BitLocker takes days on an empty external disk / Is “Encrypt used disk space only” available on Windows...











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












I have Windows 7 x64 and a brand new USB external 2 TB hard drive. I formatted it and I confirm it's empty.



I enabled BitLocker, and two things happen:





  • It is about to take at least 10 hours or even days:



    Drive F: 0.4% Completed




  • The disk was initially empty (1.81 TB free / 1.81 TB total), but just after enabling BitLocker, it's like the disk is immediately full (5.99 GB free out of 1.81 TB):



    Drive F: with 5,99 GB free of 1,81 TB




No files are present when I open F: though.



Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?





Note: I've found this screenshot for Windows 10 here. Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7 for removable devices ("BitLocker To Go")?



enter image description here










share|improve this question
























  • @Kinnectus New vs old does not matter, of course. But here it's an empty disk, so there is no data to initially encrypt. Here in this topic it is said it should be instantly done...
    – Basj
    16 hours ago















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












I have Windows 7 x64 and a brand new USB external 2 TB hard drive. I formatted it and I confirm it's empty.



I enabled BitLocker, and two things happen:





  • It is about to take at least 10 hours or even days:



    Drive F: 0.4% Completed




  • The disk was initially empty (1.81 TB free / 1.81 TB total), but just after enabling BitLocker, it's like the disk is immediately full (5.99 GB free out of 1.81 TB):



    Drive F: with 5,99 GB free of 1,81 TB




No files are present when I open F: though.



Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?





Note: I've found this screenshot for Windows 10 here. Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7 for removable devices ("BitLocker To Go")?



enter image description here










share|improve this question
























  • @Kinnectus New vs old does not matter, of course. But here it's an empty disk, so there is no data to initially encrypt. Here in this topic it is said it should be instantly done...
    – Basj
    16 hours ago













up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have Windows 7 x64 and a brand new USB external 2 TB hard drive. I formatted it and I confirm it's empty.



I enabled BitLocker, and two things happen:





  • It is about to take at least 10 hours or even days:



    Drive F: 0.4% Completed




  • The disk was initially empty (1.81 TB free / 1.81 TB total), but just after enabling BitLocker, it's like the disk is immediately full (5.99 GB free out of 1.81 TB):



    Drive F: with 5,99 GB free of 1,81 TB




No files are present when I open F: though.



Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?





Note: I've found this screenshot for Windows 10 here. Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7 for removable devices ("BitLocker To Go")?



enter image description here










share|improve this question















I have Windows 7 x64 and a brand new USB external 2 TB hard drive. I formatted it and I confirm it's empty.



I enabled BitLocker, and two things happen:





  • It is about to take at least 10 hours or even days:



    Drive F: 0.4% Completed




  • The disk was initially empty (1.81 TB free / 1.81 TB total), but just after enabling BitLocker, it's like the disk is immediately full (5.99 GB free out of 1.81 TB):



    Drive F: with 5,99 GB free of 1,81 TB




No files are present when I open F: though.



Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?





Note: I've found this screenshot for Windows 10 here. Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7 for removable devices ("BitLocker To Go")?



enter image description here







windows-7 hard-drive external-hard-drive encryption bitlocker






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 12 hours ago









Twisty Impersonator

16.9k126091




16.9k126091










asked 16 hours ago









Basj

460324




460324












  • @Kinnectus New vs old does not matter, of course. But here it's an empty disk, so there is no data to initially encrypt. Here in this topic it is said it should be instantly done...
    – Basj
    16 hours ago


















  • @Kinnectus New vs old does not matter, of course. But here it's an empty disk, so there is no data to initially encrypt. Here in this topic it is said it should be instantly done...
    – Basj
    16 hours ago
















@Kinnectus New vs old does not matter, of course. But here it's an empty disk, so there is no data to initially encrypt. Here in this topic it is said it should be instantly done...
– Basj
16 hours ago




@Kinnectus New vs old does not matter, of course. But here it's an empty disk, so there is no data to initially encrypt. Here in this topic it is said it should be instantly done...
– Basj
16 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7?



Unfortunately no. This option was introduced with Windows 8, as announced in the Microsoft TechNet Tip of the Day post BitLocker 'Encrypt Used Disk Space Only':




Previously, BitLocker encryption has been an ‘all or nothing’. Either a volume was completely encrypted or it was not. Windows 8 brings us a new option, ‘Encrypt Used Disk Space Only’.






Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?



Because without the Encrypt Used Space Only option, BitLocker must encrypt the entire disk, i.e. both data and free space (technically it only wipes the free space). This is also why the volume has only 6 GB free space during the encryption process. Here's the Microsoft BitLocker Team's explanation of what's going on:




Q: I enabled BitLocker on my volume and – poof! – all my free space is
gone! What’s wrong? More importantly, how do I get it back?



Good news: nothing is wrong and the only thing that you have to do to
get it back is wait. Here’s a high level explanation (some intricate
technical details have been omitted for brevity).



In the IT world “delete” usually means “remove from plain view” rather
than “obliterate out of existence”. Unallocated disk space is prone to
contain interesting data: rotting skeletons of compensation
spreadsheets, “deleted” text files with passwords and credit card
numbers, discarded autosave copies of top secret presentations. Hence,
BitLocker cannot just ignore free space when the volume is being
encrypted.



On the other hand, encrypting (or, to be exact, “reading, encrypting,
and writing back”) free space is a real waste on a typical volume that
is usually less than twenty percent full. As a performance
optimization, BitLocker simply overwrites unallocated space with
noise, thereby avoiding redundant reads. As expected, wiping free
space is about two times faster than encrypting data, but it still
takes considerable time on large volumes.



Now, free space tends to be very fluid. Unallocated chunks of disk
space appear and disappear all over the place, all the time.
Determining whether a given sector needs to be encrypted or wiped at a
particular moment of time is a considerable technical challenge.
BitLocker solves this problem by creating a huge file that takes most
of the available disk space (leaving 6 GB for short-term system needs)
and wiping disk sectors that belong to the file. Everything else
(including ~6 GB of free space not occupied by the wipe file) is
encrypted. When encryption of the volume is paused or completed, the
wipe file is deleted and the amount of available free space reverts to
normal.







share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Full disk encryption isn't only about hiding content of files, it's also about hiding their presence or lack. Properly encrypted disk should look like it's completely filled with random data unless you know the encryption key. Bitlocker was probably fully formatting the encrypted volume, ie. filling it with zeros, to make sure every part of it looks like random data before decryption.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Is it like this by default? People said here in this old topic that it should be instant for an empty partition. Also I see in this post you can choose between "encrypt only new data" and "encrypt data which is already on the drive". Where can one modify this BitLocker setting in Windows 7?
      – Basj
      16 hours ago












    • See the edited end of the question, do you know where to find this option in Windows 7?
      – Basj
      15 hours ago










    • Sorry, I don't know that. It's possible that this feature was introduced later.
      – gronostaj
      15 hours ago










    • When you use BitLocker yourself @gronostaj, is it useful to have 24hrs+ of work to initialize an empty new external USB hard drive?
      – Basj
      14 hours ago






    • 1




      @Basj I don't use Bitlocker, but I have some experience with similar solutions for Linux. Whether it's useful or not depends on your risk model. Having a fully encrypted drive will make it impossible to discern which areas of disk are unused. If you don't care about attackers knowing that, then you can save time by skipping full formatting.
      – gronostaj
      13 hours ago


















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Additional solution:




    • Use a friend's Windows 10 to format the drive + enable BitLocker with "Encrypt used disk space only" feature on. It will take only a few minutes.


    • When you're back on Windows 7 Ultimate, you can still read/write the disk



    And even better:




    • When you're back on Windows 7 Pro, you can still read/write the disk!


    The latter is very interesting because "BitLocker is unavailable for Windows 7 Professional and it cannot be downloaded and installed.". My test showed that creating a new BitLocker-encrypted disk is not possible with Windows 7 Pro, but using (read+write) on an already-BitLocker-enabled is possible with Windows 7 Pro!






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      +1 for investing time to verify this and getting it figured out yourself!
      – gronostaj
      8 hours ago










    • Thanks @gronostaj... I spent hours today trying BitLocker + VeraCrypt :) Finally I'll use BitLocker, because if I use VeraCrypt, then I'll be the only one at home to be able to use this external HDD. The UI/UX of VeraCrypt is not possible for a non-power user (many little - only little, but still - drawbacks that would make it difficult to use for my family). It was an interesting test!
      – Basj
      8 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1377591%2fbitlocker-takes-days-on-an-empty-external-disk-is-encrypt-used-disk-space-onl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    8
    down vote



    accepted










    Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7?



    Unfortunately no. This option was introduced with Windows 8, as announced in the Microsoft TechNet Tip of the Day post BitLocker 'Encrypt Used Disk Space Only':




    Previously, BitLocker encryption has been an ‘all or nothing’. Either a volume was completely encrypted or it was not. Windows 8 brings us a new option, ‘Encrypt Used Disk Space Only’.






    Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?



    Because without the Encrypt Used Space Only option, BitLocker must encrypt the entire disk, i.e. both data and free space (technically it only wipes the free space). This is also why the volume has only 6 GB free space during the encryption process. Here's the Microsoft BitLocker Team's explanation of what's going on:




    Q: I enabled BitLocker on my volume and – poof! – all my free space is
    gone! What’s wrong? More importantly, how do I get it back?



    Good news: nothing is wrong and the only thing that you have to do to
    get it back is wait. Here’s a high level explanation (some intricate
    technical details have been omitted for brevity).



    In the IT world “delete” usually means “remove from plain view” rather
    than “obliterate out of existence”. Unallocated disk space is prone to
    contain interesting data: rotting skeletons of compensation
    spreadsheets, “deleted” text files with passwords and credit card
    numbers, discarded autosave copies of top secret presentations. Hence,
    BitLocker cannot just ignore free space when the volume is being
    encrypted.



    On the other hand, encrypting (or, to be exact, “reading, encrypting,
    and writing back”) free space is a real waste on a typical volume that
    is usually less than twenty percent full. As a performance
    optimization, BitLocker simply overwrites unallocated space with
    noise, thereby avoiding redundant reads. As expected, wiping free
    space is about two times faster than encrypting data, but it still
    takes considerable time on large volumes.



    Now, free space tends to be very fluid. Unallocated chunks of disk
    space appear and disappear all over the place, all the time.
    Determining whether a given sector needs to be encrypted or wiped at a
    particular moment of time is a considerable technical challenge.
    BitLocker solves this problem by creating a huge file that takes most
    of the available disk space (leaving 6 GB for short-term system needs)
    and wiping disk sectors that belong to the file. Everything else
    (including ~6 GB of free space not occupied by the wipe file) is
    encrypted. When encryption of the volume is paused or completed, the
    wipe file is deleted and the amount of available free space reverts to
    normal.







    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      8
      down vote



      accepted










      Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7?



      Unfortunately no. This option was introduced with Windows 8, as announced in the Microsoft TechNet Tip of the Day post BitLocker 'Encrypt Used Disk Space Only':




      Previously, BitLocker encryption has been an ‘all or nothing’. Either a volume was completely encrypted or it was not. Windows 8 brings us a new option, ‘Encrypt Used Disk Space Only’.






      Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?



      Because without the Encrypt Used Space Only option, BitLocker must encrypt the entire disk, i.e. both data and free space (technically it only wipes the free space). This is also why the volume has only 6 GB free space during the encryption process. Here's the Microsoft BitLocker Team's explanation of what's going on:




      Q: I enabled BitLocker on my volume and – poof! – all my free space is
      gone! What’s wrong? More importantly, how do I get it back?



      Good news: nothing is wrong and the only thing that you have to do to
      get it back is wait. Here’s a high level explanation (some intricate
      technical details have been omitted for brevity).



      In the IT world “delete” usually means “remove from plain view” rather
      than “obliterate out of existence”. Unallocated disk space is prone to
      contain interesting data: rotting skeletons of compensation
      spreadsheets, “deleted” text files with passwords and credit card
      numbers, discarded autosave copies of top secret presentations. Hence,
      BitLocker cannot just ignore free space when the volume is being
      encrypted.



      On the other hand, encrypting (or, to be exact, “reading, encrypting,
      and writing back”) free space is a real waste on a typical volume that
      is usually less than twenty percent full. As a performance
      optimization, BitLocker simply overwrites unallocated space with
      noise, thereby avoiding redundant reads. As expected, wiping free
      space is about two times faster than encrypting data, but it still
      takes considerable time on large volumes.



      Now, free space tends to be very fluid. Unallocated chunks of disk
      space appear and disappear all over the place, all the time.
      Determining whether a given sector needs to be encrypted or wiped at a
      particular moment of time is a considerable technical challenge.
      BitLocker solves this problem by creating a huge file that takes most
      of the available disk space (leaving 6 GB for short-term system needs)
      and wiping disk sectors that belong to the file. Everything else
      (including ~6 GB of free space not occupied by the wipe file) is
      encrypted. When encryption of the volume is paused or completed, the
      wipe file is deleted and the amount of available free space reverts to
      normal.







      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        8
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        8
        down vote



        accepted






        Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7?



        Unfortunately no. This option was introduced with Windows 8, as announced in the Microsoft TechNet Tip of the Day post BitLocker 'Encrypt Used Disk Space Only':




        Previously, BitLocker encryption has been an ‘all or nothing’. Either a volume was completely encrypted or it was not. Windows 8 brings us a new option, ‘Encrypt Used Disk Space Only’.






        Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?



        Because without the Encrypt Used Space Only option, BitLocker must encrypt the entire disk, i.e. both data and free space (technically it only wipes the free space). This is also why the volume has only 6 GB free space during the encryption process. Here's the Microsoft BitLocker Team's explanation of what's going on:




        Q: I enabled BitLocker on my volume and – poof! – all my free space is
        gone! What’s wrong? More importantly, how do I get it back?



        Good news: nothing is wrong and the only thing that you have to do to
        get it back is wait. Here’s a high level explanation (some intricate
        technical details have been omitted for brevity).



        In the IT world “delete” usually means “remove from plain view” rather
        than “obliterate out of existence”. Unallocated disk space is prone to
        contain interesting data: rotting skeletons of compensation
        spreadsheets, “deleted” text files with passwords and credit card
        numbers, discarded autosave copies of top secret presentations. Hence,
        BitLocker cannot just ignore free space when the volume is being
        encrypted.



        On the other hand, encrypting (or, to be exact, “reading, encrypting,
        and writing back”) free space is a real waste on a typical volume that
        is usually less than twenty percent full. As a performance
        optimization, BitLocker simply overwrites unallocated space with
        noise, thereby avoiding redundant reads. As expected, wiping free
        space is about two times faster than encrypting data, but it still
        takes considerable time on large volumes.



        Now, free space tends to be very fluid. Unallocated chunks of disk
        space appear and disappear all over the place, all the time.
        Determining whether a given sector needs to be encrypted or wiped at a
        particular moment of time is a considerable technical challenge.
        BitLocker solves this problem by creating a huge file that takes most
        of the available disk space (leaving 6 GB for short-term system needs)
        and wiping disk sectors that belong to the file. Everything else
        (including ~6 GB of free space not occupied by the wipe file) is
        encrypted. When encryption of the volume is paused or completed, the
        wipe file is deleted and the amount of available free space reverts to
        normal.







        share|improve this answer














        Is the option "Encrypt used disk space only" available in Windows 7?



        Unfortunately no. This option was introduced with Windows 8, as announced in the Microsoft TechNet Tip of the Day post BitLocker 'Encrypt Used Disk Space Only':




        Previously, BitLocker encryption has been an ‘all or nothing’. Either a volume was completely encrypted or it was not. Windows 8 brings us a new option, ‘Encrypt Used Disk Space Only’.






        Why does BitLocker take hours on a brand new empty disk?



        Because without the Encrypt Used Space Only option, BitLocker must encrypt the entire disk, i.e. both data and free space (technically it only wipes the free space). This is also why the volume has only 6 GB free space during the encryption process. Here's the Microsoft BitLocker Team's explanation of what's going on:




        Q: I enabled BitLocker on my volume and – poof! – all my free space is
        gone! What’s wrong? More importantly, how do I get it back?



        Good news: nothing is wrong and the only thing that you have to do to
        get it back is wait. Here’s a high level explanation (some intricate
        technical details have been omitted for brevity).



        In the IT world “delete” usually means “remove from plain view” rather
        than “obliterate out of existence”. Unallocated disk space is prone to
        contain interesting data: rotting skeletons of compensation
        spreadsheets, “deleted” text files with passwords and credit card
        numbers, discarded autosave copies of top secret presentations. Hence,
        BitLocker cannot just ignore free space when the volume is being
        encrypted.



        On the other hand, encrypting (or, to be exact, “reading, encrypting,
        and writing back”) free space is a real waste on a typical volume that
        is usually less than twenty percent full. As a performance
        optimization, BitLocker simply overwrites unallocated space with
        noise, thereby avoiding redundant reads. As expected, wiping free
        space is about two times faster than encrypting data, but it still
        takes considerable time on large volumes.



        Now, free space tends to be very fluid. Unallocated chunks of disk
        space appear and disappear all over the place, all the time.
        Determining whether a given sector needs to be encrypted or wiped at a
        particular moment of time is a considerable technical challenge.
        BitLocker solves this problem by creating a huge file that takes most
        of the available disk space (leaving 6 GB for short-term system needs)
        and wiping disk sectors that belong to the file. Everything else
        (including ~6 GB of free space not occupied by the wipe file) is
        encrypted. When encryption of the volume is paused or completed, the
        wipe file is deleted and the amount of available free space reverts to
        normal.








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 10 hours ago

























        answered 13 hours ago









        Twisty Impersonator

        16.9k126091




        16.9k126091
























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Full disk encryption isn't only about hiding content of files, it's also about hiding their presence or lack. Properly encrypted disk should look like it's completely filled with random data unless you know the encryption key. Bitlocker was probably fully formatting the encrypted volume, ie. filling it with zeros, to make sure every part of it looks like random data before decryption.






            share|improve this answer





















            • Is it like this by default? People said here in this old topic that it should be instant for an empty partition. Also I see in this post you can choose between "encrypt only new data" and "encrypt data which is already on the drive". Where can one modify this BitLocker setting in Windows 7?
              – Basj
              16 hours ago












            • See the edited end of the question, do you know where to find this option in Windows 7?
              – Basj
              15 hours ago










            • Sorry, I don't know that. It's possible that this feature was introduced later.
              – gronostaj
              15 hours ago










            • When you use BitLocker yourself @gronostaj, is it useful to have 24hrs+ of work to initialize an empty new external USB hard drive?
              – Basj
              14 hours ago






            • 1




              @Basj I don't use Bitlocker, but I have some experience with similar solutions for Linux. Whether it's useful or not depends on your risk model. Having a fully encrypted drive will make it impossible to discern which areas of disk are unused. If you don't care about attackers knowing that, then you can save time by skipping full formatting.
              – gronostaj
              13 hours ago















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Full disk encryption isn't only about hiding content of files, it's also about hiding their presence or lack. Properly encrypted disk should look like it's completely filled with random data unless you know the encryption key. Bitlocker was probably fully formatting the encrypted volume, ie. filling it with zeros, to make sure every part of it looks like random data before decryption.






            share|improve this answer





















            • Is it like this by default? People said here in this old topic that it should be instant for an empty partition. Also I see in this post you can choose between "encrypt only new data" and "encrypt data which is already on the drive". Where can one modify this BitLocker setting in Windows 7?
              – Basj
              16 hours ago












            • See the edited end of the question, do you know where to find this option in Windows 7?
              – Basj
              15 hours ago










            • Sorry, I don't know that. It's possible that this feature was introduced later.
              – gronostaj
              15 hours ago










            • When you use BitLocker yourself @gronostaj, is it useful to have 24hrs+ of work to initialize an empty new external USB hard drive?
              – Basj
              14 hours ago






            • 1




              @Basj I don't use Bitlocker, but I have some experience with similar solutions for Linux. Whether it's useful or not depends on your risk model. Having a fully encrypted drive will make it impossible to discern which areas of disk are unused. If you don't care about attackers knowing that, then you can save time by skipping full formatting.
              – gronostaj
              13 hours ago













            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            Full disk encryption isn't only about hiding content of files, it's also about hiding their presence or lack. Properly encrypted disk should look like it's completely filled with random data unless you know the encryption key. Bitlocker was probably fully formatting the encrypted volume, ie. filling it with zeros, to make sure every part of it looks like random data before decryption.






            share|improve this answer












            Full disk encryption isn't only about hiding content of files, it's also about hiding their presence or lack. Properly encrypted disk should look like it's completely filled with random data unless you know the encryption key. Bitlocker was probably fully formatting the encrypted volume, ie. filling it with zeros, to make sure every part of it looks like random data before decryption.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 16 hours ago









            gronostaj

            27.7k1368107




            27.7k1368107












            • Is it like this by default? People said here in this old topic that it should be instant for an empty partition. Also I see in this post you can choose between "encrypt only new data" and "encrypt data which is already on the drive". Where can one modify this BitLocker setting in Windows 7?
              – Basj
              16 hours ago












            • See the edited end of the question, do you know where to find this option in Windows 7?
              – Basj
              15 hours ago










            • Sorry, I don't know that. It's possible that this feature was introduced later.
              – gronostaj
              15 hours ago










            • When you use BitLocker yourself @gronostaj, is it useful to have 24hrs+ of work to initialize an empty new external USB hard drive?
              – Basj
              14 hours ago






            • 1




              @Basj I don't use Bitlocker, but I have some experience with similar solutions for Linux. Whether it's useful or not depends on your risk model. Having a fully encrypted drive will make it impossible to discern which areas of disk are unused. If you don't care about attackers knowing that, then you can save time by skipping full formatting.
              – gronostaj
              13 hours ago


















            • Is it like this by default? People said here in this old topic that it should be instant for an empty partition. Also I see in this post you can choose between "encrypt only new data" and "encrypt data which is already on the drive". Where can one modify this BitLocker setting in Windows 7?
              – Basj
              16 hours ago












            • See the edited end of the question, do you know where to find this option in Windows 7?
              – Basj
              15 hours ago










            • Sorry, I don't know that. It's possible that this feature was introduced later.
              – gronostaj
              15 hours ago










            • When you use BitLocker yourself @gronostaj, is it useful to have 24hrs+ of work to initialize an empty new external USB hard drive?
              – Basj
              14 hours ago






            • 1




              @Basj I don't use Bitlocker, but I have some experience with similar solutions for Linux. Whether it's useful or not depends on your risk model. Having a fully encrypted drive will make it impossible to discern which areas of disk are unused. If you don't care about attackers knowing that, then you can save time by skipping full formatting.
              – gronostaj
              13 hours ago
















            Is it like this by default? People said here in this old topic that it should be instant for an empty partition. Also I see in this post you can choose between "encrypt only new data" and "encrypt data which is already on the drive". Where can one modify this BitLocker setting in Windows 7?
            – Basj
            16 hours ago






            Is it like this by default? People said here in this old topic that it should be instant for an empty partition. Also I see in this post you can choose between "encrypt only new data" and "encrypt data which is already on the drive". Where can one modify this BitLocker setting in Windows 7?
            – Basj
            16 hours ago














            See the edited end of the question, do you know where to find this option in Windows 7?
            – Basj
            15 hours ago




            See the edited end of the question, do you know where to find this option in Windows 7?
            – Basj
            15 hours ago












            Sorry, I don't know that. It's possible that this feature was introduced later.
            – gronostaj
            15 hours ago




            Sorry, I don't know that. It's possible that this feature was introduced later.
            – gronostaj
            15 hours ago












            When you use BitLocker yourself @gronostaj, is it useful to have 24hrs+ of work to initialize an empty new external USB hard drive?
            – Basj
            14 hours ago




            When you use BitLocker yourself @gronostaj, is it useful to have 24hrs+ of work to initialize an empty new external USB hard drive?
            – Basj
            14 hours ago




            1




            1




            @Basj I don't use Bitlocker, but I have some experience with similar solutions for Linux. Whether it's useful or not depends on your risk model. Having a fully encrypted drive will make it impossible to discern which areas of disk are unused. If you don't care about attackers knowing that, then you can save time by skipping full formatting.
            – gronostaj
            13 hours ago




            @Basj I don't use Bitlocker, but I have some experience with similar solutions for Linux. Whether it's useful or not depends on your risk model. Having a fully encrypted drive will make it impossible to discern which areas of disk are unused. If you don't care about attackers knowing that, then you can save time by skipping full formatting.
            – gronostaj
            13 hours ago










            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Additional solution:




            • Use a friend's Windows 10 to format the drive + enable BitLocker with "Encrypt used disk space only" feature on. It will take only a few minutes.


            • When you're back on Windows 7 Ultimate, you can still read/write the disk



            And even better:




            • When you're back on Windows 7 Pro, you can still read/write the disk!


            The latter is very interesting because "BitLocker is unavailable for Windows 7 Professional and it cannot be downloaded and installed.". My test showed that creating a new BitLocker-encrypted disk is not possible with Windows 7 Pro, but using (read+write) on an already-BitLocker-enabled is possible with Windows 7 Pro!






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              +1 for investing time to verify this and getting it figured out yourself!
              – gronostaj
              8 hours ago










            • Thanks @gronostaj... I spent hours today trying BitLocker + VeraCrypt :) Finally I'll use BitLocker, because if I use VeraCrypt, then I'll be the only one at home to be able to use this external HDD. The UI/UX of VeraCrypt is not possible for a non-power user (many little - only little, but still - drawbacks that would make it difficult to use for my family). It was an interesting test!
              – Basj
              8 hours ago

















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Additional solution:




            • Use a friend's Windows 10 to format the drive + enable BitLocker with "Encrypt used disk space only" feature on. It will take only a few minutes.


            • When you're back on Windows 7 Ultimate, you can still read/write the disk



            And even better:




            • When you're back on Windows 7 Pro, you can still read/write the disk!


            The latter is very interesting because "BitLocker is unavailable for Windows 7 Professional and it cannot be downloaded and installed.". My test showed that creating a new BitLocker-encrypted disk is not possible with Windows 7 Pro, but using (read+write) on an already-BitLocker-enabled is possible with Windows 7 Pro!






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              +1 for investing time to verify this and getting it figured out yourself!
              – gronostaj
              8 hours ago










            • Thanks @gronostaj... I spent hours today trying BitLocker + VeraCrypt :) Finally I'll use BitLocker, because if I use VeraCrypt, then I'll be the only one at home to be able to use this external HDD. The UI/UX of VeraCrypt is not possible for a non-power user (many little - only little, but still - drawbacks that would make it difficult to use for my family). It was an interesting test!
              – Basj
              8 hours ago















            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            Additional solution:




            • Use a friend's Windows 10 to format the drive + enable BitLocker with "Encrypt used disk space only" feature on. It will take only a few minutes.


            • When you're back on Windows 7 Ultimate, you can still read/write the disk



            And even better:




            • When you're back on Windows 7 Pro, you can still read/write the disk!


            The latter is very interesting because "BitLocker is unavailable for Windows 7 Professional and it cannot be downloaded and installed.". My test showed that creating a new BitLocker-encrypted disk is not possible with Windows 7 Pro, but using (read+write) on an already-BitLocker-enabled is possible with Windows 7 Pro!






            share|improve this answer












            Additional solution:




            • Use a friend's Windows 10 to format the drive + enable BitLocker with "Encrypt used disk space only" feature on. It will take only a few minutes.


            • When you're back on Windows 7 Ultimate, you can still read/write the disk



            And even better:




            • When you're back on Windows 7 Pro, you can still read/write the disk!


            The latter is very interesting because "BitLocker is unavailable for Windows 7 Professional and it cannot be downloaded and installed.". My test showed that creating a new BitLocker-encrypted disk is not possible with Windows 7 Pro, but using (read+write) on an already-BitLocker-enabled is possible with Windows 7 Pro!







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 9 hours ago









            Basj

            460324




            460324








            • 1




              +1 for investing time to verify this and getting it figured out yourself!
              – gronostaj
              8 hours ago










            • Thanks @gronostaj... I spent hours today trying BitLocker + VeraCrypt :) Finally I'll use BitLocker, because if I use VeraCrypt, then I'll be the only one at home to be able to use this external HDD. The UI/UX of VeraCrypt is not possible for a non-power user (many little - only little, but still - drawbacks that would make it difficult to use for my family). It was an interesting test!
              – Basj
              8 hours ago
















            • 1




              +1 for investing time to verify this and getting it figured out yourself!
              – gronostaj
              8 hours ago










            • Thanks @gronostaj... I spent hours today trying BitLocker + VeraCrypt :) Finally I'll use BitLocker, because if I use VeraCrypt, then I'll be the only one at home to be able to use this external HDD. The UI/UX of VeraCrypt is not possible for a non-power user (many little - only little, but still - drawbacks that would make it difficult to use for my family). It was an interesting test!
              – Basj
              8 hours ago










            1




            1




            +1 for investing time to verify this and getting it figured out yourself!
            – gronostaj
            8 hours ago




            +1 for investing time to verify this and getting it figured out yourself!
            – gronostaj
            8 hours ago












            Thanks @gronostaj... I spent hours today trying BitLocker + VeraCrypt :) Finally I'll use BitLocker, because if I use VeraCrypt, then I'll be the only one at home to be able to use this external HDD. The UI/UX of VeraCrypt is not possible for a non-power user (many little - only little, but still - drawbacks that would make it difficult to use for my family). It was an interesting test!
            – Basj
            8 hours ago






            Thanks @gronostaj... I spent hours today trying BitLocker + VeraCrypt :) Finally I'll use BitLocker, because if I use VeraCrypt, then I'll be the only one at home to be able to use this external HDD. The UI/UX of VeraCrypt is not possible for a non-power user (many little - only little, but still - drawbacks that would make it difficult to use for my family). It was an interesting test!
            – Basj
            8 hours ago




















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1377591%2fbitlocker-takes-days-on-an-empty-external-disk-is-encrypt-used-disk-space-onl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

            Mangá

             ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕