Is there a way to use Google's advanced search parameters without triggering the CAPTCHA test?
When using Googles advanced search operators, I only ever get about three or four tries before I start getting harassed by these perpetual reCAPTCHA turing tests:
Yes, I'm human. No, I'm not a robot. No I'm not doing anything suspicious. Yes, I can identify street signs and traffic lights and storefronts and motorcycles. Is there some way around this?
I know it's there for a reason, but so are the advanced parameters, right? It's a search engine. Sometimes you have to really search to get the results you're looking for. I'm using these features as they were intended; to search smarter; to reduce the number of false positives. The internet is too big to be casting too wide a net all the time.
Here's a real quick example.
Say you want to which Spider-Man movies are showing on Netflix. But not the ones with Tobey Maguire. And only in France. Or Italy. You could form a search query utilizing the following operator/parameter combinations:
site:"netflix.com"intitle:"spider-man"inurl:"/(fr|it)/title/"-"tobey maguire"
google-chrome google-search
asked Feb 5 at 6:40
tjt263tjt263
1113
migrated from superuser.com Feb 5 at 7:07
This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.
add a comment |
When using Googles advanced search operators, I only ever get about three or four tries before I start getting harassed by these perpetual reCAPTCHA turing tests:
Yes, I'm human. No, I'm not a robot. No I'm not doing anything suspicious. Yes, I can identify street signs and traffic lights and storefronts and motorcycles. Is there some way around this?
I know it's there for a reason, but so are the advanced parameters, right? It's a search engine. Sometimes you have to really search to get the results you're looking for. I'm using these features as they were intended; to search smarter; to reduce the number of false positives. The internet is too big to be casting too wide a net all the time.
Here's a real quick example.
Say you want to which Spider-Man movies are showing on Netflix. But not the ones with Tobey Maguire. And only in France. Or Italy. You could form a search query utilizing the following operator/parameter combinations:
site:"netflix.com"intitle:"spider-man"inurl:"/(fr|it)/title/"-"tobey maguire"
google-chrome google-search
asked Feb 5 at 6:40
tjt263tjt263
1113
migrated from superuser.com Feb 5 at 7:07
This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.
I guess not. capatcha is safety future against bots which is backfiring on actual more advanced humans who are able to use search operators.
– user0
Feb 5 at 14:04
@MARKMYANSWER Therein lies the problem.
– tjt263
Feb 5 at 14:34
add a comment |
When using Googles advanced search operators, I only ever get about three or four tries before I start getting harassed by these perpetual reCAPTCHA turing tests:
Yes, I'm human. No, I'm not a robot. No I'm not doing anything suspicious. Yes, I can identify street signs and traffic lights and storefronts and motorcycles. Is there some way around this?
I know it's there for a reason, but so are the advanced parameters, right? It's a search engine. Sometimes you have to really search to get the results you're looking for. I'm using these features as they were intended; to search smarter; to reduce the number of false positives. The internet is too big to be casting too wide a net all the time.
Here's a real quick example.
Say you want to which Spider-Man movies are showing on Netflix. But not the ones with Tobey Maguire. And only in France. Or Italy. You could form a search query utilizing the following operator/parameter combinations:
site:"netflix.com"intitle:"spider-man"inurl:"/(fr|it)/title/"-"tobey maguire"
google-chrome google-search
asked Feb 5 at 6:40
tjt263tjt263
1113
When using Googles advanced search operators, I only ever get about three or four tries before I start getting harassed by these perpetual reCAPTCHA turing tests:
Yes, I'm human. No, I'm not a robot. No I'm not doing anything suspicious. Yes, I can identify street signs and traffic lights and storefronts and motorcycles. Is there some way around this?
I know it's there for a reason, but so are the advanced parameters, right? It's a search engine. Sometimes you have to really search to get the results you're looking for. I'm using these features as they were intended; to search smarter; to reduce the number of false positives. The internet is too big to be casting too wide a net all the time.
Here's a real quick example.
Say you want to which Spider-Man movies are showing on Netflix. But not the ones with Tobey Maguire. And only in France. Or Italy. You could form a search query utilizing the following operator/parameter combinations:
site:"netflix.com"intitle:"spider-man"inurl:"/(fr|it)/title/"-"tobey maguire"
google-chrome google-search
google-chrome google-search
asked Feb 5 at 6:40
tjt263tjt263
1113
asked Feb 5 at 6:40
tjt263tjt263
1113
asked Feb 5 at 6:40
tjt263tjt263
1113
asked Feb 5 at 6:40
tjt263tjt263
1113
asked Feb 5 at 6:40
tjt263tjt263
1113
1113
migrated from superuser.com Feb 5 at 7:07
This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.
migrated from superuser.com Feb 5 at 7:07
This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.
I guess not. capatcha is safety future against bots which is backfiring on actual more advanced humans who are able to use search operators.
– user0
Feb 5 at 14:04
@MARKMYANSWER Therein lies the problem.
– tjt263
Feb 5 at 14:34
add a comment |
I guess not. capatcha is safety future against bots which is backfiring on actual more advanced humans who are able to use search operators.
– user0
Feb 5 at 14:04
@MARKMYANSWER Therein lies the problem.
– tjt263
Feb 5 at 14:34
I guess not. capatcha is safety future against bots which is backfiring on actual more advanced humans who are able to use search operators.
– user0
Feb 5 at 14:04
I guess not. capatcha is safety future against bots which is backfiring on actual more advanced humans who are able to use search operators.
– user0
Feb 5 at 14:04
@MARKMYANSWER Therein lies the problem.
– tjt263
Feb 5 at 14:34
@MARKMYANSWER Therein lies the problem.
– tjt263
Feb 5 at 14:34
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "34"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwebapps.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f124981%2fis-there-a-way-to-use-googles-advanced-search-parameters-without-triggering-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Web Applications Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwebapps.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f124981%2fis-there-a-way-to-use-googles-advanced-search-parameters-without-triggering-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I guess not. capatcha is safety future against bots which is backfiring on actual more advanced humans who are able to use search operators.
– user0
Feb 5 at 14:04
@MARKMYANSWER Therein lies the problem.
– tjt263
Feb 5 at 14:34