Wheaton's law rewritten as a company policy / company value





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1












Wheaton's law: "Don't be a dick", we feel would be a excellent company policy or company value. But for obvious reasons we can nit use that verbatim.



What would be a more work appropriate way of phrasing that, while still capturing the simplicity and directness, without being overly prescriptive?










share|improve this question
























  • PS you should try to spell the name correctly throughout.
    – Fattie
    30 mins ago

















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1












Wheaton's law: "Don't be a dick", we feel would be a excellent company policy or company value. But for obvious reasons we can nit use that verbatim.



What would be a more work appropriate way of phrasing that, while still capturing the simplicity and directness, without being overly prescriptive?










share|improve this question
























  • PS you should try to spell the name correctly throughout.
    – Fattie
    30 mins ago













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Wheaton's law: "Don't be a dick", we feel would be a excellent company policy or company value. But for obvious reasons we can nit use that verbatim.



What would be a more work appropriate way of phrasing that, while still capturing the simplicity and directness, without being overly prescriptive?










share|improve this question















Wheaton's law: "Don't be a dick", we feel would be a excellent company policy or company value. But for obvious reasons we can nit use that verbatim.



What would be a more work appropriate way of phrasing that, while still capturing the simplicity and directness, without being overly prescriptive?







politics company-policy motivation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 16 mins ago









Kilisi

109k61243422




109k61243422










asked 2 hours ago









DarcyThomas

1616




1616












  • PS you should try to spell the name correctly throughout.
    – Fattie
    30 mins ago


















  • PS you should try to spell the name correctly throughout.
    – Fattie
    30 mins ago
















PS you should try to spell the name correctly throughout.
– Fattie
30 mins ago




PS you should try to spell the name correctly throughout.
– Fattie
30 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Could you get away with




"Don't be an SOB."







share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote














    "Grow up mate."




    is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.





      share





















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "423"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: false,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123774%2fwheatons-law-rewritten-as-a-company-policy-company-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown




















        StackExchange.ready(function () {
        $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
        var showEditor = function() {
        $("#show-editor-button").hide();
        $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
        StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
        };

        var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
        if(useFancy == 'True') {
        var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
        var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
        var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

        $(this).loadPopup({
        url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
        loaded: function(popup) {
        var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
        var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
        var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

        pTitle.text(popupTitle);
        pBody.html(popupBody);
        pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
        }
        })
        } else{
        var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
        if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
        showEditor();
        }
        }
        });
        });






        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        0
        down vote













        Could you get away with




        "Don't be an SOB."







        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Could you get away with




          "Don't be an SOB."







          share|improve this answer























            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Could you get away with




            "Don't be an SOB."







            share|improve this answer












            Could you get away with




            "Don't be an SOB."








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 31 mins ago









            Fattie

            6,50531322




            6,50531322
























                up vote
                0
                down vote














                "Grow up mate."




                is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote














                  "Grow up mate."




                  is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.






                  share|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    "Grow up mate."




                    is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.






                    share|improve this answer













                    "Grow up mate."




                    is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 13 mins ago









                    Kilisi

                    109k61243422




                    109k61243422






















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.





                        share

























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.





                          share























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.





                            share












                            Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.






                            share











                            share


                            share










                            answered 9 mins ago









                            Hilmar

                            23.9k65872




                            23.9k65872






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123774%2fwheatons-law-rewritten-as-a-company-policy-company-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown











                                Popular posts from this blog

                                flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                                Mangá

                                 ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕