How is pressure an intensive property?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I've seen this question asked before but I can't find an answer to the specific point I'm troubled with. From the kinetic theory of gases, pressure results from molecules colliding with the walls of a container enclosing a gas, imparting a force upon the wall. Now, if we split the container into two halves, I am told that pressure remains the same on either side of the partition assuming the gas has uniform density throughout the container. But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I've seen this question asked before but I can't find an answer to the specific point I'm troubled with. From the kinetic theory of gases, pressure results from molecules colliding with the walls of a container enclosing a gas, imparting a force upon the wall. Now, if we split the container into two halves, I am told that pressure remains the same on either side of the partition assuming the gas has uniform density throughout the container. But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I've seen this question asked before but I can't find an answer to the specific point I'm troubled with. From the kinetic theory of gases, pressure results from molecules colliding with the walls of a container enclosing a gas, imparting a force upon the wall. Now, if we split the container into two halves, I am told that pressure remains the same on either side of the partition assuming the gas has uniform density throughout the container. But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I've seen this question asked before but I can't find an answer to the specific point I'm troubled with. From the kinetic theory of gases, pressure results from molecules colliding with the walls of a container enclosing a gas, imparting a force upon the wall. Now, if we split the container into two halves, I am told that pressure remains the same on either side of the partition assuming the gas has uniform density throughout the container. But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?







      fluid-dynamics pressure






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      QuIcKmAtHs

      2,4814828




      2,4814828










      asked 3 hours ago









      user552217

      243




      243






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote














          If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




          You are right that if we only halved the number of particles we would have a smaller pressure. But you have also halved the volume of the container. The fewer number of particles hits the walls more frequently due to the smaller volume. In other words, the number of particles goes down, but the number of collisions per particle goes up. The two effects cancel out, leading to the same pressure as before you put in the partition.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            2
            down vote














            But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




            The pressure is not dependent on the number of molecules alone. You can simply examine the ideal gas law: $PV=nRT$. If the temperature is constant then reducing both $n$ and $V$ by half leaves pressure unchanged.






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 1




              Physical answer vs. mathematical answer. Let's see who wins :p
              – Aaron Stevens
              2 hours ago










            • Usually physical does, but the mathematical one was so simple in this case.
              – Dale
              2 hours ago


















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Yet another way to think of it: if we use instead of $V$ and $n$ the molar density $rho_n = frac{n}{V}$, we get



            $$P = rho_n RT$$



            or at molecular level, the molecular density (also number density) $rho_N = frac{N}{V}$ giving



            $$P = rho_N k_B T$$



            which shows that the pressure is an intensive property, since the volume ($V$) does not appear. This $rho_n$ is itself an intensive property for the same reason ordinary mass density is an intensive property.



            Thinking about this more physically, since pressure is force over area, and the force is proportional to the number of molecules hitting it which in turn is proportional to how many happen to be in proximity, then we can think about it like this: the amount of molecules that each tiny piece of surface area "sees" remains the same in each case despite that we have cut off another half of the box, and thus it feels the same force. Think about a box of (reasonably small) ordinary macroscopic balls - if I insert a (thin) partition halfway in between the balls while displacing as few as possible, does any little bit of the area of the box's surface suddenly have much more or much less crowding next to it than before? The same thing happens here.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "151"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449201%2fhow-is-pressure-an-intensive-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              3
              down vote














              If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




              You are right that if we only halved the number of particles we would have a smaller pressure. But you have also halved the volume of the container. The fewer number of particles hits the walls more frequently due to the smaller volume. In other words, the number of particles goes down, but the number of collisions per particle goes up. The two effects cancel out, leading to the same pressure as before you put in the partition.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                3
                down vote














                If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




                You are right that if we only halved the number of particles we would have a smaller pressure. But you have also halved the volume of the container. The fewer number of particles hits the walls more frequently due to the smaller volume. In other words, the number of particles goes down, but the number of collisions per particle goes up. The two effects cancel out, leading to the same pressure as before you put in the partition.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




                  You are right that if we only halved the number of particles we would have a smaller pressure. But you have also halved the volume of the container. The fewer number of particles hits the walls more frequently due to the smaller volume. In other words, the number of particles goes down, but the number of collisions per particle goes up. The two effects cancel out, leading to the same pressure as before you put in the partition.






                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




                  You are right that if we only halved the number of particles we would have a smaller pressure. But you have also halved the volume of the container. The fewer number of particles hits the walls more frequently due to the smaller volume. In other words, the number of particles goes down, but the number of collisions per particle goes up. The two effects cancel out, leading to the same pressure as before you put in the partition.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Aaron Stevens

                  8,46931239




                  8,46931239






















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote














                      But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




                      The pressure is not dependent on the number of molecules alone. You can simply examine the ideal gas law: $PV=nRT$. If the temperature is constant then reducing both $n$ and $V$ by half leaves pressure unchanged.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

















                      • 1




                        Physical answer vs. mathematical answer. Let's see who wins :p
                        – Aaron Stevens
                        2 hours ago










                      • Usually physical does, but the mathematical one was so simple in this case.
                        – Dale
                        2 hours ago















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote














                      But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




                      The pressure is not dependent on the number of molecules alone. You can simply examine the ideal gas law: $PV=nRT$. If the temperature is constant then reducing both $n$ and $V$ by half leaves pressure unchanged.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

















                      • 1




                        Physical answer vs. mathematical answer. Let's see who wins :p
                        – Aaron Stevens
                        2 hours ago










                      • Usually physical does, but the mathematical one was so simple in this case.
                        – Dale
                        2 hours ago













                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




                      The pressure is not dependent on the number of molecules alone. You can simply examine the ideal gas law: $PV=nRT$. If the temperature is constant then reducing both $n$ and $V$ by half leaves pressure unchanged.






                      share|cite|improve this answer













                      But If we split the container into two, isn't there effectively half the number of molecules striking the wall on each side so the pressure should also be halved? Shouldnt pressure be dependent on the number of molecules?




                      The pressure is not dependent on the number of molecules alone. You can simply examine the ideal gas law: $PV=nRT$. If the temperature is constant then reducing both $n$ and $V$ by half leaves pressure unchanged.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered 2 hours ago









                      Dale

                      4,4891623




                      4,4891623








                      • 1




                        Physical answer vs. mathematical answer. Let's see who wins :p
                        – Aaron Stevens
                        2 hours ago










                      • Usually physical does, but the mathematical one was so simple in this case.
                        – Dale
                        2 hours ago














                      • 1




                        Physical answer vs. mathematical answer. Let's see who wins :p
                        – Aaron Stevens
                        2 hours ago










                      • Usually physical does, but the mathematical one was so simple in this case.
                        – Dale
                        2 hours ago








                      1




                      1




                      Physical answer vs. mathematical answer. Let's see who wins :p
                      – Aaron Stevens
                      2 hours ago




                      Physical answer vs. mathematical answer. Let's see who wins :p
                      – Aaron Stevens
                      2 hours ago












                      Usually physical does, but the mathematical one was so simple in this case.
                      – Dale
                      2 hours ago




                      Usually physical does, but the mathematical one was so simple in this case.
                      – Dale
                      2 hours ago










                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Yet another way to think of it: if we use instead of $V$ and $n$ the molar density $rho_n = frac{n}{V}$, we get



                      $$P = rho_n RT$$



                      or at molecular level, the molecular density (also number density) $rho_N = frac{N}{V}$ giving



                      $$P = rho_N k_B T$$



                      which shows that the pressure is an intensive property, since the volume ($V$) does not appear. This $rho_n$ is itself an intensive property for the same reason ordinary mass density is an intensive property.



                      Thinking about this more physically, since pressure is force over area, and the force is proportional to the number of molecules hitting it which in turn is proportional to how many happen to be in proximity, then we can think about it like this: the amount of molecules that each tiny piece of surface area "sees" remains the same in each case despite that we have cut off another half of the box, and thus it feels the same force. Think about a box of (reasonably small) ordinary macroscopic balls - if I insert a (thin) partition halfway in between the balls while displacing as few as possible, does any little bit of the area of the box's surface suddenly have much more or much less crowding next to it than before? The same thing happens here.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Yet another way to think of it: if we use instead of $V$ and $n$ the molar density $rho_n = frac{n}{V}$, we get



                        $$P = rho_n RT$$



                        or at molecular level, the molecular density (also number density) $rho_N = frac{N}{V}$ giving



                        $$P = rho_N k_B T$$



                        which shows that the pressure is an intensive property, since the volume ($V$) does not appear. This $rho_n$ is itself an intensive property for the same reason ordinary mass density is an intensive property.



                        Thinking about this more physically, since pressure is force over area, and the force is proportional to the number of molecules hitting it which in turn is proportional to how many happen to be in proximity, then we can think about it like this: the amount of molecules that each tiny piece of surface area "sees" remains the same in each case despite that we have cut off another half of the box, and thus it feels the same force. Think about a box of (reasonably small) ordinary macroscopic balls - if I insert a (thin) partition halfway in between the balls while displacing as few as possible, does any little bit of the area of the box's surface suddenly have much more or much less crowding next to it than before? The same thing happens here.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          Yet another way to think of it: if we use instead of $V$ and $n$ the molar density $rho_n = frac{n}{V}$, we get



                          $$P = rho_n RT$$



                          or at molecular level, the molecular density (also number density) $rho_N = frac{N}{V}$ giving



                          $$P = rho_N k_B T$$



                          which shows that the pressure is an intensive property, since the volume ($V$) does not appear. This $rho_n$ is itself an intensive property for the same reason ordinary mass density is an intensive property.



                          Thinking about this more physically, since pressure is force over area, and the force is proportional to the number of molecules hitting it which in turn is proportional to how many happen to be in proximity, then we can think about it like this: the amount of molecules that each tiny piece of surface area "sees" remains the same in each case despite that we have cut off another half of the box, and thus it feels the same force. Think about a box of (reasonably small) ordinary macroscopic balls - if I insert a (thin) partition halfway in between the balls while displacing as few as possible, does any little bit of the area of the box's surface suddenly have much more or much less crowding next to it than before? The same thing happens here.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Yet another way to think of it: if we use instead of $V$ and $n$ the molar density $rho_n = frac{n}{V}$, we get



                          $$P = rho_n RT$$



                          or at molecular level, the molecular density (also number density) $rho_N = frac{N}{V}$ giving



                          $$P = rho_N k_B T$$



                          which shows that the pressure is an intensive property, since the volume ($V$) does not appear. This $rho_n$ is itself an intensive property for the same reason ordinary mass density is an intensive property.



                          Thinking about this more physically, since pressure is force over area, and the force is proportional to the number of molecules hitting it which in turn is proportional to how many happen to be in proximity, then we can think about it like this: the amount of molecules that each tiny piece of surface area "sees" remains the same in each case despite that we have cut off another half of the box, and thus it feels the same force. Think about a box of (reasonably small) ordinary macroscopic balls - if I insert a (thin) partition halfway in between the balls while displacing as few as possible, does any little bit of the area of the box's surface suddenly have much more or much less crowding next to it than before? The same thing happens here.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 13 mins ago









                          The_Sympathizer

                          3,569923




                          3,569923






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449201%2fhow-is-pressure-an-intensive-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                              Mangá

                               ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕