Independently Tidelocked Moon?












6












$begingroup$


Simple question that might seem odd. Not going to get too specific but I am curious, more or less, as to what it would look like for a planet that had a moon (A habital one) which was in essence tidally-locked to the star of the system. In addition, just how probable/possible is that, really?



It orbits its planet as any satellite does but isn't tidally locked to it. Instead its spin in relation to its own orbit around the planet (and its own orbit of the sun) causes it to always have the same side facing the sun. I assume this would cause for habitual, essentially daily eclipses for the side in eternal day (Almost equating to its own equivalent of a "night") but I can't find what else that might entail.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to worldbuilding, please take the tour and visit the help center to make yourself familiar with our community.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jan 20 at 20:08
















6












$begingroup$


Simple question that might seem odd. Not going to get too specific but I am curious, more or less, as to what it would look like for a planet that had a moon (A habital one) which was in essence tidally-locked to the star of the system. In addition, just how probable/possible is that, really?



It orbits its planet as any satellite does but isn't tidally locked to it. Instead its spin in relation to its own orbit around the planet (and its own orbit of the sun) causes it to always have the same side facing the sun. I assume this would cause for habitual, essentially daily eclipses for the side in eternal day (Almost equating to its own equivalent of a "night") but I can't find what else that might entail.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to worldbuilding, please take the tour and visit the help center to make yourself familiar with our community.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jan 20 at 20:08














6












6








6





$begingroup$


Simple question that might seem odd. Not going to get too specific but I am curious, more or less, as to what it would look like for a planet that had a moon (A habital one) which was in essence tidally-locked to the star of the system. In addition, just how probable/possible is that, really?



It orbits its planet as any satellite does but isn't tidally locked to it. Instead its spin in relation to its own orbit around the planet (and its own orbit of the sun) causes it to always have the same side facing the sun. I assume this would cause for habitual, essentially daily eclipses for the side in eternal day (Almost equating to its own equivalent of a "night") but I can't find what else that might entail.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Simple question that might seem odd. Not going to get too specific but I am curious, more or less, as to what it would look like for a planet that had a moon (A habital one) which was in essence tidally-locked to the star of the system. In addition, just how probable/possible is that, really?



It orbits its planet as any satellite does but isn't tidally locked to it. Instead its spin in relation to its own orbit around the planet (and its own orbit of the sun) causes it to always have the same side facing the sun. I assume this would cause for habitual, essentially daily eclipses for the side in eternal day (Almost equating to its own equivalent of a "night") but I can't find what else that might entail.







gravity orbital-mechanics solar-system tides






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 20 at 19:37









MagillaMagilla

311




311












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to worldbuilding, please take the tour and visit the help center to make yourself familiar with our community.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jan 20 at 20:08


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to worldbuilding, please take the tour and visit the help center to make yourself familiar with our community.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jan 20 at 20:08
















$begingroup$
Welcome to worldbuilding, please take the tour and visit the help center to make yourself familiar with our community.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
Jan 20 at 20:08




$begingroup$
Welcome to worldbuilding, please take the tour and visit the help center to make yourself familiar with our community.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
Jan 20 at 20:08










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Tidal lock happens when the tidal forces, exerting a momentum on a body, synchronize its rotation around its axis with the revolution around the main body.



Since for a moon-planet-star system the forces exerted by the planet will always be greater than those exerted by the star, there is no way for the moon to be tidally locked with the star and not with the planet.



The only case in which the tidal forces generated by the star are stronger than those generated by the planet implies that the moon is orbiting the star and not the planet.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So does a moon have to be tidally locked to its planet? Is it not actually feasible a moon's own rotation could not sync like that with a star?
    $endgroup$
    – Magilla
    Jan 20 at 23:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Magilla It would be a short term (in astronomical terms) and temporary coincidence if it was.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57



















0












$begingroup$

For this to happen, the moon would have to be tide locked to the planet while the planet itself is tide locked to the star.



Notice that surface exposed to the star will vary slightly throughout the year due to axial tilts and also a movement called libration.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This still wouldn't work, the moon has to orbit the planet in order not to crash into it
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB I am suggesting a Moon that is tifslly locked to a planet, thus it is in orbit around the planet.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    in which case it doesn't always face one side towards the sun
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB it does if the planet is tidally locked to the star. Do a simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    The planet P faces p towards star S. Moon M faces m towards P. As P orbits S p is always pointing towards S, however m is pointing towards P not towards s. No need to run a simulation, just look at our moon. It's tidally locked on our planet and yet experiences days and nights (hence new moon, full moon, etc). Our planet being tidally locked would not change the moons orbit. It has to orbit or it crashes.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 17:05











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137179%2findependently-tidelocked-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Tidal lock happens when the tidal forces, exerting a momentum on a body, synchronize its rotation around its axis with the revolution around the main body.



Since for a moon-planet-star system the forces exerted by the planet will always be greater than those exerted by the star, there is no way for the moon to be tidally locked with the star and not with the planet.



The only case in which the tidal forces generated by the star are stronger than those generated by the planet implies that the moon is orbiting the star and not the planet.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So does a moon have to be tidally locked to its planet? Is it not actually feasible a moon's own rotation could not sync like that with a star?
    $endgroup$
    – Magilla
    Jan 20 at 23:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Magilla It would be a short term (in astronomical terms) and temporary coincidence if it was.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57
















4












$begingroup$

Tidal lock happens when the tidal forces, exerting a momentum on a body, synchronize its rotation around its axis with the revolution around the main body.



Since for a moon-planet-star system the forces exerted by the planet will always be greater than those exerted by the star, there is no way for the moon to be tidally locked with the star and not with the planet.



The only case in which the tidal forces generated by the star are stronger than those generated by the planet implies that the moon is orbiting the star and not the planet.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So does a moon have to be tidally locked to its planet? Is it not actually feasible a moon's own rotation could not sync like that with a star?
    $endgroup$
    – Magilla
    Jan 20 at 23:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Magilla It would be a short term (in astronomical terms) and temporary coincidence if it was.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57














4












4








4





$begingroup$

Tidal lock happens when the tidal forces, exerting a momentum on a body, synchronize its rotation around its axis with the revolution around the main body.



Since for a moon-planet-star system the forces exerted by the planet will always be greater than those exerted by the star, there is no way for the moon to be tidally locked with the star and not with the planet.



The only case in which the tidal forces generated by the star are stronger than those generated by the planet implies that the moon is orbiting the star and not the planet.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Tidal lock happens when the tidal forces, exerting a momentum on a body, synchronize its rotation around its axis with the revolution around the main body.



Since for a moon-planet-star system the forces exerted by the planet will always be greater than those exerted by the star, there is no way for the moon to be tidally locked with the star and not with the planet.



The only case in which the tidal forces generated by the star are stronger than those generated by the planet implies that the moon is orbiting the star and not the planet.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 20 at 20:12









L.DutchL.Dutch

84k28201412




84k28201412












  • $begingroup$
    So does a moon have to be tidally locked to its planet? Is it not actually feasible a moon's own rotation could not sync like that with a star?
    $endgroup$
    – Magilla
    Jan 20 at 23:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Magilla It would be a short term (in astronomical terms) and temporary coincidence if it was.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57


















  • $begingroup$
    So does a moon have to be tidally locked to its planet? Is it not actually feasible a moon's own rotation could not sync like that with a star?
    $endgroup$
    – Magilla
    Jan 20 at 23:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Magilla It would be a short term (in astronomical terms) and temporary coincidence if it was.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57
















$begingroup$
So does a moon have to be tidally locked to its planet? Is it not actually feasible a moon's own rotation could not sync like that with a star?
$endgroup$
– Magilla
Jan 20 at 23:22




$begingroup$
So does a moon have to be tidally locked to its planet? Is it not actually feasible a moon's own rotation could not sync like that with a star?
$endgroup$
– Magilla
Jan 20 at 23:22












$begingroup$
@Magilla It would be a short term (in astronomical terms) and temporary coincidence if it was.
$endgroup$
– Tim B
Jan 20 at 23:57




$begingroup$
@Magilla It would be a short term (in astronomical terms) and temporary coincidence if it was.
$endgroup$
– Tim B
Jan 20 at 23:57











0












$begingroup$

For this to happen, the moon would have to be tide locked to the planet while the planet itself is tide locked to the star.



Notice that surface exposed to the star will vary slightly throughout the year due to axial tilts and also a movement called libration.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This still wouldn't work, the moon has to orbit the planet in order not to crash into it
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB I am suggesting a Moon that is tifslly locked to a planet, thus it is in orbit around the planet.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    in which case it doesn't always face one side towards the sun
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB it does if the planet is tidally locked to the star. Do a simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    The planet P faces p towards star S. Moon M faces m towards P. As P orbits S p is always pointing towards S, however m is pointing towards P not towards s. No need to run a simulation, just look at our moon. It's tidally locked on our planet and yet experiences days and nights (hence new moon, full moon, etc). Our planet being tidally locked would not change the moons orbit. It has to orbit or it crashes.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 17:05
















0












$begingroup$

For this to happen, the moon would have to be tide locked to the planet while the planet itself is tide locked to the star.



Notice that surface exposed to the star will vary slightly throughout the year due to axial tilts and also a movement called libration.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This still wouldn't work, the moon has to orbit the planet in order not to crash into it
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB I am suggesting a Moon that is tifslly locked to a planet, thus it is in orbit around the planet.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    in which case it doesn't always face one side towards the sun
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB it does if the planet is tidally locked to the star. Do a simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    The planet P faces p towards star S. Moon M faces m towards P. As P orbits S p is always pointing towards S, however m is pointing towards P not towards s. No need to run a simulation, just look at our moon. It's tidally locked on our planet and yet experiences days and nights (hence new moon, full moon, etc). Our planet being tidally locked would not change the moons orbit. It has to orbit or it crashes.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 17:05














0












0








0





$begingroup$

For this to happen, the moon would have to be tide locked to the planet while the planet itself is tide locked to the star.



Notice that surface exposed to the star will vary slightly throughout the year due to axial tilts and also a movement called libration.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



For this to happen, the moon would have to be tide locked to the planet while the planet itself is tide locked to the star.



Notice that surface exposed to the star will vary slightly throughout the year due to axial tilts and also a movement called libration.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 21 at 0:33

























answered Jan 20 at 23:47









RenanRenan

48.2k13111245




48.2k13111245












  • $begingroup$
    This still wouldn't work, the moon has to orbit the planet in order not to crash into it
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB I am suggesting a Moon that is tifslly locked to a planet, thus it is in orbit around the planet.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    in which case it doesn't always face one side towards the sun
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB it does if the planet is tidally locked to the star. Do a simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    The planet P faces p towards star S. Moon M faces m towards P. As P orbits S p is always pointing towards S, however m is pointing towards P not towards s. No need to run a simulation, just look at our moon. It's tidally locked on our planet and yet experiences days and nights (hence new moon, full moon, etc). Our planet being tidally locked would not change the moons orbit. It has to orbit or it crashes.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 17:05


















  • $begingroup$
    This still wouldn't work, the moon has to orbit the planet in order not to crash into it
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 20 at 23:57










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB I am suggesting a Moon that is tifslly locked to a planet, thus it is in orbit around the planet.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    in which case it doesn't always face one side towards the sun
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 9:33










  • $begingroup$
    @TimB it does if the planet is tidally locked to the star. Do a simulation.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    Jan 21 at 9:55










  • $begingroup$
    The planet P faces p towards star S. Moon M faces m towards P. As P orbits S p is always pointing towards S, however m is pointing towards P not towards s. No need to run a simulation, just look at our moon. It's tidally locked on our planet and yet experiences days and nights (hence new moon, full moon, etc). Our planet being tidally locked would not change the moons orbit. It has to orbit or it crashes.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim B
    Jan 21 at 17:05
















$begingroup$
This still wouldn't work, the moon has to orbit the planet in order not to crash into it
$endgroup$
– Tim B
Jan 20 at 23:57




$begingroup$
This still wouldn't work, the moon has to orbit the planet in order not to crash into it
$endgroup$
– Tim B
Jan 20 at 23:57












$begingroup$
@TimB I am suggesting a Moon that is tifslly locked to a planet, thus it is in orbit around the planet.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 21 at 0:34




$begingroup$
@TimB I am suggesting a Moon that is tifslly locked to a planet, thus it is in orbit around the planet.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 21 at 0:34












$begingroup$
in which case it doesn't always face one side towards the sun
$endgroup$
– Tim B
Jan 21 at 9:33




$begingroup$
in which case it doesn't always face one side towards the sun
$endgroup$
– Tim B
Jan 21 at 9:33












$begingroup$
@TimB it does if the planet is tidally locked to the star. Do a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 21 at 9:55




$begingroup$
@TimB it does if the planet is tidally locked to the star. Do a simulation.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 21 at 9:55












$begingroup$
The planet P faces p towards star S. Moon M faces m towards P. As P orbits S p is always pointing towards S, however m is pointing towards P not towards s. No need to run a simulation, just look at our moon. It's tidally locked on our planet and yet experiences days and nights (hence new moon, full moon, etc). Our planet being tidally locked would not change the moons orbit. It has to orbit or it crashes.
$endgroup$
– Tim B
Jan 21 at 17:05




$begingroup$
The planet P faces p towards star S. Moon M faces m towards P. As P orbits S p is always pointing towards S, however m is pointing towards P not towards s. No need to run a simulation, just look at our moon. It's tidally locked on our planet and yet experiences days and nights (hence new moon, full moon, etc). Our planet being tidally locked would not change the moons orbit. It has to orbit or it crashes.
$endgroup$
– Tim B
Jan 21 at 17:05


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137179%2findependently-tidelocked-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

Eduardo VII do Reino Unido