QGIS custom grid / line oriented point displacement? [duplicate]











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1













This question already has an answer here:




  • Group and align icons in QGIS atlas

    1 answer




I am trying to sort point symbols at the same coordinates in a line. The first picture shows how I want it to be (all symbols in a single horizontal line), the second how it looks with the standard grid-based point displacement (multiple, unwanted rows of symbols, and therefor also an unwanted overlap of text and symbols).



Is there any way/plugin to either change the parameters of how the grid is built (number of rows/lines) or any other way to show symbols in a line?



I am not hugely into scripting or programming though.



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by Jochen Schwarze, BERA, whyzar, nmtoken, xunilk 7 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • Welcome to GIS.SE, Tyak! Please keep in mind, that from a cartographical point of view this display of information is not desirable, since the exact location of the ruins can not be determined.
    – Erik
    Nov 23 at 8:36










  • I agree that this is not an exact map, but since most of the stuff I am showing is only known from literature anyways I don't think that it'd matter much. Also: You gotta do what the boss wants you to do, so...^^
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 9:05












  • Sometimes telling your boss, that their ideas are bollocks, is the better solution ;-) could you tell some more about your data? Are the ruins all in one shape file? Are they separate points for each location, or do you have one point per city/site and then attributes?
    – Erik
    Nov 23 at 9:19












  • they are all different points with the same coordinates on the same shape file.
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 9:33










  • I could put them into single points with attributes too if that woud help...
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 10:54















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1













This question already has an answer here:




  • Group and align icons in QGIS atlas

    1 answer




I am trying to sort point symbols at the same coordinates in a line. The first picture shows how I want it to be (all symbols in a single horizontal line), the second how it looks with the standard grid-based point displacement (multiple, unwanted rows of symbols, and therefor also an unwanted overlap of text and symbols).



Is there any way/plugin to either change the parameters of how the grid is built (number of rows/lines) or any other way to show symbols in a line?



I am not hugely into scripting or programming though.



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by Jochen Schwarze, BERA, whyzar, nmtoken, xunilk 7 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • Welcome to GIS.SE, Tyak! Please keep in mind, that from a cartographical point of view this display of information is not desirable, since the exact location of the ruins can not be determined.
    – Erik
    Nov 23 at 8:36










  • I agree that this is not an exact map, but since most of the stuff I am showing is only known from literature anyways I don't think that it'd matter much. Also: You gotta do what the boss wants you to do, so...^^
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 9:05












  • Sometimes telling your boss, that their ideas are bollocks, is the better solution ;-) could you tell some more about your data? Are the ruins all in one shape file? Are they separate points for each location, or do you have one point per city/site and then attributes?
    – Erik
    Nov 23 at 9:19












  • they are all different points with the same coordinates on the same shape file.
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 9:33










  • I could put them into single points with attributes too if that woud help...
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 10:54













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1






This question already has an answer here:




  • Group and align icons in QGIS atlas

    1 answer




I am trying to sort point symbols at the same coordinates in a line. The first picture shows how I want it to be (all symbols in a single horizontal line), the second how it looks with the standard grid-based point displacement (multiple, unwanted rows of symbols, and therefor also an unwanted overlap of text and symbols).



Is there any way/plugin to either change the parameters of how the grid is built (number of rows/lines) or any other way to show symbols in a line?



I am not hugely into scripting or programming though.



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question









New contributor




Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












This question already has an answer here:




  • Group and align icons in QGIS atlas

    1 answer




I am trying to sort point symbols at the same coordinates in a line. The first picture shows how I want it to be (all symbols in a single horizontal line), the second how it looks with the standard grid-based point displacement (multiple, unwanted rows of symbols, and therefor also an unwanted overlap of text and symbols).



Is there any way/plugin to either change the parameters of how the grid is built (number of rows/lines) or any other way to show symbols in a line?



I am not hugely into scripting or programming though.



enter image description here



enter image description here





This question already has an answer here:




  • Group and align icons in QGIS atlas

    1 answer








qgis






share|improve this question









New contributor




Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 23 at 10:16









PolyGeo

52.8k1779237




52.8k1779237






New contributor




Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 23 at 7:50









Tyak

211




211




New contributor




Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Tyak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




marked as duplicate by Jochen Schwarze, BERA, whyzar, nmtoken, xunilk 7 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Jochen Schwarze, BERA, whyzar, nmtoken, xunilk 7 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • Welcome to GIS.SE, Tyak! Please keep in mind, that from a cartographical point of view this display of information is not desirable, since the exact location of the ruins can not be determined.
    – Erik
    Nov 23 at 8:36










  • I agree that this is not an exact map, but since most of the stuff I am showing is only known from literature anyways I don't think that it'd matter much. Also: You gotta do what the boss wants you to do, so...^^
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 9:05












  • Sometimes telling your boss, that their ideas are bollocks, is the better solution ;-) could you tell some more about your data? Are the ruins all in one shape file? Are they separate points for each location, or do you have one point per city/site and then attributes?
    – Erik
    Nov 23 at 9:19












  • they are all different points with the same coordinates on the same shape file.
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 9:33










  • I could put them into single points with attributes too if that woud help...
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 10:54


















  • Welcome to GIS.SE, Tyak! Please keep in mind, that from a cartographical point of view this display of information is not desirable, since the exact location of the ruins can not be determined.
    – Erik
    Nov 23 at 8:36










  • I agree that this is not an exact map, but since most of the stuff I am showing is only known from literature anyways I don't think that it'd matter much. Also: You gotta do what the boss wants you to do, so...^^
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 9:05












  • Sometimes telling your boss, that their ideas are bollocks, is the better solution ;-) could you tell some more about your data? Are the ruins all in one shape file? Are they separate points for each location, or do you have one point per city/site and then attributes?
    – Erik
    Nov 23 at 9:19












  • they are all different points with the same coordinates on the same shape file.
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 9:33










  • I could put them into single points with attributes too if that woud help...
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 10:54
















Welcome to GIS.SE, Tyak! Please keep in mind, that from a cartographical point of view this display of information is not desirable, since the exact location of the ruins can not be determined.
– Erik
Nov 23 at 8:36




Welcome to GIS.SE, Tyak! Please keep in mind, that from a cartographical point of view this display of information is not desirable, since the exact location of the ruins can not be determined.
– Erik
Nov 23 at 8:36












I agree that this is not an exact map, but since most of the stuff I am showing is only known from literature anyways I don't think that it'd matter much. Also: You gotta do what the boss wants you to do, so...^^
– Tyak
Nov 23 at 9:05






I agree that this is not an exact map, but since most of the stuff I am showing is only known from literature anyways I don't think that it'd matter much. Also: You gotta do what the boss wants you to do, so...^^
– Tyak
Nov 23 at 9:05














Sometimes telling your boss, that their ideas are bollocks, is the better solution ;-) could you tell some more about your data? Are the ruins all in one shape file? Are they separate points for each location, or do you have one point per city/site and then attributes?
– Erik
Nov 23 at 9:19






Sometimes telling your boss, that their ideas are bollocks, is the better solution ;-) could you tell some more about your data? Are the ruins all in one shape file? Are they separate points for each location, or do you have one point per city/site and then attributes?
– Erik
Nov 23 at 9:19














they are all different points with the same coordinates on the same shape file.
– Tyak
Nov 23 at 9:33




they are all different points with the same coordinates on the same shape file.
– Tyak
Nov 23 at 9:33












I could put them into single points with attributes too if that woud help...
– Tyak
Nov 23 at 10:54




I could put them into single points with attributes too if that woud help...
– Tyak
Nov 23 at 10:54










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













I would calculate offset distance (dx) for each feature, so that I can position them by (x, y) = ($x+dx, $y).



enter image description here



An example of expression to calculate dx is:



with_variable('my_array', array_agg("symbols", group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)"), 
5 *(array_find(@my_array, "symbols") - floor(array_length(@my_array)/2)))



  • You will need to modify "symbols" according to your attribute field which defines your categorized symbols.

  • The second line has a factor 5, but it is arbitrary. Please adjust this number by visually checking your output.




[EDIT]



To modify x-location of symbols according to the dx calculated above, there would be some options:



(Option 1) Geometry generator



This is dynamic way, and probably a preferred option. In the Layer Properties window, click on Change button next to Symbol. Then select Geometry generator as the Symbol layer type and Point/Multipoint as the Geometry type. The actual expression would be make_point($x+"dx", $y).



enter image description here



(Option 2) Create points layer from table



This tool is found under Processing Toolbox | Vector creation. It is more static way and requires new_x field (by $x+"dx") and new_y field ($y, so it is not new). One merit of this approach is that you can later modify new_x and new_y field manually, so that you can place them in two or three rows if you like.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • But wouldn't that give every symbol a fixed position? Wouldn't that result in gaps between symbols if some weren't there at a location?
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 12:14






  • 1




    @Tyak the array_length part counts the number of your symbols and array_find checks its position in the array. If you have many symbols the array is extended.
    – Kazuhito
    Nov 23 at 12:17










  • I am a bit embarrassed to admit, but it seems I'm too stupid to get the formula for the position in your very first paragraph ((x, y) = ($x+dx, $y)) working. When I copy it into the symbol style offset formula edit thingy I get an invalid expression message...
    – Tyak
    2 days ago










  • Thanks @Tyak I think some of functions take arguments differently when directly used in Layer Properties. As a test, please change group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)" to group_by:=geom_to_wkt($geometry) ( remove double quotation marks ) and see if it works.
    – Kazuhito
    2 days ago












  • oh no, you might have misunderstood me (or I wasn't clear enough about my problem). I can't figure out how to insert any kind of formula into the feature positions. the "dx"-generation worked fine. but I can't find where/how to put the offset into the points! (and also thank you very much for your patience ; ))
    – Tyak
    2 days ago


















up vote
0
down vote













Add extra points at each location to expand the grid layout until the original point symbols fit on a single line of the grid.



Make the extra points invisible by setting the opacity of their symbol to 0%.



In this example I had 5 points at one location. I added another 16 points to expand the grid to 5x5, forcing the main 5 points onto the same line. I left the grid lines on so you can see the layout.



enter image description here





Note: Leave the attributes of the duplicate points blank, so you don't later get confused and think they represent real-world features. It's probably best to make a backup of the point file.






share|improve this answer





















  • This seems to be a very easy and quick workaround, although it could become a bit confusing with the exponentially growing number of blank points. Thank you anyways. I will keep this trick in mind!
    – Tyak
    yesterday


















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













I would calculate offset distance (dx) for each feature, so that I can position them by (x, y) = ($x+dx, $y).



enter image description here



An example of expression to calculate dx is:



with_variable('my_array', array_agg("symbols", group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)"), 
5 *(array_find(@my_array, "symbols") - floor(array_length(@my_array)/2)))



  • You will need to modify "symbols" according to your attribute field which defines your categorized symbols.

  • The second line has a factor 5, but it is arbitrary. Please adjust this number by visually checking your output.




[EDIT]



To modify x-location of symbols according to the dx calculated above, there would be some options:



(Option 1) Geometry generator



This is dynamic way, and probably a preferred option. In the Layer Properties window, click on Change button next to Symbol. Then select Geometry generator as the Symbol layer type and Point/Multipoint as the Geometry type. The actual expression would be make_point($x+"dx", $y).



enter image description here



(Option 2) Create points layer from table



This tool is found under Processing Toolbox | Vector creation. It is more static way and requires new_x field (by $x+"dx") and new_y field ($y, so it is not new). One merit of this approach is that you can later modify new_x and new_y field manually, so that you can place them in two or three rows if you like.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • But wouldn't that give every symbol a fixed position? Wouldn't that result in gaps between symbols if some weren't there at a location?
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 12:14






  • 1




    @Tyak the array_length part counts the number of your symbols and array_find checks its position in the array. If you have many symbols the array is extended.
    – Kazuhito
    Nov 23 at 12:17










  • I am a bit embarrassed to admit, but it seems I'm too stupid to get the formula for the position in your very first paragraph ((x, y) = ($x+dx, $y)) working. When I copy it into the symbol style offset formula edit thingy I get an invalid expression message...
    – Tyak
    2 days ago










  • Thanks @Tyak I think some of functions take arguments differently when directly used in Layer Properties. As a test, please change group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)" to group_by:=geom_to_wkt($geometry) ( remove double quotation marks ) and see if it works.
    – Kazuhito
    2 days ago












  • oh no, you might have misunderstood me (or I wasn't clear enough about my problem). I can't figure out how to insert any kind of formula into the feature positions. the "dx"-generation worked fine. but I can't find where/how to put the offset into the points! (and also thank you very much for your patience ; ))
    – Tyak
    2 days ago















up vote
3
down vote













I would calculate offset distance (dx) for each feature, so that I can position them by (x, y) = ($x+dx, $y).



enter image description here



An example of expression to calculate dx is:



with_variable('my_array', array_agg("symbols", group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)"), 
5 *(array_find(@my_array, "symbols") - floor(array_length(@my_array)/2)))



  • You will need to modify "symbols" according to your attribute field which defines your categorized symbols.

  • The second line has a factor 5, but it is arbitrary. Please adjust this number by visually checking your output.




[EDIT]



To modify x-location of symbols according to the dx calculated above, there would be some options:



(Option 1) Geometry generator



This is dynamic way, and probably a preferred option. In the Layer Properties window, click on Change button next to Symbol. Then select Geometry generator as the Symbol layer type and Point/Multipoint as the Geometry type. The actual expression would be make_point($x+"dx", $y).



enter image description here



(Option 2) Create points layer from table



This tool is found under Processing Toolbox | Vector creation. It is more static way and requires new_x field (by $x+"dx") and new_y field ($y, so it is not new). One merit of this approach is that you can later modify new_x and new_y field manually, so that you can place them in two or three rows if you like.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • But wouldn't that give every symbol a fixed position? Wouldn't that result in gaps between symbols if some weren't there at a location?
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 12:14






  • 1




    @Tyak the array_length part counts the number of your symbols and array_find checks its position in the array. If you have many symbols the array is extended.
    – Kazuhito
    Nov 23 at 12:17










  • I am a bit embarrassed to admit, but it seems I'm too stupid to get the formula for the position in your very first paragraph ((x, y) = ($x+dx, $y)) working. When I copy it into the symbol style offset formula edit thingy I get an invalid expression message...
    – Tyak
    2 days ago










  • Thanks @Tyak I think some of functions take arguments differently when directly used in Layer Properties. As a test, please change group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)" to group_by:=geom_to_wkt($geometry) ( remove double quotation marks ) and see if it works.
    – Kazuhito
    2 days ago












  • oh no, you might have misunderstood me (or I wasn't clear enough about my problem). I can't figure out how to insert any kind of formula into the feature positions. the "dx"-generation worked fine. but I can't find where/how to put the offset into the points! (and also thank you very much for your patience ; ))
    – Tyak
    2 days ago













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









I would calculate offset distance (dx) for each feature, so that I can position them by (x, y) = ($x+dx, $y).



enter image description here



An example of expression to calculate dx is:



with_variable('my_array', array_agg("symbols", group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)"), 
5 *(array_find(@my_array, "symbols") - floor(array_length(@my_array)/2)))



  • You will need to modify "symbols" according to your attribute field which defines your categorized symbols.

  • The second line has a factor 5, but it is arbitrary. Please adjust this number by visually checking your output.




[EDIT]



To modify x-location of symbols according to the dx calculated above, there would be some options:



(Option 1) Geometry generator



This is dynamic way, and probably a preferred option. In the Layer Properties window, click on Change button next to Symbol. Then select Geometry generator as the Symbol layer type and Point/Multipoint as the Geometry type. The actual expression would be make_point($x+"dx", $y).



enter image description here



(Option 2) Create points layer from table



This tool is found under Processing Toolbox | Vector creation. It is more static way and requires new_x field (by $x+"dx") and new_y field ($y, so it is not new). One merit of this approach is that you can later modify new_x and new_y field manually, so that you can place them in two or three rows if you like.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer














I would calculate offset distance (dx) for each feature, so that I can position them by (x, y) = ($x+dx, $y).



enter image description here



An example of expression to calculate dx is:



with_variable('my_array', array_agg("symbols", group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)"), 
5 *(array_find(@my_array, "symbols") - floor(array_length(@my_array)/2)))



  • You will need to modify "symbols" according to your attribute field which defines your categorized symbols.

  • The second line has a factor 5, but it is arbitrary. Please adjust this number by visually checking your output.




[EDIT]



To modify x-location of symbols according to the dx calculated above, there would be some options:



(Option 1) Geometry generator



This is dynamic way, and probably a preferred option. In the Layer Properties window, click on Change button next to Symbol. Then select Geometry generator as the Symbol layer type and Point/Multipoint as the Geometry type. The actual expression would be make_point($x+"dx", $y).



enter image description here



(Option 2) Create points layer from table



This tool is found under Processing Toolbox | Vector creation. It is more static way and requires new_x field (by $x+"dx") and new_y field ($y, so it is not new). One merit of this approach is that you can later modify new_x and new_y field manually, so that you can place them in two or three rows if you like.



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered Nov 23 at 12:08









Kazuhito

13.8k31576




13.8k31576












  • But wouldn't that give every symbol a fixed position? Wouldn't that result in gaps between symbols if some weren't there at a location?
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 12:14






  • 1




    @Tyak the array_length part counts the number of your symbols and array_find checks its position in the array. If you have many symbols the array is extended.
    – Kazuhito
    Nov 23 at 12:17










  • I am a bit embarrassed to admit, but it seems I'm too stupid to get the formula for the position in your very first paragraph ((x, y) = ($x+dx, $y)) working. When I copy it into the symbol style offset formula edit thingy I get an invalid expression message...
    – Tyak
    2 days ago










  • Thanks @Tyak I think some of functions take arguments differently when directly used in Layer Properties. As a test, please change group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)" to group_by:=geom_to_wkt($geometry) ( remove double quotation marks ) and see if it works.
    – Kazuhito
    2 days ago












  • oh no, you might have misunderstood me (or I wasn't clear enough about my problem). I can't figure out how to insert any kind of formula into the feature positions. the "dx"-generation worked fine. but I can't find where/how to put the offset into the points! (and also thank you very much for your patience ; ))
    – Tyak
    2 days ago


















  • But wouldn't that give every symbol a fixed position? Wouldn't that result in gaps between symbols if some weren't there at a location?
    – Tyak
    Nov 23 at 12:14






  • 1




    @Tyak the array_length part counts the number of your symbols and array_find checks its position in the array. If you have many symbols the array is extended.
    – Kazuhito
    Nov 23 at 12:17










  • I am a bit embarrassed to admit, but it seems I'm too stupid to get the formula for the position in your very first paragraph ((x, y) = ($x+dx, $y)) working. When I copy it into the symbol style offset formula edit thingy I get an invalid expression message...
    – Tyak
    2 days ago










  • Thanks @Tyak I think some of functions take arguments differently when directly used in Layer Properties. As a test, please change group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)" to group_by:=geom_to_wkt($geometry) ( remove double quotation marks ) and see if it works.
    – Kazuhito
    2 days ago












  • oh no, you might have misunderstood me (or I wasn't clear enough about my problem). I can't figure out how to insert any kind of formula into the feature positions. the "dx"-generation worked fine. but I can't find where/how to put the offset into the points! (and also thank you very much for your patience ; ))
    – Tyak
    2 days ago
















But wouldn't that give every symbol a fixed position? Wouldn't that result in gaps between symbols if some weren't there at a location?
– Tyak
Nov 23 at 12:14




But wouldn't that give every symbol a fixed position? Wouldn't that result in gaps between symbols if some weren't there at a location?
– Tyak
Nov 23 at 12:14




1




1




@Tyak the array_length part counts the number of your symbols and array_find checks its position in the array. If you have many symbols the array is extended.
– Kazuhito
Nov 23 at 12:17




@Tyak the array_length part counts the number of your symbols and array_find checks its position in the array. If you have many symbols the array is extended.
– Kazuhito
Nov 23 at 12:17












I am a bit embarrassed to admit, but it seems I'm too stupid to get the formula for the position in your very first paragraph ((x, y) = ($x+dx, $y)) working. When I copy it into the symbol style offset formula edit thingy I get an invalid expression message...
– Tyak
2 days ago




I am a bit embarrassed to admit, but it seems I'm too stupid to get the formula for the position in your very first paragraph ((x, y) = ($x+dx, $y)) working. When I copy it into the symbol style offset formula edit thingy I get an invalid expression message...
– Tyak
2 days ago












Thanks @Tyak I think some of functions take arguments differently when directly used in Layer Properties. As a test, please change group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)" to group_by:=geom_to_wkt($geometry) ( remove double quotation marks ) and see if it works.
– Kazuhito
2 days ago






Thanks @Tyak I think some of functions take arguments differently when directly used in Layer Properties. As a test, please change group_by:="geom_to_wkt($geometry)" to group_by:=geom_to_wkt($geometry) ( remove double quotation marks ) and see if it works.
– Kazuhito
2 days ago














oh no, you might have misunderstood me (or I wasn't clear enough about my problem). I can't figure out how to insert any kind of formula into the feature positions. the "dx"-generation worked fine. but I can't find where/how to put the offset into the points! (and also thank you very much for your patience ; ))
– Tyak
2 days ago




oh no, you might have misunderstood me (or I wasn't clear enough about my problem). I can't figure out how to insert any kind of formula into the feature positions. the "dx"-generation worked fine. but I can't find where/how to put the offset into the points! (and also thank you very much for your patience ; ))
– Tyak
2 days ago












up vote
0
down vote













Add extra points at each location to expand the grid layout until the original point symbols fit on a single line of the grid.



Make the extra points invisible by setting the opacity of their symbol to 0%.



In this example I had 5 points at one location. I added another 16 points to expand the grid to 5x5, forcing the main 5 points onto the same line. I left the grid lines on so you can see the layout.



enter image description here





Note: Leave the attributes of the duplicate points blank, so you don't later get confused and think they represent real-world features. It's probably best to make a backup of the point file.






share|improve this answer





















  • This seems to be a very easy and quick workaround, although it could become a bit confusing with the exponentially growing number of blank points. Thank you anyways. I will keep this trick in mind!
    – Tyak
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote













Add extra points at each location to expand the grid layout until the original point symbols fit on a single line of the grid.



Make the extra points invisible by setting the opacity of their symbol to 0%.



In this example I had 5 points at one location. I added another 16 points to expand the grid to 5x5, forcing the main 5 points onto the same line. I left the grid lines on so you can see the layout.



enter image description here





Note: Leave the attributes of the duplicate points blank, so you don't later get confused and think they represent real-world features. It's probably best to make a backup of the point file.






share|improve this answer





















  • This seems to be a very easy and quick workaround, although it could become a bit confusing with the exponentially growing number of blank points. Thank you anyways. I will keep this trick in mind!
    – Tyak
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









Add extra points at each location to expand the grid layout until the original point symbols fit on a single line of the grid.



Make the extra points invisible by setting the opacity of their symbol to 0%.



In this example I had 5 points at one location. I added another 16 points to expand the grid to 5x5, forcing the main 5 points onto the same line. I left the grid lines on so you can see the layout.



enter image description here





Note: Leave the attributes of the duplicate points blank, so you don't later get confused and think they represent real-world features. It's probably best to make a backup of the point file.






share|improve this answer












Add extra points at each location to expand the grid layout until the original point symbols fit on a single line of the grid.



Make the extra points invisible by setting the opacity of their symbol to 0%.



In this example I had 5 points at one location. I added another 16 points to expand the grid to 5x5, forcing the main 5 points onto the same line. I left the grid lines on so you can see the layout.



enter image description here





Note: Leave the attributes of the duplicate points blank, so you don't later get confused and think they represent real-world features. It's probably best to make a backup of the point file.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









csk

6,375733




6,375733












  • This seems to be a very easy and quick workaround, although it could become a bit confusing with the exponentially growing number of blank points. Thank you anyways. I will keep this trick in mind!
    – Tyak
    yesterday


















  • This seems to be a very easy and quick workaround, although it could become a bit confusing with the exponentially growing number of blank points. Thank you anyways. I will keep this trick in mind!
    – Tyak
    yesterday
















This seems to be a very easy and quick workaround, although it could become a bit confusing with the exponentially growing number of blank points. Thank you anyways. I will keep this trick in mind!
– Tyak
yesterday




This seems to be a very easy and quick workaround, although it could become a bit confusing with the exponentially growing number of blank points. Thank you anyways. I will keep this trick in mind!
– Tyak
yesterday



Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

Eduardo VII do Reino Unido