Drop 1st element of {#a, #b, #c} &











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I pass the following to a function:



{#a, #b, #c} &


These are keys that are used in a list of associations.
There are instances where I want to pass only the last 2 elements, such as:



{#b, #c} &


Right now, I just rewrite it. But it seems like there should be a way to do this by getting rid of the first slot.



I looked at the full form and see that it's:



FullForm[{#a, #b, #c} &]



Function[List[Slot["a"], Slot["b"], Slot["c"]]]



I thought I could somehow get inside and drop Slot["a"], but can't seem to do it. I tried replacing Slot["a"] with a blank, but I'm left with a comma at the beginning of the list. I also tried Apply to change Function to List and doing it in the result. I couldn't.



Is there any way to get rid of the first element, #a, without rewriting the expression?










share|improve this question
























  • Instead of a blank you could replace Slot["a"]->Nothing. You'll get this Nothing in the resulting function object, but once the function is applied, Nothing will collapse.
    – Ruslan
    yesterday

















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I pass the following to a function:



{#a, #b, #c} &


These are keys that are used in a list of associations.
There are instances where I want to pass only the last 2 elements, such as:



{#b, #c} &


Right now, I just rewrite it. But it seems like there should be a way to do this by getting rid of the first slot.



I looked at the full form and see that it's:



FullForm[{#a, #b, #c} &]



Function[List[Slot["a"], Slot["b"], Slot["c"]]]



I thought I could somehow get inside and drop Slot["a"], but can't seem to do it. I tried replacing Slot["a"] with a blank, but I'm left with a comma at the beginning of the list. I also tried Apply to change Function to List and doing it in the result. I couldn't.



Is there any way to get rid of the first element, #a, without rewriting the expression?










share|improve this question
























  • Instead of a blank you could replace Slot["a"]->Nothing. You'll get this Nothing in the resulting function object, but once the function is applied, Nothing will collapse.
    – Ruslan
    yesterday















up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











I pass the following to a function:



{#a, #b, #c} &


These are keys that are used in a list of associations.
There are instances where I want to pass only the last 2 elements, such as:



{#b, #c} &


Right now, I just rewrite it. But it seems like there should be a way to do this by getting rid of the first slot.



I looked at the full form and see that it's:



FullForm[{#a, #b, #c} &]



Function[List[Slot["a"], Slot["b"], Slot["c"]]]



I thought I could somehow get inside and drop Slot["a"], but can't seem to do it. I tried replacing Slot["a"] with a blank, but I'm left with a comma at the beginning of the list. I also tried Apply to change Function to List and doing it in the result. I couldn't.



Is there any way to get rid of the first element, #a, without rewriting the expression?










share|improve this question















I pass the following to a function:



{#a, #b, #c} &


These are keys that are used in a list of associations.
There are instances where I want to pass only the last 2 elements, such as:



{#b, #c} &


Right now, I just rewrite it. But it seems like there should be a way to do this by getting rid of the first slot.



I looked at the full form and see that it's:



FullForm[{#a, #b, #c} &]



Function[List[Slot["a"], Slot["b"], Slot["c"]]]



I thought I could somehow get inside and drop Slot["a"], but can't seem to do it. I tried replacing Slot["a"] with a blank, but I'm left with a comma at the beginning of the list. I also tried Apply to change Function to List and doing it in the result. I couldn't.



Is there any way to get rid of the first element, #a, without rewriting the expression?







expression-manipulation slot






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Kuba

102k12199509




102k12199509










asked yesterday









Mitchell Kaplan

1,6371026




1,6371026












  • Instead of a blank you could replace Slot["a"]->Nothing. You'll get this Nothing in the resulting function object, but once the function is applied, Nothing will collapse.
    – Ruslan
    yesterday




















  • Instead of a blank you could replace Slot["a"]->Nothing. You'll get this Nothing in the resulting function object, but once the function is applied, Nothing will collapse.
    – Ruslan
    yesterday


















Instead of a blank you could replace Slot["a"]->Nothing. You'll get this Nothing in the resulting function object, but once the function is applied, Nothing will collapse.
– Ruslan
yesterday






Instead of a blank you could replace Slot["a"]->Nothing. You'll get this Nothing in the resulting function object, but once the function is applied, Nothing will collapse.
– Ruslan
yesterday












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










You could pass it to Delete:



Delete[#, {1, 1}] &[{#a, #b, #c} &]



{#b, #c} &







share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    5
    down vote













    foo = {#a, #b, #c} &;

    foo[[{1}, 2 ;;]]



    {#b, #c} &




    or, but only because we know there won't be any side effects:



    Evaluate /@ Rest /@ foo 



    {#b, #c} &




    or



    foo /. {_Slot, rest__Slot} :> {rest}


    At the end consider using an operator form of a KeyDrop



    bar = KeyTake[{"a", "b", "c"}];

    (Rest /@ bar)@<|"a" -> 1, "b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>



    <|"b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>







    share|improve this answer





















    • I accepted Coolwater's answer because it solved my problem simply. I appreciate the extra insight that your answer provided. Actually, I'll have to spend more time to really understand it though.
      – Mitchell Kaplan
      yesterday










    • @MitchellKaplan sure, btw, can you give a little insigth into how do you use it? Because it feels like a XY problem, maybe there is a better way anyway.
      – Kuba
      yesterday












    • I use a lot of lists of associations and very often I have to sum things by one or more keys. Why I asked this question: I work in reinsurance. My list has, among other things: treaty, effective date, line of business, IBNR. I'm estimating IBNR by all 3, but it has to balance to the total IBNR for effective/line. I need to sum both by all 3, but also by only effective/line. I call a function that does this, and I want to adjust the keys I'm using to eliminate treaty when I'm summing over just effective/line. Left some detail out to fit answer into comment.
      – Mitchell Kaplan
      15 hours ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186391%2fdrop-1st-element-of-a-b-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote



    accepted










    You could pass it to Delete:



    Delete[#, {1, 1}] &[{#a, #b, #c} &]



    {#b, #c} &







    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      7
      down vote



      accepted










      You could pass it to Delete:



      Delete[#, {1, 1}] &[{#a, #b, #c} &]



      {#b, #c} &







      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        7
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        7
        down vote



        accepted






        You could pass it to Delete:



        Delete[#, {1, 1}] &[{#a, #b, #c} &]



        {#b, #c} &







        share|improve this answer












        You could pass it to Delete:



        Delete[#, {1, 1}] &[{#a, #b, #c} &]



        {#b, #c} &








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Coolwater

        14.2k32452




        14.2k32452






















            up vote
            5
            down vote













            foo = {#a, #b, #c} &;

            foo[[{1}, 2 ;;]]



            {#b, #c} &




            or, but only because we know there won't be any side effects:



            Evaluate /@ Rest /@ foo 



            {#b, #c} &




            or



            foo /. {_Slot, rest__Slot} :> {rest}


            At the end consider using an operator form of a KeyDrop



            bar = KeyTake[{"a", "b", "c"}];

            (Rest /@ bar)@<|"a" -> 1, "b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>



            <|"b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>







            share|improve this answer





















            • I accepted Coolwater's answer because it solved my problem simply. I appreciate the extra insight that your answer provided. Actually, I'll have to spend more time to really understand it though.
              – Mitchell Kaplan
              yesterday










            • @MitchellKaplan sure, btw, can you give a little insigth into how do you use it? Because it feels like a XY problem, maybe there is a better way anyway.
              – Kuba
              yesterday












            • I use a lot of lists of associations and very often I have to sum things by one or more keys. Why I asked this question: I work in reinsurance. My list has, among other things: treaty, effective date, line of business, IBNR. I'm estimating IBNR by all 3, but it has to balance to the total IBNR for effective/line. I need to sum both by all 3, but also by only effective/line. I call a function that does this, and I want to adjust the keys I'm using to eliminate treaty when I'm summing over just effective/line. Left some detail out to fit answer into comment.
              – Mitchell Kaplan
              15 hours ago















            up vote
            5
            down vote













            foo = {#a, #b, #c} &;

            foo[[{1}, 2 ;;]]



            {#b, #c} &




            or, but only because we know there won't be any side effects:



            Evaluate /@ Rest /@ foo 



            {#b, #c} &




            or



            foo /. {_Slot, rest__Slot} :> {rest}


            At the end consider using an operator form of a KeyDrop



            bar = KeyTake[{"a", "b", "c"}];

            (Rest /@ bar)@<|"a" -> 1, "b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>



            <|"b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>







            share|improve this answer





















            • I accepted Coolwater's answer because it solved my problem simply. I appreciate the extra insight that your answer provided. Actually, I'll have to spend more time to really understand it though.
              – Mitchell Kaplan
              yesterday










            • @MitchellKaplan sure, btw, can you give a little insigth into how do you use it? Because it feels like a XY problem, maybe there is a better way anyway.
              – Kuba
              yesterday












            • I use a lot of lists of associations and very often I have to sum things by one or more keys. Why I asked this question: I work in reinsurance. My list has, among other things: treaty, effective date, line of business, IBNR. I'm estimating IBNR by all 3, but it has to balance to the total IBNR for effective/line. I need to sum both by all 3, but also by only effective/line. I call a function that does this, and I want to adjust the keys I'm using to eliminate treaty when I'm summing over just effective/line. Left some detail out to fit answer into comment.
              – Mitchell Kaplan
              15 hours ago













            up vote
            5
            down vote










            up vote
            5
            down vote









            foo = {#a, #b, #c} &;

            foo[[{1}, 2 ;;]]



            {#b, #c} &




            or, but only because we know there won't be any side effects:



            Evaluate /@ Rest /@ foo 



            {#b, #c} &




            or



            foo /. {_Slot, rest__Slot} :> {rest}


            At the end consider using an operator form of a KeyDrop



            bar = KeyTake[{"a", "b", "c"}];

            (Rest /@ bar)@<|"a" -> 1, "b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>



            <|"b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>







            share|improve this answer












            foo = {#a, #b, #c} &;

            foo[[{1}, 2 ;;]]



            {#b, #c} &




            or, but only because we know there won't be any side effects:



            Evaluate /@ Rest /@ foo 



            {#b, #c} &




            or



            foo /. {_Slot, rest__Slot} :> {rest}


            At the end consider using an operator form of a KeyDrop



            bar = KeyTake[{"a", "b", "c"}];

            (Rest /@ bar)@<|"a" -> 1, "b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>



            <|"b" -> 1, "c" -> 1|>








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            Kuba

            102k12199509




            102k12199509












            • I accepted Coolwater's answer because it solved my problem simply. I appreciate the extra insight that your answer provided. Actually, I'll have to spend more time to really understand it though.
              – Mitchell Kaplan
              yesterday










            • @MitchellKaplan sure, btw, can you give a little insigth into how do you use it? Because it feels like a XY problem, maybe there is a better way anyway.
              – Kuba
              yesterday












            • I use a lot of lists of associations and very often I have to sum things by one or more keys. Why I asked this question: I work in reinsurance. My list has, among other things: treaty, effective date, line of business, IBNR. I'm estimating IBNR by all 3, but it has to balance to the total IBNR for effective/line. I need to sum both by all 3, but also by only effective/line. I call a function that does this, and I want to adjust the keys I'm using to eliminate treaty when I'm summing over just effective/line. Left some detail out to fit answer into comment.
              – Mitchell Kaplan
              15 hours ago


















            • I accepted Coolwater's answer because it solved my problem simply. I appreciate the extra insight that your answer provided. Actually, I'll have to spend more time to really understand it though.
              – Mitchell Kaplan
              yesterday










            • @MitchellKaplan sure, btw, can you give a little insigth into how do you use it? Because it feels like a XY problem, maybe there is a better way anyway.
              – Kuba
              yesterday












            • I use a lot of lists of associations and very often I have to sum things by one or more keys. Why I asked this question: I work in reinsurance. My list has, among other things: treaty, effective date, line of business, IBNR. I'm estimating IBNR by all 3, but it has to balance to the total IBNR for effective/line. I need to sum both by all 3, but also by only effective/line. I call a function that does this, and I want to adjust the keys I'm using to eliminate treaty when I'm summing over just effective/line. Left some detail out to fit answer into comment.
              – Mitchell Kaplan
              15 hours ago
















            I accepted Coolwater's answer because it solved my problem simply. I appreciate the extra insight that your answer provided. Actually, I'll have to spend more time to really understand it though.
            – Mitchell Kaplan
            yesterday




            I accepted Coolwater's answer because it solved my problem simply. I appreciate the extra insight that your answer provided. Actually, I'll have to spend more time to really understand it though.
            – Mitchell Kaplan
            yesterday












            @MitchellKaplan sure, btw, can you give a little insigth into how do you use it? Because it feels like a XY problem, maybe there is a better way anyway.
            – Kuba
            yesterday






            @MitchellKaplan sure, btw, can you give a little insigth into how do you use it? Because it feels like a XY problem, maybe there is a better way anyway.
            – Kuba
            yesterday














            I use a lot of lists of associations and very often I have to sum things by one or more keys. Why I asked this question: I work in reinsurance. My list has, among other things: treaty, effective date, line of business, IBNR. I'm estimating IBNR by all 3, but it has to balance to the total IBNR for effective/line. I need to sum both by all 3, but also by only effective/line. I call a function that does this, and I want to adjust the keys I'm using to eliminate treaty when I'm summing over just effective/line. Left some detail out to fit answer into comment.
            – Mitchell Kaplan
            15 hours ago




            I use a lot of lists of associations and very often I have to sum things by one or more keys. Why I asked this question: I work in reinsurance. My list has, among other things: treaty, effective date, line of business, IBNR. I'm estimating IBNR by all 3, but it has to balance to the total IBNR for effective/line. I need to sum both by all 3, but also by only effective/line. I call a function that does this, and I want to adjust the keys I'm using to eliminate treaty when I'm summing over just effective/line. Left some detail out to fit answer into comment.
            – Mitchell Kaplan
            15 hours ago


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186391%2fdrop-1st-element-of-a-b-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

            Mangá

             ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕