Domaincontroller not forwarding dns requests












0















I've setup a test environment that looks like:




  • modem/router connected to physical host

  • hyper-v manager running on physical host

  • Virtual Switch connected to external network

  • Two VMs (DC + client) connected to virtual switch


The DC has the following static config:




  • IP: 192.168.1.100

  • Subn: 255.255.255.0

  • Gateway: 192.168.1.1

  • DNS 127.0.0.1

  • External DNS 8.8.8.8 added to 'Forwarders' within DNS Management.


Client config:




  • IP: 192.168.1.101

  • Subn: 255.255.255.0

  • Gateway: 192.168.1.100

  • DNS: 192.168.1.100


Facts:




  • Client can ping router and DC

  • DC can ping router, cannot ping client

  • DC has internet, client does not


To my limited understanding the DNS query from the client should by forwarded by my DC to either the router (192.168.1.1 or google dns 8.8.8.8). It seems to do neither. Is the fact that i'm using a single NIC for all machines (physical and virtual) related to the problems im having?










share|improve this question























  • The gateway on the client should, in normal situations, be the same as on the DC. Both DC and client are in the same subnet. If the modem/router is 192.168.1.1 then use that as gateway from both machines. After that the first thing to test is: is there internet connectivity from the DC. Can you resolve DNS queries from the DC? The installation being virtual and sharing hardware should not be an issue. In this setup the client should use DC for DNS queries. The DC get's the info asked from it's cache or queries upstream (8.8.8.8) to get the info requested

    – Gert Jan Kraaijeveld
    Feb 17 at 15:52











  • Setting the client gw to same address as DC didn't work at first which made me doubt. Apparantly the VPN on my physical host messed up NAT. Thanks for sending me in the right direction.

    – RockYoClock
    Feb 20 at 18:38
















0















I've setup a test environment that looks like:




  • modem/router connected to physical host

  • hyper-v manager running on physical host

  • Virtual Switch connected to external network

  • Two VMs (DC + client) connected to virtual switch


The DC has the following static config:




  • IP: 192.168.1.100

  • Subn: 255.255.255.0

  • Gateway: 192.168.1.1

  • DNS 127.0.0.1

  • External DNS 8.8.8.8 added to 'Forwarders' within DNS Management.


Client config:




  • IP: 192.168.1.101

  • Subn: 255.255.255.0

  • Gateway: 192.168.1.100

  • DNS: 192.168.1.100


Facts:




  • Client can ping router and DC

  • DC can ping router, cannot ping client

  • DC has internet, client does not


To my limited understanding the DNS query from the client should by forwarded by my DC to either the router (192.168.1.1 or google dns 8.8.8.8). It seems to do neither. Is the fact that i'm using a single NIC for all machines (physical and virtual) related to the problems im having?










share|improve this question























  • The gateway on the client should, in normal situations, be the same as on the DC. Both DC and client are in the same subnet. If the modem/router is 192.168.1.1 then use that as gateway from both machines. After that the first thing to test is: is there internet connectivity from the DC. Can you resolve DNS queries from the DC? The installation being virtual and sharing hardware should not be an issue. In this setup the client should use DC for DNS queries. The DC get's the info asked from it's cache or queries upstream (8.8.8.8) to get the info requested

    – Gert Jan Kraaijeveld
    Feb 17 at 15:52











  • Setting the client gw to same address as DC didn't work at first which made me doubt. Apparantly the VPN on my physical host messed up NAT. Thanks for sending me in the right direction.

    – RockYoClock
    Feb 20 at 18:38














0












0








0








I've setup a test environment that looks like:




  • modem/router connected to physical host

  • hyper-v manager running on physical host

  • Virtual Switch connected to external network

  • Two VMs (DC + client) connected to virtual switch


The DC has the following static config:




  • IP: 192.168.1.100

  • Subn: 255.255.255.0

  • Gateway: 192.168.1.1

  • DNS 127.0.0.1

  • External DNS 8.8.8.8 added to 'Forwarders' within DNS Management.


Client config:




  • IP: 192.168.1.101

  • Subn: 255.255.255.0

  • Gateway: 192.168.1.100

  • DNS: 192.168.1.100


Facts:




  • Client can ping router and DC

  • DC can ping router, cannot ping client

  • DC has internet, client does not


To my limited understanding the DNS query from the client should by forwarded by my DC to either the router (192.168.1.1 or google dns 8.8.8.8). It seems to do neither. Is the fact that i'm using a single NIC for all machines (physical and virtual) related to the problems im having?










share|improve this question














I've setup a test environment that looks like:




  • modem/router connected to physical host

  • hyper-v manager running on physical host

  • Virtual Switch connected to external network

  • Two VMs (DC + client) connected to virtual switch


The DC has the following static config:




  • IP: 192.168.1.100

  • Subn: 255.255.255.0

  • Gateway: 192.168.1.1

  • DNS 127.0.0.1

  • External DNS 8.8.8.8 added to 'Forwarders' within DNS Management.


Client config:




  • IP: 192.168.1.101

  • Subn: 255.255.255.0

  • Gateway: 192.168.1.100

  • DNS: 192.168.1.100


Facts:




  • Client can ping router and DC

  • DC can ping router, cannot ping client

  • DC has internet, client does not


To my limited understanding the DNS query from the client should by forwarded by my DC to either the router (192.168.1.1 or google dns 8.8.8.8). It seems to do neither. Is the fact that i'm using a single NIC for all machines (physical and virtual) related to the problems im having?







networking dns windows-domain






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 16 at 23:01









RockYoClockRockYoClock

1613




1613













  • The gateway on the client should, in normal situations, be the same as on the DC. Both DC and client are in the same subnet. If the modem/router is 192.168.1.1 then use that as gateway from both machines. After that the first thing to test is: is there internet connectivity from the DC. Can you resolve DNS queries from the DC? The installation being virtual and sharing hardware should not be an issue. In this setup the client should use DC for DNS queries. The DC get's the info asked from it's cache or queries upstream (8.8.8.8) to get the info requested

    – Gert Jan Kraaijeveld
    Feb 17 at 15:52











  • Setting the client gw to same address as DC didn't work at first which made me doubt. Apparantly the VPN on my physical host messed up NAT. Thanks for sending me in the right direction.

    – RockYoClock
    Feb 20 at 18:38



















  • The gateway on the client should, in normal situations, be the same as on the DC. Both DC and client are in the same subnet. If the modem/router is 192.168.1.1 then use that as gateway from both machines. After that the first thing to test is: is there internet connectivity from the DC. Can you resolve DNS queries from the DC? The installation being virtual and sharing hardware should not be an issue. In this setup the client should use DC for DNS queries. The DC get's the info asked from it's cache or queries upstream (8.8.8.8) to get the info requested

    – Gert Jan Kraaijeveld
    Feb 17 at 15:52











  • Setting the client gw to same address as DC didn't work at first which made me doubt. Apparantly the VPN on my physical host messed up NAT. Thanks for sending me in the right direction.

    – RockYoClock
    Feb 20 at 18:38

















The gateway on the client should, in normal situations, be the same as on the DC. Both DC and client are in the same subnet. If the modem/router is 192.168.1.1 then use that as gateway from both machines. After that the first thing to test is: is there internet connectivity from the DC. Can you resolve DNS queries from the DC? The installation being virtual and sharing hardware should not be an issue. In this setup the client should use DC for DNS queries. The DC get's the info asked from it's cache or queries upstream (8.8.8.8) to get the info requested

– Gert Jan Kraaijeveld
Feb 17 at 15:52





The gateway on the client should, in normal situations, be the same as on the DC. Both DC and client are in the same subnet. If the modem/router is 192.168.1.1 then use that as gateway from both machines. After that the first thing to test is: is there internet connectivity from the DC. Can you resolve DNS queries from the DC? The installation being virtual and sharing hardware should not be an issue. In this setup the client should use DC for DNS queries. The DC get's the info asked from it's cache or queries upstream (8.8.8.8) to get the info requested

– Gert Jan Kraaijeveld
Feb 17 at 15:52













Setting the client gw to same address as DC didn't work at first which made me doubt. Apparantly the VPN on my physical host messed up NAT. Thanks for sending me in the right direction.

– RockYoClock
Feb 20 at 18:38





Setting the client gw to same address as DC didn't work at first which made me doubt. Apparantly the VPN on my physical host messed up NAT. Thanks for sending me in the right direction.

– RockYoClock
Feb 20 at 18:38










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1406595%2fdomaincontroller-not-forwarding-dns-requests%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1406595%2fdomaincontroller-not-forwarding-dns-requests%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

 ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕