Fractions common denominator
8
I am trying to receive this look of fractions 
I need the red numbers, which are over the fractions.
*They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
Here is my code
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$dfrac{13}{25}, dfrac{9}{20}, dfrac{3}{4},
dfrac{3}{4}, dfrac{3}{5}, dfrac{1}{6};$
end{document}
fractions
asked Dec 8 at 14:06
Simeon Simeonov
1546
add a comment |
8
I am trying to receive this look of fractions
I need the red numbers, which are over the fractions.
*They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
Here is my code
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$dfrac{13}{25}, dfrac{9}{20}, dfrac{3}{4},
dfrac{3}{4}, dfrac{3}{5}, dfrac{1}{6};$
end{document}
fractions
asked Dec 8 at 14:06
Simeon Simeonov
1546
Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
– siracusa
Dec 8 at 14:50
They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:51
Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 14:53
It would be nice.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:59
add a comment |
8
8
8
2
I am trying to receive this look of fractions
I need the red numbers, which are over the fractions.
*They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
Here is my code
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$dfrac{13}{25}, dfrac{9}{20}, dfrac{3}{4},
dfrac{3}{4}, dfrac{3}{5}, dfrac{1}{6};$
end{document}
fractions
asked Dec 8 at 14:06
Simeon Simeonov
1546
I am trying to receive this look of fractions
I need the red numbers, which are over the fractions.
*They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
Here is my code
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$dfrac{13}{25}, dfrac{9}{20}, dfrac{3}{4},
dfrac{3}{4}, dfrac{3}{5}, dfrac{1}{6};$
end{document}
fractions
fractions
asked Dec 8 at 14:06
Simeon Simeonov
1546
asked Dec 8 at 14:06
Simeon Simeonov
1546
edited Dec 8 at 14:51
asked Dec 8 at 14:06
Simeon Simeonov
1546
asked Dec 8 at 14:06
Simeon Simeonov
1546
asked Dec 8 at 14:06
Simeon Simeonov
1546
1546
Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
– siracusa
Dec 8 at 14:50
They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:51
Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 14:53
It would be nice.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:59
add a comment |
Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
– siracusa
Dec 8 at 14:50
They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:51
Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 14:53
It would be nice.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:59
Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
– siracusa
Dec 8 at 14:50
Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
– siracusa
Dec 8 at 14:50
They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:51
They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:51
Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 14:53
Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 14:53
It would be nice.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:59
It would be nice.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:59
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
10
Why take the risk of an error in computing ?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
#1%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 21:54
jfbu
45.9k66147
I was kind of expecting it. :-)
– egreg
Dec 8 at 22:18
Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
– R..
Dec 9 at 3:48
1
@R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have thefracmglobally defined to use thexintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}operation. In this approach thefracmshould arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to insidefractionswithlcmargument...
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:02
@egreg your answer withoutexpl3/xparsedemonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:05
Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 9 at 12:54
|
show 5 more comments
13
For the curved symbol you can use smile:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{12}{13}{25},
fracm{15}{9}{20},
fracm{75}{3}{4},
fracm{60}{3}{5},
fracm{50}{1}{6}
}{300}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 19:06
egreg
706k8618773159
add a comment |
4
With widehat instead of curves:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
Edit: Ok, with curves
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
makeatletter
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
makeatletter
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 15:53
Fran
51k6112175
But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 16:03
It should be curved up, like half circle.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:00
I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:28
BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
– ShreevatsaR
Dec 8 at 20:26
add a comment |
3
What about this?
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
begin{document}
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 14:55
Sigur
23.7k355136
I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 15:01
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463816%2ffractions-common-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
10
Why take the risk of an error in computing ?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
#1%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 21:54
jfbu
45.9k66147
I was kind of expecting it. :-)
– egreg
Dec 8 at 22:18
Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
– R..
Dec 9 at 3:48
1
@R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have thefracmglobally defined to use thexintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}operation. In this approach thefracmshould arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to insidefractionswithlcmargument...
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:02
@egreg your answer withoutexpl3/xparsedemonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:05
Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 9 at 12:54
|
show 5 more comments
10
Why take the risk of an error in computing ?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
#1%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 21:54
jfbu
45.9k66147
I was kind of expecting it. :-)
– egreg
Dec 8 at 22:18
Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
– R..
Dec 9 at 3:48
1
@R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have thefracmglobally defined to use thexintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}operation. In this approach thefracmshould arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to insidefractionswithlcmargument...
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:02
@egreg your answer withoutexpl3/xparsedemonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:05
Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 9 at 12:54
|
show 5 more comments
10
10
10
Why take the risk of an error in computing ?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
#1%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 21:54
jfbu
45.9k66147
Why take the risk of an error in computing ?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{xintgcd}
newsaveboxmybox
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
$#1$}%
edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
#1%
}
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{13}{25},
fracm{9}{20},
fracm{3}{4},
fracm{3}{5},
fracm{1}{6}
}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 21:54
jfbu
45.9k66147
edited Dec 9 at 16:24
answered Dec 8 at 21:54
jfbu
45.9k66147
answered Dec 8 at 21:54
jfbu
45.9k66147
answered Dec 8 at 21:54
jfbu
45.9k66147
45.9k66147
I was kind of expecting it. :-)
– egreg
Dec 8 at 22:18
Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
– R..
Dec 9 at 3:48
1
@R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have thefracmglobally defined to use thexintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}operation. In this approach thefracmshould arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to insidefractionswithlcmargument...
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:02
@egreg your answer withoutexpl3/xparsedemonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:05
Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 9 at 12:54
|
show 5 more comments
I was kind of expecting it. :-)
– egreg
Dec 8 at 22:18
Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
– R..
Dec 9 at 3:48
1
@R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have thefracmglobally defined to use thexintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}operation. In this approach thefracmshould arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to insidefractionswithlcmargument...
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:02
@egreg your answer withoutexpl3/xparsedemonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:05
Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 9 at 12:54
I was kind of expecting it. :-)
– egreg
Dec 8 at 22:18
I was kind of expecting it. :-)
– egreg
Dec 8 at 22:18
Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
– R..
Dec 9 at 3:48
Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
– R..
Dec 9 at 3:48
1
1
@R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the
fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:02
@R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the
fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:02
@egreg your answer without
expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:05
@egreg your answer without
expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !– jfbu
Dec 9 at 12:05
Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 9 at 12:54
Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 9 at 12:54
|
show 5 more comments
13
For the curved symbol you can use smile:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{12}{13}{25},
fracm{15}{9}{20},
fracm{75}{3}{4},
fracm{60}{3}{5},
fracm{50}{1}{6}
}{300}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 19:06
egreg
706k8618773159
add a comment |
13
For the curved symbol you can use smile:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{12}{13}{25},
fracm{15}{9}{20},
fracm{75}{3}{4},
fracm{60}{3}{5},
fracm{50}{1}{6}
}{300}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 19:06
egreg
706k8618773159
add a comment |
13
13
13
For the curved symbol you can use smile:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{12}{13}{25},
fracm{15}{9}{20},
fracm{75}{3}{4},
fracm{60}{3}{5},
fracm{50}{1}{6}
}{300}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 19:06
egreg
706k8618773159
For the curved symbol you can use smile:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
{underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
}
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
}
begin{document}
[
fractionswithlcm{
fracm{12}{13}{25},
fracm{15}{9}{20},
fracm{75}{3}{4},
fracm{60}{3}{5},
fracm{50}{1}{6}
}{300}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 19:06
egreg
706k8618773159
answered Dec 8 at 19:06
egreg
706k8618773159
answered Dec 8 at 19:06
egreg
706k8618773159
answered Dec 8 at 19:06
egreg
706k8618773159
706k8618773159
add a comment |
add a comment |
4
With widehat instead of curves:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
Edit: Ok, with curves
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
makeatletter
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
makeatletter
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 15:53
Fran
51k6112175
But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 16:03
It should be curved up, like half circle.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:00
I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:28
BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
– ShreevatsaR
Dec 8 at 20:26
add a comment |
4
With widehat instead of curves:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
Edit: Ok, with curves
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
makeatletter
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
makeatletter
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 15:53
Fran
51k6112175
But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 16:03
It should be curved up, like half circle.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:00
I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:28
BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
– ShreevatsaR
Dec 8 at 20:26
add a comment |
4
4
4
With widehat instead of curves:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
Edit: Ok, with curves
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
makeatletter
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
makeatletter
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 15:53
Fran
51k6112175
With widehat instead of curves:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
Edit: Ok, with curves
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
makeatletter
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
$hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
makeatletter
begin{document}
$overset{underbrace{
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
}}{300}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 15:53
Fran
51k6112175
edited Dec 8 at 18:41
answered Dec 8 at 15:53
Fran
51k6112175
answered Dec 8 at 15:53
Fran
51k6112175
answered Dec 8 at 15:53
Fran
51k6112175
51k6112175
But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 16:03
It should be curved up, like half circle.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:00
I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:28
BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
– ShreevatsaR
Dec 8 at 20:26
add a comment |
But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 16:03
It should be curved up, like half circle.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:00
I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:28
BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
– ShreevatsaR
Dec 8 at 20:26
But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 16:03
But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 16:03
It should be curved up, like half circle.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:00
It should be curved up, like half circle.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:00
I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:28
I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 18:28
BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
– ShreevatsaR
Dec 8 at 20:26
BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
– ShreevatsaR
Dec 8 at 20:26
add a comment |
3
What about this?
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
begin{document}
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 14:55
Sigur
23.7k355136
I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 15:01
add a comment |
3
What about this?
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
begin{document}
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 14:55
Sigur
23.7k355136
I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 15:01
add a comment |
3
3
3
What about this?
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
begin{document}
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 14:55
Sigur
23.7k355136
What about this?
documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
begin{document}
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
end{document}
answered Dec 8 at 14:55
Sigur
23.7k355136
answered Dec 8 at 14:55
Sigur
23.7k355136
answered Dec 8 at 14:55
Sigur
23.7k355136
answered Dec 8 at 14:55
Sigur
23.7k355136
23.7k355136
I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 15:01
add a comment |
I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 15:01
I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 15:01
I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 15:01
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463816%2ffractions-common-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
– siracusa
Dec 8 at 14:50
They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:51
Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 14:53
It would be nice.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:59