The cotangent bundle of a non-compact Riemann surface











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Suppose that $M$ is a non-compact Riemann surface obtained by removing several points from a compact one. It is known that the holomorphic cotangent bundle of $M$ is trivial. Therefore there exists a holomorphic 1-form $omega$ that does not have any zeroes on $M$. I am interested to know whether we can find an exact 1-form $omega=df$, where $f$ is some holomorphic function on $M$, such that $omega$ does not have zeroes on $M$.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose that $M$ is a non-compact Riemann surface obtained by removing several points from a compact one. It is known that the holomorphic cotangent bundle of $M$ is trivial. Therefore there exists a holomorphic 1-form $omega$ that does not have any zeroes on $M$. I am interested to know whether we can find an exact 1-form $omega=df$, where $f$ is some holomorphic function on $M$, such that $omega$ does not have zeroes on $M$.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose that $M$ is a non-compact Riemann surface obtained by removing several points from a compact one. It is known that the holomorphic cotangent bundle of $M$ is trivial. Therefore there exists a holomorphic 1-form $omega$ that does not have any zeroes on $M$. I am interested to know whether we can find an exact 1-form $omega=df$, where $f$ is some holomorphic function on $M$, such that $omega$ does not have zeroes on $M$.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Suppose that $M$ is a non-compact Riemann surface obtained by removing several points from a compact one. It is known that the holomorphic cotangent bundle of $M$ is trivial. Therefore there exists a holomorphic 1-form $omega$ that does not have any zeroes on $M$. I am interested to know whether we can find an exact 1-form $omega=df$, where $f$ is some holomorphic function on $M$, such that $omega$ does not have zeroes on $M$.







      ag.algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 5 at 3:34









      Todor

      561




      561






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          10
          down vote













          Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:



          R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
          Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
            – David E Speyer
            Dec 5 at 19:30










          • @David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
            – Alexandre Eremenko
            Dec 6 at 0:13











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316925%2fthe-cotangent-bundle-of-a-non-compact-riemann-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          10
          down vote













          Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:



          R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
          Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
            – David E Speyer
            Dec 5 at 19:30










          • @David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
            – Alexandre Eremenko
            Dec 6 at 0:13















          up vote
          10
          down vote













          Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:



          R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
          Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
            – David E Speyer
            Dec 5 at 19:30










          • @David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
            – Alexandre Eremenko
            Dec 6 at 0:13













          up vote
          10
          down vote










          up vote
          10
          down vote









          Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:



          R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
          Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Such $f$ exists on every open Riemann surface:



          R.C. Gunning and R. Narasimhan. Immersion of open Riemann surfaces.
          Math. Ann., 174:103–108, 1967.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 5 at 18:48

























          answered Dec 5 at 4:18









          Alexandre Eremenko

          48.9k6136253




          48.9k6136253








          • 1




            We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
            – David E Speyer
            Dec 5 at 19:30










          • @David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
            – Alexandre Eremenko
            Dec 6 at 0:13














          • 1




            We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
            – David E Speyer
            Dec 5 at 19:30










          • @David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
            – Alexandre Eremenko
            Dec 6 at 0:13








          1




          1




          We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
          – David E Speyer
          Dec 5 at 19:30




          We discussed this paper at mathoverflow.net/questions/287275
          – David E Speyer
          Dec 5 at 19:30












          @David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
          – Alexandre Eremenko
          Dec 6 at 0:13




          @David E Speyer: Thanks for reminding. I remembered that I learned about this paper from MO, but no exact context.
          – Alexandre Eremenko
          Dec 6 at 0:13


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316925%2fthe-cotangent-bundle-of-a-non-compact-riemann-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

          Mangá

           ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕