Improve speed between two PCs on Wifi by directly connecting with single Ethernet cable
I have a wifi network at home with multiple devices connected for internet and also for filesharing with SMB. Two PCs on the network are physically very close to each other. Is it possible to directly connect these two PCs to each other with a single ethernet cable to improve the transfer speeds between them?
Do I need to create a subnet or do some kind of bridging? One PC is running Ubuntu and the other I dual boot with both Ubuntu and Windows 10 occasionally.
networking wireless-networking ethernet home-networking
asked Dec 11 at 23:09
jeevcat
214
add a comment |
I have a wifi network at home with multiple devices connected for internet and also for filesharing with SMB. Two PCs on the network are physically very close to each other. Is it possible to directly connect these two PCs to each other with a single ethernet cable to improve the transfer speeds between them?
Do I need to create a subnet or do some kind of bridging? One PC is running Ubuntu and the other I dual boot with both Ubuntu and Windows 10 occasionally.
networking wireless-networking ethernet home-networking
asked Dec 11 at 23:09
jeevcat
214
add a comment |
I have a wifi network at home with multiple devices connected for internet and also for filesharing with SMB. Two PCs on the network are physically very close to each other. Is it possible to directly connect these two PCs to each other with a single ethernet cable to improve the transfer speeds between them?
Do I need to create a subnet or do some kind of bridging? One PC is running Ubuntu and the other I dual boot with both Ubuntu and Windows 10 occasionally.
networking wireless-networking ethernet home-networking
asked Dec 11 at 23:09
jeevcat
214
I have a wifi network at home with multiple devices connected for internet and also for filesharing with SMB. Two PCs on the network are physically very close to each other. Is it possible to directly connect these two PCs to each other with a single ethernet cable to improve the transfer speeds between them?
Do I need to create a subnet or do some kind of bridging? One PC is running Ubuntu and the other I dual boot with both Ubuntu and Windows 10 occasionally.
networking wireless-networking ethernet home-networking
networking wireless-networking ethernet home-networking
asked Dec 11 at 23:09
jeevcat
214
asked Dec 11 at 23:09
jeevcat
214
asked Dec 11 at 23:09
jeevcat
214
asked Dec 11 at 23:09
jeevcat
214
asked Dec 11 at 23:09
jeevcat
214
214
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you can do this. You will need to manually define IPs for the etherenet interface (because there is no DHCP available for the interview). These IPs need to be in a different subnet to everything else. (If your wifi uses 192.168x.x, try using 10.x.x.x)
That said, from a useability POV, it's probably simpler and faster to use a router as an AP client and bridge the 2 PC's to 2 of its ethernet ports, for a seem less network. You do need to make sure the router/AP can handle the required packets per second between Ethernet devices though.
answered Dec 12 at 0:22
davidgo
42.1k75086
3
would it be worth adding that he should not set a gateway for this cable network?
– Jorge Valentini
Dec 12 at 0:36
add a comment |
This should answer your question: Transfer files directly between computers over ethernet cable?
I did get my laptop (that had wifi) to give a Desktop internet by a 1-1 Ethernet connection by bridging the Ethernet adapter and the wifi adapter or my laptop(Win8.1).
answered Dec 11 at 23:58
Pancakedinner
1975
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1382793%2fimprove-speed-between-two-pcs-on-wifi-by-directly-connecting-with-single-etherne%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you can do this. You will need to manually define IPs for the etherenet interface (because there is no DHCP available for the interview). These IPs need to be in a different subnet to everything else. (If your wifi uses 192.168x.x, try using 10.x.x.x)
That said, from a useability POV, it's probably simpler and faster to use a router as an AP client and bridge the 2 PC's to 2 of its ethernet ports, for a seem less network. You do need to make sure the router/AP can handle the required packets per second between Ethernet devices though.
answered Dec 12 at 0:22
davidgo
42.1k75086
3
would it be worth adding that he should not set a gateway for this cable network?
– Jorge Valentini
Dec 12 at 0:36
add a comment |
Yes, you can do this. You will need to manually define IPs for the etherenet interface (because there is no DHCP available for the interview). These IPs need to be in a different subnet to everything else. (If your wifi uses 192.168x.x, try using 10.x.x.x)
That said, from a useability POV, it's probably simpler and faster to use a router as an AP client and bridge the 2 PC's to 2 of its ethernet ports, for a seem less network. You do need to make sure the router/AP can handle the required packets per second between Ethernet devices though.
answered Dec 12 at 0:22
davidgo
42.1k75086
3
would it be worth adding that he should not set a gateway for this cable network?
– Jorge Valentini
Dec 12 at 0:36
add a comment |
Yes, you can do this. You will need to manually define IPs for the etherenet interface (because there is no DHCP available for the interview). These IPs need to be in a different subnet to everything else. (If your wifi uses 192.168x.x, try using 10.x.x.x)
That said, from a useability POV, it's probably simpler and faster to use a router as an AP client and bridge the 2 PC's to 2 of its ethernet ports, for a seem less network. You do need to make sure the router/AP can handle the required packets per second between Ethernet devices though.
answered Dec 12 at 0:22
davidgo
42.1k75086
Yes, you can do this. You will need to manually define IPs for the etherenet interface (because there is no DHCP available for the interview). These IPs need to be in a different subnet to everything else. (If your wifi uses 192.168x.x, try using 10.x.x.x)
That said, from a useability POV, it's probably simpler and faster to use a router as an AP client and bridge the 2 PC's to 2 of its ethernet ports, for a seem less network. You do need to make sure the router/AP can handle the required packets per second between Ethernet devices though.
answered Dec 12 at 0:22
davidgo
42.1k75086
answered Dec 12 at 0:22
davidgo
42.1k75086
answered Dec 12 at 0:22
davidgo
42.1k75086
answered Dec 12 at 0:22
davidgo
42.1k75086
42.1k75086
3
would it be worth adding that he should not set a gateway for this cable network?
– Jorge Valentini
Dec 12 at 0:36
add a comment |
3
would it be worth adding that he should not set a gateway for this cable network?
– Jorge Valentini
Dec 12 at 0:36
3
3
would it be worth adding that he should not set a gateway for this cable network?
– Jorge Valentini
Dec 12 at 0:36
would it be worth adding that he should not set a gateway for this cable network?
– Jorge Valentini
Dec 12 at 0:36
add a comment |
This should answer your question: Transfer files directly between computers over ethernet cable?
I did get my laptop (that had wifi) to give a Desktop internet by a 1-1 Ethernet connection by bridging the Ethernet adapter and the wifi adapter or my laptop(Win8.1).
answered Dec 11 at 23:58
Pancakedinner
1975
add a comment |
This should answer your question: Transfer files directly between computers over ethernet cable?
I did get my laptop (that had wifi) to give a Desktop internet by a 1-1 Ethernet connection by bridging the Ethernet adapter and the wifi adapter or my laptop(Win8.1).
answered Dec 11 at 23:58
Pancakedinner
1975
add a comment |
This should answer your question: Transfer files directly between computers over ethernet cable?
I did get my laptop (that had wifi) to give a Desktop internet by a 1-1 Ethernet connection by bridging the Ethernet adapter and the wifi adapter or my laptop(Win8.1).
answered Dec 11 at 23:58
Pancakedinner
1975
This should answer your question: Transfer files directly between computers over ethernet cable?
I did get my laptop (that had wifi) to give a Desktop internet by a 1-1 Ethernet connection by bridging the Ethernet adapter and the wifi adapter or my laptop(Win8.1).
answered Dec 11 at 23:58
Pancakedinner
1975
answered Dec 11 at 23:58
Pancakedinner
1975
answered Dec 11 at 23:58
Pancakedinner
1975
answered Dec 11 at 23:58
Pancakedinner
1975
1975
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1382793%2fimprove-speed-between-two-pcs-on-wifi-by-directly-connecting-with-single-etherne%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
