Kubuntu 18.04.1 decreasing network speed after some update











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












On fresh installed system the internet speed approaching the expected values (250/20 Mbit/s). After some update (it is about 1-2 weeks) the download speed lose to ~ 20 Mbit/s.



This phenomenon is exist on both older and newer kernels. Same software environment but different hardware component, then the problem has occurred. That this means for me this phenomena is not caused by hardware problem.



What can cause this and how can it be solved?



You see below output of some network debug commands:



lshw: 
[...]
*-network
description: Ethernet interface
product: Ethernet Connection (7) I219-V
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1f.6
bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.6
logical name: eno1
version: 10
serial: e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
size: 100Mbit/s
capacity: 1Gbit/s
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
configuration: autonegotiation=off broadcast=yes driver=e1000e driverversion=3.2.6-k duplex=half firmware=0.5-4 ip=192.168.0.14 latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=twisted pair speed=100Mbit/s
resources: irq:128 memory:a1100000-a111ffff
[...]


adam@adam-desktop:~$ dmesg | grep eno1
[ 4.412467] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: renamed from eth0
[ 10.606625] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
[ 10.804270] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
[ 13.702582] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
[ 13.702691] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
[ 19.841054] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
[ 19.841058] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
[ 904.341772] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Down
[ 904.377333] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
[ 904.575156] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
[ 909.151672] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
[ 909.151681] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
[ 909.153598] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
[ 8147.365327] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
[ 8147.385753] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
[ 8400.493539] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
[ 8400.588167] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
[ 8401.976052] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
[ 8402.010766] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
[ 8421.085114] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
[ 8421.156676] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
[ 9015.405834] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
[ 9097.114836] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
[ 9097.128537] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
[10753.364676] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
[10998.288485] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
[10998.303859] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
[11197.966575] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
[13418.385002] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Down
[13418.481160] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
[13418.682810] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
[13422.959394] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
[13422.959402] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
[13422.961318] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready


adam@adam-desktop:~$ ethtool -i eno1
driver: e1000e
version: 3.2.6-k
firmware-version: 0.5-4
expansion-rom-version:
bus-info: 0000:00:1f.6
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom-access: yes
supports-register-dump: yes
supports-priv-flags: no









share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    On fresh installed system the internet speed approaching the expected values (250/20 Mbit/s). After some update (it is about 1-2 weeks) the download speed lose to ~ 20 Mbit/s.



    This phenomenon is exist on both older and newer kernels. Same software environment but different hardware component, then the problem has occurred. That this means for me this phenomena is not caused by hardware problem.



    What can cause this and how can it be solved?



    You see below output of some network debug commands:



    lshw: 
    [...]
    *-network
    description: Ethernet interface
    product: Ethernet Connection (7) I219-V
    vendor: Intel Corporation
    physical id: 1f.6
    bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.6
    logical name: eno1
    version: 10
    serial: e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
    size: 100Mbit/s
    capacity: 1Gbit/s
    width: 32 bits
    clock: 33MHz
    capabilities: bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
    configuration: autonegotiation=off broadcast=yes driver=e1000e driverversion=3.2.6-k duplex=half firmware=0.5-4 ip=192.168.0.14 latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=twisted pair speed=100Mbit/s
    resources: irq:128 memory:a1100000-a111ffff
    [...]


    adam@adam-desktop:~$ dmesg | grep eno1
    [ 4.412467] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: renamed from eth0
    [ 10.606625] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
    [ 10.804270] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
    [ 13.702582] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
    [ 13.702691] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
    [ 19.841054] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
    [ 19.841058] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
    [ 904.341772] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Down
    [ 904.377333] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
    [ 904.575156] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
    [ 909.151672] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
    [ 909.151681] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
    [ 909.153598] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
    [ 8147.365327] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
    [ 8147.385753] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
    [ 8400.493539] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
    [ 8400.588167] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
    [ 8401.976052] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
    [ 8402.010766] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
    [ 8421.085114] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
    [ 8421.156676] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
    [ 9015.405834] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
    [ 9097.114836] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
    [ 9097.128537] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
    [10753.364676] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
    [10998.288485] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
    [10998.303859] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
    [11197.966575] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
    [13418.385002] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Down
    [13418.481160] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
    [13418.682810] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
    [13422.959394] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
    [13422.959402] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
    [13422.961318] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready


    adam@adam-desktop:~$ ethtool -i eno1
    driver: e1000e
    version: 3.2.6-k
    firmware-version: 0.5-4
    expansion-rom-version:
    bus-info: 0000:00:1f.6
    supports-statistics: yes
    supports-test: yes
    supports-eeprom-access: yes
    supports-register-dump: yes
    supports-priv-flags: no









    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      On fresh installed system the internet speed approaching the expected values (250/20 Mbit/s). After some update (it is about 1-2 weeks) the download speed lose to ~ 20 Mbit/s.



      This phenomenon is exist on both older and newer kernels. Same software environment but different hardware component, then the problem has occurred. That this means for me this phenomena is not caused by hardware problem.



      What can cause this and how can it be solved?



      You see below output of some network debug commands:



      lshw: 
      [...]
      *-network
      description: Ethernet interface
      product: Ethernet Connection (7) I219-V
      vendor: Intel Corporation
      physical id: 1f.6
      bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.6
      logical name: eno1
      version: 10
      serial: e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
      size: 100Mbit/s
      capacity: 1Gbit/s
      width: 32 bits
      clock: 33MHz
      capabilities: bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
      configuration: autonegotiation=off broadcast=yes driver=e1000e driverversion=3.2.6-k duplex=half firmware=0.5-4 ip=192.168.0.14 latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=twisted pair speed=100Mbit/s
      resources: irq:128 memory:a1100000-a111ffff
      [...]


      adam@adam-desktop:~$ dmesg | grep eno1
      [ 4.412467] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: renamed from eth0
      [ 10.606625] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [ 10.804270] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [ 13.702582] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
      [ 13.702691] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
      [ 19.841054] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
      [ 19.841058] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
      [ 904.341772] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Down
      [ 904.377333] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [ 904.575156] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [ 909.151672] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
      [ 909.151681] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
      [ 909.153598] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
      [ 8147.365327] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
      [ 8147.385753] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [ 8400.493539] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [ 8400.588167] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [ 8401.976052] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [ 8402.010766] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [ 8421.085114] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [ 8421.156676] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [ 9015.405834] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [ 9097.114836] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
      [ 9097.128537] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [10753.364676] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [10998.288485] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
      [10998.303859] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [11197.966575] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [13418.385002] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Down
      [13418.481160] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [13418.682810] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [13422.959394] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
      [13422.959402] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
      [13422.961318] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready


      adam@adam-desktop:~$ ethtool -i eno1
      driver: e1000e
      version: 3.2.6-k
      firmware-version: 0.5-4
      expansion-rom-version:
      bus-info: 0000:00:1f.6
      supports-statistics: yes
      supports-test: yes
      supports-eeprom-access: yes
      supports-register-dump: yes
      supports-priv-flags: no









      share|improve this question













      On fresh installed system the internet speed approaching the expected values (250/20 Mbit/s). After some update (it is about 1-2 weeks) the download speed lose to ~ 20 Mbit/s.



      This phenomenon is exist on both older and newer kernels. Same software environment but different hardware component, then the problem has occurred. That this means for me this phenomena is not caused by hardware problem.



      What can cause this and how can it be solved?



      You see below output of some network debug commands:



      lshw: 
      [...]
      *-network
      description: Ethernet interface
      product: Ethernet Connection (7) I219-V
      vendor: Intel Corporation
      physical id: 1f.6
      bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.6
      logical name: eno1
      version: 10
      serial: e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
      size: 100Mbit/s
      capacity: 1Gbit/s
      width: 32 bits
      clock: 33MHz
      capabilities: bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
      configuration: autonegotiation=off broadcast=yes driver=e1000e driverversion=3.2.6-k duplex=half firmware=0.5-4 ip=192.168.0.14 latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=twisted pair speed=100Mbit/s
      resources: irq:128 memory:a1100000-a111ffff
      [...]


      adam@adam-desktop:~$ dmesg | grep eno1
      [ 4.412467] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: renamed from eth0
      [ 10.606625] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [ 10.804270] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [ 13.702582] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
      [ 13.702691] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
      [ 19.841054] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
      [ 19.841058] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
      [ 904.341772] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Down
      [ 904.377333] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [ 904.575156] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [ 909.151672] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
      [ 909.151681] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
      [ 909.153598] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready
      [ 8147.365327] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
      [ 8147.385753] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [ 8400.493539] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [ 8400.588167] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [ 8401.976052] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [ 8402.010766] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [ 8421.085114] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [ 8421.156676] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [ 9015.405834] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [ 9097.114836] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
      [ 9097.128537] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [10753.364676] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [10998.288485] VBoxNetFlt: attached to 'eno1' / e0:d5:5e:d8:80:d0
      [10998.303859] device eno1 entered promiscuous mode
      [11197.966575] device eno1 left promiscuous mode
      [13418.385002] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Down
      [13418.481160] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [13418.682810] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eno1: link is not ready
      [13422.959394] e1000e: eno1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
      [13422.959402] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
      [13422.961318] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eno1: link becomes ready


      adam@adam-desktop:~$ ethtool -i eno1
      driver: e1000e
      version: 3.2.6-k
      firmware-version: 0.5-4
      expansion-rom-version:
      bus-info: 0000:00:1f.6
      supports-statistics: yes
      supports-test: yes
      supports-eeprom-access: yes
      supports-register-dump: yes
      supports-priv-flags: no






      18.04 kubuntu nic






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 3 at 11:55









      Adam P.

      114




      114



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1098126%2fkubuntu-18-04-1-decreasing-network-speed-after-some-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1098126%2fkubuntu-18-04-1-decreasing-network-speed-after-some-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

          Mangá

           ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕