Require every user connecting via wireless access point to use their own captive portal account [closed]











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a LAN cable that if I plug it into my computer and try to access the Internet a captive portal opens and asks for a username and password. I connected an access point to this LAN so everyone can connect wirelessly to this LAN. But the problem is if I connect to the access point through Wi-Fi and enter my username and password in the captive portal, any other user connecting to that Wi-Fi network can access the Internet using my account!



How can I prevent this? I want everyone to use their own account on the captive portal.










share|improve this question















closed as unclear what you're asking by DavidPostill Dec 5 at 14:19


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1




    Are you sure you have an Access Point? Because it sounds like you have a regular NAT router. // Also keep in mind that you are most likely not authorized to add a wireless extension to this protected network.
    – Daniel B
    Dec 5 at 12:21






  • 1




    Anyone able to comment on what is unclear about this question?
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:58










  • @TwistyImpersonator What captive portal? How can we answer anything about the users configuration if we don't know what it is?
    – Jan Doggen
    Dec 5 at 15:29










  • The information in the question clearly implies the captive portal is performing IP or MAC based authentication. This is all one needs to know in order to answer the question. See the answer I posted to understand why this is all that is needed.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 15:34















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a LAN cable that if I plug it into my computer and try to access the Internet a captive portal opens and asks for a username and password. I connected an access point to this LAN so everyone can connect wirelessly to this LAN. But the problem is if I connect to the access point through Wi-Fi and enter my username and password in the captive portal, any other user connecting to that Wi-Fi network can access the Internet using my account!



How can I prevent this? I want everyone to use their own account on the captive portal.










share|improve this question















closed as unclear what you're asking by DavidPostill Dec 5 at 14:19


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1




    Are you sure you have an Access Point? Because it sounds like you have a regular NAT router. // Also keep in mind that you are most likely not authorized to add a wireless extension to this protected network.
    – Daniel B
    Dec 5 at 12:21






  • 1




    Anyone able to comment on what is unclear about this question?
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:58










  • @TwistyImpersonator What captive portal? How can we answer anything about the users configuration if we don't know what it is?
    – Jan Doggen
    Dec 5 at 15:29










  • The information in the question clearly implies the captive portal is performing IP or MAC based authentication. This is all one needs to know in order to answer the question. See the answer I posted to understand why this is all that is needed.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 15:34













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have a LAN cable that if I plug it into my computer and try to access the Internet a captive portal opens and asks for a username and password. I connected an access point to this LAN so everyone can connect wirelessly to this LAN. But the problem is if I connect to the access point through Wi-Fi and enter my username and password in the captive portal, any other user connecting to that Wi-Fi network can access the Internet using my account!



How can I prevent this? I want everyone to use their own account on the captive portal.










share|improve this question















I have a LAN cable that if I plug it into my computer and try to access the Internet a captive portal opens and asks for a username and password. I connected an access point to this LAN so everyone can connect wirelessly to this LAN. But the problem is if I connect to the access point through Wi-Fi and enter my username and password in the captive portal, any other user connecting to that Wi-Fi network can access the Internet using my account!



How can I prevent this? I want everyone to use their own account on the captive portal.







wireless-networking wireless-access-point captive-portal






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 5 at 20:05









Twisty Impersonator

17.5k136394




17.5k136394










asked Dec 5 at 12:12









j doe

92




92




closed as unclear what you're asking by DavidPostill Dec 5 at 14:19


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as unclear what you're asking by DavidPostill Dec 5 at 14:19


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 1




    Are you sure you have an Access Point? Because it sounds like you have a regular NAT router. // Also keep in mind that you are most likely not authorized to add a wireless extension to this protected network.
    – Daniel B
    Dec 5 at 12:21






  • 1




    Anyone able to comment on what is unclear about this question?
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:58










  • @TwistyImpersonator What captive portal? How can we answer anything about the users configuration if we don't know what it is?
    – Jan Doggen
    Dec 5 at 15:29










  • The information in the question clearly implies the captive portal is performing IP or MAC based authentication. This is all one needs to know in order to answer the question. See the answer I posted to understand why this is all that is needed.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 15:34














  • 1




    Are you sure you have an Access Point? Because it sounds like you have a regular NAT router. // Also keep in mind that you are most likely not authorized to add a wireless extension to this protected network.
    – Daniel B
    Dec 5 at 12:21






  • 1




    Anyone able to comment on what is unclear about this question?
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:58










  • @TwistyImpersonator What captive portal? How can we answer anything about the users configuration if we don't know what it is?
    – Jan Doggen
    Dec 5 at 15:29










  • The information in the question clearly implies the captive portal is performing IP or MAC based authentication. This is all one needs to know in order to answer the question. See the answer I posted to understand why this is all that is needed.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 15:34








1




1




Are you sure you have an Access Point? Because it sounds like you have a regular NAT router. // Also keep in mind that you are most likely not authorized to add a wireless extension to this protected network.
– Daniel B
Dec 5 at 12:21




Are you sure you have an Access Point? Because it sounds like you have a regular NAT router. // Also keep in mind that you are most likely not authorized to add a wireless extension to this protected network.
– Daniel B
Dec 5 at 12:21




1




1




Anyone able to comment on what is unclear about this question?
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 5 at 14:58




Anyone able to comment on what is unclear about this question?
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 5 at 14:58












@TwistyImpersonator What captive portal? How can we answer anything about the users configuration if we don't know what it is?
– Jan Doggen
Dec 5 at 15:29




@TwistyImpersonator What captive portal? How can we answer anything about the users configuration if we don't know what it is?
– Jan Doggen
Dec 5 at 15:29












The information in the question clearly implies the captive portal is performing IP or MAC based authentication. This is all one needs to know in order to answer the question. See the answer I posted to understand why this is all that is needed.
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 5 at 15:34




The information in the question clearly implies the captive portal is performing IP or MAC based authentication. This is all one needs to know in order to answer the question. See the answer I posted to understand why this is all that is needed.
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 5 at 15:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Based on your description, the captive portal is configured on your network's Internet gateway, possibly your router. Further, it is performing IP-based (or MAC-based) authentication, meaning that when a device is authenticated, all further traffic from that device's IP address is permitted to the Internet.



This leads me to conclude that your wireless access point is using NAT to connect wireless clients to your LAN. In other words the AP makes all of the wireless clients appear as a single IP address on the LAN, hence the reason you are required to authenticate only once and also why all further Internet access from the wireless devices is associated with your portal account.



To resolve this, configure your wireless access point to place Wi-Fi clients directly on the LAN so that they each get their own IP address on its subnet. This will in turn require each wireless client to authenticate separately with the captive portal.






share|improve this answer























  • It doesn't really matter here whether IP and/or MAC authentication is in use – a router+NAT will rewrite both, a pure bridge AP will rewrite neither. (The middle option of a router with no NAT is probably unlikely given the question.)
    – grawity
    Dec 5 at 13:57










  • Oh yes, I forgot about MAC based authentication. Thanks!
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:57










  • @TwistyImpersonator Yes i think this is the correct answer. but is this configuration possible on most access points? and where is this kind of settings?
    – j doe
    Dec 5 at 20:02












  • You're asking a new question there. Please do so by posting a new question.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 20:03


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Based on your description, the captive portal is configured on your network's Internet gateway, possibly your router. Further, it is performing IP-based (or MAC-based) authentication, meaning that when a device is authenticated, all further traffic from that device's IP address is permitted to the Internet.



This leads me to conclude that your wireless access point is using NAT to connect wireless clients to your LAN. In other words the AP makes all of the wireless clients appear as a single IP address on the LAN, hence the reason you are required to authenticate only once and also why all further Internet access from the wireless devices is associated with your portal account.



To resolve this, configure your wireless access point to place Wi-Fi clients directly on the LAN so that they each get their own IP address on its subnet. This will in turn require each wireless client to authenticate separately with the captive portal.






share|improve this answer























  • It doesn't really matter here whether IP and/or MAC authentication is in use – a router+NAT will rewrite both, a pure bridge AP will rewrite neither. (The middle option of a router with no NAT is probably unlikely given the question.)
    – grawity
    Dec 5 at 13:57










  • Oh yes, I forgot about MAC based authentication. Thanks!
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:57










  • @TwistyImpersonator Yes i think this is the correct answer. but is this configuration possible on most access points? and where is this kind of settings?
    – j doe
    Dec 5 at 20:02












  • You're asking a new question there. Please do so by posting a new question.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 20:03















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Based on your description, the captive portal is configured on your network's Internet gateway, possibly your router. Further, it is performing IP-based (or MAC-based) authentication, meaning that when a device is authenticated, all further traffic from that device's IP address is permitted to the Internet.



This leads me to conclude that your wireless access point is using NAT to connect wireless clients to your LAN. In other words the AP makes all of the wireless clients appear as a single IP address on the LAN, hence the reason you are required to authenticate only once and also why all further Internet access from the wireless devices is associated with your portal account.



To resolve this, configure your wireless access point to place Wi-Fi clients directly on the LAN so that they each get their own IP address on its subnet. This will in turn require each wireless client to authenticate separately with the captive portal.






share|improve this answer























  • It doesn't really matter here whether IP and/or MAC authentication is in use – a router+NAT will rewrite both, a pure bridge AP will rewrite neither. (The middle option of a router with no NAT is probably unlikely given the question.)
    – grawity
    Dec 5 at 13:57










  • Oh yes, I forgot about MAC based authentication. Thanks!
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:57










  • @TwistyImpersonator Yes i think this is the correct answer. but is this configuration possible on most access points? and where is this kind of settings?
    – j doe
    Dec 5 at 20:02












  • You're asking a new question there. Please do so by posting a new question.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 20:03













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






Based on your description, the captive portal is configured on your network's Internet gateway, possibly your router. Further, it is performing IP-based (or MAC-based) authentication, meaning that when a device is authenticated, all further traffic from that device's IP address is permitted to the Internet.



This leads me to conclude that your wireless access point is using NAT to connect wireless clients to your LAN. In other words the AP makes all of the wireless clients appear as a single IP address on the LAN, hence the reason you are required to authenticate only once and also why all further Internet access from the wireless devices is associated with your portal account.



To resolve this, configure your wireless access point to place Wi-Fi clients directly on the LAN so that they each get their own IP address on its subnet. This will in turn require each wireless client to authenticate separately with the captive portal.






share|improve this answer














Based on your description, the captive portal is configured on your network's Internet gateway, possibly your router. Further, it is performing IP-based (or MAC-based) authentication, meaning that when a device is authenticated, all further traffic from that device's IP address is permitted to the Internet.



This leads me to conclude that your wireless access point is using NAT to connect wireless clients to your LAN. In other words the AP makes all of the wireless clients appear as a single IP address on the LAN, hence the reason you are required to authenticate only once and also why all further Internet access from the wireless devices is associated with your portal account.



To resolve this, configure your wireless access point to place Wi-Fi clients directly on the LAN so that they each get their own IP address on its subnet. This will in turn require each wireless client to authenticate separately with the captive portal.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 5 at 14:56

























answered Dec 5 at 13:21









Twisty Impersonator

17.5k136394




17.5k136394












  • It doesn't really matter here whether IP and/or MAC authentication is in use – a router+NAT will rewrite both, a pure bridge AP will rewrite neither. (The middle option of a router with no NAT is probably unlikely given the question.)
    – grawity
    Dec 5 at 13:57










  • Oh yes, I forgot about MAC based authentication. Thanks!
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:57










  • @TwistyImpersonator Yes i think this is the correct answer. but is this configuration possible on most access points? and where is this kind of settings?
    – j doe
    Dec 5 at 20:02












  • You're asking a new question there. Please do so by posting a new question.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 20:03


















  • It doesn't really matter here whether IP and/or MAC authentication is in use – a router+NAT will rewrite both, a pure bridge AP will rewrite neither. (The middle option of a router with no NAT is probably unlikely given the question.)
    – grawity
    Dec 5 at 13:57










  • Oh yes, I forgot about MAC based authentication. Thanks!
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 14:57










  • @TwistyImpersonator Yes i think this is the correct answer. but is this configuration possible on most access points? and where is this kind of settings?
    – j doe
    Dec 5 at 20:02












  • You're asking a new question there. Please do so by posting a new question.
    – Twisty Impersonator
    Dec 5 at 20:03
















It doesn't really matter here whether IP and/or MAC authentication is in use – a router+NAT will rewrite both, a pure bridge AP will rewrite neither. (The middle option of a router with no NAT is probably unlikely given the question.)
– grawity
Dec 5 at 13:57




It doesn't really matter here whether IP and/or MAC authentication is in use – a router+NAT will rewrite both, a pure bridge AP will rewrite neither. (The middle option of a router with no NAT is probably unlikely given the question.)
– grawity
Dec 5 at 13:57












Oh yes, I forgot about MAC based authentication. Thanks!
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 5 at 14:57




Oh yes, I forgot about MAC based authentication. Thanks!
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 5 at 14:57












@TwistyImpersonator Yes i think this is the correct answer. but is this configuration possible on most access points? and where is this kind of settings?
– j doe
Dec 5 at 20:02






@TwistyImpersonator Yes i think this is the correct answer. but is this configuration possible on most access points? and where is this kind of settings?
– j doe
Dec 5 at 20:02














You're asking a new question there. Please do so by posting a new question.
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 5 at 20:03




You're asking a new question there. Please do so by posting a new question.
– Twisty Impersonator
Dec 5 at 20:03



Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

Eduardo VII do Reino Unido