Why doesn't “cd” work in a shell script?











up vote
37
down vote

favorite
18












I just want to write a script which changes my directory.



I put the below commands in the file /home/alex/pathABC



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C
echo HelloWorld


I did chmod +x pathABC.



In the terminal, while in /home/alex, I run ./pathABC, but the output is just HelloWorld and the current directory is not changed.



So what is wrong?










share|improve this question




















  • 6




    Look at this Why doesn't “cd” work in a bash shell script?
    – TuKsn
    Jun 11 '14 at 8:45

















up vote
37
down vote

favorite
18












I just want to write a script which changes my directory.



I put the below commands in the file /home/alex/pathABC



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C
echo HelloWorld


I did chmod +x pathABC.



In the terminal, while in /home/alex, I run ./pathABC, but the output is just HelloWorld and the current directory is not changed.



So what is wrong?










share|improve this question




















  • 6




    Look at this Why doesn't “cd” work in a bash shell script?
    – TuKsn
    Jun 11 '14 at 8:45















up vote
37
down vote

favorite
18









up vote
37
down vote

favorite
18






18





I just want to write a script which changes my directory.



I put the below commands in the file /home/alex/pathABC



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C
echo HelloWorld


I did chmod +x pathABC.



In the terminal, while in /home/alex, I run ./pathABC, but the output is just HelloWorld and the current directory is not changed.



So what is wrong?










share|improve this question















I just want to write a script which changes my directory.



I put the below commands in the file /home/alex/pathABC



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C
echo HelloWorld


I did chmod +x pathABC.



In the terminal, while in /home/alex, I run ./pathABC, but the output is just HelloWorld and the current directory is not changed.



So what is wrong?







command-line scripts gnome-terminal






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 24 at 21:05









wjandrea

7,90342258




7,90342258










asked Jun 11 '14 at 8:35









Mohammad Reza Rezwani

3,5742258109




3,5742258109








  • 6




    Look at this Why doesn't “cd” work in a bash shell script?
    – TuKsn
    Jun 11 '14 at 8:45
















  • 6




    Look at this Why doesn't “cd” work in a bash shell script?
    – TuKsn
    Jun 11 '14 at 8:45










6




6




Look at this Why doesn't “cd” work in a bash shell script?
– TuKsn
Jun 11 '14 at 8:45






Look at this Why doesn't “cd” work in a bash shell script?
– TuKsn
Jun 11 '14 at 8:45












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
69
down vote



accepted










As others have explained, the directory is changed in the child process of your script, not in the terminal process from which the script is called. After the child process dies, you are back in the terminal which is left where it was.



Several alternatives:



1. Symbolic link



Put a symlink in your home to the long path you want to easily access



$ ln -s /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C ~/pathABC


then access the directory with:



$ cd ~/pathABC


2. Alias



Put an alias in your ~/.bashrc:



alias pathABC="cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


(from here)



3. Function



Create a function that changes the directory, the function runs in the process of your terminal and can then change its directory.



(from here)



4. Avoid running as child



Source your script instead of running it. Sourcing (done by . or source) causes the script to be executed in the same shell instead of running in its own subshell.



$ . ./pathABC


(from here and here)



5. cd-able vars



Set the cdable_vars option in your ~/.bashrc and create an environment variable to the directory:



shopt -s cdable_vars
export pathABC="/home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


Then you can use cd pathABC



(from here)






share|improve this answer



















  • 13




    Now I understand the usage of source! I always wondered why I do source .bashrc and not bash .bashrc
    – hytromo
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:05










  • Option 3 worked great. I just defined a function go_to_wherever() { cd my/directory } at the beginning of my script. Called it before running the operations in that directory.
    – i2097i
    Jan 28 '17 at 20:13












  • > 5. cd-able vars -- isn't it cd $pathABC ?
    – loxaxs
    Jul 2 '17 at 9:56


















up vote
7
down vote













When you run script in a terminal, a child process runs. In this child program ie your script will change to whatever directory specified. But in the parent process ie where you run the script is still in the old path.
OR simply we can say:



The scope of cd command is only for child process not parent






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Adding to this, @alex to achieve the effect you are looking for, execute the script within the parent process by sourcing it: either . pathABC or source pathABC.
    – zwets
    Jun 11 '14 at 9:26




















up vote
4
down vote













You are making a thinking error. While the current shell stays in the same directory, the script has moved to the new directory.



You could see that by creating another script in the new directory, and running it from your script, after it has changed directory:



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C && ./another_script.sh # (if it is executable)


The second script would run from the new directory.



HelloWorld 


is just the output of the script.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    HelloWorld is not "returned" to the parent shell, it's output to the standard output
    – Mog
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:01










  • Might be clearer if you just run pwd in the new directory, instead of adding a whole new script to the situation.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 24 at 21:17


















up vote
0
down vote













Because hello world is just a trace statement, let's try this:



Create bash script file cd.sh containing:



#!/bin/bash
echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C"



  • The .sh extension is an older convention of giving bash script filenames an extension. It's purely cosmetic and usually unnecessary. However in this case it's important to differentiate from the core cd command.


Mark the bash script file executable using:



chmod a+x cd.sh


Now run the file:



$ cd $(./cd.sh)
bash: cd: /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C: No such file or directory




  • cd we all know.


  • $(...) executes command inside parenthesis and returns output.

  • If cd.sh was in your path you don't need to specify where it is. We prefix with ./ to specify the command is in the current directory.

  • The echo output from the cd.sh script is sent back to the parent via the $(...). The parent (our shell prompt) uses this output and passes it to the Linux cd command.


As others have mentioned a child process can't change the parent's directory. This is one way the child can tell the parent where to go after the process ends.






share|improve this answer























  • @wjandrea That's what you get for coding on a phone! Just got home, I'll fix it up. Thanks. Um just checked and it works fine. Maybe it's your 14.04 version I read about an hour ago or so?
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 24 at 22:51












  • Well, you totally changed the script. Previously it was just one command: cd /home/mike/Documents/A/B/C, which didn't produce any output. Now it's echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C", which does produce output.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 25 at 1:01












  • @wjandrea True, I also totally changed the way of calling the script too. Instead of a simple ./cd.sh it's now cd $(./cd.sh) but it accomplishes the goal of the child changing the parent's current directory. Yes it's unconventional but it's another way of doing it that I hope people find interesting.
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 25 at 1:26













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f481715%2fwhy-doesnt-cd-work-in-a-shell-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
69
down vote



accepted










As others have explained, the directory is changed in the child process of your script, not in the terminal process from which the script is called. After the child process dies, you are back in the terminal which is left where it was.



Several alternatives:



1. Symbolic link



Put a symlink in your home to the long path you want to easily access



$ ln -s /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C ~/pathABC


then access the directory with:



$ cd ~/pathABC


2. Alias



Put an alias in your ~/.bashrc:



alias pathABC="cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


(from here)



3. Function



Create a function that changes the directory, the function runs in the process of your terminal and can then change its directory.



(from here)



4. Avoid running as child



Source your script instead of running it. Sourcing (done by . or source) causes the script to be executed in the same shell instead of running in its own subshell.



$ . ./pathABC


(from here and here)



5. cd-able vars



Set the cdable_vars option in your ~/.bashrc and create an environment variable to the directory:



shopt -s cdable_vars
export pathABC="/home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


Then you can use cd pathABC



(from here)






share|improve this answer



















  • 13




    Now I understand the usage of source! I always wondered why I do source .bashrc and not bash .bashrc
    – hytromo
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:05










  • Option 3 worked great. I just defined a function go_to_wherever() { cd my/directory } at the beginning of my script. Called it before running the operations in that directory.
    – i2097i
    Jan 28 '17 at 20:13












  • > 5. cd-able vars -- isn't it cd $pathABC ?
    – loxaxs
    Jul 2 '17 at 9:56















up vote
69
down vote



accepted










As others have explained, the directory is changed in the child process of your script, not in the terminal process from which the script is called. After the child process dies, you are back in the terminal which is left where it was.



Several alternatives:



1. Symbolic link



Put a symlink in your home to the long path you want to easily access



$ ln -s /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C ~/pathABC


then access the directory with:



$ cd ~/pathABC


2. Alias



Put an alias in your ~/.bashrc:



alias pathABC="cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


(from here)



3. Function



Create a function that changes the directory, the function runs in the process of your terminal and can then change its directory.



(from here)



4. Avoid running as child



Source your script instead of running it. Sourcing (done by . or source) causes the script to be executed in the same shell instead of running in its own subshell.



$ . ./pathABC


(from here and here)



5. cd-able vars



Set the cdable_vars option in your ~/.bashrc and create an environment variable to the directory:



shopt -s cdable_vars
export pathABC="/home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


Then you can use cd pathABC



(from here)






share|improve this answer



















  • 13




    Now I understand the usage of source! I always wondered why I do source .bashrc and not bash .bashrc
    – hytromo
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:05










  • Option 3 worked great. I just defined a function go_to_wherever() { cd my/directory } at the beginning of my script. Called it before running the operations in that directory.
    – i2097i
    Jan 28 '17 at 20:13












  • > 5. cd-able vars -- isn't it cd $pathABC ?
    – loxaxs
    Jul 2 '17 at 9:56













up vote
69
down vote



accepted







up vote
69
down vote



accepted






As others have explained, the directory is changed in the child process of your script, not in the terminal process from which the script is called. After the child process dies, you are back in the terminal which is left where it was.



Several alternatives:



1. Symbolic link



Put a symlink in your home to the long path you want to easily access



$ ln -s /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C ~/pathABC


then access the directory with:



$ cd ~/pathABC


2. Alias



Put an alias in your ~/.bashrc:



alias pathABC="cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


(from here)



3. Function



Create a function that changes the directory, the function runs in the process of your terminal and can then change its directory.



(from here)



4. Avoid running as child



Source your script instead of running it. Sourcing (done by . or source) causes the script to be executed in the same shell instead of running in its own subshell.



$ . ./pathABC


(from here and here)



5. cd-able vars



Set the cdable_vars option in your ~/.bashrc and create an environment variable to the directory:



shopt -s cdable_vars
export pathABC="/home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


Then you can use cd pathABC



(from here)






share|improve this answer














As others have explained, the directory is changed in the child process of your script, not in the terminal process from which the script is called. After the child process dies, you are back in the terminal which is left where it was.



Several alternatives:



1. Symbolic link



Put a symlink in your home to the long path you want to easily access



$ ln -s /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C ~/pathABC


then access the directory with:



$ cd ~/pathABC


2. Alias



Put an alias in your ~/.bashrc:



alias pathABC="cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


(from here)



3. Function



Create a function that changes the directory, the function runs in the process of your terminal and can then change its directory.



(from here)



4. Avoid running as child



Source your script instead of running it. Sourcing (done by . or source) causes the script to be executed in the same shell instead of running in its own subshell.



$ . ./pathABC


(from here and here)



5. cd-able vars



Set the cdable_vars option in your ~/.bashrc and create an environment variable to the directory:



shopt -s cdable_vars
export pathABC="/home/alex/Documents/A/B/C"


Then you can use cd pathABC



(from here)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 23 '17 at 12:39









Community

1




1










answered Jun 11 '14 at 9:33









Gauthier

1,5521527




1,5521527








  • 13




    Now I understand the usage of source! I always wondered why I do source .bashrc and not bash .bashrc
    – hytromo
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:05










  • Option 3 worked great. I just defined a function go_to_wherever() { cd my/directory } at the beginning of my script. Called it before running the operations in that directory.
    – i2097i
    Jan 28 '17 at 20:13












  • > 5. cd-able vars -- isn't it cd $pathABC ?
    – loxaxs
    Jul 2 '17 at 9:56














  • 13




    Now I understand the usage of source! I always wondered why I do source .bashrc and not bash .bashrc
    – hytromo
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:05










  • Option 3 worked great. I just defined a function go_to_wherever() { cd my/directory } at the beginning of my script. Called it before running the operations in that directory.
    – i2097i
    Jan 28 '17 at 20:13












  • > 5. cd-able vars -- isn't it cd $pathABC ?
    – loxaxs
    Jul 2 '17 at 9:56








13




13




Now I understand the usage of source! I always wondered why I do source .bashrc and not bash .bashrc
– hytromo
Jun 11 '14 at 12:05




Now I understand the usage of source! I always wondered why I do source .bashrc and not bash .bashrc
– hytromo
Jun 11 '14 at 12:05












Option 3 worked great. I just defined a function go_to_wherever() { cd my/directory } at the beginning of my script. Called it before running the operations in that directory.
– i2097i
Jan 28 '17 at 20:13






Option 3 worked great. I just defined a function go_to_wherever() { cd my/directory } at the beginning of my script. Called it before running the operations in that directory.
– i2097i
Jan 28 '17 at 20:13














> 5. cd-able vars -- isn't it cd $pathABC ?
– loxaxs
Jul 2 '17 at 9:56




> 5. cd-able vars -- isn't it cd $pathABC ?
– loxaxs
Jul 2 '17 at 9:56












up vote
7
down vote













When you run script in a terminal, a child process runs. In this child program ie your script will change to whatever directory specified. But in the parent process ie where you run the script is still in the old path.
OR simply we can say:



The scope of cd command is only for child process not parent






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Adding to this, @alex to achieve the effect you are looking for, execute the script within the parent process by sourcing it: either . pathABC or source pathABC.
    – zwets
    Jun 11 '14 at 9:26

















up vote
7
down vote













When you run script in a terminal, a child process runs. In this child program ie your script will change to whatever directory specified. But in the parent process ie where you run the script is still in the old path.
OR simply we can say:



The scope of cd command is only for child process not parent






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Adding to this, @alex to achieve the effect you are looking for, execute the script within the parent process by sourcing it: either . pathABC or source pathABC.
    – zwets
    Jun 11 '14 at 9:26















up vote
7
down vote










up vote
7
down vote









When you run script in a terminal, a child process runs. In this child program ie your script will change to whatever directory specified. But in the parent process ie where you run the script is still in the old path.
OR simply we can say:



The scope of cd command is only for child process not parent






share|improve this answer












When you run script in a terminal, a child process runs. In this child program ie your script will change to whatever directory specified. But in the parent process ie where you run the script is still in the old path.
OR simply we can say:



The scope of cd command is only for child process not parent







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jun 11 '14 at 8:56









Tingrammer

1793




1793








  • 2




    Adding to this, @alex to achieve the effect you are looking for, execute the script within the parent process by sourcing it: either . pathABC or source pathABC.
    – zwets
    Jun 11 '14 at 9:26
















  • 2




    Adding to this, @alex to achieve the effect you are looking for, execute the script within the parent process by sourcing it: either . pathABC or source pathABC.
    – zwets
    Jun 11 '14 at 9:26










2




2




Adding to this, @alex to achieve the effect you are looking for, execute the script within the parent process by sourcing it: either . pathABC or source pathABC.
– zwets
Jun 11 '14 at 9:26






Adding to this, @alex to achieve the effect you are looking for, execute the script within the parent process by sourcing it: either . pathABC or source pathABC.
– zwets
Jun 11 '14 at 9:26












up vote
4
down vote













You are making a thinking error. While the current shell stays in the same directory, the script has moved to the new directory.



You could see that by creating another script in the new directory, and running it from your script, after it has changed directory:



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C && ./another_script.sh # (if it is executable)


The second script would run from the new directory.



HelloWorld 


is just the output of the script.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    HelloWorld is not "returned" to the parent shell, it's output to the standard output
    – Mog
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:01










  • Might be clearer if you just run pwd in the new directory, instead of adding a whole new script to the situation.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 24 at 21:17















up vote
4
down vote













You are making a thinking error. While the current shell stays in the same directory, the script has moved to the new directory.



You could see that by creating another script in the new directory, and running it from your script, after it has changed directory:



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C && ./another_script.sh # (if it is executable)


The second script would run from the new directory.



HelloWorld 


is just the output of the script.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    HelloWorld is not "returned" to the parent shell, it's output to the standard output
    – Mog
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:01










  • Might be clearer if you just run pwd in the new directory, instead of adding a whole new script to the situation.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 24 at 21:17













up vote
4
down vote










up vote
4
down vote









You are making a thinking error. While the current shell stays in the same directory, the script has moved to the new directory.



You could see that by creating another script in the new directory, and running it from your script, after it has changed directory:



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C && ./another_script.sh # (if it is executable)


The second script would run from the new directory.



HelloWorld 


is just the output of the script.






share|improve this answer














You are making a thinking error. While the current shell stays in the same directory, the script has moved to the new directory.



You could see that by creating another script in the new directory, and running it from your script, after it has changed directory:



#!/bin/sh
cd /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C && ./another_script.sh # (if it is executable)


The second script would run from the new directory.



HelloWorld 


is just the output of the script.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jul 24 at 21:15









wjandrea

7,90342258




7,90342258










answered Jun 11 '14 at 8:48









Jacob Vlijm

62.9k9121215




62.9k9121215








  • 3




    HelloWorld is not "returned" to the parent shell, it's output to the standard output
    – Mog
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:01










  • Might be clearer if you just run pwd in the new directory, instead of adding a whole new script to the situation.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 24 at 21:17














  • 3




    HelloWorld is not "returned" to the parent shell, it's output to the standard output
    – Mog
    Jun 11 '14 at 12:01










  • Might be clearer if you just run pwd in the new directory, instead of adding a whole new script to the situation.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 24 at 21:17








3




3




HelloWorld is not "returned" to the parent shell, it's output to the standard output
– Mog
Jun 11 '14 at 12:01




HelloWorld is not "returned" to the parent shell, it's output to the standard output
– Mog
Jun 11 '14 at 12:01












Might be clearer if you just run pwd in the new directory, instead of adding a whole new script to the situation.
– wjandrea
Jul 24 at 21:17




Might be clearer if you just run pwd in the new directory, instead of adding a whole new script to the situation.
– wjandrea
Jul 24 at 21:17










up vote
0
down vote













Because hello world is just a trace statement, let's try this:



Create bash script file cd.sh containing:



#!/bin/bash
echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C"



  • The .sh extension is an older convention of giving bash script filenames an extension. It's purely cosmetic and usually unnecessary. However in this case it's important to differentiate from the core cd command.


Mark the bash script file executable using:



chmod a+x cd.sh


Now run the file:



$ cd $(./cd.sh)
bash: cd: /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C: No such file or directory




  • cd we all know.


  • $(...) executes command inside parenthesis and returns output.

  • If cd.sh was in your path you don't need to specify where it is. We prefix with ./ to specify the command is in the current directory.

  • The echo output from the cd.sh script is sent back to the parent via the $(...). The parent (our shell prompt) uses this output and passes it to the Linux cd command.


As others have mentioned a child process can't change the parent's directory. This is one way the child can tell the parent where to go after the process ends.






share|improve this answer























  • @wjandrea That's what you get for coding on a phone! Just got home, I'll fix it up. Thanks. Um just checked and it works fine. Maybe it's your 14.04 version I read about an hour ago or so?
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 24 at 22:51












  • Well, you totally changed the script. Previously it was just one command: cd /home/mike/Documents/A/B/C, which didn't produce any output. Now it's echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C", which does produce output.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 25 at 1:01












  • @wjandrea True, I also totally changed the way of calling the script too. Instead of a simple ./cd.sh it's now cd $(./cd.sh) but it accomplishes the goal of the child changing the parent's current directory. Yes it's unconventional but it's another way of doing it that I hope people find interesting.
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 25 at 1:26

















up vote
0
down vote













Because hello world is just a trace statement, let's try this:



Create bash script file cd.sh containing:



#!/bin/bash
echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C"



  • The .sh extension is an older convention of giving bash script filenames an extension. It's purely cosmetic and usually unnecessary. However in this case it's important to differentiate from the core cd command.


Mark the bash script file executable using:



chmod a+x cd.sh


Now run the file:



$ cd $(./cd.sh)
bash: cd: /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C: No such file or directory




  • cd we all know.


  • $(...) executes command inside parenthesis and returns output.

  • If cd.sh was in your path you don't need to specify where it is. We prefix with ./ to specify the command is in the current directory.

  • The echo output from the cd.sh script is sent back to the parent via the $(...). The parent (our shell prompt) uses this output and passes it to the Linux cd command.


As others have mentioned a child process can't change the parent's directory. This is one way the child can tell the parent where to go after the process ends.






share|improve this answer























  • @wjandrea That's what you get for coding on a phone! Just got home, I'll fix it up. Thanks. Um just checked and it works fine. Maybe it's your 14.04 version I read about an hour ago or so?
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 24 at 22:51












  • Well, you totally changed the script. Previously it was just one command: cd /home/mike/Documents/A/B/C, which didn't produce any output. Now it's echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C", which does produce output.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 25 at 1:01












  • @wjandrea True, I also totally changed the way of calling the script too. Instead of a simple ./cd.sh it's now cd $(./cd.sh) but it accomplishes the goal of the child changing the parent's current directory. Yes it's unconventional but it's another way of doing it that I hope people find interesting.
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 25 at 1:26















up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









Because hello world is just a trace statement, let's try this:



Create bash script file cd.sh containing:



#!/bin/bash
echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C"



  • The .sh extension is an older convention of giving bash script filenames an extension. It's purely cosmetic and usually unnecessary. However in this case it's important to differentiate from the core cd command.


Mark the bash script file executable using:



chmod a+x cd.sh


Now run the file:



$ cd $(./cd.sh)
bash: cd: /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C: No such file or directory




  • cd we all know.


  • $(...) executes command inside parenthesis and returns output.

  • If cd.sh was in your path you don't need to specify where it is. We prefix with ./ to specify the command is in the current directory.

  • The echo output from the cd.sh script is sent back to the parent via the $(...). The parent (our shell prompt) uses this output and passes it to the Linux cd command.


As others have mentioned a child process can't change the parent's directory. This is one way the child can tell the parent where to go after the process ends.






share|improve this answer














Because hello world is just a trace statement, let's try this:



Create bash script file cd.sh containing:



#!/bin/bash
echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C"



  • The .sh extension is an older convention of giving bash script filenames an extension. It's purely cosmetic and usually unnecessary. However in this case it's important to differentiate from the core cd command.


Mark the bash script file executable using:



chmod a+x cd.sh


Now run the file:



$ cd $(./cd.sh)
bash: cd: /home/alex/Documents/A/B/C: No such file or directory




  • cd we all know.


  • $(...) executes command inside parenthesis and returns output.

  • If cd.sh was in your path you don't need to specify where it is. We prefix with ./ to specify the command is in the current directory.

  • The echo output from the cd.sh script is sent back to the parent via the $(...). The parent (our shell prompt) uses this output and passes it to the Linux cd command.


As others have mentioned a child process can't change the parent's directory. This is one way the child can tell the parent where to go after the process ends.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jul 24 at 23:01

























answered Jul 24 at 22:08









WinEunuuchs2Unix

39.8k1066148




39.8k1066148












  • @wjandrea That's what you get for coding on a phone! Just got home, I'll fix it up. Thanks. Um just checked and it works fine. Maybe it's your 14.04 version I read about an hour ago or so?
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 24 at 22:51












  • Well, you totally changed the script. Previously it was just one command: cd /home/mike/Documents/A/B/C, which didn't produce any output. Now it's echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C", which does produce output.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 25 at 1:01












  • @wjandrea True, I also totally changed the way of calling the script too. Instead of a simple ./cd.sh it's now cd $(./cd.sh) but it accomplishes the goal of the child changing the parent's current directory. Yes it's unconventional but it's another way of doing it that I hope people find interesting.
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 25 at 1:26




















  • @wjandrea That's what you get for coding on a phone! Just got home, I'll fix it up. Thanks. Um just checked and it works fine. Maybe it's your 14.04 version I read about an hour ago or so?
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 24 at 22:51












  • Well, you totally changed the script. Previously it was just one command: cd /home/mike/Documents/A/B/C, which didn't produce any output. Now it's echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C", which does produce output.
    – wjandrea
    Jul 25 at 1:01












  • @wjandrea True, I also totally changed the way of calling the script too. Instead of a simple ./cd.sh it's now cd $(./cd.sh) but it accomplishes the goal of the child changing the parent's current directory. Yes it's unconventional but it's another way of doing it that I hope people find interesting.
    – WinEunuuchs2Unix
    Jul 25 at 1:26


















@wjandrea That's what you get for coding on a phone! Just got home, I'll fix it up. Thanks. Um just checked and it works fine. Maybe it's your 14.04 version I read about an hour ago or so?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 24 at 22:51






@wjandrea That's what you get for coding on a phone! Just got home, I'll fix it up. Thanks. Um just checked and it works fine. Maybe it's your 14.04 version I read about an hour ago or so?
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 24 at 22:51














Well, you totally changed the script. Previously it was just one command: cd /home/mike/Documents/A/B/C, which didn't produce any output. Now it's echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C", which does produce output.
– wjandrea
Jul 25 at 1:01






Well, you totally changed the script. Previously it was just one command: cd /home/mike/Documents/A/B/C, which didn't produce any output. Now it's echo "/home/mike/Documents/A/B/C", which does produce output.
– wjandrea
Jul 25 at 1:01














@wjandrea True, I also totally changed the way of calling the script too. Instead of a simple ./cd.sh it's now cd $(./cd.sh) but it accomplishes the goal of the child changing the parent's current directory. Yes it's unconventional but it's another way of doing it that I hope people find interesting.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 25 at 1:26






@wjandrea True, I also totally changed the way of calling the script too. Instead of a simple ./cd.sh it's now cd $(./cd.sh) but it accomplishes the goal of the child changing the parent's current directory. Yes it's unconventional but it's another way of doing it that I hope people find interesting.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Jul 25 at 1:26




















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f481715%2fwhy-doesnt-cd-work-in-a-shell-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

Eduardo VII do Reino Unido