Cache for apt packages in local network
I have a desktop and laptop at home, both running the same flavour of Debian Testing. How can I configure apt on the laptop so that it first tries to download the packages from the desktop before going to the Internet?
linux debian apt-get apt aptitude
add a comment |
I have a desktop and laptop at home, both running the same flavour of Debian Testing. How can I configure apt on the laptop so that it first tries to download the packages from the desktop before going to the Internet?
linux debian apt-get apt aptitude
add a comment |
I have a desktop and laptop at home, both running the same flavour of Debian Testing. How can I configure apt on the laptop so that it first tries to download the packages from the desktop before going to the Internet?
linux debian apt-get apt aptitude
I have a desktop and laptop at home, both running the same flavour of Debian Testing. How can I configure apt on the laptop so that it first tries to download the packages from the desktop before going to the Internet?
linux debian apt-get apt aptitude
linux debian apt-get apt aptitude
edited Feb 12 at 21:52
doak
1535
1535
asked Jun 28 '11 at 21:42
GrzenioGrzenio
1,37483453
1,37483453
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There are several ways. One of the easiest is to install squid. Squid is simply a web/FTP cache, but that means it will cache your Debian downloads--as well as any web sites. So it has an added bonus!
One drawback of using squid (or any caching proxy server) is that your sources.list must all point to the same mirror, or the cache hits won't help.
Another option is apt-proxy. I haven't used it, but my understanding is that it works much like squid, but is specifically tailored for use with apt repositories--so it may not require that you use the same mirror for all machines, and may have other apt-specific optimizations.
A third option is to set up a partial mirror that you keep in sync with an upstream mirror. This probably isn't really what you want, though, as it's much more involved to configure, and uses a lot more bandwidth.
And a final, poor-man's option, would be to keep /var/cache/apt/archives in sync between the two systems, possibly using rsync. You could simply run this command before doing any apt installs:
rsync -vc username@otherhost:/var/cache/apt/archives/* /var/cache/apt/archives
This won't cache the Packages files at all (the other methods I mentioned would), but whenever the system is about to download a package, if that package already exists in that dir, it won't do the download. So you'd get most of the benefit of a proper caching server, without the setup overhead.
I generally only use this last method for one-off instances, like on a fresh install.
Do I run thisrsync
command on the desktop (the one with the cache) or on the laptop (the one that is going to be upgraded)?
– Grzenio
Jun 29 '11 at 6:54
As written, that rsync command copies from the remote host to the local host. But rsync can work either way.
– Flimzy
Jun 29 '11 at 7:00
add a comment |
I think you should try out apt-cacher. If you click that link, you'll be taken to a guide/tutorial that explains, in fairly nice detail, how to do this.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f303621%2fcache-for-apt-packages-in-local-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are several ways. One of the easiest is to install squid. Squid is simply a web/FTP cache, but that means it will cache your Debian downloads--as well as any web sites. So it has an added bonus!
One drawback of using squid (or any caching proxy server) is that your sources.list must all point to the same mirror, or the cache hits won't help.
Another option is apt-proxy. I haven't used it, but my understanding is that it works much like squid, but is specifically tailored for use with apt repositories--so it may not require that you use the same mirror for all machines, and may have other apt-specific optimizations.
A third option is to set up a partial mirror that you keep in sync with an upstream mirror. This probably isn't really what you want, though, as it's much more involved to configure, and uses a lot more bandwidth.
And a final, poor-man's option, would be to keep /var/cache/apt/archives in sync between the two systems, possibly using rsync. You could simply run this command before doing any apt installs:
rsync -vc username@otherhost:/var/cache/apt/archives/* /var/cache/apt/archives
This won't cache the Packages files at all (the other methods I mentioned would), but whenever the system is about to download a package, if that package already exists in that dir, it won't do the download. So you'd get most of the benefit of a proper caching server, without the setup overhead.
I generally only use this last method for one-off instances, like on a fresh install.
Do I run thisrsync
command on the desktop (the one with the cache) or on the laptop (the one that is going to be upgraded)?
– Grzenio
Jun 29 '11 at 6:54
As written, that rsync command copies from the remote host to the local host. But rsync can work either way.
– Flimzy
Jun 29 '11 at 7:00
add a comment |
There are several ways. One of the easiest is to install squid. Squid is simply a web/FTP cache, but that means it will cache your Debian downloads--as well as any web sites. So it has an added bonus!
One drawback of using squid (or any caching proxy server) is that your sources.list must all point to the same mirror, or the cache hits won't help.
Another option is apt-proxy. I haven't used it, but my understanding is that it works much like squid, but is specifically tailored for use with apt repositories--so it may not require that you use the same mirror for all machines, and may have other apt-specific optimizations.
A third option is to set up a partial mirror that you keep in sync with an upstream mirror. This probably isn't really what you want, though, as it's much more involved to configure, and uses a lot more bandwidth.
And a final, poor-man's option, would be to keep /var/cache/apt/archives in sync between the two systems, possibly using rsync. You could simply run this command before doing any apt installs:
rsync -vc username@otherhost:/var/cache/apt/archives/* /var/cache/apt/archives
This won't cache the Packages files at all (the other methods I mentioned would), but whenever the system is about to download a package, if that package already exists in that dir, it won't do the download. So you'd get most of the benefit of a proper caching server, without the setup overhead.
I generally only use this last method for one-off instances, like on a fresh install.
Do I run thisrsync
command on the desktop (the one with the cache) or on the laptop (the one that is going to be upgraded)?
– Grzenio
Jun 29 '11 at 6:54
As written, that rsync command copies from the remote host to the local host. But rsync can work either way.
– Flimzy
Jun 29 '11 at 7:00
add a comment |
There are several ways. One of the easiest is to install squid. Squid is simply a web/FTP cache, but that means it will cache your Debian downloads--as well as any web sites. So it has an added bonus!
One drawback of using squid (or any caching proxy server) is that your sources.list must all point to the same mirror, or the cache hits won't help.
Another option is apt-proxy. I haven't used it, but my understanding is that it works much like squid, but is specifically tailored for use with apt repositories--so it may not require that you use the same mirror for all machines, and may have other apt-specific optimizations.
A third option is to set up a partial mirror that you keep in sync with an upstream mirror. This probably isn't really what you want, though, as it's much more involved to configure, and uses a lot more bandwidth.
And a final, poor-man's option, would be to keep /var/cache/apt/archives in sync between the two systems, possibly using rsync. You could simply run this command before doing any apt installs:
rsync -vc username@otherhost:/var/cache/apt/archives/* /var/cache/apt/archives
This won't cache the Packages files at all (the other methods I mentioned would), but whenever the system is about to download a package, if that package already exists in that dir, it won't do the download. So you'd get most of the benefit of a proper caching server, without the setup overhead.
I generally only use this last method for one-off instances, like on a fresh install.
There are several ways. One of the easiest is to install squid. Squid is simply a web/FTP cache, but that means it will cache your Debian downloads--as well as any web sites. So it has an added bonus!
One drawback of using squid (or any caching proxy server) is that your sources.list must all point to the same mirror, or the cache hits won't help.
Another option is apt-proxy. I haven't used it, but my understanding is that it works much like squid, but is specifically tailored for use with apt repositories--so it may not require that you use the same mirror for all machines, and may have other apt-specific optimizations.
A third option is to set up a partial mirror that you keep in sync with an upstream mirror. This probably isn't really what you want, though, as it's much more involved to configure, and uses a lot more bandwidth.
And a final, poor-man's option, would be to keep /var/cache/apt/archives in sync between the two systems, possibly using rsync. You could simply run this command before doing any apt installs:
rsync -vc username@otherhost:/var/cache/apt/archives/* /var/cache/apt/archives
This won't cache the Packages files at all (the other methods I mentioned would), but whenever the system is about to download a package, if that package already exists in that dir, it won't do the download. So you'd get most of the benefit of a proper caching server, without the setup overhead.
I generally only use this last method for one-off instances, like on a fresh install.
edited Jun 28 '11 at 21:54
answered Jun 28 '11 at 21:48
FlimzyFlimzy
3,9701237
3,9701237
Do I run thisrsync
command on the desktop (the one with the cache) or on the laptop (the one that is going to be upgraded)?
– Grzenio
Jun 29 '11 at 6:54
As written, that rsync command copies from the remote host to the local host. But rsync can work either way.
– Flimzy
Jun 29 '11 at 7:00
add a comment |
Do I run thisrsync
command on the desktop (the one with the cache) or on the laptop (the one that is going to be upgraded)?
– Grzenio
Jun 29 '11 at 6:54
As written, that rsync command copies from the remote host to the local host. But rsync can work either way.
– Flimzy
Jun 29 '11 at 7:00
Do I run this
rsync
command on the desktop (the one with the cache) or on the laptop (the one that is going to be upgraded)?– Grzenio
Jun 29 '11 at 6:54
Do I run this
rsync
command on the desktop (the one with the cache) or on the laptop (the one that is going to be upgraded)?– Grzenio
Jun 29 '11 at 6:54
As written, that rsync command copies from the remote host to the local host. But rsync can work either way.
– Flimzy
Jun 29 '11 at 7:00
As written, that rsync command copies from the remote host to the local host. But rsync can work either way.
– Flimzy
Jun 29 '11 at 7:00
add a comment |
I think you should try out apt-cacher. If you click that link, you'll be taken to a guide/tutorial that explains, in fairly nice detail, how to do this.
add a comment |
I think you should try out apt-cacher. If you click that link, you'll be taken to a guide/tutorial that explains, in fairly nice detail, how to do this.
add a comment |
I think you should try out apt-cacher. If you click that link, you'll be taken to a guide/tutorial that explains, in fairly nice detail, how to do this.
I think you should try out apt-cacher. If you click that link, you'll be taken to a guide/tutorial that explains, in fairly nice detail, how to do this.
answered Jun 28 '11 at 21:49
James T SnellJames T Snell
5,58611331
5,58611331
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f303621%2fcache-for-apt-packages-in-local-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown