Explain an OVER clause
I saw a concise TSQL statement that effectively splits a string into its constituent characters, one per line, for the purpose of evaluating the ascii
value on each character.
If I am reading the query correctly, effectively, 3 CTEs are being used to prepare a table of 1 column containing 10,000 rows, each with the value '0'.
A fourth CTE is defined as follows:
cteTally(n) AS(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) n
FROM E4
)
Subsequently, this CTE is joined to a table containing a column with the strings of interest, with the following select
:
SELECT n, SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1), ASCII( SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1))
That is, row number n, then the nth character in LastName, then the ascii value of that character.
My questions relate to the over
clause in the CTE above.
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
If we are querying row_number from 10,000 identical rows, why do we need an order by
clause at all? Why is the order by
put into an over
clause rather than as an order by
clause for the select
statement - especially as the over
clause isn't even specifying any partition? (I presume this means the window over which row_number
operates is the full 10,000 rows?) And what does it mean to order by select null
?
sql-server t-sql window-functions
add a comment |
I saw a concise TSQL statement that effectively splits a string into its constituent characters, one per line, for the purpose of evaluating the ascii
value on each character.
If I am reading the query correctly, effectively, 3 CTEs are being used to prepare a table of 1 column containing 10,000 rows, each with the value '0'.
A fourth CTE is defined as follows:
cteTally(n) AS(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) n
FROM E4
)
Subsequently, this CTE is joined to a table containing a column with the strings of interest, with the following select
:
SELECT n, SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1), ASCII( SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1))
That is, row number n, then the nth character in LastName, then the ascii value of that character.
My questions relate to the over
clause in the CTE above.
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
If we are querying row_number from 10,000 identical rows, why do we need an order by
clause at all? Why is the order by
put into an over
clause rather than as an order by
clause for the select
statement - especially as the over
clause isn't even specifying any partition? (I presume this means the window over which row_number
operates is the full 10,000 rows?) And what does it mean to order by select null
?
sql-server t-sql window-functions
add a comment |
I saw a concise TSQL statement that effectively splits a string into its constituent characters, one per line, for the purpose of evaluating the ascii
value on each character.
If I am reading the query correctly, effectively, 3 CTEs are being used to prepare a table of 1 column containing 10,000 rows, each with the value '0'.
A fourth CTE is defined as follows:
cteTally(n) AS(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) n
FROM E4
)
Subsequently, this CTE is joined to a table containing a column with the strings of interest, with the following select
:
SELECT n, SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1), ASCII( SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1))
That is, row number n, then the nth character in LastName, then the ascii value of that character.
My questions relate to the over
clause in the CTE above.
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
If we are querying row_number from 10,000 identical rows, why do we need an order by
clause at all? Why is the order by
put into an over
clause rather than as an order by
clause for the select
statement - especially as the over
clause isn't even specifying any partition? (I presume this means the window over which row_number
operates is the full 10,000 rows?) And what does it mean to order by select null
?
sql-server t-sql window-functions
I saw a concise TSQL statement that effectively splits a string into its constituent characters, one per line, for the purpose of evaluating the ascii
value on each character.
If I am reading the query correctly, effectively, 3 CTEs are being used to prepare a table of 1 column containing 10,000 rows, each with the value '0'.
A fourth CTE is defined as follows:
cteTally(n) AS(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) n
FROM E4
)
Subsequently, this CTE is joined to a table containing a column with the strings of interest, with the following select
:
SELECT n, SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1), ASCII( SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1))
That is, row number n, then the nth character in LastName, then the ascii value of that character.
My questions relate to the over
clause in the CTE above.
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
If we are querying row_number from 10,000 identical rows, why do we need an order by
clause at all? Why is the order by
put into an over
clause rather than as an order by
clause for the select
statement - especially as the over
clause isn't even specifying any partition? (I presume this means the window over which row_number
operates is the full 10,000 rows?) And what does it mean to order by select null
?
sql-server t-sql window-functions
sql-server t-sql window-functions
asked 5 hours ago
youcantryreachingmeyoucantryreachingme
2987
2987
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
ROW_NUMBER() is a ranking window function, and ranking window functions require a mandatory ORDER BY clause.
If you try to write it without the ORDER BY you will get a syntax error.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER()
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 4112, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
-- The function 'ROW_NUMBER' must have an OVER clause with ORDER BY.
The trick with the subquery was discovered by someone who blogged about it, as a performance optimization.
SQL Server always performs a sort operation since constants are not allowed for the ORDER BY clause:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY NULL)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5309, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support constants as ORDER BY clause expressions.
And neither are integers which are treated as indices:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY 1)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5308, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support integer indices as ORDER BY clause expressions.
Turns out that due to some glitch in the code, you can circumvent this limitation by using a subquery, which for some reason is allowed, and eliminates the sort operator.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT 1))
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
You can use any constant in the sub query, the NULL is probably a reminiscent of the habit of using SELECT NULL within EXISTS predicates, which in the early history of SQL Server had a performance impact as opposed to * or any other column expression, as the optimizer wasn't smart enough to ignore it.
HTH
Thank you. Sure does. I can see most of my questions fall over like a house of cards on "windows functions require a mandatory order by clause". The MS docs on theover
clause sayorder by
is optional - but I guess this means partitions might be used without window functions (and not require anorder by
). Nice username!
– youcantryreachingme
3 hours ago
2
Not all window functions require anORDER BY
. Only ranking window functions -ROW_NUMBER()
,RANK()
,DENSE_RANK()
,NTILE()
. Providing aPARTITION BY
or not is irrelevant.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
3 hours ago
You can doSELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 1/0);
– Erik Darling
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The OVER clause sets the ordering (and partitioning if PARTITION BY is included) of the row set before applying the selected Windowing function. As you can use multiple Window functions in a single query, each requires its own partitioning and ordering to ensure the data is returned as desired.
In your example, ROW_NUMBER() is being used to generate a sequential row number for each row in the CTE. SELECT NULL is used because there is no particular order required but an ORDER BY clause is required for a windowing function.
Another way of achieving the same thing would be using an IDENTITY column, however, that has other implications and requires changes to an existing table, or a temp table to be created. The ROW_NUMBER window function in a CTE allows for this identity to be generated on the fly.
To answer your specific question:
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
It is ordering the rows in E4 'randomly' before applying the ROW_NUMBER() window function to that result set to produce a list of row numbers equal to the number of rows in E4. OVER can be translated as "Fetch me a result set with this ordering and partitioning and apply (OVER) this window function to that result set independent of the ordering in the main SELECT statement."
More info: OVER Clause
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f230328%2fexplain-an-over-clause%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
ROW_NUMBER() is a ranking window function, and ranking window functions require a mandatory ORDER BY clause.
If you try to write it without the ORDER BY you will get a syntax error.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER()
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 4112, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
-- The function 'ROW_NUMBER' must have an OVER clause with ORDER BY.
The trick with the subquery was discovered by someone who blogged about it, as a performance optimization.
SQL Server always performs a sort operation since constants are not allowed for the ORDER BY clause:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY NULL)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5309, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support constants as ORDER BY clause expressions.
And neither are integers which are treated as indices:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY 1)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5308, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support integer indices as ORDER BY clause expressions.
Turns out that due to some glitch in the code, you can circumvent this limitation by using a subquery, which for some reason is allowed, and eliminates the sort operator.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT 1))
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
You can use any constant in the sub query, the NULL is probably a reminiscent of the habit of using SELECT NULL within EXISTS predicates, which in the early history of SQL Server had a performance impact as opposed to * or any other column expression, as the optimizer wasn't smart enough to ignore it.
HTH
Thank you. Sure does. I can see most of my questions fall over like a house of cards on "windows functions require a mandatory order by clause". The MS docs on theover
clause sayorder by
is optional - but I guess this means partitions might be used without window functions (and not require anorder by
). Nice username!
– youcantryreachingme
3 hours ago
2
Not all window functions require anORDER BY
. Only ranking window functions -ROW_NUMBER()
,RANK()
,DENSE_RANK()
,NTILE()
. Providing aPARTITION BY
or not is irrelevant.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
3 hours ago
You can doSELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 1/0);
– Erik Darling
1 hour ago
add a comment |
ROW_NUMBER() is a ranking window function, and ranking window functions require a mandatory ORDER BY clause.
If you try to write it without the ORDER BY you will get a syntax error.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER()
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 4112, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
-- The function 'ROW_NUMBER' must have an OVER clause with ORDER BY.
The trick with the subquery was discovered by someone who blogged about it, as a performance optimization.
SQL Server always performs a sort operation since constants are not allowed for the ORDER BY clause:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY NULL)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5309, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support constants as ORDER BY clause expressions.
And neither are integers which are treated as indices:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY 1)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5308, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support integer indices as ORDER BY clause expressions.
Turns out that due to some glitch in the code, you can circumvent this limitation by using a subquery, which for some reason is allowed, and eliminates the sort operator.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT 1))
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
You can use any constant in the sub query, the NULL is probably a reminiscent of the habit of using SELECT NULL within EXISTS predicates, which in the early history of SQL Server had a performance impact as opposed to * or any other column expression, as the optimizer wasn't smart enough to ignore it.
HTH
Thank you. Sure does. I can see most of my questions fall over like a house of cards on "windows functions require a mandatory order by clause". The MS docs on theover
clause sayorder by
is optional - but I guess this means partitions might be used without window functions (and not require anorder by
). Nice username!
– youcantryreachingme
3 hours ago
2
Not all window functions require anORDER BY
. Only ranking window functions -ROW_NUMBER()
,RANK()
,DENSE_RANK()
,NTILE()
. Providing aPARTITION BY
or not is irrelevant.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
3 hours ago
You can doSELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 1/0);
– Erik Darling
1 hour ago
add a comment |
ROW_NUMBER() is a ranking window function, and ranking window functions require a mandatory ORDER BY clause.
If you try to write it without the ORDER BY you will get a syntax error.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER()
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 4112, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
-- The function 'ROW_NUMBER' must have an OVER clause with ORDER BY.
The trick with the subquery was discovered by someone who blogged about it, as a performance optimization.
SQL Server always performs a sort operation since constants are not allowed for the ORDER BY clause:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY NULL)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5309, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support constants as ORDER BY clause expressions.
And neither are integers which are treated as indices:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY 1)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5308, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support integer indices as ORDER BY clause expressions.
Turns out that due to some glitch in the code, you can circumvent this limitation by using a subquery, which for some reason is allowed, and eliminates the sort operator.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT 1))
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
You can use any constant in the sub query, the NULL is probably a reminiscent of the habit of using SELECT NULL within EXISTS predicates, which in the early history of SQL Server had a performance impact as opposed to * or any other column expression, as the optimizer wasn't smart enough to ignore it.
HTH
ROW_NUMBER() is a ranking window function, and ranking window functions require a mandatory ORDER BY clause.
If you try to write it without the ORDER BY you will get a syntax error.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER()
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 4112, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
-- The function 'ROW_NUMBER' must have an OVER clause with ORDER BY.
The trick with the subquery was discovered by someone who blogged about it, as a performance optimization.
SQL Server always performs a sort operation since constants are not allowed for the ORDER BY clause:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY NULL)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5309, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support constants as ORDER BY clause expressions.
And neither are integers which are treated as indices:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY 1)
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5308, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions
-- do not support integer indices as ORDER BY clause expressions.
Turns out that due to some glitch in the code, you can circumvent this limitation by using a subquery, which for some reason is allowed, and eliminates the sort operator.
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT 1))
FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
You can use any constant in the sub query, the NULL is probably a reminiscent of the habit of using SELECT NULL within EXISTS predicates, which in the early history of SQL Server had a performance impact as opposed to * or any other column expression, as the optimizer wasn't smart enough to ignore it.
HTH
answered 3 hours ago
SQLRaptorSQLRaptor
2,3361319
2,3361319
Thank you. Sure does. I can see most of my questions fall over like a house of cards on "windows functions require a mandatory order by clause". The MS docs on theover
clause sayorder by
is optional - but I guess this means partitions might be used without window functions (and not require anorder by
). Nice username!
– youcantryreachingme
3 hours ago
2
Not all window functions require anORDER BY
. Only ranking window functions -ROW_NUMBER()
,RANK()
,DENSE_RANK()
,NTILE()
. Providing aPARTITION BY
or not is irrelevant.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
3 hours ago
You can doSELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 1/0);
– Erik Darling
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thank you. Sure does. I can see most of my questions fall over like a house of cards on "windows functions require a mandatory order by clause". The MS docs on theover
clause sayorder by
is optional - but I guess this means partitions might be used without window functions (and not require anorder by
). Nice username!
– youcantryreachingme
3 hours ago
2
Not all window functions require anORDER BY
. Only ranking window functions -ROW_NUMBER()
,RANK()
,DENSE_RANK()
,NTILE()
. Providing aPARTITION BY
or not is irrelevant.
– ypercubeᵀᴹ
3 hours ago
You can doSELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 1/0);
– Erik Darling
1 hour ago
Thank you. Sure does. I can see most of my questions fall over like a house of cards on "windows functions require a mandatory order by clause". The MS docs on the
over
clause say order by
is optional - but I guess this means partitions might be used without window functions (and not require an order by
). Nice username!– youcantryreachingme
3 hours ago
Thank you. Sure does. I can see most of my questions fall over like a house of cards on "windows functions require a mandatory order by clause". The MS docs on the
over
clause say order by
is optional - but I guess this means partitions might be used without window functions (and not require an order by
). Nice username!– youcantryreachingme
3 hours ago
2
2
Not all window functions require an
ORDER BY
. Only ranking window functions - ROW_NUMBER()
, RANK()
, DENSE_RANK()
, NTILE()
. Providing a PARTITION BY
or not is irrelevant.– ypercubeᵀᴹ
3 hours ago
Not all window functions require an
ORDER BY
. Only ranking window functions - ROW_NUMBER()
, RANK()
, DENSE_RANK()
, NTILE()
. Providing a PARTITION BY
or not is irrelevant.– ypercubeᵀᴹ
3 hours ago
You can do
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 1/0);
– Erik Darling
1 hour ago
You can do
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 1/0);
– Erik Darling
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The OVER clause sets the ordering (and partitioning if PARTITION BY is included) of the row set before applying the selected Windowing function. As you can use multiple Window functions in a single query, each requires its own partitioning and ordering to ensure the data is returned as desired.
In your example, ROW_NUMBER() is being used to generate a sequential row number for each row in the CTE. SELECT NULL is used because there is no particular order required but an ORDER BY clause is required for a windowing function.
Another way of achieving the same thing would be using an IDENTITY column, however, that has other implications and requires changes to an existing table, or a temp table to be created. The ROW_NUMBER window function in a CTE allows for this identity to be generated on the fly.
To answer your specific question:
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
It is ordering the rows in E4 'randomly' before applying the ROW_NUMBER() window function to that result set to produce a list of row numbers equal to the number of rows in E4. OVER can be translated as "Fetch me a result set with this ordering and partitioning and apply (OVER) this window function to that result set independent of the ordering in the main SELECT statement."
More info: OVER Clause
add a comment |
The OVER clause sets the ordering (and partitioning if PARTITION BY is included) of the row set before applying the selected Windowing function. As you can use multiple Window functions in a single query, each requires its own partitioning and ordering to ensure the data is returned as desired.
In your example, ROW_NUMBER() is being used to generate a sequential row number for each row in the CTE. SELECT NULL is used because there is no particular order required but an ORDER BY clause is required for a windowing function.
Another way of achieving the same thing would be using an IDENTITY column, however, that has other implications and requires changes to an existing table, or a temp table to be created. The ROW_NUMBER window function in a CTE allows for this identity to be generated on the fly.
To answer your specific question:
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
It is ordering the rows in E4 'randomly' before applying the ROW_NUMBER() window function to that result set to produce a list of row numbers equal to the number of rows in E4. OVER can be translated as "Fetch me a result set with this ordering and partitioning and apply (OVER) this window function to that result set independent of the ordering in the main SELECT statement."
More info: OVER Clause
add a comment |
The OVER clause sets the ordering (and partitioning if PARTITION BY is included) of the row set before applying the selected Windowing function. As you can use multiple Window functions in a single query, each requires its own partitioning and ordering to ensure the data is returned as desired.
In your example, ROW_NUMBER() is being used to generate a sequential row number for each row in the CTE. SELECT NULL is used because there is no particular order required but an ORDER BY clause is required for a windowing function.
Another way of achieving the same thing would be using an IDENTITY column, however, that has other implications and requires changes to an existing table, or a temp table to be created. The ROW_NUMBER window function in a CTE allows for this identity to be generated on the fly.
To answer your specific question:
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
It is ordering the rows in E4 'randomly' before applying the ROW_NUMBER() window function to that result set to produce a list of row numbers equal to the number of rows in E4. OVER can be translated as "Fetch me a result set with this ordering and partitioning and apply (OVER) this window function to that result set independent of the ordering in the main SELECT statement."
More info: OVER Clause
The OVER clause sets the ordering (and partitioning if PARTITION BY is included) of the row set before applying the selected Windowing function. As you can use multiple Window functions in a single query, each requires its own partitioning and ordering to ensure the data is returned as desired.
In your example, ROW_NUMBER() is being used to generate a sequential row number for each row in the CTE. SELECT NULL is used because there is no particular order required but an ORDER BY clause is required for a windowing function.
Another way of achieving the same thing would be using an IDENTITY column, however, that has other implications and requires changes to an existing table, or a temp table to be created. The ROW_NUMBER window function in a CTE allows for this identity to be generated on the fly.
To answer your specific question:
Essentially, what exactly is it doing?
It is ordering the rows in E4 'randomly' before applying the ROW_NUMBER() window function to that result set to produce a list of row numbers equal to the number of rows in E4. OVER can be translated as "Fetch me a result set with this ordering and partitioning and apply (OVER) this window function to that result set independent of the ordering in the main SELECT statement."
More info: OVER Clause
answered 4 hours ago
HandyDHandyD
939112
939112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f230328%2fexplain-an-over-clause%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown