Connection between GCD and LCM of two numbers











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












These two exercises I encountered recently seem to develop some type of connection between GCD and LCM I can't quite figure out.



Exercise 1:




Find all the numbers $x$ and $y$ such that:



$a) GCD(x,y)=15, LCM(x,y)=150$ $b) GCD(x,y)=120 LCM(x,y)=1320$
$c) GCD(x,y)=100 LCM(x,y)=990$




Exercise 2:





Find all the numbers $m,n$ such that $GCD(m,n)=pq , LCM(m,n)=p^2qs$




where $p,q,s$ are prime




The first thing that is known to me is that $GCD(x,y) cdot LCM(x,y)= x cdot y$



Also $LCM(x,y)$ is at most $x cdot y$ while $GCD(x,y)$ is at most $max {x,y}$. Last thing is that $GCD(x,y)|LCM(x,y)$.



Using all this I tried to solve the first exercise:



$a)$ First two obvious pairs are $x=15, y=150$ and $y=15, x=150$. Now neither of the numbers can be bigger than $150$ or smaller than $15$. So we are looking for numbers in the range $15-150$ that satisfy $x cdot y = 15 cdot 150$ Another such pair is $(x,y)=(30,75), (x,y)=(75,30)$.



Similarly for $b)$ we find that the only possible values are permutations of the set {$120,1320$} and in $c)$ since $100$ does not divide $990$ no such numbers exist.



Now exercise 2 is what made me think there is actually another connection I'm not quite aware of since now it's about arbitrary prime numbers and the previous method doesn't work anymore. My intuition is that it has something to do with $GCD$ or $LCM$ of the $GCD(x,y), LCM(x,y)$










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Do you mean $lcm(m,n)=p^2qs$ and $gcd(m,n)=pq$?
    – tarit goswami
    Nov 21 at 16:35















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












These two exercises I encountered recently seem to develop some type of connection between GCD and LCM I can't quite figure out.



Exercise 1:




Find all the numbers $x$ and $y$ such that:



$a) GCD(x,y)=15, LCM(x,y)=150$ $b) GCD(x,y)=120 LCM(x,y)=1320$
$c) GCD(x,y)=100 LCM(x,y)=990$




Exercise 2:





Find all the numbers $m,n$ such that $GCD(m,n)=pq , LCM(m,n)=p^2qs$




where $p,q,s$ are prime




The first thing that is known to me is that $GCD(x,y) cdot LCM(x,y)= x cdot y$



Also $LCM(x,y)$ is at most $x cdot y$ while $GCD(x,y)$ is at most $max {x,y}$. Last thing is that $GCD(x,y)|LCM(x,y)$.



Using all this I tried to solve the first exercise:



$a)$ First two obvious pairs are $x=15, y=150$ and $y=15, x=150$. Now neither of the numbers can be bigger than $150$ or smaller than $15$. So we are looking for numbers in the range $15-150$ that satisfy $x cdot y = 15 cdot 150$ Another such pair is $(x,y)=(30,75), (x,y)=(75,30)$.



Similarly for $b)$ we find that the only possible values are permutations of the set {$120,1320$} and in $c)$ since $100$ does not divide $990$ no such numbers exist.



Now exercise 2 is what made me think there is actually another connection I'm not quite aware of since now it's about arbitrary prime numbers and the previous method doesn't work anymore. My intuition is that it has something to do with $GCD$ or $LCM$ of the $GCD(x,y), LCM(x,y)$










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Do you mean $lcm(m,n)=p^2qs$ and $gcd(m,n)=pq$?
    – tarit goswami
    Nov 21 at 16:35













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











These two exercises I encountered recently seem to develop some type of connection between GCD and LCM I can't quite figure out.



Exercise 1:




Find all the numbers $x$ and $y$ such that:



$a) GCD(x,y)=15, LCM(x,y)=150$ $b) GCD(x,y)=120 LCM(x,y)=1320$
$c) GCD(x,y)=100 LCM(x,y)=990$




Exercise 2:





Find all the numbers $m,n$ such that $GCD(m,n)=pq , LCM(m,n)=p^2qs$




where $p,q,s$ are prime




The first thing that is known to me is that $GCD(x,y) cdot LCM(x,y)= x cdot y$



Also $LCM(x,y)$ is at most $x cdot y$ while $GCD(x,y)$ is at most $max {x,y}$. Last thing is that $GCD(x,y)|LCM(x,y)$.



Using all this I tried to solve the first exercise:



$a)$ First two obvious pairs are $x=15, y=150$ and $y=15, x=150$. Now neither of the numbers can be bigger than $150$ or smaller than $15$. So we are looking for numbers in the range $15-150$ that satisfy $x cdot y = 15 cdot 150$ Another such pair is $(x,y)=(30,75), (x,y)=(75,30)$.



Similarly for $b)$ we find that the only possible values are permutations of the set {$120,1320$} and in $c)$ since $100$ does not divide $990$ no such numbers exist.



Now exercise 2 is what made me think there is actually another connection I'm not quite aware of since now it's about arbitrary prime numbers and the previous method doesn't work anymore. My intuition is that it has something to do with $GCD$ or $LCM$ of the $GCD(x,y), LCM(x,y)$










share|cite|improve this question















These two exercises I encountered recently seem to develop some type of connection between GCD and LCM I can't quite figure out.



Exercise 1:




Find all the numbers $x$ and $y$ such that:



$a) GCD(x,y)=15, LCM(x,y)=150$ $b) GCD(x,y)=120 LCM(x,y)=1320$
$c) GCD(x,y)=100 LCM(x,y)=990$




Exercise 2:





Find all the numbers $m,n$ such that $GCD(m,n)=pq , LCM(m,n)=p^2qs$




where $p,q,s$ are prime




The first thing that is known to me is that $GCD(x,y) cdot LCM(x,y)= x cdot y$



Also $LCM(x,y)$ is at most $x cdot y$ while $GCD(x,y)$ is at most $max {x,y}$. Last thing is that $GCD(x,y)|LCM(x,y)$.



Using all this I tried to solve the first exercise:



$a)$ First two obvious pairs are $x=15, y=150$ and $y=15, x=150$. Now neither of the numbers can be bigger than $150$ or smaller than $15$. So we are looking for numbers in the range $15-150$ that satisfy $x cdot y = 15 cdot 150$ Another such pair is $(x,y)=(30,75), (x,y)=(75,30)$.



Similarly for $b)$ we find that the only possible values are permutations of the set {$120,1320$} and in $c)$ since $100$ does not divide $990$ no such numbers exist.



Now exercise 2 is what made me think there is actually another connection I'm not quite aware of since now it's about arbitrary prime numbers and the previous method doesn't work anymore. My intuition is that it has something to do with $GCD$ or $LCM$ of the $GCD(x,y), LCM(x,y)$







number-theory prime-numbers divisibility greatest-common-divisor least-common-multiple






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 16:43

























asked Nov 21 at 16:28









DreaDk

586217




586217








  • 1




    Do you mean $lcm(m,n)=p^2qs$ and $gcd(m,n)=pq$?
    – tarit goswami
    Nov 21 at 16:35














  • 1




    Do you mean $lcm(m,n)=p^2qs$ and $gcd(m,n)=pq$?
    – tarit goswami
    Nov 21 at 16:35








1




1




Do you mean $lcm(m,n)=p^2qs$ and $gcd(m,n)=pq$?
– tarit goswami
Nov 21 at 16:35




Do you mean $lcm(m,n)=p^2qs$ and $gcd(m,n)=pq$?
– tarit goswami
Nov 21 at 16:35










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If you have two numbers with prime factorizations



$$x = p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}p_3^{a_3}cdots p_n^{a_n}$$
$$y = p_1^{b_1}p_2^{b_2}p_3^{b_3}cdots p_n^{b_n}$$



then



$$GCD(x,y) = p_1^{min(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{min(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{min(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{min(a_n, b_n)}$$



and



$$LCM(x,y) = p_1^{max(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{max(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{max(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{max(a_n, b_n)}$$



where $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$ are the minimum and maximum of $a$ and $b$, respectively.



Does this help?






share|cite|improve this answer























  • That is same as lhf saying
    – tarit goswami
    Nov 21 at 16:40


















up vote
3
down vote













Here is the relevant fact:




Let $d=gcd(a,b)$ and $m=lcm(a,b)$. Then $v_p(d)=min(v_p(a),v_p(b))$ and $v_p(m)=max(v_p(a),v_p(b))$.




Here, $v_p(n)$ is the exponent of the prime $p$ in the factorization of $n$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Somehow completely forgot about prime factorisation and how it relates to everything I wrote.
    – DreaDk
    Nov 21 at 16:43






  • 1




    In other words, $gcd(a,b)cdottext{lcm}(a,b)=acdot b$.
    – vrugtehagel
    Nov 21 at 16:44




















up vote
2
down vote













$begin{align}{bf Hint}
&gcd(X,Y) = d, {rm lcm}(X,Y) = m text{yields by cancelling $,dneq 0$}\[.3em]
iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y =, m/d, {rm for} x = X/d,, y = Y/d
end{align}$



$begin{align}{rm e.g.}
&gcd(X,Y) = 15, , {rm lcm}(X,Y) = 150\[.3em]
iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y, =, 10
end{align}$



This method quickly and simply solves all of them. Cancelling to reduce to the coprime case is a common way to simplify homogeneous divisibility problems.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007964%2fconnection-between-gcd-and-lcm-of-two-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    If you have two numbers with prime factorizations



    $$x = p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}p_3^{a_3}cdots p_n^{a_n}$$
    $$y = p_1^{b_1}p_2^{b_2}p_3^{b_3}cdots p_n^{b_n}$$



    then



    $$GCD(x,y) = p_1^{min(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{min(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{min(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{min(a_n, b_n)}$$



    and



    $$LCM(x,y) = p_1^{max(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{max(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{max(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{max(a_n, b_n)}$$



    where $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$ are the minimum and maximum of $a$ and $b$, respectively.



    Does this help?






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • That is same as lhf saying
      – tarit goswami
      Nov 21 at 16:40















    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    If you have two numbers with prime factorizations



    $$x = p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}p_3^{a_3}cdots p_n^{a_n}$$
    $$y = p_1^{b_1}p_2^{b_2}p_3^{b_3}cdots p_n^{b_n}$$



    then



    $$GCD(x,y) = p_1^{min(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{min(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{min(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{min(a_n, b_n)}$$



    and



    $$LCM(x,y) = p_1^{max(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{max(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{max(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{max(a_n, b_n)}$$



    where $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$ are the minimum and maximum of $a$ and $b$, respectively.



    Does this help?






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • That is same as lhf saying
      – tarit goswami
      Nov 21 at 16:40













    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted






    If you have two numbers with prime factorizations



    $$x = p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}p_3^{a_3}cdots p_n^{a_n}$$
    $$y = p_1^{b_1}p_2^{b_2}p_3^{b_3}cdots p_n^{b_n}$$



    then



    $$GCD(x,y) = p_1^{min(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{min(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{min(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{min(a_n, b_n)}$$



    and



    $$LCM(x,y) = p_1^{max(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{max(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{max(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{max(a_n, b_n)}$$



    where $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$ are the minimum and maximum of $a$ and $b$, respectively.



    Does this help?






    share|cite|improve this answer














    If you have two numbers with prime factorizations



    $$x = p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}p_3^{a_3}cdots p_n^{a_n}$$
    $$y = p_1^{b_1}p_2^{b_2}p_3^{b_3}cdots p_n^{b_n}$$



    then



    $$GCD(x,y) = p_1^{min(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{min(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{min(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{min(a_n, b_n)}$$



    and



    $$LCM(x,y) = p_1^{max(a_1, b_1)}p_2^{max(a_2, b_2)}p_3^{max(a_3, b_3)}cdots p_n^{max(a_n, b_n)}$$



    where $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$ are the minimum and maximum of $a$ and $b$, respectively.



    Does this help?







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 21 at 16:47

























    answered Nov 21 at 16:40









    John

    22.3k32347




    22.3k32347












    • That is same as lhf saying
      – tarit goswami
      Nov 21 at 16:40


















    • That is same as lhf saying
      – tarit goswami
      Nov 21 at 16:40
















    That is same as lhf saying
    – tarit goswami
    Nov 21 at 16:40




    That is same as lhf saying
    – tarit goswami
    Nov 21 at 16:40










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Here is the relevant fact:




    Let $d=gcd(a,b)$ and $m=lcm(a,b)$. Then $v_p(d)=min(v_p(a),v_p(b))$ and $v_p(m)=max(v_p(a),v_p(b))$.




    Here, $v_p(n)$ is the exponent of the prime $p$ in the factorization of $n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Somehow completely forgot about prime factorisation and how it relates to everything I wrote.
      – DreaDk
      Nov 21 at 16:43






    • 1




      In other words, $gcd(a,b)cdottext{lcm}(a,b)=acdot b$.
      – vrugtehagel
      Nov 21 at 16:44

















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Here is the relevant fact:




    Let $d=gcd(a,b)$ and $m=lcm(a,b)$. Then $v_p(d)=min(v_p(a),v_p(b))$ and $v_p(m)=max(v_p(a),v_p(b))$.




    Here, $v_p(n)$ is the exponent of the prime $p$ in the factorization of $n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Somehow completely forgot about prime factorisation and how it relates to everything I wrote.
      – DreaDk
      Nov 21 at 16:43






    • 1




      In other words, $gcd(a,b)cdottext{lcm}(a,b)=acdot b$.
      – vrugtehagel
      Nov 21 at 16:44















    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    Here is the relevant fact:




    Let $d=gcd(a,b)$ and $m=lcm(a,b)$. Then $v_p(d)=min(v_p(a),v_p(b))$ and $v_p(m)=max(v_p(a),v_p(b))$.




    Here, $v_p(n)$ is the exponent of the prime $p$ in the factorization of $n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    Here is the relevant fact:




    Let $d=gcd(a,b)$ and $m=lcm(a,b)$. Then $v_p(d)=min(v_p(a),v_p(b))$ and $v_p(m)=max(v_p(a),v_p(b))$.




    Here, $v_p(n)$ is the exponent of the prime $p$ in the factorization of $n$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 21 at 16:35









    lhf

    161k9165384




    161k9165384












    • Somehow completely forgot about prime factorisation and how it relates to everything I wrote.
      – DreaDk
      Nov 21 at 16:43






    • 1




      In other words, $gcd(a,b)cdottext{lcm}(a,b)=acdot b$.
      – vrugtehagel
      Nov 21 at 16:44




















    • Somehow completely forgot about prime factorisation and how it relates to everything I wrote.
      – DreaDk
      Nov 21 at 16:43






    • 1




      In other words, $gcd(a,b)cdottext{lcm}(a,b)=acdot b$.
      – vrugtehagel
      Nov 21 at 16:44


















    Somehow completely forgot about prime factorisation and how it relates to everything I wrote.
    – DreaDk
    Nov 21 at 16:43




    Somehow completely forgot about prime factorisation and how it relates to everything I wrote.
    – DreaDk
    Nov 21 at 16:43




    1




    1




    In other words, $gcd(a,b)cdottext{lcm}(a,b)=acdot b$.
    – vrugtehagel
    Nov 21 at 16:44






    In other words, $gcd(a,b)cdottext{lcm}(a,b)=acdot b$.
    – vrugtehagel
    Nov 21 at 16:44












    up vote
    2
    down vote













    $begin{align}{bf Hint}
    &gcd(X,Y) = d, {rm lcm}(X,Y) = m text{yields by cancelling $,dneq 0$}\[.3em]
    iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y =, m/d, {rm for} x = X/d,, y = Y/d
    end{align}$



    $begin{align}{rm e.g.}
    &gcd(X,Y) = 15, , {rm lcm}(X,Y) = 150\[.3em]
    iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y, =, 10
    end{align}$



    This method quickly and simply solves all of them. Cancelling to reduce to the coprime case is a common way to simplify homogeneous divisibility problems.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      $begin{align}{bf Hint}
      &gcd(X,Y) = d, {rm lcm}(X,Y) = m text{yields by cancelling $,dneq 0$}\[.3em]
      iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y =, m/d, {rm for} x = X/d,, y = Y/d
      end{align}$



      $begin{align}{rm e.g.}
      &gcd(X,Y) = 15, , {rm lcm}(X,Y) = 150\[.3em]
      iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y, =, 10
      end{align}$



      This method quickly and simply solves all of them. Cancelling to reduce to the coprime case is a common way to simplify homogeneous divisibility problems.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        $begin{align}{bf Hint}
        &gcd(X,Y) = d, {rm lcm}(X,Y) = m text{yields by cancelling $,dneq 0$}\[.3em]
        iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y =, m/d, {rm for} x = X/d,, y = Y/d
        end{align}$



        $begin{align}{rm e.g.}
        &gcd(X,Y) = 15, , {rm lcm}(X,Y) = 150\[.3em]
        iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y, =, 10
        end{align}$



        This method quickly and simply solves all of them. Cancelling to reduce to the coprime case is a common way to simplify homogeneous divisibility problems.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        $begin{align}{bf Hint}
        &gcd(X,Y) = d, {rm lcm}(X,Y) = m text{yields by cancelling $,dneq 0$}\[.3em]
        iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y =, m/d, {rm for} x = X/d,, y = Y/d
        end{align}$



        $begin{align}{rm e.g.}
        &gcd(X,Y) = 15, , {rm lcm}(X,Y) = 150\[.3em]
        iff &gcd(x,,y) = 1,qquad , xcdot y, =, 10
        end{align}$



        This method quickly and simply solves all of them. Cancelling to reduce to the coprime case is a common way to simplify homogeneous divisibility problems.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 21 at 19:53

























        answered Nov 21 at 19:45









        Bill Dubuque

        206k29189621




        206k29189621






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007964%2fconnection-between-gcd-and-lcm-of-two-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

            Mangá

            Eduardo VII do Reino Unido