How is Wireshark constructing HTTP Flows?












0















I'm trying to understand how Wireshark knows what request is correlated to a response - "Follow HTTP Flow".

For example, some http packets may be sent with gaps of other tcp packets.

Some have responses that are separated between several tcp packets and Wireshark needs to understand they are correlated.

Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?










share|improve this question



























    0















    I'm trying to understand how Wireshark knows what request is correlated to a response - "Follow HTTP Flow".

    For example, some http packets may be sent with gaps of other tcp packets.

    Some have responses that are separated between several tcp packets and Wireshark needs to understand they are correlated.

    Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I'm trying to understand how Wireshark knows what request is correlated to a response - "Follow HTTP Flow".

      For example, some http packets may be sent with gaps of other tcp packets.

      Some have responses that are separated between several tcp packets and Wireshark needs to understand they are correlated.

      Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?










      share|improve this question














      I'm trying to understand how Wireshark knows what request is correlated to a response - "Follow HTTP Flow".

      For example, some http packets may be sent with gaps of other tcp packets.

      Some have responses that are separated between several tcp packets and Wireshark needs to understand they are correlated.

      Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?







      networking tcp wireshark






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 24 at 18:34









      funerrfunerr

      127116




      127116






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1















          Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?




          Yes, HTTP/2 and earlier all rely on TCP for keeping track of the packet stream, and TCP uses Seq and Ack numbers for this, along with the 4-tuple of (source IP, source port, destination IP, destination port).



          HTTP/2 has additional flow-tracking mechanisms of top of TCP (that HTTP 1.1 and earlier didn't have) because HTTP/2 allows multiple concurrent HTTP transactions within a single TCP stream.



          HTTP/3 (the new name for QUIC) is a different story, because it is UDP-based. But I believe it uses a TCP-like Seq/Ack mechanism to keep things straight.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "3"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1398035%2fhow-is-wireshark-constructing-http-flows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1















            Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?




            Yes, HTTP/2 and earlier all rely on TCP for keeping track of the packet stream, and TCP uses Seq and Ack numbers for this, along with the 4-tuple of (source IP, source port, destination IP, destination port).



            HTTP/2 has additional flow-tracking mechanisms of top of TCP (that HTTP 1.1 and earlier didn't have) because HTTP/2 allows multiple concurrent HTTP transactions within a single TCP stream.



            HTTP/3 (the new name for QUIC) is a different story, because it is UDP-based. But I believe it uses a TCP-like Seq/Ack mechanism to keep things straight.






            share|improve this answer




























              1















              Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?




              Yes, HTTP/2 and earlier all rely on TCP for keeping track of the packet stream, and TCP uses Seq and Ack numbers for this, along with the 4-tuple of (source IP, source port, destination IP, destination port).



              HTTP/2 has additional flow-tracking mechanisms of top of TCP (that HTTP 1.1 and earlier didn't have) because HTTP/2 allows multiple concurrent HTTP transactions within a single TCP stream.



              HTTP/3 (the new name for QUIC) is a different story, because it is UDP-based. But I believe it uses a TCP-like Seq/Ack mechanism to keep things straight.






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1








                Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?




                Yes, HTTP/2 and earlier all rely on TCP for keeping track of the packet stream, and TCP uses Seq and Ack numbers for this, along with the 4-tuple of (source IP, source port, destination IP, destination port).



                HTTP/2 has additional flow-tracking mechanisms of top of TCP (that HTTP 1.1 and earlier didn't have) because HTTP/2 allows multiple concurrent HTTP transactions within a single TCP stream.



                HTTP/3 (the new name for QUIC) is a different story, because it is UDP-based. But I believe it uses a TCP-like Seq/Ack mechanism to keep things straight.






                share|improve this answer














                Does this have to do with SEQ and ACK in TCP?




                Yes, HTTP/2 and earlier all rely on TCP for keeping track of the packet stream, and TCP uses Seq and Ack numbers for this, along with the 4-tuple of (source IP, source port, destination IP, destination port).



                HTTP/2 has additional flow-tracking mechanisms of top of TCP (that HTTP 1.1 and earlier didn't have) because HTTP/2 allows multiple concurrent HTTP transactions within a single TCP stream.



                HTTP/3 (the new name for QUIC) is a different story, because it is UDP-based. But I believe it uses a TCP-like Seq/Ack mechanism to keep things straight.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jan 24 at 20:03









                SpiffSpiff

                77.6k10118163




                77.6k10118163






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1398035%2fhow-is-wireshark-constructing-http-flows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                    Mangá

                     ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕