32 bit-processor download [duplicate]












1
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Why is there no 32 bit ISO for the new Ubuntu 18.04?

    4 answers



  • How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements?

    8 answers




What download if any should I use on an old Dell dimension B110? I believe it is a 32 bit machine. The old XP software is corrupted and I would like to try a desktop version of Ubuntu or something similar just for online brousing and video streaming. I would be a new/first time user.










share|improve this question













marked as duplicate by karel, guiverc, user535733, Melebius, N0rbert Jan 8 at 8:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 3





    Possible duplicate of How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements? Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Pay attention to the amount of RAM. You'll need at least 512MB of RAM.

    – karel
    Jan 8 at 3:04













  • Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. I don't know your cpu/machine , but from what I see in thomasrutter's answer, I would suggest a lighter flavor of Ubuntu, such as Lubuntu or Xubuntu. They contain the same Ubuntu based, but Lubuntu contains the LXDE interface (assuming you use Lubuntu 18.04 LTS or the long-term-support release, and not Lubuntu 18.10) or XFCE (Xubuntu 18.04 LTS). I'm suggesting LTS or long-term-support releases as they have three (3) years of support, longer than the 9 months of for example Lubuntu/Xubuntu 18.10. Ubuntu releases are yy.mm in format, so 18.04 = 2018.April release

    – guiverc
    Jan 8 at 3:05











  • As for which is best for you, your own tastes will have a huge influence on that. LXDE approaches the GUI (graphical user interface) one way, XFCE slightly different. It's this 'gui' or desktop that makes it different to the much heavier GNOME default in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. GNOME uses more memory, more cpu cycles so will appear slower than LXDE or XFCE. Even if you have a fast modern machine, some people still prefer the lighter DEsktops just because they love the speed of them. Your machine's memory may also influence the best for you, but download, write to ISO & try for yourself.

    – guiverc
    Jan 8 at 3:08











  • B110 came with 512MB RAM as standard. Should be fine for desktop Ubuntu, though obviously more is better. Maybe it's already been upgraded.

    – thomasrutter
    Jan 8 at 4:13


















1
















This question already has an answer here:




  • Why is there no 32 bit ISO for the new Ubuntu 18.04?

    4 answers



  • How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements?

    8 answers




What download if any should I use on an old Dell dimension B110? I believe it is a 32 bit machine. The old XP software is corrupted and I would like to try a desktop version of Ubuntu or something similar just for online brousing and video streaming. I would be a new/first time user.










share|improve this question













marked as duplicate by karel, guiverc, user535733, Melebius, N0rbert Jan 8 at 8:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 3





    Possible duplicate of How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements? Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Pay attention to the amount of RAM. You'll need at least 512MB of RAM.

    – karel
    Jan 8 at 3:04













  • Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. I don't know your cpu/machine , but from what I see in thomasrutter's answer, I would suggest a lighter flavor of Ubuntu, such as Lubuntu or Xubuntu. They contain the same Ubuntu based, but Lubuntu contains the LXDE interface (assuming you use Lubuntu 18.04 LTS or the long-term-support release, and not Lubuntu 18.10) or XFCE (Xubuntu 18.04 LTS). I'm suggesting LTS or long-term-support releases as they have three (3) years of support, longer than the 9 months of for example Lubuntu/Xubuntu 18.10. Ubuntu releases are yy.mm in format, so 18.04 = 2018.April release

    – guiverc
    Jan 8 at 3:05











  • As for which is best for you, your own tastes will have a huge influence on that. LXDE approaches the GUI (graphical user interface) one way, XFCE slightly different. It's this 'gui' or desktop that makes it different to the much heavier GNOME default in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. GNOME uses more memory, more cpu cycles so will appear slower than LXDE or XFCE. Even if you have a fast modern machine, some people still prefer the lighter DEsktops just because they love the speed of them. Your machine's memory may also influence the best for you, but download, write to ISO & try for yourself.

    – guiverc
    Jan 8 at 3:08











  • B110 came with 512MB RAM as standard. Should be fine for desktop Ubuntu, though obviously more is better. Maybe it's already been upgraded.

    – thomasrutter
    Jan 8 at 4:13
















1












1








1









This question already has an answer here:




  • Why is there no 32 bit ISO for the new Ubuntu 18.04?

    4 answers



  • How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements?

    8 answers




What download if any should I use on an old Dell dimension B110? I believe it is a 32 bit machine. The old XP software is corrupted and I would like to try a desktop version of Ubuntu or something similar just for online brousing and video streaming. I would be a new/first time user.










share|improve this question















This question already has an answer here:




  • Why is there no 32 bit ISO for the new Ubuntu 18.04?

    4 answers



  • How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements?

    8 answers




What download if any should I use on an old Dell dimension B110? I believe it is a 32 bit machine. The old XP software is corrupted and I would like to try a desktop version of Ubuntu or something similar just for online brousing and video streaming. I would be a new/first time user.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Why is there no 32 bit ISO for the new Ubuntu 18.04?

    4 answers



  • How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements?

    8 answers








downloads






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 8 at 2:38









Kurt486Kurt486

61




61




marked as duplicate by karel, guiverc, user535733, Melebius, N0rbert Jan 8 at 8:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by karel, guiverc, user535733, Melebius, N0rbert Jan 8 at 8:03


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 3





    Possible duplicate of How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements? Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Pay attention to the amount of RAM. You'll need at least 512MB of RAM.

    – karel
    Jan 8 at 3:04













  • Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. I don't know your cpu/machine , but from what I see in thomasrutter's answer, I would suggest a lighter flavor of Ubuntu, such as Lubuntu or Xubuntu. They contain the same Ubuntu based, but Lubuntu contains the LXDE interface (assuming you use Lubuntu 18.04 LTS or the long-term-support release, and not Lubuntu 18.10) or XFCE (Xubuntu 18.04 LTS). I'm suggesting LTS or long-term-support releases as they have three (3) years of support, longer than the 9 months of for example Lubuntu/Xubuntu 18.10. Ubuntu releases are yy.mm in format, so 18.04 = 2018.April release

    – guiverc
    Jan 8 at 3:05











  • As for which is best for you, your own tastes will have a huge influence on that. LXDE approaches the GUI (graphical user interface) one way, XFCE slightly different. It's this 'gui' or desktop that makes it different to the much heavier GNOME default in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. GNOME uses more memory, more cpu cycles so will appear slower than LXDE or XFCE. Even if you have a fast modern machine, some people still prefer the lighter DEsktops just because they love the speed of them. Your machine's memory may also influence the best for you, but download, write to ISO & try for yourself.

    – guiverc
    Jan 8 at 3:08











  • B110 came with 512MB RAM as standard. Should be fine for desktop Ubuntu, though obviously more is better. Maybe it's already been upgraded.

    – thomasrutter
    Jan 8 at 4:13
















  • 3





    Possible duplicate of How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements? Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Pay attention to the amount of RAM. You'll need at least 512MB of RAM.

    – karel
    Jan 8 at 3:04













  • Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. I don't know your cpu/machine , but from what I see in thomasrutter's answer, I would suggest a lighter flavor of Ubuntu, such as Lubuntu or Xubuntu. They contain the same Ubuntu based, but Lubuntu contains the LXDE interface (assuming you use Lubuntu 18.04 LTS or the long-term-support release, and not Lubuntu 18.10) or XFCE (Xubuntu 18.04 LTS). I'm suggesting LTS or long-term-support releases as they have three (3) years of support, longer than the 9 months of for example Lubuntu/Xubuntu 18.10. Ubuntu releases are yy.mm in format, so 18.04 = 2018.April release

    – guiverc
    Jan 8 at 3:05











  • As for which is best for you, your own tastes will have a huge influence on that. LXDE approaches the GUI (graphical user interface) one way, XFCE slightly different. It's this 'gui' or desktop that makes it different to the much heavier GNOME default in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. GNOME uses more memory, more cpu cycles so will appear slower than LXDE or XFCE. Even if you have a fast modern machine, some people still prefer the lighter DEsktops just because they love the speed of them. Your machine's memory may also influence the best for you, but download, write to ISO & try for yourself.

    – guiverc
    Jan 8 at 3:08











  • B110 came with 512MB RAM as standard. Should be fine for desktop Ubuntu, though obviously more is better. Maybe it's already been upgraded.

    – thomasrutter
    Jan 8 at 4:13










3




3





Possible duplicate of How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements? Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Pay attention to the amount of RAM. You'll need at least 512MB of RAM.

– karel
Jan 8 at 3:04







Possible duplicate of How do I find out which version and derivative of Ubuntu is right for my hardware in terms of minimal system requirements? Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. Pay attention to the amount of RAM. You'll need at least 512MB of RAM.

– karel
Jan 8 at 3:04















Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. I don't know your cpu/machine , but from what I see in thomasrutter's answer, I would suggest a lighter flavor of Ubuntu, such as Lubuntu or Xubuntu. They contain the same Ubuntu based, but Lubuntu contains the LXDE interface (assuming you use Lubuntu 18.04 LTS or the long-term-support release, and not Lubuntu 18.10) or XFCE (Xubuntu 18.04 LTS). I'm suggesting LTS or long-term-support releases as they have three (3) years of support, longer than the 9 months of for example Lubuntu/Xubuntu 18.10. Ubuntu releases are yy.mm in format, so 18.04 = 2018.April release

– guiverc
Jan 8 at 3:05





Welcome to Ask Ubuntu. I don't know your cpu/machine , but from what I see in thomasrutter's answer, I would suggest a lighter flavor of Ubuntu, such as Lubuntu or Xubuntu. They contain the same Ubuntu based, but Lubuntu contains the LXDE interface (assuming you use Lubuntu 18.04 LTS or the long-term-support release, and not Lubuntu 18.10) or XFCE (Xubuntu 18.04 LTS). I'm suggesting LTS or long-term-support releases as they have three (3) years of support, longer than the 9 months of for example Lubuntu/Xubuntu 18.10. Ubuntu releases are yy.mm in format, so 18.04 = 2018.April release

– guiverc
Jan 8 at 3:05













As for which is best for you, your own tastes will have a huge influence on that. LXDE approaches the GUI (graphical user interface) one way, XFCE slightly different. It's this 'gui' or desktop that makes it different to the much heavier GNOME default in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. GNOME uses more memory, more cpu cycles so will appear slower than LXDE or XFCE. Even if you have a fast modern machine, some people still prefer the lighter DEsktops just because they love the speed of them. Your machine's memory may also influence the best for you, but download, write to ISO & try for yourself.

– guiverc
Jan 8 at 3:08





As for which is best for you, your own tastes will have a huge influence on that. LXDE approaches the GUI (graphical user interface) one way, XFCE slightly different. It's this 'gui' or desktop that makes it different to the much heavier GNOME default in Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. GNOME uses more memory, more cpu cycles so will appear slower than LXDE or XFCE. Even if you have a fast modern machine, some people still prefer the lighter DEsktops just because they love the speed of them. Your machine's memory may also influence the best for you, but download, write to ISO & try for yourself.

– guiverc
Jan 8 at 3:08













B110 came with 512MB RAM as standard. Should be fine for desktop Ubuntu, though obviously more is better. Maybe it's already been upgraded.

– thomasrutter
Jan 8 at 4:13







B110 came with 512MB RAM as standard. Should be fine for desktop Ubuntu, though obviously more is better. Maybe it's already been upgraded.

– thomasrutter
Jan 8 at 4:13












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Your computer has an Intel Celeron D 325 processor which indeed only has a 32-bit instruction set. You can download a 32-bit installer image from the alternative downloads page under "Network installer". It's called a Network installer to distinguish it from the Live installer, which boots to a live Ubuntu installation, and because it loads its packages from the internet as it installs so it requires a network connection. The Live installer is no longer available for 32-bit Ubuntu.



https://www.ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads



You'll want the "i386" architecture, and then download the .iso file, which is around 50 MB.



Note: the .iso files are intended to be burned as images to a CD, but if you don't have a CD drive you can write it as a raw image to a USB stick and it should work as long as you can boot from USB devices, as it is a hybrid image. How you do this depends on your OS.






share|improve this answer

































    0














    To be honest, that was a pretty low end system. I have my doubts as to how well any flavor of Ubuntu may run on it. If you find it to be a poor experience, you may do better with something like Q4OS, which is really aimed at bringing modern software advancements to such low-end systems.



    I'm impressed you've been able to keep it running this long.






    share|improve this answer






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      Your computer has an Intel Celeron D 325 processor which indeed only has a 32-bit instruction set. You can download a 32-bit installer image from the alternative downloads page under "Network installer". It's called a Network installer to distinguish it from the Live installer, which boots to a live Ubuntu installation, and because it loads its packages from the internet as it installs so it requires a network connection. The Live installer is no longer available for 32-bit Ubuntu.



      https://www.ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads



      You'll want the "i386" architecture, and then download the .iso file, which is around 50 MB.



      Note: the .iso files are intended to be burned as images to a CD, but if you don't have a CD drive you can write it as a raw image to a USB stick and it should work as long as you can boot from USB devices, as it is a hybrid image. How you do this depends on your OS.






      share|improve this answer






























        2














        Your computer has an Intel Celeron D 325 processor which indeed only has a 32-bit instruction set. You can download a 32-bit installer image from the alternative downloads page under "Network installer". It's called a Network installer to distinguish it from the Live installer, which boots to a live Ubuntu installation, and because it loads its packages from the internet as it installs so it requires a network connection. The Live installer is no longer available for 32-bit Ubuntu.



        https://www.ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads



        You'll want the "i386" architecture, and then download the .iso file, which is around 50 MB.



        Note: the .iso files are intended to be burned as images to a CD, but if you don't have a CD drive you can write it as a raw image to a USB stick and it should work as long as you can boot from USB devices, as it is a hybrid image. How you do this depends on your OS.






        share|improve this answer




























          2












          2








          2







          Your computer has an Intel Celeron D 325 processor which indeed only has a 32-bit instruction set. You can download a 32-bit installer image from the alternative downloads page under "Network installer". It's called a Network installer to distinguish it from the Live installer, which boots to a live Ubuntu installation, and because it loads its packages from the internet as it installs so it requires a network connection. The Live installer is no longer available for 32-bit Ubuntu.



          https://www.ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads



          You'll want the "i386" architecture, and then download the .iso file, which is around 50 MB.



          Note: the .iso files are intended to be burned as images to a CD, but if you don't have a CD drive you can write it as a raw image to a USB stick and it should work as long as you can boot from USB devices, as it is a hybrid image. How you do this depends on your OS.






          share|improve this answer















          Your computer has an Intel Celeron D 325 processor which indeed only has a 32-bit instruction set. You can download a 32-bit installer image from the alternative downloads page under "Network installer". It's called a Network installer to distinguish it from the Live installer, which boots to a live Ubuntu installation, and because it loads its packages from the internet as it installs so it requires a network connection. The Live installer is no longer available for 32-bit Ubuntu.



          https://www.ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads



          You'll want the "i386" architecture, and then download the .iso file, which is around 50 MB.



          Note: the .iso files are intended to be burned as images to a CD, but if you don't have a CD drive you can write it as a raw image to a USB stick and it should work as long as you can boot from USB devices, as it is a hybrid image. How you do this depends on your OS.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 8 at 8:05









          N0rbert

          22.1k547104




          22.1k547104










          answered Jan 8 at 2:58









          thomasrutterthomasrutter

          26.6k46389




          26.6k46389

























              0














              To be honest, that was a pretty low end system. I have my doubts as to how well any flavor of Ubuntu may run on it. If you find it to be a poor experience, you may do better with something like Q4OS, which is really aimed at bringing modern software advancements to such low-end systems.



              I'm impressed you've been able to keep it running this long.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                To be honest, that was a pretty low end system. I have my doubts as to how well any flavor of Ubuntu may run on it. If you find it to be a poor experience, you may do better with something like Q4OS, which is really aimed at bringing modern software advancements to such low-end systems.



                I'm impressed you've been able to keep it running this long.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  To be honest, that was a pretty low end system. I have my doubts as to how well any flavor of Ubuntu may run on it. If you find it to be a poor experience, you may do better with something like Q4OS, which is really aimed at bringing modern software advancements to such low-end systems.



                  I'm impressed you've been able to keep it running this long.






                  share|improve this answer













                  To be honest, that was a pretty low end system. I have my doubts as to how well any flavor of Ubuntu may run on it. If you find it to be a poor experience, you may do better with something like Q4OS, which is really aimed at bringing modern software advancements to such low-end systems.



                  I'm impressed you've been able to keep it running this long.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 8 at 4:26









                  SturgeSturge

                  112




                  112















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                      Mangá

                       ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕