Gaseous metals?
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
Metals form metallic bonds which explain many of their chemical and physical properties.
This is most familiar in the solid state but metallic properties are still quite recognizable in the liquid state e.g. mercury and molten iron.
However, gaseous metals are much less familiar and it is not obvious whether they would still have a distinct metallic behaviour. For example, is there a distinction between gas and plasma for a metal?
This article mentions that the metallic bond persists in the liquid state but says nothing about the gas state: Metallic bonding at Chemguide.
So, do metals retain any distinct metallic behaviour in the gas state?
Note that I am not asking only about the electrical properties. My main question is whether the gas consists of neutral atoms, small molecules, or positive ions in a sea of electrons?
metal gas-phase-chemistry
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
Metals form metallic bonds which explain many of their chemical and physical properties.
This is most familiar in the solid state but metallic properties are still quite recognizable in the liquid state e.g. mercury and molten iron.
However, gaseous metals are much less familiar and it is not obvious whether they would still have a distinct metallic behaviour. For example, is there a distinction between gas and plasma for a metal?
This article mentions that the metallic bond persists in the liquid state but says nothing about the gas state: Metallic bonding at Chemguide.
So, do metals retain any distinct metallic behaviour in the gas state?
Note that I am not asking only about the electrical properties. My main question is whether the gas consists of neutral atoms, small molecules, or positive ions in a sea of electrons?
metal gas-phase-chemistry
3
Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
– Mithoron
2 days ago
chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
1
Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
– badjohn
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
up vote
9
down vote
favorite
Metals form metallic bonds which explain many of their chemical and physical properties.
This is most familiar in the solid state but metallic properties are still quite recognizable in the liquid state e.g. mercury and molten iron.
However, gaseous metals are much less familiar and it is not obvious whether they would still have a distinct metallic behaviour. For example, is there a distinction between gas and plasma for a metal?
This article mentions that the metallic bond persists in the liquid state but says nothing about the gas state: Metallic bonding at Chemguide.
So, do metals retain any distinct metallic behaviour in the gas state?
Note that I am not asking only about the electrical properties. My main question is whether the gas consists of neutral atoms, small molecules, or positive ions in a sea of electrons?
metal gas-phase-chemistry
Metals form metallic bonds which explain many of their chemical and physical properties.
This is most familiar in the solid state but metallic properties are still quite recognizable in the liquid state e.g. mercury and molten iron.
However, gaseous metals are much less familiar and it is not obvious whether they would still have a distinct metallic behaviour. For example, is there a distinction between gas and plasma for a metal?
This article mentions that the metallic bond persists in the liquid state but says nothing about the gas state: Metallic bonding at Chemguide.
So, do metals retain any distinct metallic behaviour in the gas state?
Note that I am not asking only about the electrical properties. My main question is whether the gas consists of neutral atoms, small molecules, or positive ions in a sea of electrons?
metal gas-phase-chemistry
metal gas-phase-chemistry
edited 2 days ago
asked 2 days ago
badjohn
461111
461111
3
Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
– Mithoron
2 days ago
chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
1
Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
– badjohn
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
– Mithoron
2 days ago
chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
1
Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
– badjohn
2 days ago
3
3
Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
– Mithoron
2 days ago
Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
– Mithoron
2 days ago
chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
1
1
Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
– badjohn
2 days ago
Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
– badjohn
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.
See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.
Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.
So it goes.
2
There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago
1
Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago
1
Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.
See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.
Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.
So it goes.
2
There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago
1
Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago
1
Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.
See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.
Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.
So it goes.
2
There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago
1
Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago
1
Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
up vote
18
down vote
accepted
No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.
See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.
Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.
So it goes.
No, gaseous metals do not retain metallic bonds, nor metallic conductivity, nor luster, nor any other metallic properties. They are no different from other gases. True, they typically require pretty high temperatures to form, but then again, they are hardly special in this regard, as many non-metallic substances require the same.
See, all metallic properties are in fact collective effects. They are caused by metallic bonding, and not just of two atoms, but of an entire piece of metal (like a thousand, only much more). You don't have bonding in gases. The particles (lone atoms in this case) are basically free to go. Maybe they bump into each other, two or three at a time, but definitely not a thousand.
Plasma is an entirely different thing, unrelated to your initial question. Yes, plasma is pretty different from a gas; to obtain it, you'll have to heat the gas until it ionizes.
So it goes.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Ivan Neretin
22.8k34684
22.8k34684
2
There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago
1
Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago
1
Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago
1
Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago
1
Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago
2
2
There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago
There could be molecules/small clusters, but that would not be enough for properties we'd recognize as metallic.
– Oscar Lanzi
2 days ago
1
1
Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago
Thanks. I suspected something like that but wanted confirmation. So, we can have gaseous iron which is not a plasma? Just neutral iron atoms (or small clusters) rather ions in a sea of electrons.
– badjohn
2 days ago
1
1
Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago
Yes we can.$,$
– Ivan Neretin
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104408%2fgaseous-metals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Possible duplicate of Structure of a metal in gas phase
– Mithoron
2 days ago
chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/4801/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
Similar thing as chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/2511/…
– Mithoron
2 days ago
1
Similar but not quite identical. That one seems to concentrate on conductivity whereas my question was more generic and not restricted to their electrical properties. Also, I have received which I will accept tomorrow unless an even better one comes along.
– badjohn
2 days ago