How do I figure out the right pronunciation for transitions?
$begingroup$
For example, the CNERY transition,* how exactly is this pronounced? On the VATSIM community, it seems there's a huge debate on what this is called. Some people say CONNERY, and some people say SCENERY. I personally say SCENERY since it makes more sense, but what is the most proper one? And is there a place where we can find pronunciation of such things?
Like another one is SCTRR transition which some people say SCOOTER, some people say SCATTER.
* CNERY transition is part of KLAX's DOTSS TWO DEPARTURE.
radio-communications sid-star
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For example, the CNERY transition,* how exactly is this pronounced? On the VATSIM community, it seems there's a huge debate on what this is called. Some people say CONNERY, and some people say SCENERY. I personally say SCENERY since it makes more sense, but what is the most proper one? And is there a place where we can find pronunciation of such things?
Like another one is SCTRR transition which some people say SCOOTER, some people say SCATTER.
* CNERY transition is part of KLAX's DOTSS TWO DEPARTURE.
radio-communications sid-star
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome. I recommend editing the question to include where those transitions are located, it will help get you the answers.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Feb 24 at 1:29
$begingroup$
Welcome to aviation.SE! You mentioned that you've heard the real-world pronunciation, so I'm not sure what additional information you're asking for. Are you looking for some sort of pronunciation guide for waypoint names? And the tour may be helpful if you're new to StackExchange.
$endgroup$
– Pondlife
Feb 24 at 1:31
1
$begingroup$
I think @IAmNoobPilot is asking for the correct one, maybe doesn't know that both are correct and used?
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 1:35
$begingroup$
@Jihyun Oh both is correct? thank you!
$endgroup$
– RepeaterCreeper
Feb 24 at 1:41
$begingroup$
I've only taken classes at uni so far, but for my pilot and leadership studies in rotc whenever case studies with such terms come up as long as it's widely accepted, understandable, and sensible they are usable. this is only on my personal experience, that's why i framed my earlier comment as a question because there are far more knowledgeable people who will know this for sure ;)
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 17:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For example, the CNERY transition,* how exactly is this pronounced? On the VATSIM community, it seems there's a huge debate on what this is called. Some people say CONNERY, and some people say SCENERY. I personally say SCENERY since it makes more sense, but what is the most proper one? And is there a place where we can find pronunciation of such things?
Like another one is SCTRR transition which some people say SCOOTER, some people say SCATTER.
* CNERY transition is part of KLAX's DOTSS TWO DEPARTURE.
radio-communications sid-star
$endgroup$
For example, the CNERY transition,* how exactly is this pronounced? On the VATSIM community, it seems there's a huge debate on what this is called. Some people say CONNERY, and some people say SCENERY. I personally say SCENERY since it makes more sense, but what is the most proper one? And is there a place where we can find pronunciation of such things?
Like another one is SCTRR transition which some people say SCOOTER, some people say SCATTER.
* CNERY transition is part of KLAX's DOTSS TWO DEPARTURE.
radio-communications sid-star
radio-communications sid-star
edited Feb 24 at 14:27
RepeaterCreeper
asked Feb 24 at 1:24
RepeaterCreeperRepeaterCreeper
333
333
2
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome. I recommend editing the question to include where those transitions are located, it will help get you the answers.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Feb 24 at 1:29
$begingroup$
Welcome to aviation.SE! You mentioned that you've heard the real-world pronunciation, so I'm not sure what additional information you're asking for. Are you looking for some sort of pronunciation guide for waypoint names? And the tour may be helpful if you're new to StackExchange.
$endgroup$
– Pondlife
Feb 24 at 1:31
1
$begingroup$
I think @IAmNoobPilot is asking for the correct one, maybe doesn't know that both are correct and used?
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 1:35
$begingroup$
@Jihyun Oh both is correct? thank you!
$endgroup$
– RepeaterCreeper
Feb 24 at 1:41
$begingroup$
I've only taken classes at uni so far, but for my pilot and leadership studies in rotc whenever case studies with such terms come up as long as it's widely accepted, understandable, and sensible they are usable. this is only on my personal experience, that's why i framed my earlier comment as a question because there are far more knowledgeable people who will know this for sure ;)
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 17:25
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome. I recommend editing the question to include where those transitions are located, it will help get you the answers.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Feb 24 at 1:29
$begingroup$
Welcome to aviation.SE! You mentioned that you've heard the real-world pronunciation, so I'm not sure what additional information you're asking for. Are you looking for some sort of pronunciation guide for waypoint names? And the tour may be helpful if you're new to StackExchange.
$endgroup$
– Pondlife
Feb 24 at 1:31
1
$begingroup$
I think @IAmNoobPilot is asking for the correct one, maybe doesn't know that both are correct and used?
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 1:35
$begingroup$
@Jihyun Oh both is correct? thank you!
$endgroup$
– RepeaterCreeper
Feb 24 at 1:41
$begingroup$
I've only taken classes at uni so far, but for my pilot and leadership studies in rotc whenever case studies with such terms come up as long as it's widely accepted, understandable, and sensible they are usable. this is only on my personal experience, that's why i framed my earlier comment as a question because there are far more knowledgeable people who will know this for sure ;)
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 17:25
2
2
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome. I recommend editing the question to include where those transitions are located, it will help get you the answers.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Feb 24 at 1:29
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome. I recommend editing the question to include where those transitions are located, it will help get you the answers.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Feb 24 at 1:29
$begingroup$
Welcome to aviation.SE! You mentioned that you've heard the real-world pronunciation, so I'm not sure what additional information you're asking for. Are you looking for some sort of pronunciation guide for waypoint names? And the tour may be helpful if you're new to StackExchange.
$endgroup$
– Pondlife
Feb 24 at 1:31
$begingroup$
Welcome to aviation.SE! You mentioned that you've heard the real-world pronunciation, so I'm not sure what additional information you're asking for. Are you looking for some sort of pronunciation guide for waypoint names? And the tour may be helpful if you're new to StackExchange.
$endgroup$
– Pondlife
Feb 24 at 1:31
1
1
$begingroup$
I think @IAmNoobPilot is asking for the correct one, maybe doesn't know that both are correct and used?
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 1:35
$begingroup$
I think @IAmNoobPilot is asking for the correct one, maybe doesn't know that both are correct and used?
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 1:35
$begingroup$
@Jihyun Oh both is correct? thank you!
$endgroup$
– RepeaterCreeper
Feb 24 at 1:41
$begingroup$
@Jihyun Oh both is correct? thank you!
$endgroup$
– RepeaterCreeper
Feb 24 at 1:41
$begingroup$
I've only taken classes at uni so far, but for my pilot and leadership studies in rotc whenever case studies with such terms come up as long as it's widely accepted, understandable, and sensible they are usable. this is only on my personal experience, that's why i framed my earlier comment as a question because there are far more knowledgeable people who will know this for sure ;)
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 17:25
$begingroup$
I've only taken classes at uni so far, but for my pilot and leadership studies in rotc whenever case studies with such terms come up as long as it's widely accepted, understandable, and sensible they are usable. this is only on my personal experience, that's why i framed my earlier comment as a question because there are far more knowledgeable people who will know this for sure ;)
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 17:25
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It would be nice if there were an authoritative, canonical, source for these sorts of waypoints, but sadly, I don't think one exists. I say that because I hear controllers sometimes using a different set of vowels or syllable emphasis "today" than they did "yesterday". If there were a single "right" way to verbalize CNERY or SCTRR, I'd expect ATC to have them all down. But in plenty of cases beyond those two, it remains unclear.
For example, the JFRYE arrival into Dallas -- is it the "Jeffrey" or the "J-Fry" arrival? You hear both from Ft Worth Center all the time.
My conclusion: no cannonical source exists.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a word was used to choose a pronounceable 5-letter designator (name-code), it would not be documented. (There are many pronounceable name-codes that don't mean a thing – in both English and the local language.)
ICAO Annex 11 (Air Traffic Services) Appendix 2 says:
4.2 In printed and coded communications, only the coded designator or the selected name-code shall be used to refer to a significant point.
So don't expect to find any mention other than the 5-letter code, which has to be pronounceable for some fixes:
For the USA, Order 8260.19H says:
Pronounceable fix names. Except as stated in paragraph 2-10-5.a(3), all fix names serving any IFP must be pronounceable.
Which Annex 11 points out as:
Where a significant point is required at a position not marked by the site of a radio navigation aid, the significant point shall be designated by a unique five-letter pronounceable "name-code". This name-code designator then serves as the name as well as the coded designator of the significant point.
XKCDQ would not be a pronounceable name, but CNERY would. If you did not comprehend whatever name the controller used, say you're flying in a new area with little traffic around you (prior comms to/from other traffic help you in anticipating things like that), you can simply ask the controller, "Say again in phonetic alphabet."
Sometimes the airspace designers come up with funny sequences though, e.g., see: Anybody know the reason for the ‘Star Wars’ themed STARs into KATL?
(All emphasis mine.)
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that requesting the spelling is always a valid request
$endgroup$
– Florian
Feb 24 at 15:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no single "correct" pronunciation for fix/waypoint names. The only rule is that the pronunciations must be unambiguous with respect to all other nearby names. For CNERY, jf one controller says "Scenery" and another says "Connery", and neither is ambiguous, then both are arguably correct. Heck, I'd even accept "Canary"; maybe the local fixes are named after birds but CNARY was already in use elsewhere.
As a practical matter, pilots should read things back the same way the controller said them. The point of communication is to be understood, so as long as that's happening, the details aren't important.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60467%2fhow-do-i-figure-out-the-right-pronunciation-for-transitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It would be nice if there were an authoritative, canonical, source for these sorts of waypoints, but sadly, I don't think one exists. I say that because I hear controllers sometimes using a different set of vowels or syllable emphasis "today" than they did "yesterday". If there were a single "right" way to verbalize CNERY or SCTRR, I'd expect ATC to have them all down. But in plenty of cases beyond those two, it remains unclear.
For example, the JFRYE arrival into Dallas -- is it the "Jeffrey" or the "J-Fry" arrival? You hear both from Ft Worth Center all the time.
My conclusion: no cannonical source exists.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It would be nice if there were an authoritative, canonical, source for these sorts of waypoints, but sadly, I don't think one exists. I say that because I hear controllers sometimes using a different set of vowels or syllable emphasis "today" than they did "yesterday". If there were a single "right" way to verbalize CNERY or SCTRR, I'd expect ATC to have them all down. But in plenty of cases beyond those two, it remains unclear.
For example, the JFRYE arrival into Dallas -- is it the "Jeffrey" or the "J-Fry" arrival? You hear both from Ft Worth Center all the time.
My conclusion: no cannonical source exists.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It would be nice if there were an authoritative, canonical, source for these sorts of waypoints, but sadly, I don't think one exists. I say that because I hear controllers sometimes using a different set of vowels or syllable emphasis "today" than they did "yesterday". If there were a single "right" way to verbalize CNERY or SCTRR, I'd expect ATC to have them all down. But in plenty of cases beyond those two, it remains unclear.
For example, the JFRYE arrival into Dallas -- is it the "Jeffrey" or the "J-Fry" arrival? You hear both from Ft Worth Center all the time.
My conclusion: no cannonical source exists.
$endgroup$
It would be nice if there were an authoritative, canonical, source for these sorts of waypoints, but sadly, I don't think one exists. I say that because I hear controllers sometimes using a different set of vowels or syllable emphasis "today" than they did "yesterday". If there were a single "right" way to verbalize CNERY or SCTRR, I'd expect ATC to have them all down. But in plenty of cases beyond those two, it remains unclear.
For example, the JFRYE arrival into Dallas -- is it the "Jeffrey" or the "J-Fry" arrival? You hear both from Ft Worth Center all the time.
My conclusion: no cannonical source exists.
answered Feb 24 at 2:22
Ralph JRalph J
28.6k888147
28.6k888147
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a word was used to choose a pronounceable 5-letter designator (name-code), it would not be documented. (There are many pronounceable name-codes that don't mean a thing – in both English and the local language.)
ICAO Annex 11 (Air Traffic Services) Appendix 2 says:
4.2 In printed and coded communications, only the coded designator or the selected name-code shall be used to refer to a significant point.
So don't expect to find any mention other than the 5-letter code, which has to be pronounceable for some fixes:
For the USA, Order 8260.19H says:
Pronounceable fix names. Except as stated in paragraph 2-10-5.a(3), all fix names serving any IFP must be pronounceable.
Which Annex 11 points out as:
Where a significant point is required at a position not marked by the site of a radio navigation aid, the significant point shall be designated by a unique five-letter pronounceable "name-code". This name-code designator then serves as the name as well as the coded designator of the significant point.
XKCDQ would not be a pronounceable name, but CNERY would. If you did not comprehend whatever name the controller used, say you're flying in a new area with little traffic around you (prior comms to/from other traffic help you in anticipating things like that), you can simply ask the controller, "Say again in phonetic alphabet."
Sometimes the airspace designers come up with funny sequences though, e.g., see: Anybody know the reason for the ‘Star Wars’ themed STARs into KATL?
(All emphasis mine.)
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that requesting the spelling is always a valid request
$endgroup$
– Florian
Feb 24 at 15:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a word was used to choose a pronounceable 5-letter designator (name-code), it would not be documented. (There are many pronounceable name-codes that don't mean a thing – in both English and the local language.)
ICAO Annex 11 (Air Traffic Services) Appendix 2 says:
4.2 In printed and coded communications, only the coded designator or the selected name-code shall be used to refer to a significant point.
So don't expect to find any mention other than the 5-letter code, which has to be pronounceable for some fixes:
For the USA, Order 8260.19H says:
Pronounceable fix names. Except as stated in paragraph 2-10-5.a(3), all fix names serving any IFP must be pronounceable.
Which Annex 11 points out as:
Where a significant point is required at a position not marked by the site of a radio navigation aid, the significant point shall be designated by a unique five-letter pronounceable "name-code". This name-code designator then serves as the name as well as the coded designator of the significant point.
XKCDQ would not be a pronounceable name, but CNERY would. If you did not comprehend whatever name the controller used, say you're flying in a new area with little traffic around you (prior comms to/from other traffic help you in anticipating things like that), you can simply ask the controller, "Say again in phonetic alphabet."
Sometimes the airspace designers come up with funny sequences though, e.g., see: Anybody know the reason for the ‘Star Wars’ themed STARs into KATL?
(All emphasis mine.)
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that requesting the spelling is always a valid request
$endgroup$
– Florian
Feb 24 at 15:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a word was used to choose a pronounceable 5-letter designator (name-code), it would not be documented. (There are many pronounceable name-codes that don't mean a thing – in both English and the local language.)
ICAO Annex 11 (Air Traffic Services) Appendix 2 says:
4.2 In printed and coded communications, only the coded designator or the selected name-code shall be used to refer to a significant point.
So don't expect to find any mention other than the 5-letter code, which has to be pronounceable for some fixes:
For the USA, Order 8260.19H says:
Pronounceable fix names. Except as stated in paragraph 2-10-5.a(3), all fix names serving any IFP must be pronounceable.
Which Annex 11 points out as:
Where a significant point is required at a position not marked by the site of a radio navigation aid, the significant point shall be designated by a unique five-letter pronounceable "name-code". This name-code designator then serves as the name as well as the coded designator of the significant point.
XKCDQ would not be a pronounceable name, but CNERY would. If you did not comprehend whatever name the controller used, say you're flying in a new area with little traffic around you (prior comms to/from other traffic help you in anticipating things like that), you can simply ask the controller, "Say again in phonetic alphabet."
Sometimes the airspace designers come up with funny sequences though, e.g., see: Anybody know the reason for the ‘Star Wars’ themed STARs into KATL?
(All emphasis mine.)
$endgroup$
If a word was used to choose a pronounceable 5-letter designator (name-code), it would not be documented. (There are many pronounceable name-codes that don't mean a thing – in both English and the local language.)
ICAO Annex 11 (Air Traffic Services) Appendix 2 says:
4.2 In printed and coded communications, only the coded designator or the selected name-code shall be used to refer to a significant point.
So don't expect to find any mention other than the 5-letter code, which has to be pronounceable for some fixes:
For the USA, Order 8260.19H says:
Pronounceable fix names. Except as stated in paragraph 2-10-5.a(3), all fix names serving any IFP must be pronounceable.
Which Annex 11 points out as:
Where a significant point is required at a position not marked by the site of a radio navigation aid, the significant point shall be designated by a unique five-letter pronounceable "name-code". This name-code designator then serves as the name as well as the coded designator of the significant point.
XKCDQ would not be a pronounceable name, but CNERY would. If you did not comprehend whatever name the controller used, say you're flying in a new area with little traffic around you (prior comms to/from other traffic help you in anticipating things like that), you can simply ask the controller, "Say again in phonetic alphabet."
Sometimes the airspace designers come up with funny sequences though, e.g., see: Anybody know the reason for the ‘Star Wars’ themed STARs into KATL?
(All emphasis mine.)
edited Feb 24 at 16:16
answered Feb 24 at 14:27
ymb1ymb1
68.3k7216363
68.3k7216363
2
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that requesting the spelling is always a valid request
$endgroup$
– Florian
Feb 24 at 15:47
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that requesting the spelling is always a valid request
$endgroup$
– Florian
Feb 24 at 15:47
2
2
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that requesting the spelling is always a valid request
$endgroup$
– Florian
Feb 24 at 15:47
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that requesting the spelling is always a valid request
$endgroup$
– Florian
Feb 24 at 15:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no single "correct" pronunciation for fix/waypoint names. The only rule is that the pronunciations must be unambiguous with respect to all other nearby names. For CNERY, jf one controller says "Scenery" and another says "Connery", and neither is ambiguous, then both are arguably correct. Heck, I'd even accept "Canary"; maybe the local fixes are named after birds but CNARY was already in use elsewhere.
As a practical matter, pilots should read things back the same way the controller said them. The point of communication is to be understood, so as long as that's happening, the details aren't important.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no single "correct" pronunciation for fix/waypoint names. The only rule is that the pronunciations must be unambiguous with respect to all other nearby names. For CNERY, jf one controller says "Scenery" and another says "Connery", and neither is ambiguous, then both are arguably correct. Heck, I'd even accept "Canary"; maybe the local fixes are named after birds but CNARY was already in use elsewhere.
As a practical matter, pilots should read things back the same way the controller said them. The point of communication is to be understood, so as long as that's happening, the details aren't important.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no single "correct" pronunciation for fix/waypoint names. The only rule is that the pronunciations must be unambiguous with respect to all other nearby names. For CNERY, jf one controller says "Scenery" and another says "Connery", and neither is ambiguous, then both are arguably correct. Heck, I'd even accept "Canary"; maybe the local fixes are named after birds but CNARY was already in use elsewhere.
As a practical matter, pilots should read things back the same way the controller said them. The point of communication is to be understood, so as long as that's happening, the details aren't important.
$endgroup$
There is no single "correct" pronunciation for fix/waypoint names. The only rule is that the pronunciations must be unambiguous with respect to all other nearby names. For CNERY, jf one controller says "Scenery" and another says "Connery", and neither is ambiguous, then both are arguably correct. Heck, I'd even accept "Canary"; maybe the local fixes are named after birds but CNARY was already in use elsewhere.
As a practical matter, pilots should read things back the same way the controller said them. The point of communication is to be understood, so as long as that's happening, the details aren't important.
answered Feb 24 at 2:57
StephenSStephenS
4,3361726
4,3361726
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60467%2fhow-do-i-figure-out-the-right-pronunciation-for-transitions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Hi and welcome. I recommend editing the question to include where those transitions are located, it will help get you the answers.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Feb 24 at 1:29
$begingroup$
Welcome to aviation.SE! You mentioned that you've heard the real-world pronunciation, so I'm not sure what additional information you're asking for. Are you looking for some sort of pronunciation guide for waypoint names? And the tour may be helpful if you're new to StackExchange.
$endgroup$
– Pondlife
Feb 24 at 1:31
1
$begingroup$
I think @IAmNoobPilot is asking for the correct one, maybe doesn't know that both are correct and used?
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 1:35
$begingroup$
@Jihyun Oh both is correct? thank you!
$endgroup$
– RepeaterCreeper
Feb 24 at 1:41
$begingroup$
I've only taken classes at uni so far, but for my pilot and leadership studies in rotc whenever case studies with such terms come up as long as it's widely accepted, understandable, and sensible they are usable. this is only on my personal experience, that's why i framed my earlier comment as a question because there are far more knowledgeable people who will know this for sure ;)
$endgroup$
– Jihyun
Feb 24 at 17:25