Enable “audit process tracking” using batch file
I'm following this post and trying to enable Audit process tracking.
Local Security Policy > Local Policies > Audit Policy > Double Click Audit process tracking and enable.
I'm hoping for a quicker way to do it (preferably a batch file).
I took a look at ntrights
but can't seem to figure out how to enable it .
I just need the batch file to enable "Success" audits.
windows batch automation security-policy
add a comment |
I'm following this post and trying to enable Audit process tracking.
Local Security Policy > Local Policies > Audit Policy > Double Click Audit process tracking and enable.
I'm hoping for a quicker way to do it (preferably a batch file).
I took a look at ntrights
but can't seem to figure out how to enable it .
I just need the batch file to enable "Success" audits.
windows batch automation security-policy
This might help: serverfault.com/questions/133104/… Or this: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/secguide/2016/01/21/…
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 21:45
@DougDeden I saw the SF post, that's how I found out aboutntrights
, still confused though. I will check out the other page you linked, thanks.
– WELZ
Feb 6 at 21:46
1
It seems like this should do it:auditpol /set /subcategory:"Process Creation" /success:enable
. But I don't see that doing that correlates with the desired line in Local Security Policy, at least I my testing. Maybe it will spur someone else to contribute.
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 22:04
add a comment |
I'm following this post and trying to enable Audit process tracking.
Local Security Policy > Local Policies > Audit Policy > Double Click Audit process tracking and enable.
I'm hoping for a quicker way to do it (preferably a batch file).
I took a look at ntrights
but can't seem to figure out how to enable it .
I just need the batch file to enable "Success" audits.
windows batch automation security-policy
I'm following this post and trying to enable Audit process tracking.
Local Security Policy > Local Policies > Audit Policy > Double Click Audit process tracking and enable.
I'm hoping for a quicker way to do it (preferably a batch file).
I took a look at ntrights
but can't seem to figure out how to enable it .
I just need the batch file to enable "Success" audits.
windows batch automation security-policy
windows batch automation security-policy
asked Feb 6 at 21:37
WELZWELZ
1461313
1461313
This might help: serverfault.com/questions/133104/… Or this: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/secguide/2016/01/21/…
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 21:45
@DougDeden I saw the SF post, that's how I found out aboutntrights
, still confused though. I will check out the other page you linked, thanks.
– WELZ
Feb 6 at 21:46
1
It seems like this should do it:auditpol /set /subcategory:"Process Creation" /success:enable
. But I don't see that doing that correlates with the desired line in Local Security Policy, at least I my testing. Maybe it will spur someone else to contribute.
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 22:04
add a comment |
This might help: serverfault.com/questions/133104/… Or this: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/secguide/2016/01/21/…
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 21:45
@DougDeden I saw the SF post, that's how I found out aboutntrights
, still confused though. I will check out the other page you linked, thanks.
– WELZ
Feb 6 at 21:46
1
It seems like this should do it:auditpol /set /subcategory:"Process Creation" /success:enable
. But I don't see that doing that correlates with the desired line in Local Security Policy, at least I my testing. Maybe it will spur someone else to contribute.
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 22:04
This might help: serverfault.com/questions/133104/… Or this: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/secguide/2016/01/21/…
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 21:45
This might help: serverfault.com/questions/133104/… Or this: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/secguide/2016/01/21/…
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 21:45
@DougDeden I saw the SF post, that's how I found out about
ntrights
, still confused though. I will check out the other page you linked, thanks.– WELZ
Feb 6 at 21:46
@DougDeden I saw the SF post, that's how I found out about
ntrights
, still confused though. I will check out the other page you linked, thanks.– WELZ
Feb 6 at 21:46
1
1
It seems like this should do it:
auditpol /set /subcategory:"Process Creation" /success:enable
. But I don't see that doing that correlates with the desired line in Local Security Policy, at least I my testing. Maybe it will spur someone else to contribute.– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 22:04
It seems like this should do it:
auditpol /set /subcategory:"Process Creation" /success:enable
. But I don't see that doing that correlates with the desired line in Local Security Policy, at least I my testing. Maybe it will spur someone else to contribute.– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 22:04
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1402875%2fenable-audit-process-tracking-using-batch-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1402875%2fenable-audit-process-tracking-using-batch-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This might help: serverfault.com/questions/133104/… Or this: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/secguide/2016/01/21/…
– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 21:45
@DougDeden I saw the SF post, that's how I found out about
ntrights
, still confused though. I will check out the other page you linked, thanks.– WELZ
Feb 6 at 21:46
1
It seems like this should do it:
auditpol /set /subcategory:"Process Creation" /success:enable
. But I don't see that doing that correlates with the desired line in Local Security Policy, at least I my testing. Maybe it will spur someone else to contribute.– Doug Deden
Feb 6 at 22:04