mitm threat with apt
I think* there is a recent zdnet article about a potential mitm threat-- but I'm not quite sure whether to take the advice or not. Specifically, is there a hive mind that already knows the/some of the proxies that might be affected by not allowing redirects on update & upgrade commands?
https://www.zdnet.com/article/nasty-security-bug-found-and-fixed-in-linux-apt/
Also, I think what's being suggested is to turn off redirects, run a patch, and then update again. Never having run a patch like this before, I'm cautious. Don't see a lot of discussion of this here already. Did I miss it?
apt patch
asked Jan 24 at 19:55
ksfksf
1
add a comment |
I think* there is a recent zdnet article about a potential mitm threat-- but I'm not quite sure whether to take the advice or not. Specifically, is there a hive mind that already knows the/some of the proxies that might be affected by not allowing redirects on update & upgrade commands?
https://www.zdnet.com/article/nasty-security-bug-found-and-fixed-in-linux-apt/
Also, I think what's being suggested is to turn off redirects, run a patch, and then update again. Never having run a patch like this before, I'm cautious. Don't see a lot of discussion of this here already. Did I miss it?
apt patch
asked Jan 24 at 19:55
ksfksf
1
add a comment |
I think* there is a recent zdnet article about a potential mitm threat-- but I'm not quite sure whether to take the advice or not. Specifically, is there a hive mind that already knows the/some of the proxies that might be affected by not allowing redirects on update & upgrade commands?
https://www.zdnet.com/article/nasty-security-bug-found-and-fixed-in-linux-apt/
Also, I think what's being suggested is to turn off redirects, run a patch, and then update again. Never having run a patch like this before, I'm cautious. Don't see a lot of discussion of this here already. Did I miss it?
apt patch
asked Jan 24 at 19:55
ksfksf
1
I think* there is a recent zdnet article about a potential mitm threat-- but I'm not quite sure whether to take the advice or not. Specifically, is there a hive mind that already knows the/some of the proxies that might be affected by not allowing redirects on update & upgrade commands?
https://www.zdnet.com/article/nasty-security-bug-found-and-fixed-in-linux-apt/
Also, I think what's being suggested is to turn off redirects, run a patch, and then update again. Never having run a patch like this before, I'm cautious. Don't see a lot of discussion of this here already. Did I miss it?
apt patch
apt patch
asked Jan 24 at 19:55
ksfksf
1
asked Jan 24 at 19:55
ksfksf
1
asked Jan 24 at 19:55
ksfksf
1
asked Jan 24 at 19:55
ksfksf
1
asked Jan 24 at 19:55
ksfksf
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No such acrobatics are necessary. YOU do not need to patch apt. The Ubuntu Security Team has already patched apt for you.
If you are using Unattended Upgrades, then you already have the patched version of apt.
If you are paranoid about security (not a bad thing!), then download the patched apt package yourself from https://packages.ubuntu.com. Be sure to pick the correct version for your release of Ubuntu.
answered Jan 24 at 20:10
user535733user535733
8,41322943
You may also be interested in apt-transport-https, though some say this adds minimal security.
– earthmeLon
Jan 24 at 21:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1112609%2fmitm-threat-with-apt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No such acrobatics are necessary. YOU do not need to patch apt. The Ubuntu Security Team has already patched apt for you.
If you are using Unattended Upgrades, then you already have the patched version of apt.
If you are paranoid about security (not a bad thing!), then download the patched apt package yourself from https://packages.ubuntu.com. Be sure to pick the correct version for your release of Ubuntu.
answered Jan 24 at 20:10
user535733user535733
8,41322943
You may also be interested in apt-transport-https, though some say this adds minimal security.
– earthmeLon
Jan 24 at 21:21
add a comment |
No such acrobatics are necessary. YOU do not need to patch apt. The Ubuntu Security Team has already patched apt for you.
If you are using Unattended Upgrades, then you already have the patched version of apt.
If you are paranoid about security (not a bad thing!), then download the patched apt package yourself from https://packages.ubuntu.com. Be sure to pick the correct version for your release of Ubuntu.
answered Jan 24 at 20:10
user535733user535733
8,41322943
You may also be interested in apt-transport-https, though some say this adds minimal security.
– earthmeLon
Jan 24 at 21:21
add a comment |
No such acrobatics are necessary. YOU do not need to patch apt. The Ubuntu Security Team has already patched apt for you.
If you are using Unattended Upgrades, then you already have the patched version of apt.
If you are paranoid about security (not a bad thing!), then download the patched apt package yourself from https://packages.ubuntu.com. Be sure to pick the correct version for your release of Ubuntu.
answered Jan 24 at 20:10
user535733user535733
8,41322943
No such acrobatics are necessary. YOU do not need to patch apt. The Ubuntu Security Team has already patched apt for you.
If you are using Unattended Upgrades, then you already have the patched version of apt.
If you are paranoid about security (not a bad thing!), then download the patched apt package yourself from https://packages.ubuntu.com. Be sure to pick the correct version for your release of Ubuntu.
answered Jan 24 at 20:10
user535733user535733
8,41322943
answered Jan 24 at 20:10
user535733user535733
8,41322943
answered Jan 24 at 20:10
user535733user535733
8,41322943
answered Jan 24 at 20:10
user535733user535733
8,41322943
8,41322943
You may also be interested in apt-transport-https, though some say this adds minimal security.
– earthmeLon
Jan 24 at 21:21
add a comment |
You may also be interested in apt-transport-https, though some say this adds minimal security.
– earthmeLon
Jan 24 at 21:21
You may also be interested in apt-transport-https, though some say this adds minimal security.
– earthmeLon
Jan 24 at 21:21
You may also be interested in apt-transport-https, though some say this adds minimal security.
– earthmeLon
Jan 24 at 21:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1112609%2fmitm-threat-with-apt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
