Why are the internals of NES Gamepaks so small compared to the case?











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












As you probably know, in the technology world, smaller is generally considered to be better. Companies compete to make the most portable phone, or the smallest laptop, but apparently Nintendo didn't get the memo on this back in the '80, because if you take a look inside an NES cartridge you may notice they were opting for the exact opposite:



enter image description here



In other words, the case is massive compared to the internals.



Why would they do this? Why would anyone do this? Am I missing something?










share|improve this question
























  • Those chips are two 32-pin 0.6-inch wide chips, and a 16-pin 0.3-wide chip, on 0.1-inch pitch, which was the normal size then. What makes you say they are small?
    – jonathanjo
    Nov 29 at 21:26










  • look at the size of the case
    – Jack Kasbrack
    Nov 29 at 21:27






  • 1




    Do you mean the case is big?
    – jonathanjo
    Nov 29 at 21:28






  • 7




    The case is big enough to hold components that could be larger than the example shown. Also, while electronic components are made smaller over time, human hands have not shown a similar trend.
    – Glen Yates
    Nov 29 at 21:34






  • 2




    /me stares at his hands
    – jdv
    Nov 29 at 21:39















up vote
5
down vote

favorite












As you probably know, in the technology world, smaller is generally considered to be better. Companies compete to make the most portable phone, or the smallest laptop, but apparently Nintendo didn't get the memo on this back in the '80, because if you take a look inside an NES cartridge you may notice they were opting for the exact opposite:



enter image description here



In other words, the case is massive compared to the internals.



Why would they do this? Why would anyone do this? Am I missing something?










share|improve this question
























  • Those chips are two 32-pin 0.6-inch wide chips, and a 16-pin 0.3-wide chip, on 0.1-inch pitch, which was the normal size then. What makes you say they are small?
    – jonathanjo
    Nov 29 at 21:26










  • look at the size of the case
    – Jack Kasbrack
    Nov 29 at 21:27






  • 1




    Do you mean the case is big?
    – jonathanjo
    Nov 29 at 21:28






  • 7




    The case is big enough to hold components that could be larger than the example shown. Also, while electronic components are made smaller over time, human hands have not shown a similar trend.
    – Glen Yates
    Nov 29 at 21:34






  • 2




    /me stares at his hands
    – jdv
    Nov 29 at 21:39













up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











As you probably know, in the technology world, smaller is generally considered to be better. Companies compete to make the most portable phone, or the smallest laptop, but apparently Nintendo didn't get the memo on this back in the '80, because if you take a look inside an NES cartridge you may notice they were opting for the exact opposite:



enter image description here



In other words, the case is massive compared to the internals.



Why would they do this? Why would anyone do this? Am I missing something?










share|improve this question















As you probably know, in the technology world, smaller is generally considered to be better. Companies compete to make the most portable phone, or the smallest laptop, but apparently Nintendo didn't get the memo on this back in the '80, because if you take a look inside an NES cartridge you may notice they were opting for the exact opposite:



enter image description here



In other words, the case is massive compared to the internals.



Why would they do this? Why would anyone do this? Am I missing something?







nintendo nes chip game-cartridge






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 30 at 1:29









paxdiablo

1,6191235




1,6191235










asked Nov 29 at 21:16









Jack Kasbrack

1,094633




1,094633












  • Those chips are two 32-pin 0.6-inch wide chips, and a 16-pin 0.3-wide chip, on 0.1-inch pitch, which was the normal size then. What makes you say they are small?
    – jonathanjo
    Nov 29 at 21:26










  • look at the size of the case
    – Jack Kasbrack
    Nov 29 at 21:27






  • 1




    Do you mean the case is big?
    – jonathanjo
    Nov 29 at 21:28






  • 7




    The case is big enough to hold components that could be larger than the example shown. Also, while electronic components are made smaller over time, human hands have not shown a similar trend.
    – Glen Yates
    Nov 29 at 21:34






  • 2




    /me stares at his hands
    – jdv
    Nov 29 at 21:39


















  • Those chips are two 32-pin 0.6-inch wide chips, and a 16-pin 0.3-wide chip, on 0.1-inch pitch, which was the normal size then. What makes you say they are small?
    – jonathanjo
    Nov 29 at 21:26










  • look at the size of the case
    – Jack Kasbrack
    Nov 29 at 21:27






  • 1




    Do you mean the case is big?
    – jonathanjo
    Nov 29 at 21:28






  • 7




    The case is big enough to hold components that could be larger than the example shown. Also, while electronic components are made smaller over time, human hands have not shown a similar trend.
    – Glen Yates
    Nov 29 at 21:34






  • 2




    /me stares at his hands
    – jdv
    Nov 29 at 21:39
















Those chips are two 32-pin 0.6-inch wide chips, and a 16-pin 0.3-wide chip, on 0.1-inch pitch, which was the normal size then. What makes you say they are small?
– jonathanjo
Nov 29 at 21:26




Those chips are two 32-pin 0.6-inch wide chips, and a 16-pin 0.3-wide chip, on 0.1-inch pitch, which was the normal size then. What makes you say they are small?
– jonathanjo
Nov 29 at 21:26












look at the size of the case
– Jack Kasbrack
Nov 29 at 21:27




look at the size of the case
– Jack Kasbrack
Nov 29 at 21:27




1




1




Do you mean the case is big?
– jonathanjo
Nov 29 at 21:28




Do you mean the case is big?
– jonathanjo
Nov 29 at 21:28




7




7




The case is big enough to hold components that could be larger than the example shown. Also, while electronic components are made smaller over time, human hands have not shown a similar trend.
– Glen Yates
Nov 29 at 21:34




The case is big enough to hold components that could be larger than the example shown. Also, while electronic components are made smaller over time, human hands have not shown a similar trend.
– Glen Yates
Nov 29 at 21:34




2




2




/me stares at his hands
– jdv
Nov 29 at 21:39




/me stares at his hands
– jdv
Nov 29 at 21:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
10
down vote



accepted










Under the hood, the NES was almost identical to the Famicom, its Japanese counterpart released in 1983:



Famicomimage source



The Famicom console itself was much smaller that the NES, and it had a traditional top-loading cartridge slot instead of the NES's notoriously unreliable front-loader. It's cartridges were also more reasonably sized:



Famicom with cartridge



Inside of cartridge



Image source



At the time the NES was released in the United States, the North American video game market had just crashed. Consumers were unwilling to buy video game systems, and retailers were unwilling to sell them. The Nintendo Entertainment System made quite a few unusual design decisions in an effort to market the NES as an "entertainment system" rather than a video game console. According to the Wikipedia article History of the Nintendo Entertainment System:




Nintendo purposefully designed the system so as not to resemble a video game console, and would avoid terms associated with game consoles, using the term "Pak" for cartridge, or "Control Deck" instead of "console". Renamed the "Nintendo Entertainment System" (NES), the new version lacked most of the upscale features added in the AVS, but retained many of its design elements, such as the grey color scheme and boxy design. In avoidance of an obvious video game connotation, NES replaced the top-loading cartridge slot of the Famicom with a front-loading chamber for software cartridges that place the inserted cartridge out of view. The revised design includes design flaws which have the side-effect of making the NES more prone to breakdown. The loading mechanism became notorious for slowly failing. The Famicom's pair of hard-wired controllers was replaced with two custom 7-pin sockets for detachable controllers.




Nintendo knew they couldn't sell a video game system, so they made something that looked futuristic and not like a video game system. The design decision of inserting a large cartridge into a slot on the front of the system was an effort to resemble something like a VCR rather than a game console.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    The mechanical aspects of the NES require that all NES Gamepaks be about the same size. NES could not predict with certainty everything that game designers might want to include in a Gamepak, and were more interested in ensuring that the cartridges could handle the worst-case need than in making them as small as possible.



    Making the cartridges larger would also cater toward an attitude that increased size correlates with more sophistication, and made it easier for people to acquire an impressive-looking collections of games.



    Which looks more impressive: a stack of 10 NES cartridges, or a stack of 20 Nintendo DS cartridges?






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "648"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8414%2fwhy-are-the-internals-of-nes-gamepaks-so-small-compared-to-the-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      10
      down vote



      accepted










      Under the hood, the NES was almost identical to the Famicom, its Japanese counterpart released in 1983:



      Famicomimage source



      The Famicom console itself was much smaller that the NES, and it had a traditional top-loading cartridge slot instead of the NES's notoriously unreliable front-loader. It's cartridges were also more reasonably sized:



      Famicom with cartridge



      Inside of cartridge



      Image source



      At the time the NES was released in the United States, the North American video game market had just crashed. Consumers were unwilling to buy video game systems, and retailers were unwilling to sell them. The Nintendo Entertainment System made quite a few unusual design decisions in an effort to market the NES as an "entertainment system" rather than a video game console. According to the Wikipedia article History of the Nintendo Entertainment System:




      Nintendo purposefully designed the system so as not to resemble a video game console, and would avoid terms associated with game consoles, using the term "Pak" for cartridge, or "Control Deck" instead of "console". Renamed the "Nintendo Entertainment System" (NES), the new version lacked most of the upscale features added in the AVS, but retained many of its design elements, such as the grey color scheme and boxy design. In avoidance of an obvious video game connotation, NES replaced the top-loading cartridge slot of the Famicom with a front-loading chamber for software cartridges that place the inserted cartridge out of view. The revised design includes design flaws which have the side-effect of making the NES more prone to breakdown. The loading mechanism became notorious for slowly failing. The Famicom's pair of hard-wired controllers was replaced with two custom 7-pin sockets for detachable controllers.




      Nintendo knew they couldn't sell a video game system, so they made something that looked futuristic and not like a video game system. The design decision of inserting a large cartridge into a slot on the front of the system was an effort to resemble something like a VCR rather than a game console.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        10
        down vote



        accepted










        Under the hood, the NES was almost identical to the Famicom, its Japanese counterpart released in 1983:



        Famicomimage source



        The Famicom console itself was much smaller that the NES, and it had a traditional top-loading cartridge slot instead of the NES's notoriously unreliable front-loader. It's cartridges were also more reasonably sized:



        Famicom with cartridge



        Inside of cartridge



        Image source



        At the time the NES was released in the United States, the North American video game market had just crashed. Consumers were unwilling to buy video game systems, and retailers were unwilling to sell them. The Nintendo Entertainment System made quite a few unusual design decisions in an effort to market the NES as an "entertainment system" rather than a video game console. According to the Wikipedia article History of the Nintendo Entertainment System:




        Nintendo purposefully designed the system so as not to resemble a video game console, and would avoid terms associated with game consoles, using the term "Pak" for cartridge, or "Control Deck" instead of "console". Renamed the "Nintendo Entertainment System" (NES), the new version lacked most of the upscale features added in the AVS, but retained many of its design elements, such as the grey color scheme and boxy design. In avoidance of an obvious video game connotation, NES replaced the top-loading cartridge slot of the Famicom with a front-loading chamber for software cartridges that place the inserted cartridge out of view. The revised design includes design flaws which have the side-effect of making the NES more prone to breakdown. The loading mechanism became notorious for slowly failing. The Famicom's pair of hard-wired controllers was replaced with two custom 7-pin sockets for detachable controllers.




        Nintendo knew they couldn't sell a video game system, so they made something that looked futuristic and not like a video game system. The design decision of inserting a large cartridge into a slot on the front of the system was an effort to resemble something like a VCR rather than a game console.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          10
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          10
          down vote



          accepted






          Under the hood, the NES was almost identical to the Famicom, its Japanese counterpart released in 1983:



          Famicomimage source



          The Famicom console itself was much smaller that the NES, and it had a traditional top-loading cartridge slot instead of the NES's notoriously unreliable front-loader. It's cartridges were also more reasonably sized:



          Famicom with cartridge



          Inside of cartridge



          Image source



          At the time the NES was released in the United States, the North American video game market had just crashed. Consumers were unwilling to buy video game systems, and retailers were unwilling to sell them. The Nintendo Entertainment System made quite a few unusual design decisions in an effort to market the NES as an "entertainment system" rather than a video game console. According to the Wikipedia article History of the Nintendo Entertainment System:




          Nintendo purposefully designed the system so as not to resemble a video game console, and would avoid terms associated with game consoles, using the term "Pak" for cartridge, or "Control Deck" instead of "console". Renamed the "Nintendo Entertainment System" (NES), the new version lacked most of the upscale features added in the AVS, but retained many of its design elements, such as the grey color scheme and boxy design. In avoidance of an obvious video game connotation, NES replaced the top-loading cartridge slot of the Famicom with a front-loading chamber for software cartridges that place the inserted cartridge out of view. The revised design includes design flaws which have the side-effect of making the NES more prone to breakdown. The loading mechanism became notorious for slowly failing. The Famicom's pair of hard-wired controllers was replaced with two custom 7-pin sockets for detachable controllers.




          Nintendo knew they couldn't sell a video game system, so they made something that looked futuristic and not like a video game system. The design decision of inserting a large cartridge into a slot on the front of the system was an effort to resemble something like a VCR rather than a game console.






          share|improve this answer












          Under the hood, the NES was almost identical to the Famicom, its Japanese counterpart released in 1983:



          Famicomimage source



          The Famicom console itself was much smaller that the NES, and it had a traditional top-loading cartridge slot instead of the NES's notoriously unreliable front-loader. It's cartridges were also more reasonably sized:



          Famicom with cartridge



          Inside of cartridge



          Image source



          At the time the NES was released in the United States, the North American video game market had just crashed. Consumers were unwilling to buy video game systems, and retailers were unwilling to sell them. The Nintendo Entertainment System made quite a few unusual design decisions in an effort to market the NES as an "entertainment system" rather than a video game console. According to the Wikipedia article History of the Nintendo Entertainment System:




          Nintendo purposefully designed the system so as not to resemble a video game console, and would avoid terms associated with game consoles, using the term "Pak" for cartridge, or "Control Deck" instead of "console". Renamed the "Nintendo Entertainment System" (NES), the new version lacked most of the upscale features added in the AVS, but retained many of its design elements, such as the grey color scheme and boxy design. In avoidance of an obvious video game connotation, NES replaced the top-loading cartridge slot of the Famicom with a front-loading chamber for software cartridges that place the inserted cartridge out of view. The revised design includes design flaws which have the side-effect of making the NES more prone to breakdown. The loading mechanism became notorious for slowly failing. The Famicom's pair of hard-wired controllers was replaced with two custom 7-pin sockets for detachable controllers.




          Nintendo knew they couldn't sell a video game system, so they made something that looked futuristic and not like a video game system. The design decision of inserting a large cartridge into a slot on the front of the system was an effort to resemble something like a VCR rather than a game console.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 29 at 21:39









          NobodyNada

          2,7061027




          2,7061027






















              up vote
              4
              down vote













              The mechanical aspects of the NES require that all NES Gamepaks be about the same size. NES could not predict with certainty everything that game designers might want to include in a Gamepak, and were more interested in ensuring that the cartridges could handle the worst-case need than in making them as small as possible.



              Making the cartridges larger would also cater toward an attitude that increased size correlates with more sophistication, and made it easier for people to acquire an impressive-looking collections of games.



              Which looks more impressive: a stack of 10 NES cartridges, or a stack of 20 Nintendo DS cartridges?






              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                The mechanical aspects of the NES require that all NES Gamepaks be about the same size. NES could not predict with certainty everything that game designers might want to include in a Gamepak, and were more interested in ensuring that the cartridges could handle the worst-case need than in making them as small as possible.



                Making the cartridges larger would also cater toward an attitude that increased size correlates with more sophistication, and made it easier for people to acquire an impressive-looking collections of games.



                Which looks more impressive: a stack of 10 NES cartridges, or a stack of 20 Nintendo DS cartridges?






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  The mechanical aspects of the NES require that all NES Gamepaks be about the same size. NES could not predict with certainty everything that game designers might want to include in a Gamepak, and were more interested in ensuring that the cartridges could handle the worst-case need than in making them as small as possible.



                  Making the cartridges larger would also cater toward an attitude that increased size correlates with more sophistication, and made it easier for people to acquire an impressive-looking collections of games.



                  Which looks more impressive: a stack of 10 NES cartridges, or a stack of 20 Nintendo DS cartridges?






                  share|improve this answer














                  The mechanical aspects of the NES require that all NES Gamepaks be about the same size. NES could not predict with certainty everything that game designers might want to include in a Gamepak, and were more interested in ensuring that the cartridges could handle the worst-case need than in making them as small as possible.



                  Making the cartridges larger would also cater toward an attitude that increased size correlates with more sophistication, and made it easier for people to acquire an impressive-looking collections of games.



                  Which looks more impressive: a stack of 10 NES cartridges, or a stack of 20 Nintendo DS cartridges?







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 29 at 21:38









                  paxdiablo

                  1,6191235




                  1,6191235










                  answered Nov 29 at 21:35









                  supercat

                  6,652736




                  6,652736






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8414%2fwhy-are-the-internals-of-nes-gamepaks-so-small-compared-to-the-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                      Mangá

                       ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕