Why does Homer handle a rod of uranium in the opening?











up vote
36
down vote

favorite
6












In The Simpsons opening Homer handles a rod of uranium, that he gets rid of while commuting to home afterward. However, as he works as a safety inspector, it doesn't seem to be part of his work responsibility to deal with uranium directly. Is there any explanation why he does that?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7




    events in the opening aren't canon anyway ;)
    – NKCampbell
    yesterday








  • 3




    @NKCampbell [citation needed] -- I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious what your basis for the statement is.
    – KlaymenDK
    yesterday






  • 4




    Is there any explanation why he wouldn't do that? Homer hasn't generally been shown to be an extremely competent Nukulur Safety Inspector. ...or an extremely competent anything (so long as that Crayon is in his nose anyways).
    – BruceWayne
    yesterday










  • Also neither do actual nuclear power plants have any nuclear fuel rods in this form, nor do they handle the nuclear fuel in this way, nor does the nuclear fuel glow green. The entire scene is a combination of silly clichés.
    – Loong
    12 hours ago















up vote
36
down vote

favorite
6












In The Simpsons opening Homer handles a rod of uranium, that he gets rid of while commuting to home afterward. However, as he works as a safety inspector, it doesn't seem to be part of his work responsibility to deal with uranium directly. Is there any explanation why he does that?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 7




    events in the opening aren't canon anyway ;)
    – NKCampbell
    yesterday








  • 3




    @NKCampbell [citation needed] -- I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious what your basis for the statement is.
    – KlaymenDK
    yesterday






  • 4




    Is there any explanation why he wouldn't do that? Homer hasn't generally been shown to be an extremely competent Nukulur Safety Inspector. ...or an extremely competent anything (so long as that Crayon is in his nose anyways).
    – BruceWayne
    yesterday










  • Also neither do actual nuclear power plants have any nuclear fuel rods in this form, nor do they handle the nuclear fuel in this way, nor does the nuclear fuel glow green. The entire scene is a combination of silly clichés.
    – Loong
    12 hours ago













up vote
36
down vote

favorite
6









up vote
36
down vote

favorite
6






6





In The Simpsons opening Homer handles a rod of uranium, that he gets rid of while commuting to home afterward. However, as he works as a safety inspector, it doesn't seem to be part of his work responsibility to deal with uranium directly. Is there any explanation why he does that?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











In The Simpsons opening Homer handles a rod of uranium, that he gets rid of while commuting to home afterward. However, as he works as a safety inspector, it doesn't seem to be part of his work responsibility to deal with uranium directly. Is there any explanation why he does that?







plot-explanation the-simpsons






share|improve this question









New contributor




Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Ankit Sharma

68.4k58353562




68.4k58353562






New contributor




Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Aleksandr Medvedev

29226




29226




New contributor




Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Aleksandr Medvedev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 7




    events in the opening aren't canon anyway ;)
    – NKCampbell
    yesterday








  • 3




    @NKCampbell [citation needed] -- I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious what your basis for the statement is.
    – KlaymenDK
    yesterday






  • 4




    Is there any explanation why he wouldn't do that? Homer hasn't generally been shown to be an extremely competent Nukulur Safety Inspector. ...or an extremely competent anything (so long as that Crayon is in his nose anyways).
    – BruceWayne
    yesterday










  • Also neither do actual nuclear power plants have any nuclear fuel rods in this form, nor do they handle the nuclear fuel in this way, nor does the nuclear fuel glow green. The entire scene is a combination of silly clichés.
    – Loong
    12 hours ago














  • 7




    events in the opening aren't canon anyway ;)
    – NKCampbell
    yesterday








  • 3




    @NKCampbell [citation needed] -- I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious what your basis for the statement is.
    – KlaymenDK
    yesterday






  • 4




    Is there any explanation why he wouldn't do that? Homer hasn't generally been shown to be an extremely competent Nukulur Safety Inspector. ...or an extremely competent anything (so long as that Crayon is in his nose anyways).
    – BruceWayne
    yesterday










  • Also neither do actual nuclear power plants have any nuclear fuel rods in this form, nor do they handle the nuclear fuel in this way, nor does the nuclear fuel glow green. The entire scene is a combination of silly clichés.
    – Loong
    12 hours ago








7




7




events in the opening aren't canon anyway ;)
– NKCampbell
yesterday






events in the opening aren't canon anyway ;)
– NKCampbell
yesterday






3




3




@NKCampbell [citation needed] -- I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious what your basis for the statement is.
– KlaymenDK
yesterday




@NKCampbell [citation needed] -- I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious what your basis for the statement is.
– KlaymenDK
yesterday




4




4




Is there any explanation why he wouldn't do that? Homer hasn't generally been shown to be an extremely competent Nukulur Safety Inspector. ...or an extremely competent anything (so long as that Crayon is in his nose anyways).
– BruceWayne
yesterday




Is there any explanation why he wouldn't do that? Homer hasn't generally been shown to be an extremely competent Nukulur Safety Inspector. ...or an extremely competent anything (so long as that Crayon is in his nose anyways).
– BruceWayne
yesterday












Also neither do actual nuclear power plants have any nuclear fuel rods in this form, nor do they handle the nuclear fuel in this way, nor does the nuclear fuel glow green. The entire scene is a combination of silly clichés.
– Loong
12 hours ago




Also neither do actual nuclear power plants have any nuclear fuel rods in this form, nor do they handle the nuclear fuel in this way, nor does the nuclear fuel glow green. The entire scene is a combination of silly clichés.
– Loong
12 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
73
down vote



accepted










Homer's first job was actually not a Nuclear Safety Inspector. He was a "nuclear technician" or "technical supervisor" (No one really knows. Not even him). In S01E03, he is fired from this job. He eventually becomes a "safety crusader" after witnessing all the safety violations the plant commits. Mr. Burns re-hires him as a safety inspector to shut him up.



That part of the opening sequence has been unchanged for the entire span of the show. What you're actually seeing is Homer at his original "Nuclear Technician" job before he became a safety inspector.






share|improve this answer

















  • 4




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer%27s_Odyssey_(The_Simpsons)
    – Paulie_D
    2 days ago






  • 24




    (It's spelled "Nukulur") :P
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 2




    I thought he was a supervising technician? (as opposed to nucular technician)
    – colmde
    yesterday






  • 4




    @colmde I think the joke was his job was so meaningless that nobody actually knew what it was.
    – DeeV
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Studoku Technical supervising assistant to the assistant supervising technician.
    – R.M.
    yesterday


















up vote
20
down vote













DeeV answered it quite well but one more update it's not even rod of uranium but a carbon rod. And to be accurate Inanimate carbon rod.



There were two such rods prominent in the show as detailed in linked wikia. And it shows he is less valuable to the plant than an inanimate object and also during NASA mission history repeat itself.



And he did use to work in Springfield Nuclear Power Plant, so having a carbon rod is not so strange especially when you envy it so much.






share|improve this answer



















  • 27




    To be even more accurate: an animated inanimate carbon rod.
    – T.J. Crowder
    yesterday






  • 3




    @T.J.Crowder Whereas, if I drew such a rod in the style of The Simpsons, it would be an imitated animated inanimate rod.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday






  • 2




    The rod in the opening appears to be glowing, while the inanimate carbon rod pictured in the wiki article does not seem to be. Are we sure they're the same thing?
    – Zach Lipton
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    @ZachLipton Fuel rods don't glow either.
    – David Richerby
    10 hours ago



















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
73
down vote



accepted










Homer's first job was actually not a Nuclear Safety Inspector. He was a "nuclear technician" or "technical supervisor" (No one really knows. Not even him). In S01E03, he is fired from this job. He eventually becomes a "safety crusader" after witnessing all the safety violations the plant commits. Mr. Burns re-hires him as a safety inspector to shut him up.



That part of the opening sequence has been unchanged for the entire span of the show. What you're actually seeing is Homer at his original "Nuclear Technician" job before he became a safety inspector.






share|improve this answer

















  • 4




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer%27s_Odyssey_(The_Simpsons)
    – Paulie_D
    2 days ago






  • 24




    (It's spelled "Nukulur") :P
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 2




    I thought he was a supervising technician? (as opposed to nucular technician)
    – colmde
    yesterday






  • 4




    @colmde I think the joke was his job was so meaningless that nobody actually knew what it was.
    – DeeV
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Studoku Technical supervising assistant to the assistant supervising technician.
    – R.M.
    yesterday















up vote
73
down vote



accepted










Homer's first job was actually not a Nuclear Safety Inspector. He was a "nuclear technician" or "technical supervisor" (No one really knows. Not even him). In S01E03, he is fired from this job. He eventually becomes a "safety crusader" after witnessing all the safety violations the plant commits. Mr. Burns re-hires him as a safety inspector to shut him up.



That part of the opening sequence has been unchanged for the entire span of the show. What you're actually seeing is Homer at his original "Nuclear Technician" job before he became a safety inspector.






share|improve this answer

















  • 4




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer%27s_Odyssey_(The_Simpsons)
    – Paulie_D
    2 days ago






  • 24




    (It's spelled "Nukulur") :P
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 2




    I thought he was a supervising technician? (as opposed to nucular technician)
    – colmde
    yesterday






  • 4




    @colmde I think the joke was his job was so meaningless that nobody actually knew what it was.
    – DeeV
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Studoku Technical supervising assistant to the assistant supervising technician.
    – R.M.
    yesterday













up vote
73
down vote



accepted







up vote
73
down vote



accepted






Homer's first job was actually not a Nuclear Safety Inspector. He was a "nuclear technician" or "technical supervisor" (No one really knows. Not even him). In S01E03, he is fired from this job. He eventually becomes a "safety crusader" after witnessing all the safety violations the plant commits. Mr. Burns re-hires him as a safety inspector to shut him up.



That part of the opening sequence has been unchanged for the entire span of the show. What you're actually seeing is Homer at his original "Nuclear Technician" job before he became a safety inspector.






share|improve this answer












Homer's first job was actually not a Nuclear Safety Inspector. He was a "nuclear technician" or "technical supervisor" (No one really knows. Not even him). In S01E03, he is fired from this job. He eventually becomes a "safety crusader" after witnessing all the safety violations the plant commits. Mr. Burns re-hires him as a safety inspector to shut him up.



That part of the opening sequence has been unchanged for the entire span of the show. What you're actually seeing is Homer at his original "Nuclear Technician" job before he became a safety inspector.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









DeeV

2,57811015




2,57811015








  • 4




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer%27s_Odyssey_(The_Simpsons)
    – Paulie_D
    2 days ago






  • 24




    (It's spelled "Nukulur") :P
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 2




    I thought he was a supervising technician? (as opposed to nucular technician)
    – colmde
    yesterday






  • 4




    @colmde I think the joke was his job was so meaningless that nobody actually knew what it was.
    – DeeV
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Studoku Technical supervising assistant to the assistant supervising technician.
    – R.M.
    yesterday














  • 4




    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer%27s_Odyssey_(The_Simpsons)
    – Paulie_D
    2 days ago






  • 24




    (It's spelled "Nukulur") :P
    – BruceWayne
    2 days ago






  • 2




    I thought he was a supervising technician? (as opposed to nucular technician)
    – colmde
    yesterday






  • 4




    @colmde I think the joke was his job was so meaningless that nobody actually knew what it was.
    – DeeV
    yesterday






  • 9




    @Studoku Technical supervising assistant to the assistant supervising technician.
    – R.M.
    yesterday








4




4




en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer%27s_Odyssey_(The_Simpsons)
– Paulie_D
2 days ago




en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer%27s_Odyssey_(The_Simpsons)
– Paulie_D
2 days ago




24




24




(It's spelled "Nukulur") :P
– BruceWayne
2 days ago




(It's spelled "Nukulur") :P
– BruceWayne
2 days ago




2




2




I thought he was a supervising technician? (as opposed to nucular technician)
– colmde
yesterday




I thought he was a supervising technician? (as opposed to nucular technician)
– colmde
yesterday




4




4




@colmde I think the joke was his job was so meaningless that nobody actually knew what it was.
– DeeV
yesterday




@colmde I think the joke was his job was so meaningless that nobody actually knew what it was.
– DeeV
yesterday




9




9




@Studoku Technical supervising assistant to the assistant supervising technician.
– R.M.
yesterday




@Studoku Technical supervising assistant to the assistant supervising technician.
– R.M.
yesterday










up vote
20
down vote













DeeV answered it quite well but one more update it's not even rod of uranium but a carbon rod. And to be accurate Inanimate carbon rod.



There were two such rods prominent in the show as detailed in linked wikia. And it shows he is less valuable to the plant than an inanimate object and also during NASA mission history repeat itself.



And he did use to work in Springfield Nuclear Power Plant, so having a carbon rod is not so strange especially when you envy it so much.






share|improve this answer



















  • 27




    To be even more accurate: an animated inanimate carbon rod.
    – T.J. Crowder
    yesterday






  • 3




    @T.J.Crowder Whereas, if I drew such a rod in the style of The Simpsons, it would be an imitated animated inanimate rod.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday






  • 2




    The rod in the opening appears to be glowing, while the inanimate carbon rod pictured in the wiki article does not seem to be. Are we sure they're the same thing?
    – Zach Lipton
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    @ZachLipton Fuel rods don't glow either.
    – David Richerby
    10 hours ago















up vote
20
down vote













DeeV answered it quite well but one more update it's not even rod of uranium but a carbon rod. And to be accurate Inanimate carbon rod.



There were two such rods prominent in the show as detailed in linked wikia. And it shows he is less valuable to the plant than an inanimate object and also during NASA mission history repeat itself.



And he did use to work in Springfield Nuclear Power Plant, so having a carbon rod is not so strange especially when you envy it so much.






share|improve this answer



















  • 27




    To be even more accurate: an animated inanimate carbon rod.
    – T.J. Crowder
    yesterday






  • 3




    @T.J.Crowder Whereas, if I drew such a rod in the style of The Simpsons, it would be an imitated animated inanimate rod.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday






  • 2




    The rod in the opening appears to be glowing, while the inanimate carbon rod pictured in the wiki article does not seem to be. Are we sure they're the same thing?
    – Zach Lipton
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    @ZachLipton Fuel rods don't glow either.
    – David Richerby
    10 hours ago













up vote
20
down vote










up vote
20
down vote









DeeV answered it quite well but one more update it's not even rod of uranium but a carbon rod. And to be accurate Inanimate carbon rod.



There were two such rods prominent in the show as detailed in linked wikia. And it shows he is less valuable to the plant than an inanimate object and also during NASA mission history repeat itself.



And he did use to work in Springfield Nuclear Power Plant, so having a carbon rod is not so strange especially when you envy it so much.






share|improve this answer














DeeV answered it quite well but one more update it's not even rod of uranium but a carbon rod. And to be accurate Inanimate carbon rod.



There were two such rods prominent in the show as detailed in linked wikia. And it shows he is less valuable to the plant than an inanimate object and also during NASA mission history repeat itself.



And he did use to work in Springfield Nuclear Power Plant, so having a carbon rod is not so strange especially when you envy it so much.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday









A J

39.1k15207221




39.1k15207221










answered yesterday









Ankit Sharma

68.4k58353562




68.4k58353562








  • 27




    To be even more accurate: an animated inanimate carbon rod.
    – T.J. Crowder
    yesterday






  • 3




    @T.J.Crowder Whereas, if I drew such a rod in the style of The Simpsons, it would be an imitated animated inanimate rod.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday






  • 2




    The rod in the opening appears to be glowing, while the inanimate carbon rod pictured in the wiki article does not seem to be. Are we sure they're the same thing?
    – Zach Lipton
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    @ZachLipton Fuel rods don't glow either.
    – David Richerby
    10 hours ago














  • 27




    To be even more accurate: an animated inanimate carbon rod.
    – T.J. Crowder
    yesterday






  • 3




    @T.J.Crowder Whereas, if I drew such a rod in the style of The Simpsons, it would be an imitated animated inanimate rod.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday






  • 2




    The rod in the opening appears to be glowing, while the inanimate carbon rod pictured in the wiki article does not seem to be. Are we sure they're the same thing?
    – Zach Lipton
    18 hours ago






  • 3




    @ZachLipton Fuel rods don't glow either.
    – David Richerby
    10 hours ago








27




27




To be even more accurate: an animated inanimate carbon rod.
– T.J. Crowder
yesterday




To be even more accurate: an animated inanimate carbon rod.
– T.J. Crowder
yesterday




3




3




@T.J.Crowder Whereas, if I drew such a rod in the style of The Simpsons, it would be an imitated animated inanimate rod.
– David Richerby
yesterday




@T.J.Crowder Whereas, if I drew such a rod in the style of The Simpsons, it would be an imitated animated inanimate rod.
– David Richerby
yesterday




2




2




The rod in the opening appears to be glowing, while the inanimate carbon rod pictured in the wiki article does not seem to be. Are we sure they're the same thing?
– Zach Lipton
18 hours ago




The rod in the opening appears to be glowing, while the inanimate carbon rod pictured in the wiki article does not seem to be. Are we sure they're the same thing?
– Zach Lipton
18 hours ago




3




3




@ZachLipton Fuel rods don't glow either.
– David Richerby
10 hours ago




@ZachLipton Fuel rods don't glow either.
– David Richerby
10 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

Eduardo VII do Reino Unido