Accidental expletives in mathematical literature.











up vote
55
down vote

favorite
19












It's a bit of a silly one, yeah, but this question has so far been unanswered in any readily accessible place online (as far as I can tell).




Are there any instances of expletives (in any language) that have occurred (preferably by mistake) in serious, mathematical literature?




I don't know of any examples.



The sort of thing I am looking for:



Suppose a paper is published studying a phenomenon innocently with the variables $c, f, k, u$ and there just so happens to be the expression



$$f^uck$$



somewhere in a derivation of some identity or what have you.





NB: I believe that this question is within SE standards since it is talking about the words themselves, although it is a bit risqué!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 10




    such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
    – mathworker21
    yesterday






  • 16




    I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
    – darij grinberg
    yesterday






  • 11




    Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
    – AccidentalFourierTransform
    yesterday






  • 8




    There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
    – Jair Taylor
    yesterday








  • 11




    Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday

















up vote
55
down vote

favorite
19












It's a bit of a silly one, yeah, but this question has so far been unanswered in any readily accessible place online (as far as I can tell).




Are there any instances of expletives (in any language) that have occurred (preferably by mistake) in serious, mathematical literature?




I don't know of any examples.



The sort of thing I am looking for:



Suppose a paper is published studying a phenomenon innocently with the variables $c, f, k, u$ and there just so happens to be the expression



$$f^uck$$



somewhere in a derivation of some identity or what have you.





NB: I believe that this question is within SE standards since it is talking about the words themselves, although it is a bit risqué!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 10




    such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
    – mathworker21
    yesterday






  • 16




    I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
    – darij grinberg
    yesterday






  • 11




    Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
    – AccidentalFourierTransform
    yesterday






  • 8




    There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
    – Jair Taylor
    yesterday








  • 11




    Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday















up vote
55
down vote

favorite
19









up vote
55
down vote

favorite
19






19





It's a bit of a silly one, yeah, but this question has so far been unanswered in any readily accessible place online (as far as I can tell).




Are there any instances of expletives (in any language) that have occurred (preferably by mistake) in serious, mathematical literature?




I don't know of any examples.



The sort of thing I am looking for:



Suppose a paper is published studying a phenomenon innocently with the variables $c, f, k, u$ and there just so happens to be the expression



$$f^uck$$



somewhere in a derivation of some identity or what have you.





NB: I believe that this question is within SE standards since it is talking about the words themselves, although it is a bit risqué!










share|cite|improve this question















It's a bit of a silly one, yeah, but this question has so far been unanswered in any readily accessible place online (as far as I can tell).




Are there any instances of expletives (in any language) that have occurred (preferably by mistake) in serious, mathematical literature?




I don't know of any examples.



The sort of thing I am looking for:



Suppose a paper is published studying a phenomenon innocently with the variables $c, f, k, u$ and there just so happens to be the expression



$$f^uck$$



somewhere in a derivation of some identity or what have you.





NB: I believe that this question is within SE standards since it is talking about the words themselves, although it is a bit risqué!







reference-request book-recommendation math-history big-list translation-request






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 13 hours ago


























community wiki





Shaun









  • 10




    such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
    – mathworker21
    yesterday






  • 16




    I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
    – darij grinberg
    yesterday






  • 11




    Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
    – AccidentalFourierTransform
    yesterday






  • 8




    There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
    – Jair Taylor
    yesterday








  • 11




    Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday
















  • 10




    such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
    – mathworker21
    yesterday






  • 16




    I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
    – darij grinberg
    yesterday






  • 11




    Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
    – AccidentalFourierTransform
    yesterday






  • 8




    There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
    – Jair Taylor
    yesterday








  • 11




    Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
    – Eric Duminil
    yesterday










10




10




such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
– mathworker21
yesterday




such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
– mathworker21
yesterday




16




16




I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
– darij grinberg
yesterday




I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
– darij grinberg
yesterday




11




11




Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
– AccidentalFourierTransform
yesterday




Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
– AccidentalFourierTransform
yesterday




8




8




There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
– Jair Taylor
yesterday






There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
– Jair Taylor
yesterday






11




11




Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
– Eric Duminil
yesterday






Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
– Eric Duminil
yesterday












13 Answers
13






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
57
down vote













I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




$$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 7




    A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
    – Steve Kass
    yesterday


















up vote
44
down vote













This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
$$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



"d (bi-ch)".



Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



"d (bi+ch)".



When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 10




    Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
    – bof
    yesterday






  • 15




    @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
    – tparker
    yesterday






  • 9




    On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
    – ekkilop
    17 hours ago




















up vote
21
down vote













The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
$$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    17
    down vote













    My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 7




      As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
      – Robert Wolfe
      20 hours ago


















    up vote
    17
    down vote













    Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



    The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 4




      The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
      – Ross Presser
      19 hours ago










    • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
      – Michael Lugo
      16 hours ago










    • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
      – Nic Hartley
      15 hours ago


















    up vote
    13
    down vote













    Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



    Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
      – Will Appleby
      22 hours ago






    • 4




      I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
      – Ral Zarek
      22 hours ago


















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



      [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
      https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick






      share|cite|improve this answer






























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)






        share|cite|improve this answer






























          up vote
          2
          down vote













          It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




            Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.







            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
              – Git Gud
              9 mins ago


















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



            A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



            From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
              – hardmath
              19 hours ago


















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).






            share|cite|improve this answer























              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000579%2faccidental-expletives-in-mathematical-literature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              13 Answers
              13






              active

              oldest

              votes








              13 Answers
              13






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              57
              down vote













              I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




              $$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




              occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 7




                A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
                – Steve Kass
                yesterday















              up vote
              57
              down vote













              I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




              $$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




              occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 7




                A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
                – Steve Kass
                yesterday













              up vote
              57
              down vote










              up vote
              57
              down vote









              I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




              $$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




              occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".






              share|cite|improve this answer














              I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




              $$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




              occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited yesterday


























              community wiki





              bof









              • 7




                A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
                – Steve Kass
                yesterday














              • 7




                A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
                – Steve Kass
                yesterday








              7




              7




              A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
              – Steve Kass
              yesterday




              A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
              – Steve Kass
              yesterday










              up vote
              44
              down vote













              This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



              In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
              $$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
              via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



              "d (bi-ch)".



              Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



              "d (bi+ch)".



              When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 10




                Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
                – bof
                yesterday






              • 15




                @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
                – tparker
                yesterday






              • 9




                On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
                – ekkilop
                17 hours ago

















              up vote
              44
              down vote













              This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



              In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
              $$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
              via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



              "d (bi-ch)".



              Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



              "d (bi+ch)".



              When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 10




                Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
                – bof
                yesterday






              • 15




                @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
                – tparker
                yesterday






              • 9




                On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
                – ekkilop
                17 hours ago















              up vote
              44
              down vote










              up vote
              44
              down vote









              This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



              In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
              $$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
              via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



              "d (bi-ch)".



              Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



              "d (bi+ch)".



              When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.






              share|cite|improve this answer














              This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



              In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
              $$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
              via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



              "d (bi-ch)".



              Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



              "d (bi+ch)".



              When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              answered yesterday


























              community wiki





              tparker









              • 10




                Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
                – bof
                yesterday






              • 15




                @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
                – tparker
                yesterday






              • 9




                On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
                – ekkilop
                17 hours ago
















              • 10




                Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
                – bof
                yesterday






              • 15




                @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
                – tparker
                yesterday






              • 9




                On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
                – ekkilop
                17 hours ago










              10




              10




              Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
              – bof
              yesterday




              Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
              – bof
              yesterday




              15




              15




              @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
              – tparker
              yesterday




              @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
              – tparker
              yesterday




              9




              9




              On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
              – ekkilop
              17 hours ago






              On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
              – ekkilop
              17 hours ago












              up vote
              21
              down vote













              The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
              $$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
              This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                21
                down vote













                The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
                $$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
                This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  21
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  21
                  down vote









                  The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
                  $$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
                  This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
                  $$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
                  This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited yesterday


























                  community wiki





                  Matt Samuel























                      up vote
                      17
                      down vote













                      My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.






                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                      • 7




                        As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                        – Robert Wolfe
                        20 hours ago















                      up vote
                      17
                      down vote













                      My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.






                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                      • 7




                        As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                        – Robert Wolfe
                        20 hours ago













                      up vote
                      17
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      17
                      down vote









                      My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      answered yesterday


























                      community wiki





                      Jared Norman









                      • 7




                        As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                        – Robert Wolfe
                        20 hours ago














                      • 7




                        As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                        – Robert Wolfe
                        20 hours ago








                      7




                      7




                      As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                      – Robert Wolfe
                      20 hours ago




                      As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                      – Robert Wolfe
                      20 hours ago










                      up vote
                      17
                      down vote













                      Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



                      The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.






                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                      • 4




                        The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                        – Ross Presser
                        19 hours ago










                      • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                        – Michael Lugo
                        16 hours ago










                      • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                        – Nic Hartley
                        15 hours ago















                      up vote
                      17
                      down vote













                      Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



                      The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.






                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                      • 4




                        The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                        – Ross Presser
                        19 hours ago










                      • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                        – Michael Lugo
                        16 hours ago










                      • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                        – Nic Hartley
                        15 hours ago













                      up vote
                      17
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      17
                      down vote









                      Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



                      The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



                      The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      answered 21 hours ago


























                      community wiki





                      aghostinthefigures









                      • 4




                        The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                        – Ross Presser
                        19 hours ago










                      • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                        – Michael Lugo
                        16 hours ago










                      • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                        – Nic Hartley
                        15 hours ago














                      • 4




                        The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                        – Ross Presser
                        19 hours ago










                      • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                        – Michael Lugo
                        16 hours ago










                      • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                        – Nic Hartley
                        15 hours ago








                      4




                      4




                      The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                      – Ross Presser
                      19 hours ago




                      The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                      – Ross Presser
                      19 hours ago












                      Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                      – Michael Lugo
                      16 hours ago




                      Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                      – Michael Lugo
                      16 hours ago












                      @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                      – Nic Hartley
                      15 hours ago




                      @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                      – Nic Hartley
                      15 hours ago










                      up vote
                      13
                      down vote













                      Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



                      Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                        – Will Appleby
                        22 hours ago






                      • 4




                        I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                        – Ral Zarek
                        22 hours ago















                      up vote
                      13
                      down vote













                      Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



                      Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                        – Will Appleby
                        22 hours ago






                      • 4




                        I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                        – Ral Zarek
                        22 hours ago













                      up vote
                      13
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      13
                      down vote









                      Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



                      Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



                      Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      answered yesterday


























                      community wiki





                      jovisg













                      • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                        – Will Appleby
                        22 hours ago






                      • 4




                        I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                        – Ral Zarek
                        22 hours ago


















                      • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                        – Will Appleby
                        22 hours ago






                      • 4




                        I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                        – Ral Zarek
                        22 hours ago
















                      I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                      – Will Appleby
                      22 hours ago




                      I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                      – Will Appleby
                      22 hours ago




                      4




                      4




                      I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                      – Ral Zarek
                      22 hours ago




                      I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                      – Ral Zarek
                      22 hours ago










                      up vote
                      6
                      down vote













                      My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".






                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        6
                        down vote













                        My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          6
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          6
                          down vote









                          My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          answered yesterday


























                          community wiki





                          Robin























                              up vote
                              3
                              down vote













                              I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



                              [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
                              https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick






                              share|cite|improve this answer



























                                up vote
                                3
                                down vote













                                I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



                                [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
                                https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick






                                share|cite|improve this answer

























                                  up vote
                                  3
                                  down vote










                                  up vote
                                  3
                                  down vote









                                  I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



                                  [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
                                  https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick






                                  share|cite|improve this answer














                                  I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



                                  [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
                                  https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick







                                  share|cite|improve this answer














                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                  share|cite|improve this answer








                                  answered 6 hours ago


























                                  community wiki





                                  Aganju























                                      up vote
                                      2
                                      down vote













                                      One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)






                                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                                        up vote
                                        2
                                        down vote













                                        One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)






                                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                                          up vote
                                          2
                                          down vote










                                          up vote
                                          2
                                          down vote









                                          One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)






                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                          One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)







                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                          share|cite|improve this answer








                                          answered 20 hours ago


























                                          community wiki





                                          Lars H























                                              up vote
                                              2
                                              down vote













                                              It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer



























                                                up vote
                                                2
                                                down vote













                                                It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.






                                                share|cite|improve this answer

























                                                  up vote
                                                  2
                                                  down vote










                                                  up vote
                                                  2
                                                  down vote









                                                  It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.






                                                  share|cite|improve this answer














                                                  It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.







                                                  share|cite|improve this answer














                                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                                  share|cite|improve this answer








                                                  answered 17 hours ago


























                                                  community wiki





                                                  Graham























                                                      up vote
                                                      2
                                                      down vote













                                                      The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




                                                      Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.







                                                      share|cite|improve this answer























                                                      • Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                                        – Git Gud
                                                        9 mins ago















                                                      up vote
                                                      2
                                                      down vote













                                                      The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




                                                      Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.







                                                      share|cite|improve this answer























                                                      • Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                                        – Git Gud
                                                        9 mins ago













                                                      up vote
                                                      2
                                                      down vote










                                                      up vote
                                                      2
                                                      down vote









                                                      The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




                                                      Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.







                                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                                      The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




                                                      Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.








                                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                                      answered 16 hours ago


























                                                      community wiki





                                                      Ben C













                                                      • Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                                        – Git Gud
                                                        9 mins ago


















                                                      • Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                                        – Git Gud
                                                        9 mins ago
















                                                      Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                                      – Git Gud
                                                      9 mins ago




                                                      Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                                      – Git Gud
                                                      9 mins ago










                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote













                                                      There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



                                                      A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



                                                      From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                                                      • 1




                                                        The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                                        – hardmath
                                                        19 hours ago















                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote













                                                      There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



                                                      A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



                                                      From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                                                      • 1




                                                        The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                                        – hardmath
                                                        19 hours ago













                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote










                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote









                                                      There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



                                                      A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



                                                      From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                                      There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



                                                      A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



                                                      From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf







                                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                                      edited 18 hours ago


























                                                      community wiki





                                                      Oscar Bravo









                                                      • 1




                                                        The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                                        – hardmath
                                                        19 hours ago














                                                      • 1




                                                        The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                                        – hardmath
                                                        19 hours ago








                                                      1




                                                      1




                                                      The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                                      – hardmath
                                                      19 hours ago




                                                      The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                                      – hardmath
                                                      19 hours ago










                                                      up vote
                                                      0
                                                      down vote













                                                      This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                                                        up vote
                                                        0
                                                        down vote













                                                        This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).






                                                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                                                          up vote
                                                          0
                                                          down vote










                                                          up vote
                                                          0
                                                          down vote









                                                          This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).






                                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                                          This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).







                                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                                          share|cite|improve this answer








                                                          answered 15 hours ago


























                                                          community wiki





                                                          lko































                                                               

                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded



















































                                                               


                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function () {
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000579%2faccidental-expletives-in-mathematical-literature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                              }
                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Popular posts from this blog

                                                              flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                                                              Mangá

                                                               ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕