Gaseous metals?











up vote
9
down vote

favorite












Metals form metallic bonds which explain many of their chemical and physical properties.



This is most familiar in the solid state but metallic properties are still quite recognizable in the liquid state e.g. mercury and molten iron.



However, gaseous metals are much less familiar and it is not obvious whether they would still have a distinct metallic behaviour. For example, is there a distinction between gas and plasma for a metal?



This article mentions that the metallic bond persists in the liquid state but says nothing about the gas state: Metallic bonding at Chemguide.



So, do metals retain any distinct metallic behaviour in the gas state?



Note that I am not asking only about the electrical properties. My main question is whether the gas consists of neutral atoms, small molecules, or positive ions in a sea of electrons?










share|improve this question




















  • 3




    Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago










  • chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago










  • Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago















up vote
9
down vote

favorite












Metals form metallic bonds which explain many of their chemical and physical properties.



This is most familiar in the solid state but metallic properties are still quite recognizable in the liquid state e.g. mercury and molten iron.



However, gaseous metals are much less familiar and it is not obvious whether they would still have a distinct metallic behaviour. For example, is there a distinction between gas and plasma for a metal?



This article mentions that the metallic bond persists in the liquid state but says nothing about the gas state: Metallic bonding at Chemguide.



So, do metals retain any distinct metallic behaviour in the gas state?



Note that I am not asking only about the electrical properties. My main question is whether the gas consists of neutral atoms, small molecules, or positive ions in a sea of electrons?










share|improve this question




















  • 3




    Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago










  • chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago










  • Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago













up vote
9
down vote

favorite









up vote
9
down vote

favorite











Metals form metallic bonds which explain many of their chemical and physical properties.



This is most familiar in the solid state but metallic properties are still quite recognizable in the liquid state e.g. mercury and molten iron.



However, gaseous metals are much less familiar and it is not obvious whether they would still have a distinct metallic behaviour. For example, is there a distinction between gas and plasma for a metal?



This article mentions that the metallic bond persists in the liquid state but says nothing about the gas state: Metallic bonding at Chemguide.



So, do metals retain any distinct metallic behaviour in the gas state?



Note that I am not asking only about the electrical properties. My main question is whether the gas consists of neutral atoms, small molecules, or positive ions in a sea of electrons?










share|improve this question















Metals form metallic bonds which explain many of their chemical and physical properties.



This is most familiar in the solid state but metallic properties are still quite recognizable in the liquid state e.g. mercury and molten iron.



However, gaseous metals are much less familiar and it is not obvious whether they would still have a distinct metallic behaviour. For example, is there a distinction between gas and plasma for a metal?



This article mentions that the metallic bond persists in the liquid state but says nothing about the gas state: Metallic bonding at Chemguide.



So, do metals retain any distinct metallic behaviour in the gas state?



Note that I am not asking only about the electrical properties. My main question is whether the gas consists of neutral atoms, small molecules, or positive ions in a sea of electrons?







metal gas-phase-chemistry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago

























asked 2 days ago









badjohn

461111




461111








  • 3




    Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago










  • chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago










  • Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago














  • 3




    Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago










  • chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago










  • Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
    – Mithoron
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago








3




3




Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
– Mithoron
2 days ago




Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
– Mithoron
2 days ago












chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago




chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago












Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago




Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago




1




1




Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
– badjohn
2 days ago




Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
– badjohn
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
18
down vote



accepted










No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.



See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.



Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.



So it goes.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
    – Oscar Lanzi
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes we can.$,$
    – Ivan Neretin
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104408%2fgaseous-metals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
18
down vote



accepted










No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.



See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.



Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.



So it goes.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
    – Oscar Lanzi
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes we can.$,$
    – Ivan Neretin
    2 days ago















up vote
18
down vote



accepted










No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.



See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.



Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.



So it goes.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
    – Oscar Lanzi
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes we can.$,$
    – Ivan Neretin
    2 days ago













up vote
18
down vote



accepted







up vote
18
down vote



accepted






No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.



See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.



Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.



So it goes.






share|improve this answer














No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.



See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.



Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.



So it goes.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









Ivan Neretin

22.8k34684




22.8k34684








  • 2




    There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
    – Oscar Lanzi
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes we can.$,$
    – Ivan Neretin
    2 days ago














  • 2




    There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
    – Oscar Lanzi
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
    – badjohn
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes we can.$,$
    – Ivan Neretin
    2 days ago








2




2




There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago




There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago




1




1




Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago




Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago




1




1




Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago




Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104408%2fgaseous-metals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

Eduardo VII do Reino Unido