Installing new version of linux on vary old
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I have a compact version of linux, build from ubuntu V10 and kernel v3.13. Now because of hardware changes, i need to replace it by newest kernel. When I try to update in directly, after downloading latest *deb files from kernel.ubuntu.com when i try to install them via dpkg command, i receive error "archive *** contains not understood data member control.tar.xz" ...
Can somebody help me with solution?
linux linux-kernel
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I have a compact version of linux, build from ubuntu V10 and kernel v3.13. Now because of hardware changes, i need to replace it by newest kernel. When I try to update in directly, after downloading latest *deb files from kernel.ubuntu.com when i try to install them via dpkg command, i receive error "archive *** contains not understood data member control.tar.xz" ...
Can somebody help me with solution?
linux linux-kernel
Does "ubuntu V10" mean you're using Ubuntu 10.04? From 2010?
– Xen2050
Dec 2 at 18:43
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I have a compact version of linux, build from ubuntu V10 and kernel v3.13. Now because of hardware changes, i need to replace it by newest kernel. When I try to update in directly, after downloading latest *deb files from kernel.ubuntu.com when i try to install them via dpkg command, i receive error "archive *** contains not understood data member control.tar.xz" ...
Can somebody help me with solution?
linux linux-kernel
I have a compact version of linux, build from ubuntu V10 and kernel v3.13. Now because of hardware changes, i need to replace it by newest kernel. When I try to update in directly, after downloading latest *deb files from kernel.ubuntu.com when i try to install them via dpkg command, i receive error "archive *** contains not understood data member control.tar.xz" ...
Can somebody help me with solution?
linux linux-kernel
linux linux-kernel
asked Dec 2 at 11:56
zimopisec
1
1
Does "ubuntu V10" mean you're using Ubuntu 10.04? From 2010?
– Xen2050
Dec 2 at 18:43
add a comment |
Does "ubuntu V10" mean you're using Ubuntu 10.04? From 2010?
– Xen2050
Dec 2 at 18:43
Does "ubuntu V10" mean you're using Ubuntu 10.04? From 2010?
– Xen2050
Dec 2 at 18:43
Does "ubuntu V10" mean you're using Ubuntu 10.04? From 2010?
– Xen2050
Dec 2 at 18:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Why are you not just upgrading Ubuntu? It has a built-in upgrade mechanism, that will give you newer kernels. Manually upgrading just the kernel witch such large version differences will probably cause problems.
It sounds like the OP may be using some customized spin (not a standard release), of a very old version. The built-in upgrade typically works from one major release to the next, but not many generations, and may not handle a customized spin (it doesn't have the meta files to know what is supposed to be in it). It also probably can't be upgraded by just looking at the packages, because a much different set of packages may compose the current version. These kinds of upgrades tend to be a lot more hands-on. But you're also probably right that just a kernel upgrade may not do it.
– fixer1234
Dec 2 at 12:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380172%2finstalling-new-version-of-linux-on-vary-old%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Why are you not just upgrading Ubuntu? It has a built-in upgrade mechanism, that will give you newer kernels. Manually upgrading just the kernel witch such large version differences will probably cause problems.
It sounds like the OP may be using some customized spin (not a standard release), of a very old version. The built-in upgrade typically works from one major release to the next, but not many generations, and may not handle a customized spin (it doesn't have the meta files to know what is supposed to be in it). It also probably can't be upgraded by just looking at the packages, because a much different set of packages may compose the current version. These kinds of upgrades tend to be a lot more hands-on. But you're also probably right that just a kernel upgrade may not do it.
– fixer1234
Dec 2 at 12:36
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Why are you not just upgrading Ubuntu? It has a built-in upgrade mechanism, that will give you newer kernels. Manually upgrading just the kernel witch such large version differences will probably cause problems.
It sounds like the OP may be using some customized spin (not a standard release), of a very old version. The built-in upgrade typically works from one major release to the next, but not many generations, and may not handle a customized spin (it doesn't have the meta files to know what is supposed to be in it). It also probably can't be upgraded by just looking at the packages, because a much different set of packages may compose the current version. These kinds of upgrades tend to be a lot more hands-on. But you're also probably right that just a kernel upgrade may not do it.
– fixer1234
Dec 2 at 12:36
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Why are you not just upgrading Ubuntu? It has a built-in upgrade mechanism, that will give you newer kernels. Manually upgrading just the kernel witch such large version differences will probably cause problems.
Why are you not just upgrading Ubuntu? It has a built-in upgrade mechanism, that will give you newer kernels. Manually upgrading just the kernel witch such large version differences will probably cause problems.
answered Dec 2 at 12:04
Eloy
524
524
It sounds like the OP may be using some customized spin (not a standard release), of a very old version. The built-in upgrade typically works from one major release to the next, but not many generations, and may not handle a customized spin (it doesn't have the meta files to know what is supposed to be in it). It also probably can't be upgraded by just looking at the packages, because a much different set of packages may compose the current version. These kinds of upgrades tend to be a lot more hands-on. But you're also probably right that just a kernel upgrade may not do it.
– fixer1234
Dec 2 at 12:36
add a comment |
It sounds like the OP may be using some customized spin (not a standard release), of a very old version. The built-in upgrade typically works from one major release to the next, but not many generations, and may not handle a customized spin (it doesn't have the meta files to know what is supposed to be in it). It also probably can't be upgraded by just looking at the packages, because a much different set of packages may compose the current version. These kinds of upgrades tend to be a lot more hands-on. But you're also probably right that just a kernel upgrade may not do it.
– fixer1234
Dec 2 at 12:36
It sounds like the OP may be using some customized spin (not a standard release), of a very old version. The built-in upgrade typically works from one major release to the next, but not many generations, and may not handle a customized spin (it doesn't have the meta files to know what is supposed to be in it). It also probably can't be upgraded by just looking at the packages, because a much different set of packages may compose the current version. These kinds of upgrades tend to be a lot more hands-on. But you're also probably right that just a kernel upgrade may not do it.
– fixer1234
Dec 2 at 12:36
It sounds like the OP may be using some customized spin (not a standard release), of a very old version. The built-in upgrade typically works from one major release to the next, but not many generations, and may not handle a customized spin (it doesn't have the meta files to know what is supposed to be in it). It also probably can't be upgraded by just looking at the packages, because a much different set of packages may compose the current version. These kinds of upgrades tend to be a lot more hands-on. But you're also probably right that just a kernel upgrade may not do it.
– fixer1234
Dec 2 at 12:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380172%2finstalling-new-version-of-linux-on-vary-old%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Does "ubuntu V10" mean you're using Ubuntu 10.04? From 2010?
– Xen2050
Dec 2 at 18:43