was working on), however, both instances were assigned the same IP address. Is this perhaps a bug in our DHCP, which I think VirtualBox uses to get IP addresses? Or perhaps something in the way I set up my VMs? Anyway, I am ultimately interested in resolving this issue so that I can two VMs of the same image concurrently.
virtualbox virtual-machine ip dhcp
virtualbox virtual-machine ip dhcp
asked Oct 7 '13 at 20:47
amphibientamphibient
74851331
74851331
On VMWare, if you started a previously used VM from a different path, it asked if you copied it or moved the VM to be able to avoid such situations... How did you clone the VM?
– ppeterka
Oct 7 '13 at 20:51
i'm afraid this is not the situation here...
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 20:52
1
It is possible that you copied the machine with the MAC (Ethernet) address. That is one of differences between copying and moving in VMware as mentioned by ppeterka. Could you please check the addresses? Could you also please describe how exactly did you clone the machine?
– pabouk
Oct 7 '13 at 21:12
yes, when i ranifconfig -a, it showed the same MAC address for both (displayed asHWaddr)
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:34
but the way i cloned it was in UI, just right-clicked the VM and hitClone
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:36
add a comment |
On VMWare, if you started a previously used VM from a different path, it asked if you copied it or moved the VM to be able to avoid such situations... How did you clone the VM?
– ppeterka
Oct 7 '13 at 20:51
i'm afraid this is not the situation here...
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 20:52
1
It is possible that you copied the machine with the MAC (Ethernet) address. That is one of differences between copying and moving in VMware as mentioned by ppeterka. Could you please check the addresses? Could you also please describe how exactly did you clone the machine?
– pabouk
Oct 7 '13 at 21:12
yes, when i ranifconfig -a, it showed the same MAC address for both (displayed asHWaddr)
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:34
but the way i cloned it was in UI, just right-clicked the VM and hitClone
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:36
On VMWare, if you started a previously used VM from a different path, it asked if you copied it or moved the VM to be able to avoid such situations... How did you clone the VM?
– ppeterka
Oct 7 '13 at 20:51
On VMWare, if you started a previously used VM from a different path, it asked if you copied it or moved the VM to be able to avoid such situations... How did you clone the VM?
– ppeterka
Oct 7 '13 at 20:51
i'm afraid this is not the situation here...
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 20:52
i'm afraid this is not the situation here...
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 20:52
1
1
It is possible that you copied the machine with the MAC (Ethernet) address. That is one of differences between copying and moving in VMware as mentioned by ppeterka. Could you please check the addresses? Could you also please describe how exactly did you clone the machine?
– pabouk
Oct 7 '13 at 21:12
It is possible that you copied the machine with the MAC (Ethernet) address. That is one of differences between copying and moving in VMware as mentioned by ppeterka. Could you please check the addresses? Could you also please describe how exactly did you clone the machine?
– pabouk
Oct 7 '13 at 21:12
yes, when i ran
ifconfig -a, it showed the same MAC address for both (displayed as HWaddr)– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:34
yes, when i ran
ifconfig -a, it showed the same MAC address for both (displayed as HWaddr)– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:34
but the way i cloned it was in UI, just right-clicked the VM and hit
Clone– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:36
but the way i cloned it was in UI, just right-clicked the VM and hit
Clone– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:36
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
This is known as an IP conflict and can cause major headaches on the network.
You can re-initialize the MAC address of the cloned VM; that just means generate a new random one. On your cloned VM click Settings >> Network >> Advanced then click the two circular arrows to generate a new MAC. Your VM will need to be off. When it boots your DHCP server should assign the VM a different IP address.
Also FYI, when you cloned your VM you should have seen a checkbox with the words "reinitialize MAC", that would have cloned the VM and generated a new MAC instead of cloning it.
If you were curious, cloning a VM is often used to make a full backup of the VM, in this case you would want the MAC and IP to be the same in case you had to use the backup. For your case of cloning the VM to build a cluster you'll want to re-initialize the MAC on every clone.
Update 1
In response to your comments from 10/8/2013.
Make sure the IP address is not statically set. You mentioned in your question that the VM should be getting it's IP from DHCP. If thats the case the config should look something like the following. For debian based systems it will be found at /etc/network/interfaces
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
For redhat based systems the networking configuration is at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
Your second comment mentioned that eth0 is missing. Do you have an eth1? Since your computer changed mac addresses, the OS keeps the original mac as eth0 and usually assigns eth1 to the new mac. To reset the eth* devices so you have an eth0 and not an eth1 you'll need to clear the udev networking rules.
Messing with networking can get hairy. One option would be to delete your cloned VM and clone the original again and check "reinitialize mac". I'm not certain it will fix your problem but it might.
1
I did that and restarted both VMs but they were still assigned the same IP :(
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:39
the clone does not haveeth0when i runifconfig
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:42
I updated my answer to address the issues you wrote about in the comments.
– tbenz9
Oct 9 '13 at 18:09
@amphibient, I re-created your problem and was able to solve it easily by deleting everything out of the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file and rebooting. Good luck!
– tbenz9
Oct 10 '13 at 4:58
add a comment |
Please read about available adapters in VirtualBox (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#networkingmodes). If you want connection just between VMs then for your tests will be more suitable Internal Network adapter. However from you comment I get that you are using NAT.
I checked below scenario on VirtualBox 5.0.2 on host Mint 17.2 and guests Fedora 21:
Create main VM with default NAT adapter. Create Linked clone (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#clone) with MACs reinitialization. Cloned and original VM have same values in file:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp0s3
however
ip a
shows different MAC addresses on each one.
When I updated HWADDR in that file according to link/ether value from ip command and changed UUID with new one using
uuidgen
then despite the same IP on these (enp0s3) interfaces on original and cloned VMs, external network (Internet) was working well.
add a comment |
I came across this same situation today. I was using a NAT adapter and a Host-only Ethernet Adapter for my Solaris VM. The IP of the clone changed when I refreshed the Host-Only adapter's mac address.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f655670%2ftwo-virtualbox-vms-running-in-parallel-assigned-same-ip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is known as an IP conflict and can cause major headaches on the network.
You can re-initialize the MAC address of the cloned VM; that just means generate a new random one. On your cloned VM click Settings >> Network >> Advanced then click the two circular arrows to generate a new MAC. Your VM will need to be off. When it boots your DHCP server should assign the VM a different IP address.
Also FYI, when you cloned your VM you should have seen a checkbox with the words "reinitialize MAC", that would have cloned the VM and generated a new MAC instead of cloning it.
If you were curious, cloning a VM is often used to make a full backup of the VM, in this case you would want the MAC and IP to be the same in case you had to use the backup. For your case of cloning the VM to build a cluster you'll want to re-initialize the MAC on every clone.
Update 1
In response to your comments from 10/8/2013.
Make sure the IP address is not statically set. You mentioned in your question that the VM should be getting it's IP from DHCP. If thats the case the config should look something like the following. For debian based systems it will be found at /etc/network/interfaces
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
For redhat based systems the networking configuration is at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
Your second comment mentioned that eth0 is missing. Do you have an eth1? Since your computer changed mac addresses, the OS keeps the original mac as eth0 and usually assigns eth1 to the new mac. To reset the eth* devices so you have an eth0 and not an eth1 you'll need to clear the udev networking rules.
Messing with networking can get hairy. One option would be to delete your cloned VM and clone the original again and check "reinitialize mac". I'm not certain it will fix your problem but it might.
1
I did that and restarted both VMs but they were still assigned the same IP :(
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:39
the clone does not haveeth0when i runifconfig
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:42
I updated my answer to address the issues you wrote about in the comments.
– tbenz9
Oct 9 '13 at 18:09
@amphibient, I re-created your problem and was able to solve it easily by deleting everything out of the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file and rebooting. Good luck!
– tbenz9
Oct 10 '13 at 4:58
add a comment |
This is known as an IP conflict and can cause major headaches on the network.
You can re-initialize the MAC address of the cloned VM; that just means generate a new random one. On your cloned VM click Settings >> Network >> Advanced then click the two circular arrows to generate a new MAC. Your VM will need to be off. When it boots your DHCP server should assign the VM a different IP address.
Also FYI, when you cloned your VM you should have seen a checkbox with the words "reinitialize MAC", that would have cloned the VM and generated a new MAC instead of cloning it.
If you were curious, cloning a VM is often used to make a full backup of the VM, in this case you would want the MAC and IP to be the same in case you had to use the backup. For your case of cloning the VM to build a cluster you'll want to re-initialize the MAC on every clone.
Update 1
In response to your comments from 10/8/2013.
Make sure the IP address is not statically set. You mentioned in your question that the VM should be getting it's IP from DHCP. If thats the case the config should look something like the following. For debian based systems it will be found at /etc/network/interfaces
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
For redhat based systems the networking configuration is at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
Your second comment mentioned that eth0 is missing. Do you have an eth1? Since your computer changed mac addresses, the OS keeps the original mac as eth0 and usually assigns eth1 to the new mac. To reset the eth* devices so you have an eth0 and not an eth1 you'll need to clear the udev networking rules.
Messing with networking can get hairy. One option would be to delete your cloned VM and clone the original again and check "reinitialize mac". I'm not certain it will fix your problem but it might.
1
I did that and restarted both VMs but they were still assigned the same IP :(
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:39
the clone does not haveeth0when i runifconfig
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:42
I updated my answer to address the issues you wrote about in the comments.
– tbenz9
Oct 9 '13 at 18:09
@amphibient, I re-created your problem and was able to solve it easily by deleting everything out of the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file and rebooting. Good luck!
– tbenz9
Oct 10 '13 at 4:58
add a comment |
This is known as an IP conflict and can cause major headaches on the network.
You can re-initialize the MAC address of the cloned VM; that just means generate a new random one. On your cloned VM click Settings >> Network >> Advanced then click the two circular arrows to generate a new MAC. Your VM will need to be off. When it boots your DHCP server should assign the VM a different IP address.
Also FYI, when you cloned your VM you should have seen a checkbox with the words "reinitialize MAC", that would have cloned the VM and generated a new MAC instead of cloning it.
If you were curious, cloning a VM is often used to make a full backup of the VM, in this case you would want the MAC and IP to be the same in case you had to use the backup. For your case of cloning the VM to build a cluster you'll want to re-initialize the MAC on every clone.
Update 1
In response to your comments from 10/8/2013.
Make sure the IP address is not statically set. You mentioned in your question that the VM should be getting it's IP from DHCP. If thats the case the config should look something like the following. For debian based systems it will be found at /etc/network/interfaces
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
For redhat based systems the networking configuration is at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
Your second comment mentioned that eth0 is missing. Do you have an eth1? Since your computer changed mac addresses, the OS keeps the original mac as eth0 and usually assigns eth1 to the new mac. To reset the eth* devices so you have an eth0 and not an eth1 you'll need to clear the udev networking rules.
Messing with networking can get hairy. One option would be to delete your cloned VM and clone the original again and check "reinitialize mac". I'm not certain it will fix your problem but it might.
This is known as an IP conflict and can cause major headaches on the network.
You can re-initialize the MAC address of the cloned VM; that just means generate a new random one. On your cloned VM click Settings >> Network >> Advanced then click the two circular arrows to generate a new MAC. Your VM will need to be off. When it boots your DHCP server should assign the VM a different IP address.
Also FYI, when you cloned your VM you should have seen a checkbox with the words "reinitialize MAC", that would have cloned the VM and generated a new MAC instead of cloning it.
If you were curious, cloning a VM is often used to make a full backup of the VM, in this case you would want the MAC and IP to be the same in case you had to use the backup. For your case of cloning the VM to build a cluster you'll want to re-initialize the MAC on every clone.
Update 1
In response to your comments from 10/8/2013.
Make sure the IP address is not statically set. You mentioned in your question that the VM should be getting it's IP from DHCP. If thats the case the config should look something like the following. For debian based systems it will be found at /etc/network/interfaces
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
For redhat based systems the networking configuration is at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
Your second comment mentioned that eth0 is missing. Do you have an eth1? Since your computer changed mac addresses, the OS keeps the original mac as eth0 and usually assigns eth1 to the new mac. To reset the eth* devices so you have an eth0 and not an eth1 you'll need to clear the udev networking rules.
Messing with networking can get hairy. One option would be to delete your cloned VM and clone the original again and check "reinitialize mac". I'm not certain it will fix your problem but it might.
edited Oct 9 '13 at 18:09
answered Oct 8 '13 at 0:43
tbenz9tbenz9
5,11321928
5,11321928
1
I did that and restarted both VMs but they were still assigned the same IP :(
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:39
the clone does not haveeth0when i runifconfig
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:42
I updated my answer to address the issues you wrote about in the comments.
– tbenz9
Oct 9 '13 at 18:09
@amphibient, I re-created your problem and was able to solve it easily by deleting everything out of the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file and rebooting. Good luck!
– tbenz9
Oct 10 '13 at 4:58
add a comment |
1
I did that and restarted both VMs but they were still assigned the same IP :(
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:39
the clone does not haveeth0when i runifconfig
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:42
I updated my answer to address the issues you wrote about in the comments.
– tbenz9
Oct 9 '13 at 18:09
@amphibient, I re-created your problem and was able to solve it easily by deleting everything out of the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file and rebooting. Good luck!
– tbenz9
Oct 10 '13 at 4:58
1
1
I did that and restarted both VMs but they were still assigned the same IP :(
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:39
I did that and restarted both VMs but they were still assigned the same IP :(
– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:39
the clone does not have
eth0 when i run ifconfig– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:42
the clone does not have
eth0 when i run ifconfig– amphibient
Oct 8 '13 at 14:42
I updated my answer to address the issues you wrote about in the comments.
– tbenz9
Oct 9 '13 at 18:09
I updated my answer to address the issues you wrote about in the comments.
– tbenz9
Oct 9 '13 at 18:09
@amphibient, I re-created your problem and was able to solve it easily by deleting everything out of the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file and rebooting. Good luck!
– tbenz9
Oct 10 '13 at 4:58
@amphibient, I re-created your problem and was able to solve it easily by deleting everything out of the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file and rebooting. Good luck!
– tbenz9
Oct 10 '13 at 4:58
add a comment |
Please read about available adapters in VirtualBox (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#networkingmodes). If you want connection just between VMs then for your tests will be more suitable Internal Network adapter. However from you comment I get that you are using NAT.
I checked below scenario on VirtualBox 5.0.2 on host Mint 17.2 and guests Fedora 21:
Create main VM with default NAT adapter. Create Linked clone (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#clone) with MACs reinitialization. Cloned and original VM have same values in file:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp0s3
however
ip a
shows different MAC addresses on each one.
When I updated HWADDR in that file according to link/ether value from ip command and changed UUID with new one using
uuidgen
then despite the same IP on these (enp0s3) interfaces on original and cloned VMs, external network (Internet) was working well.
add a comment |
Please read about available adapters in VirtualBox (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#networkingmodes). If you want connection just between VMs then for your tests will be more suitable Internal Network adapter. However from you comment I get that you are using NAT.
I checked below scenario on VirtualBox 5.0.2 on host Mint 17.2 and guests Fedora 21:
Create main VM with default NAT adapter. Create Linked clone (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#clone) with MACs reinitialization. Cloned and original VM have same values in file:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp0s3
however
ip a
shows different MAC addresses on each one.
When I updated HWADDR in that file according to link/ether value from ip command and changed UUID with new one using
uuidgen
then despite the same IP on these (enp0s3) interfaces on original and cloned VMs, external network (Internet) was working well.
add a comment |
Please read about available adapters in VirtualBox (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#networkingmodes). If you want connection just between VMs then for your tests will be more suitable Internal Network adapter. However from you comment I get that you are using NAT.
I checked below scenario on VirtualBox 5.0.2 on host Mint 17.2 and guests Fedora 21:
Create main VM with default NAT adapter. Create Linked clone (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#clone) with MACs reinitialization. Cloned and original VM have same values in file:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp0s3
however
ip a
shows different MAC addresses on each one.
When I updated HWADDR in that file according to link/ether value from ip command and changed UUID with new one using
uuidgen
then despite the same IP on these (enp0s3) interfaces on original and cloned VMs, external network (Internet) was working well.
Please read about available adapters in VirtualBox (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#networkingmodes). If you want connection just between VMs then for your tests will be more suitable Internal Network adapter. However from you comment I get that you are using NAT.
I checked below scenario on VirtualBox 5.0.2 on host Mint 17.2 and guests Fedora 21:
Create main VM with default NAT adapter. Create Linked clone (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#clone) with MACs reinitialization. Cloned and original VM have same values in file:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp0s3
however
ip a
shows different MAC addresses on each one.
When I updated HWADDR in that file according to link/ether value from ip command and changed UUID with new one using
uuidgen
then despite the same IP on these (enp0s3) interfaces on original and cloned VMs, external network (Internet) was working well.
answered Jan 6 '16 at 16:01
edwardoedwardo
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
I came across this same situation today. I was using a NAT adapter and a Host-only Ethernet Adapter for my Solaris VM. The IP of the clone changed when I refreshed the Host-Only adapter's mac address.
add a comment |
I came across this same situation today. I was using a NAT adapter and a Host-only Ethernet Adapter for my Solaris VM. The IP of the clone changed when I refreshed the Host-Only adapter's mac address.
add a comment |
I came across this same situation today. I was using a NAT adapter and a Host-only Ethernet Adapter for my Solaris VM. The IP of the clone changed when I refreshed the Host-Only adapter's mac address.
I came across this same situation today. I was using a NAT adapter and a Host-only Ethernet Adapter for my Solaris VM. The IP of the clone changed when I refreshed the Host-Only adapter's mac address.
answered May 31 '17 at 23:04
xboxxbox
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f655670%2ftwo-virtualbox-vms-running-in-parallel-assigned-same-ip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
On VMWare, if you started a previously used VM from a different path, it asked if you copied it or moved the VM to be able to avoid such situations... How did you clone the VM?
– ppeterka
Oct 7 '13 at 20:51
i'm afraid this is not the situation here...
– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 20:52
1
It is possible that you copied the machine with the MAC (Ethernet) address. That is one of differences between copying and moving in VMware as mentioned by ppeterka. Could you please check the addresses? Could you also please describe how exactly did you clone the machine?
– pabouk
Oct 7 '13 at 21:12
yes, when i ran
ifconfig -a, it showed the same MAC address for both (displayed asHWaddr)– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:34
but the way i cloned it was in UI, just right-clicked the VM and hit
Clone– amphibient
Oct 7 '13 at 21:36