Limit at infinity for complex functions












3












$begingroup$


Suppose $f$ is entire and $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$. Show that $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$.



First of all I don't really understand this question. I know $ztoinfty$ means $|z|toinfty$, but what does $f(z)toinfty$ means? Does it mean $|f(z)|to infty$? Also, I just learnt about the one point compactification $infty$ to the complex plane. So the reason we write $ztoinfty$ instead of $|z|to infty$ is because we are referring to $infty$ as a point in the extended complex plane $bar{mathbb{C}}$? So $f(z)toinfty$ is also referring to $infty$ in $bar{mathbb{C}}$?






complex-analysis







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Suppose $f$ is entire and $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$. Show that $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$.



    First of all I don't really understand this question. I know $ztoinfty$ means $|z|toinfty$, but what does $f(z)toinfty$ means? Does it mean $|f(z)|to infty$? Also, I just learnt about the one point compactification $infty$ to the complex plane. So the reason we write $ztoinfty$ instead of $|z|to infty$ is because we are referring to $infty$ as a point in the extended complex plane $bar{mathbb{C}}$? So $f(z)toinfty$ is also referring to $infty$ in $bar{mathbb{C}}$?






    complex-analysis







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      Suppose $f$ is entire and $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$. Show that $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$.



      First of all I don't really understand this question. I know $ztoinfty$ means $|z|toinfty$, but what does $f(z)toinfty$ means? Does it mean $|f(z)|to infty$? Also, I just learnt about the one point compactification $infty$ to the complex plane. So the reason we write $ztoinfty$ instead of $|z|to infty$ is because we are referring to $infty$ as a point in the extended complex plane $bar{mathbb{C}}$? So $f(z)toinfty$ is also referring to $infty$ in $bar{mathbb{C}}$?






      complex-analysis







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose $f$ is entire and $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$. Show that $f(mathbb{C})=mathbb{C}$.



      First of all I don't really understand this question. I know $ztoinfty$ means $|z|toinfty$, but what does $f(z)toinfty$ means? Does it mean $|f(z)|to infty$? Also, I just learnt about the one point compactification $infty$ to the complex plane. So the reason we write $ztoinfty$ instead of $|z|to infty$ is because we are referring to $infty$ as a point in the extended complex plane $bar{mathbb{C}}$? So $f(z)toinfty$ is also referring to $infty$ in $bar{mathbb{C}}$?






      complex-analysis




      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 38 mins ago









      Fluffy SkyeFluffy Skye

      1459




      1459






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          The niceties of the one-point compactification of $Bbb C$ aside, consider:



          $f(z) ne w, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 1$



          $f(z) - w ne 0, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 2$



          $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is then entire; since



          $f(z) to infty ; text{as} ; z to infty tag 3$



          $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is bounded; hence by Liouville's theorem, constant; but then we cannot have (3); thus (1) fails.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Nice answer! +1 vote.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            18 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            @KaviRamaMurthy: quite a complement, considering the source! Cheers!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Lewis
            17 mins ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          The statement $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$ means $|f(z)|to infty$ as $|z|toinfty$. It can be seen as convergence to $infty inBbb C_infty$ where $Bbb C_infty$ is a one-point compactification of $Bbb C$. In fact, this property implies that $f(z)=p(z)$ for some non-constant polynomial $p$. By fundamental theorem of algebra, it follows $f(Bbb C)=Bbb C$. To see this, let
          $
          g(z)=f(frac1{z})
          $           for $zne 0$. Since $lim_{zto 0}|g(z)|=infty$ (which is true because as $zto 0$, $1/z to infty$ and $g(z)=f(1/z)toinfty$ by the assumption), it follows that $g$ has an $n$-th pole at $0$, i.e. for some $nge 1$, $a_{-n}ne 0$ and for all $zne 0$,
          $$
          g(z)=sum_{k=-n}^infty a_kz^k.
          $$           (Here, $g$ having a pole is a classical result. Since $1/g$ tends to $0$ as $zto 0$, it has a removable singularity at $0$, which is also an $n$-th zero. It follows $1/g(z)=z^nh(z)$ for some $hne 0$ on a neighborhood of $0$. So $g(z) = z^{-n}frac1{h(z)}$ has an $n$-th pole.) Thus $f(z)=g(frac1{z})=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k +sum_{i>0}a_{i}z^{-i}$, and since $f$ is entire, it follows $$f(z)=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k=p(z).$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The statement right after $lim_{z to 0} |g(z)| = infty$ is not that clear to me. It would require more arguments.
            $endgroup$
            – nicomezi
            12 mins ago










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you but I was rather talking about what is after that limit (the fact that $g$ has an $n$-th pole). I am not saying it is false. Since we have the limit on $f$ at $infty$ it cannot be an essential singularity. But it seems quite hard (compared to others answers) to write this rigorously.
            $endgroup$
            – nicomezi
            7 mins ago





















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $g(z):=f(1/z)$ for $z ne 0$. Then $g$ has at $0$ an isolated singularity. Since $g(z) to infty$ as $z to 0$, $g$ has a pole at $0$.



          Let $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_nz^n$, then the Laurent expansion of $g$ at $0$ is given by



          $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n frac{1}{z^n}$, which shows that there is $m$ such that $a_n=0$ for $n>m$.



          Hence $f$ is a non- constant poynomial. Now use the fundamental theorem of algebra.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3125734%2flimit-at-infinity-for-complex-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            The niceties of the one-point compactification of $Bbb C$ aside, consider:



            $f(z) ne w, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 1$



            $f(z) - w ne 0, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 2$



            $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is then entire; since



            $f(z) to infty ; text{as} ; z to infty tag 3$



            $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is bounded; hence by Liouville's theorem, constant; but then we cannot have (3); thus (1) fails.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nice answer! +1 vote.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              18 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @KaviRamaMurthy: quite a complement, considering the source! Cheers!
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Lewis
              17 mins ago
















            4












            $begingroup$

            The niceties of the one-point compactification of $Bbb C$ aside, consider:



            $f(z) ne w, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 1$



            $f(z) - w ne 0, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 2$



            $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is then entire; since



            $f(z) to infty ; text{as} ; z to infty tag 3$



            $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is bounded; hence by Liouville's theorem, constant; but then we cannot have (3); thus (1) fails.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nice answer! +1 vote.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              18 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @KaviRamaMurthy: quite a complement, considering the source! Cheers!
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Lewis
              17 mins ago














            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            The niceties of the one-point compactification of $Bbb C$ aside, consider:



            $f(z) ne w, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 1$



            $f(z) - w ne 0, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 2$



            $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is then entire; since



            $f(z) to infty ; text{as} ; z to infty tag 3$



            $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is bounded; hence by Liouville's theorem, constant; but then we cannot have (3); thus (1) fails.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The niceties of the one-point compactification of $Bbb C$ aside, consider:



            $f(z) ne w, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 1$



            $f(z) - w ne 0, ; forall z in Bbb C; tag 2$



            $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is then entire; since



            $f(z) to infty ; text{as} ; z to infty tag 3$



            $(f(z) - w)^{-1}$ is bounded; hence by Liouville's theorem, constant; but then we cannot have (3); thus (1) fails.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 19 mins ago









            Robert LewisRobert Lewis

            47.1k23067




            47.1k23067








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nice answer! +1 vote.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              18 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @KaviRamaMurthy: quite a complement, considering the source! Cheers!
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Lewis
              17 mins ago














            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Nice answer! +1 vote.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              18 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @KaviRamaMurthy: quite a complement, considering the source! Cheers!
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Lewis
              17 mins ago








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Nice answer! +1 vote.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            18 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Nice answer! +1 vote.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            18 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            @KaviRamaMurthy: quite a complement, considering the source! Cheers!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Lewis
            17 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @KaviRamaMurthy: quite a complement, considering the source! Cheers!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Lewis
            17 mins ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            The statement $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$ means $|f(z)|to infty$ as $|z|toinfty$. It can be seen as convergence to $infty inBbb C_infty$ where $Bbb C_infty$ is a one-point compactification of $Bbb C$. In fact, this property implies that $f(z)=p(z)$ for some non-constant polynomial $p$. By fundamental theorem of algebra, it follows $f(Bbb C)=Bbb C$. To see this, let
            $
            g(z)=f(frac1{z})
            $             for $zne 0$. Since $lim_{zto 0}|g(z)|=infty$ (which is true because as $zto 0$, $1/z to infty$ and $g(z)=f(1/z)toinfty$ by the assumption), it follows that $g$ has an $n$-th pole at $0$, i.e. for some $nge 1$, $a_{-n}ne 0$ and for all $zne 0$,
            $$
            g(z)=sum_{k=-n}^infty a_kz^k.
            $$             (Here, $g$ having a pole is a classical result. Since $1/g$ tends to $0$ as $zto 0$, it has a removable singularity at $0$, which is also an $n$-th zero. It follows $1/g(z)=z^nh(z)$ for some $hne 0$ on a neighborhood of $0$. So $g(z) = z^{-n}frac1{h(z)}$ has an $n$-th pole.) Thus $f(z)=g(frac1{z})=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k +sum_{i>0}a_{i}z^{-i}$, and since $f$ is entire, it follows $$f(z)=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k=p(z).$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The statement right after $lim_{z to 0} |g(z)| = infty$ is not that clear to me. It would require more arguments.
              $endgroup$
              – nicomezi
              12 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you but I was rather talking about what is after that limit (the fact that $g$ has an $n$-th pole). I am not saying it is false. Since we have the limit on $f$ at $infty$ it cannot be an essential singularity. But it seems quite hard (compared to others answers) to write this rigorously.
              $endgroup$
              – nicomezi
              7 mins ago


















            1












            $begingroup$

            The statement $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$ means $|f(z)|to infty$ as $|z|toinfty$. It can be seen as convergence to $infty inBbb C_infty$ where $Bbb C_infty$ is a one-point compactification of $Bbb C$. In fact, this property implies that $f(z)=p(z)$ for some non-constant polynomial $p$. By fundamental theorem of algebra, it follows $f(Bbb C)=Bbb C$. To see this, let
            $
            g(z)=f(frac1{z})
            $             for $zne 0$. Since $lim_{zto 0}|g(z)|=infty$ (which is true because as $zto 0$, $1/z to infty$ and $g(z)=f(1/z)toinfty$ by the assumption), it follows that $g$ has an $n$-th pole at $0$, i.e. for some $nge 1$, $a_{-n}ne 0$ and for all $zne 0$,
            $$
            g(z)=sum_{k=-n}^infty a_kz^k.
            $$             (Here, $g$ having a pole is a classical result. Since $1/g$ tends to $0$ as $zto 0$, it has a removable singularity at $0$, which is also an $n$-th zero. It follows $1/g(z)=z^nh(z)$ for some $hne 0$ on a neighborhood of $0$. So $g(z) = z^{-n}frac1{h(z)}$ has an $n$-th pole.) Thus $f(z)=g(frac1{z})=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k +sum_{i>0}a_{i}z^{-i}$, and since $f$ is entire, it follows $$f(z)=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k=p(z).$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              The statement right after $lim_{z to 0} |g(z)| = infty$ is not that clear to me. It would require more arguments.
              $endgroup$
              – nicomezi
              12 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you but I was rather talking about what is after that limit (the fact that $g$ has an $n$-th pole). I am not saying it is false. Since we have the limit on $f$ at $infty$ it cannot be an essential singularity. But it seems quite hard (compared to others answers) to write this rigorously.
              $endgroup$
              – nicomezi
              7 mins ago
















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            The statement $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$ means $|f(z)|to infty$ as $|z|toinfty$. It can be seen as convergence to $infty inBbb C_infty$ where $Bbb C_infty$ is a one-point compactification of $Bbb C$. In fact, this property implies that $f(z)=p(z)$ for some non-constant polynomial $p$. By fundamental theorem of algebra, it follows $f(Bbb C)=Bbb C$. To see this, let
            $
            g(z)=f(frac1{z})
            $             for $zne 0$. Since $lim_{zto 0}|g(z)|=infty$ (which is true because as $zto 0$, $1/z to infty$ and $g(z)=f(1/z)toinfty$ by the assumption), it follows that $g$ has an $n$-th pole at $0$, i.e. for some $nge 1$, $a_{-n}ne 0$ and for all $zne 0$,
            $$
            g(z)=sum_{k=-n}^infty a_kz^k.
            $$             (Here, $g$ having a pole is a classical result. Since $1/g$ tends to $0$ as $zto 0$, it has a removable singularity at $0$, which is also an $n$-th zero. It follows $1/g(z)=z^nh(z)$ for some $hne 0$ on a neighborhood of $0$. So $g(z) = z^{-n}frac1{h(z)}$ has an $n$-th pole.) Thus $f(z)=g(frac1{z})=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k +sum_{i>0}a_{i}z^{-i}$, and since $f$ is entire, it follows $$f(z)=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k=p(z).$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The statement $lim_{ztoinfty}f(z)=infty$ means $|f(z)|to infty$ as $|z|toinfty$. It can be seen as convergence to $infty inBbb C_infty$ where $Bbb C_infty$ is a one-point compactification of $Bbb C$. In fact, this property implies that $f(z)=p(z)$ for some non-constant polynomial $p$. By fundamental theorem of algebra, it follows $f(Bbb C)=Bbb C$. To see this, let
            $
            g(z)=f(frac1{z})
            $             for $zne 0$. Since $lim_{zto 0}|g(z)|=infty$ (which is true because as $zto 0$, $1/z to infty$ and $g(z)=f(1/z)toinfty$ by the assumption), it follows that $g$ has an $n$-th pole at $0$, i.e. for some $nge 1$, $a_{-n}ne 0$ and for all $zne 0$,
            $$
            g(z)=sum_{k=-n}^infty a_kz^k.
            $$             (Here, $g$ having a pole is a classical result. Since $1/g$ tends to $0$ as $zto 0$, it has a removable singularity at $0$, which is also an $n$-th zero. It follows $1/g(z)=z^nh(z)$ for some $hne 0$ on a neighborhood of $0$. So $g(z) = z^{-n}frac1{h(z)}$ has an $n$-th pole.) Thus $f(z)=g(frac1{z})=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k +sum_{i>0}a_{i}z^{-i}$, and since $f$ is entire, it follows $$f(z)=sum_{k=0}^n a_{-k}z^k=p(z).$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 min ago

























            answered 26 mins ago









            SongSong

            14.9k1635




            14.9k1635












            • $begingroup$
              The statement right after $lim_{z to 0} |g(z)| = infty$ is not that clear to me. It would require more arguments.
              $endgroup$
              – nicomezi
              12 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you but I was rather talking about what is after that limit (the fact that $g$ has an $n$-th pole). I am not saying it is false. Since we have the limit on $f$ at $infty$ it cannot be an essential singularity. But it seems quite hard (compared to others answers) to write this rigorously.
              $endgroup$
              – nicomezi
              7 mins ago




















            • $begingroup$
              The statement right after $lim_{z to 0} |g(z)| = infty$ is not that clear to me. It would require more arguments.
              $endgroup$
              – nicomezi
              12 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thank you but I was rather talking about what is after that limit (the fact that $g$ has an $n$-th pole). I am not saying it is false. Since we have the limit on $f$ at $infty$ it cannot be an essential singularity. But it seems quite hard (compared to others answers) to write this rigorously.
              $endgroup$
              – nicomezi
              7 mins ago


















            $begingroup$
            The statement right after $lim_{z to 0} |g(z)| = infty$ is not that clear to me. It would require more arguments.
            $endgroup$
            – nicomezi
            12 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            The statement right after $lim_{z to 0} |g(z)| = infty$ is not that clear to me. It would require more arguments.
            $endgroup$
            – nicomezi
            12 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            Thank you but I was rather talking about what is after that limit (the fact that $g$ has an $n$-th pole). I am not saying it is false. Since we have the limit on $f$ at $infty$ it cannot be an essential singularity. But it seems quite hard (compared to others answers) to write this rigorously.
            $endgroup$
            – nicomezi
            7 mins ago






            $begingroup$
            Thank you but I was rather talking about what is after that limit (the fact that $g$ has an $n$-th pole). I am not saying it is false. Since we have the limit on $f$ at $infty$ it cannot be an essential singularity. But it seems quite hard (compared to others answers) to write this rigorously.
            $endgroup$
            – nicomezi
            7 mins ago













            0












            $begingroup$

            Let $g(z):=f(1/z)$ for $z ne 0$. Then $g$ has at $0$ an isolated singularity. Since $g(z) to infty$ as $z to 0$, $g$ has a pole at $0$.



            Let $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_nz^n$, then the Laurent expansion of $g$ at $0$ is given by



            $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n frac{1}{z^n}$, which shows that there is $m$ such that $a_n=0$ for $n>m$.



            Hence $f$ is a non- constant poynomial. Now use the fundamental theorem of algebra.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Let $g(z):=f(1/z)$ for $z ne 0$. Then $g$ has at $0$ an isolated singularity. Since $g(z) to infty$ as $z to 0$, $g$ has a pole at $0$.



              Let $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_nz^n$, then the Laurent expansion of $g$ at $0$ is given by



              $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n frac{1}{z^n}$, which shows that there is $m$ such that $a_n=0$ for $n>m$.



              Hence $f$ is a non- constant poynomial. Now use the fundamental theorem of algebra.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Let $g(z):=f(1/z)$ for $z ne 0$. Then $g$ has at $0$ an isolated singularity. Since $g(z) to infty$ as $z to 0$, $g$ has a pole at $0$.



                Let $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_nz^n$, then the Laurent expansion of $g$ at $0$ is given by



                $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n frac{1}{z^n}$, which shows that there is $m$ such that $a_n=0$ for $n>m$.



                Hence $f$ is a non- constant poynomial. Now use the fundamental theorem of algebra.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Let $g(z):=f(1/z)$ for $z ne 0$. Then $g$ has at $0$ an isolated singularity. Since $g(z) to infty$ as $z to 0$, $g$ has a pole at $0$.



                Let $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_nz^n$, then the Laurent expansion of $g$ at $0$ is given by



                $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n frac{1}{z^n}$, which shows that there is $m$ such that $a_n=0$ for $n>m$.



                Hence $f$ is a non- constant poynomial. Now use the fundamental theorem of algebra.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 10 mins ago









                FredFred

                46.9k1848




                46.9k1848






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3125734%2flimit-at-infinity-for-complex-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                    Image
                    0 I recently upgraded an Ubuntu 16.04 virtual machine to 18.04. I regularly use this VM to run apt-mirror at school on their high-speed internet, then rsync these files to my rack-mount server at home for updating multiple computers at home without wasting the tiny amount of bandwidth I have there. Since updating I can't get apt-mirror to run on my VM. It keeps giving the error: flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror line 214 immediately followed by: apt-mirror is already running, exiting at /usr/bin/apt-mirror line 217 apt-mirror is NOT running, and does not have a cron job. I've tried rebooting, and even looked for the old-style lockfile to delete, but I guess that method is no longer used. Is there some way to force unlock this so I can run apt-mirror? UPDATE: So... I f...
                    Read more

                    Mangá

                    Image
                      Nota:  Não confundir com Manga. Mangás e Animes Mangá Mangaká • Tankōbon Film comic La nouvelle manga Mangá original em inglês Anime História Animação influenciada por animes • Filler • OVA • Seiyū Públicos Kodomo • Shōjo • Shōnen Josei • Seinen Gêneros Mahō shōjo • Mecha • Harém Ecchi • Hentai ( Yaoi • Yuri Futanari • Shotacon • Lolicon Toddlercon ) Termos Bishōjo • Chibi • Fan service Gaiden • Kawaii • Kaitō • Light novel Mahō shōnen • Moe (antropomorfismo • Kemonomimi Nekomimi ) • Super deformed Omake • Tsundere • Yonkoma Listas Mangás • Animes • Ecchi • Mangaka • Estúdios • Revistas Fãs ( otaku ) Anime Music Video Convenções • Cosplay Dōjinshi • Fansub • Fandub • Fujoshi OS-tan • Scanlation Portal de Anime e mangá v d e O mangá (português brasileiro) ou manga (português europeu) [ 1 ] (em japonês: 漫画 , manga ? , lit. “história em quadrinhos”) , é a ...
                    Read more

                    Eduardo VII do Reino Unido

                    Image
                    Eduardo VII Rei do Reino Unido da Grã-Bretanha e Irlanda e dos Domínios Britânicos de Além-mar Imperador da Índia Rei do Reino Unido e Imperador da Índia Reinado 22 de janeiro de 1901 a 6 de maio de 1910 Coroação 9 de agosto de 1902 Delhi Durbar 1 de janeiro de 1903 Predecessora Vitória Sucessor Jorge V   Esposa Alexandra da Dinamarca Descendência Alberto Vitor, Duque de Clarence e Avondale Jorge V do Reino Unido Luísa, Princesa Real Vitória de Gales Maud de Gales Alexandre João de Gales Casa Saxe-Coburgo-Gota Nome completo Alberto Eduardo Nascimento 9 de novembro de 1841   Palácio de Buckingham, Londres, Reino Unido Morte 6 de maio de 1910 (68 anos)   Palácio de Buckingham, Londres, Reino Unido Enterro Capela de São Jorge, Windsor, Berkshire, Reino Unido 20 de maio de 1910 Pai Alberto de Saxe-Coburgo-Gota Mãe Vitória do Reino Unido Assinatura ...
                    Read more