Can my university revoke my degree after it was granted due to (corporate) data having changed?












2















I did my thesis using corporate data (I used to work there, they don't give their information freely or sell it), data is from 2009 to 2018.



I collect the data, analyze it, everything normal. However, after my thesis was approved and submitted, I saw that the company has modified some of their data from 2009 to 2018, historical data from the past was changed (they have valid reasons) but I am worried that if someone tries to verify the source of my information, they will find different data and think that I commit fraud or data manipulation.



My supervisor and many people told me that nothing wrong will happen because my research was in a specified period of time when data was presented like that, they also told me that after a thesis approval, no one verifies data source. They also told me that the verification of data source is done before thesis approval.



However I am still worried, because it is not common for a company to modify data from the past.



My thesis wont be published because the used data is privated, so they are allowing me to not publish it.



Any ideas of what should I do?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 11





    Nothing. Adviser is correct. No one is going to check your data. It might be interesting to see if your results match up on the new data set, but no one is going to care. In the absolute worst case that someone does care you can simply point out that they revised the data.

    – JoshuaZ
    8 hours ago











  • I did the experiment again and my results match up (hypothesis, discussion and conclusions still the same).

    – Carlos Varas Tello
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Go find another project to worry about - that one is dead and sorted...

    – Solar Mike
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    You can always attach a short note saying what you just wrote here, namely the analysis was done on a data set that latter was corrected by the company, but it has not implication on your conclusions. This kind of anomalies are only problem when a researcher changes the data on purpose.

    – Greg
    2 hours ago
















2















I did my thesis using corporate data (I used to work there, they don't give their information freely or sell it), data is from 2009 to 2018.



I collect the data, analyze it, everything normal. However, after my thesis was approved and submitted, I saw that the company has modified some of their data from 2009 to 2018, historical data from the past was changed (they have valid reasons) but I am worried that if someone tries to verify the source of my information, they will find different data and think that I commit fraud or data manipulation.



My supervisor and many people told me that nothing wrong will happen because my research was in a specified period of time when data was presented like that, they also told me that after a thesis approval, no one verifies data source. They also told me that the verification of data source is done before thesis approval.



However I am still worried, because it is not common for a company to modify data from the past.



My thesis wont be published because the used data is privated, so they are allowing me to not publish it.



Any ideas of what should I do?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 11





    Nothing. Adviser is correct. No one is going to check your data. It might be interesting to see if your results match up on the new data set, but no one is going to care. In the absolute worst case that someone does care you can simply point out that they revised the data.

    – JoshuaZ
    8 hours ago











  • I did the experiment again and my results match up (hypothesis, discussion and conclusions still the same).

    – Carlos Varas Tello
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Go find another project to worry about - that one is dead and sorted...

    – Solar Mike
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    You can always attach a short note saying what you just wrote here, namely the analysis was done on a data set that latter was corrected by the company, but it has not implication on your conclusions. This kind of anomalies are only problem when a researcher changes the data on purpose.

    – Greg
    2 hours ago














2












2








2








I did my thesis using corporate data (I used to work there, they don't give their information freely or sell it), data is from 2009 to 2018.



I collect the data, analyze it, everything normal. However, after my thesis was approved and submitted, I saw that the company has modified some of their data from 2009 to 2018, historical data from the past was changed (they have valid reasons) but I am worried that if someone tries to verify the source of my information, they will find different data and think that I commit fraud or data manipulation.



My supervisor and many people told me that nothing wrong will happen because my research was in a specified period of time when data was presented like that, they also told me that after a thesis approval, no one verifies data source. They also told me that the verification of data source is done before thesis approval.



However I am still worried, because it is not common for a company to modify data from the past.



My thesis wont be published because the used data is privated, so they are allowing me to not publish it.



Any ideas of what should I do?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I did my thesis using corporate data (I used to work there, they don't give their information freely or sell it), data is from 2009 to 2018.



I collect the data, analyze it, everything normal. However, after my thesis was approved and submitted, I saw that the company has modified some of their data from 2009 to 2018, historical data from the past was changed (they have valid reasons) but I am worried that if someone tries to verify the source of my information, they will find different data and think that I commit fraud or data manipulation.



My supervisor and many people told me that nothing wrong will happen because my research was in a specified period of time when data was presented like that, they also told me that after a thesis approval, no one verifies data source. They also told me that the verification of data source is done before thesis approval.



However I am still worried, because it is not common for a company to modify data from the past.



My thesis wont be published because the used data is privated, so they are allowing me to not publish it.



Any ideas of what should I do?







research-process thesis degree data






share|improve this question









New contributor




Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 mins ago









cag51

12.7k52753




12.7k52753






New contributor




Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









Carlos Varas TelloCarlos Varas Tello

111




111




New contributor




Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 11





    Nothing. Adviser is correct. No one is going to check your data. It might be interesting to see if your results match up on the new data set, but no one is going to care. In the absolute worst case that someone does care you can simply point out that they revised the data.

    – JoshuaZ
    8 hours ago











  • I did the experiment again and my results match up (hypothesis, discussion and conclusions still the same).

    – Carlos Varas Tello
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Go find another project to worry about - that one is dead and sorted...

    – Solar Mike
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    You can always attach a short note saying what you just wrote here, namely the analysis was done on a data set that latter was corrected by the company, but it has not implication on your conclusions. This kind of anomalies are only problem when a researcher changes the data on purpose.

    – Greg
    2 hours ago














  • 11





    Nothing. Adviser is correct. No one is going to check your data. It might be interesting to see if your results match up on the new data set, but no one is going to care. In the absolute worst case that someone does care you can simply point out that they revised the data.

    – JoshuaZ
    8 hours ago











  • I did the experiment again and my results match up (hypothesis, discussion and conclusions still the same).

    – Carlos Varas Tello
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Go find another project to worry about - that one is dead and sorted...

    – Solar Mike
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    You can always attach a short note saying what you just wrote here, namely the analysis was done on a data set that latter was corrected by the company, but it has not implication on your conclusions. This kind of anomalies are only problem when a researcher changes the data on purpose.

    – Greg
    2 hours ago








11




11





Nothing. Adviser is correct. No one is going to check your data. It might be interesting to see if your results match up on the new data set, but no one is going to care. In the absolute worst case that someone does care you can simply point out that they revised the data.

– JoshuaZ
8 hours ago





Nothing. Adviser is correct. No one is going to check your data. It might be interesting to see if your results match up on the new data set, but no one is going to care. In the absolute worst case that someone does care you can simply point out that they revised the data.

– JoshuaZ
8 hours ago













I did the experiment again and my results match up (hypothesis, discussion and conclusions still the same).

– Carlos Varas Tello
8 hours ago





I did the experiment again and my results match up (hypothesis, discussion and conclusions still the same).

– Carlos Varas Tello
8 hours ago




2




2





Go find another project to worry about - that one is dead and sorted...

– Solar Mike
8 hours ago





Go find another project to worry about - that one is dead and sorted...

– Solar Mike
8 hours ago




3




3





You can always attach a short note saying what you just wrote here, namely the analysis was done on a data set that latter was corrected by the company, but it has not implication on your conclusions. This kind of anomalies are only problem when a researcher changes the data on purpose.

– Greg
2 hours ago





You can always attach a short note saying what you just wrote here, namely the analysis was done on a data set that latter was corrected by the company, but it has not implication on your conclusions. This kind of anomalies are only problem when a researcher changes the data on purpose.

– Greg
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















16














Revoking a degree is rarely done and, then, only for the most extreme reasons such as explicit dishonesty and such. Any results in any thesis are subject to revision as new information becomes available that was not present in the past. It doesn't mean that the work was wrongly done, but only that what is known has advanced.



Since you re-did the experiment and came to the same conclusion, you may be able to publish something based on the new results and, when citing your unpublished theses, mention that the conclusions there were verified with new data.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123891%2fcan-my-university-revoke-my-degree-after-it-was-granted-due-to-corporate-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    16














    Revoking a degree is rarely done and, then, only for the most extreme reasons such as explicit dishonesty and such. Any results in any thesis are subject to revision as new information becomes available that was not present in the past. It doesn't mean that the work was wrongly done, but only that what is known has advanced.



    Since you re-did the experiment and came to the same conclusion, you may be able to publish something based on the new results and, when citing your unpublished theses, mention that the conclusions there were verified with new data.






    share|improve this answer




























      16














      Revoking a degree is rarely done and, then, only for the most extreme reasons such as explicit dishonesty and such. Any results in any thesis are subject to revision as new information becomes available that was not present in the past. It doesn't mean that the work was wrongly done, but only that what is known has advanced.



      Since you re-did the experiment and came to the same conclusion, you may be able to publish something based on the new results and, when citing your unpublished theses, mention that the conclusions there were verified with new data.






      share|improve this answer


























        16












        16








        16







        Revoking a degree is rarely done and, then, only for the most extreme reasons such as explicit dishonesty and such. Any results in any thesis are subject to revision as new information becomes available that was not present in the past. It doesn't mean that the work was wrongly done, but only that what is known has advanced.



        Since you re-did the experiment and came to the same conclusion, you may be able to publish something based on the new results and, when citing your unpublished theses, mention that the conclusions there were verified with new data.






        share|improve this answer













        Revoking a degree is rarely done and, then, only for the most extreme reasons such as explicit dishonesty and such. Any results in any thesis are subject to revision as new information becomes available that was not present in the past. It doesn't mean that the work was wrongly done, but only that what is known has advanced.



        Since you re-did the experiment and came to the same conclusion, you may be able to publish something based on the new results and, when citing your unpublished theses, mention that the conclusions there were verified with new data.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        BuffyBuffy

        42.6k10138219




        42.6k10138219






















            Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Carlos Varas Tello is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123891%2fcan-my-university-revoke-my-degree-after-it-was-granted-due-to-corporate-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

            Mangá

             ⁒  ․,‪⁊‑⁙ ⁖, ⁇‒※‌, †,⁖‗‌⁝    ‾‸⁘,‖⁔⁣,⁂‾
”‑,‥–,‬ ,⁀‹⁋‴⁑ ‒ ,‴⁋”‼ ⁨,‷⁔„ ‰′,‐‚ ‥‡‎“‷⁃⁨⁅⁣,⁔
⁇‘⁔⁡⁏⁌⁡‿‶‏⁨ ⁣⁕⁖⁨⁩⁥‽⁀  ‴‬⁜‟ ⁃‣‧⁕‮ …‍⁨‴ ⁩,⁚⁖‫ ,‵ ⁀,‮⁝‣‣ ⁑  ⁂– ․, ‾‽ ‏⁁“⁗‸ ‾… ‹‡⁌⁎‸‘ ‡⁏⁌‪ ‵⁛ ‎⁨ ―⁦⁤⁄⁕