Can't force samba to use SMB2 or SMB3
I have a Debian server running smbd (Debian 9.3, samba 4.5.12) and an Ubuntu 17.10 client with which I mount samba shares using the gio mount (previously gvfs-mount) commmand: gio mount smb://server/storage
As both server and client are up to date, I would expect them to negotiate mounts with SMB3, or SMB2 at the least, but if I run smbstatus on the server the mount is using NT1 (which AFAIK is SMB1):
Samba version 4.5.12-Debian
PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12164 darren darren 192.168.10.86 (ipv4:192.168.10.86:34052) NT1 - -
Service pid Machine Connected at Encryption Signing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
storage 12164 192.168.10.86 Thu Dec 21 22:49:30 2017 GMT - -
No locked files
If I add client min protocol = SMB3 to smb.conf, I can confirm that the change takes affect with testparm -v | grep protocol:
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section "[printers]"
Processing section "[home]"
Processing section "[storage]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
client ipc max protocol = default
client ipc min protocol = default
client max protocol = default
client min protocol = SMB3
server max protocol = SMB3
server min protocol = LANMAN1
But the output of smbstatus is the same, and the mounts are still using NT1 (have umounted and remounted). How can I force the gio mount command to use a later protocol, and why isn't it working by default?
Here is my smb.conf:
[printers]
guest ok=yes
comment=Attached printers
browseable=no
printable=yes
path=/var/spool/samba
use client driver=yes
[global]
log file=/var/log/samba/log.all
guest account=nobody
load printers=yes
obey pam restrictions=yes
socket options=TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
interfaces=br0
map to guest=Bad User
show add printer wizard=no
encrypt passwords=true
passdb backend=tdbsam
unix extensions=no
dns proxy=no
wide links=yes
printing=cups
server string=%h Miniserver
invalid users=root
workgroup = sharefamily
printcap name=cups
#syslog=0
security=user
preferred master=yes
max log size=1000
disable spoolss=Yes
bind interfaces only=yes
client min protocol = SMB3
[home]
hide dotfiles=yes
browseable=yes
writable=yes
admin users=darren
path=/home
write list=darren
hide files=/lost+found/
guest ok=no
create mask=0764
directory mask=0775
comment=Home Directories
hide special files=yes
public=no
[storage]
browseable=yes
inherit owner=yes
inherit permissions=yes
admin users=darren
write list=darren
path=/home/storage
hide files=/lost+found/
guest ok=no
comment=Common storage
read only=yes
hide special files=yes
public=no
update
Another client I tested (an iPhone app) is successfully negotiating SMB2 so it appears to be a limitation of gvfs. I found this related question that suggests it’s limited to SMB1 in order to be able to browse networks by host. Will try the suggested workaround and update accordingly.
ubuntu debian samba
add a comment |
I have a Debian server running smbd (Debian 9.3, samba 4.5.12) and an Ubuntu 17.10 client with which I mount samba shares using the gio mount (previously gvfs-mount) commmand: gio mount smb://server/storage
As both server and client are up to date, I would expect them to negotiate mounts with SMB3, or SMB2 at the least, but if I run smbstatus on the server the mount is using NT1 (which AFAIK is SMB1):
Samba version 4.5.12-Debian
PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12164 darren darren 192.168.10.86 (ipv4:192.168.10.86:34052) NT1 - -
Service pid Machine Connected at Encryption Signing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
storage 12164 192.168.10.86 Thu Dec 21 22:49:30 2017 GMT - -
No locked files
If I add client min protocol = SMB3 to smb.conf, I can confirm that the change takes affect with testparm -v | grep protocol:
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section "[printers]"
Processing section "[home]"
Processing section "[storage]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
client ipc max protocol = default
client ipc min protocol = default
client max protocol = default
client min protocol = SMB3
server max protocol = SMB3
server min protocol = LANMAN1
But the output of smbstatus is the same, and the mounts are still using NT1 (have umounted and remounted). How can I force the gio mount command to use a later protocol, and why isn't it working by default?
Here is my smb.conf:
[printers]
guest ok=yes
comment=Attached printers
browseable=no
printable=yes
path=/var/spool/samba
use client driver=yes
[global]
log file=/var/log/samba/log.all
guest account=nobody
load printers=yes
obey pam restrictions=yes
socket options=TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
interfaces=br0
map to guest=Bad User
show add printer wizard=no
encrypt passwords=true
passdb backend=tdbsam
unix extensions=no
dns proxy=no
wide links=yes
printing=cups
server string=%h Miniserver
invalid users=root
workgroup = sharefamily
printcap name=cups
#syslog=0
security=user
preferred master=yes
max log size=1000
disable spoolss=Yes
bind interfaces only=yes
client min protocol = SMB3
[home]
hide dotfiles=yes
browseable=yes
writable=yes
admin users=darren
path=/home
write list=darren
hide files=/lost+found/
guest ok=no
create mask=0764
directory mask=0775
comment=Home Directories
hide special files=yes
public=no
[storage]
browseable=yes
inherit owner=yes
inherit permissions=yes
admin users=darren
write list=darren
path=/home/storage
hide files=/lost+found/
guest ok=no
comment=Common storage
read only=yes
hide special files=yes
public=no
update
Another client I tested (an iPhone app) is successfully negotiating SMB2 so it appears to be a limitation of gvfs. I found this related question that suggests it’s limited to SMB1 in order to be able to browse networks by host. Will try the suggested workaround and update accordingly.
ubuntu debian samba
add a comment |
I have a Debian server running smbd (Debian 9.3, samba 4.5.12) and an Ubuntu 17.10 client with which I mount samba shares using the gio mount (previously gvfs-mount) commmand: gio mount smb://server/storage
As both server and client are up to date, I would expect them to negotiate mounts with SMB3, or SMB2 at the least, but if I run smbstatus on the server the mount is using NT1 (which AFAIK is SMB1):
Samba version 4.5.12-Debian
PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12164 darren darren 192.168.10.86 (ipv4:192.168.10.86:34052) NT1 - -
Service pid Machine Connected at Encryption Signing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
storage 12164 192.168.10.86 Thu Dec 21 22:49:30 2017 GMT - -
No locked files
If I add client min protocol = SMB3 to smb.conf, I can confirm that the change takes affect with testparm -v | grep protocol:
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section "[printers]"
Processing section "[home]"
Processing section "[storage]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
client ipc max protocol = default
client ipc min protocol = default
client max protocol = default
client min protocol = SMB3
server max protocol = SMB3
server min protocol = LANMAN1
But the output of smbstatus is the same, and the mounts are still using NT1 (have umounted and remounted). How can I force the gio mount command to use a later protocol, and why isn't it working by default?
Here is my smb.conf:
[printers]
guest ok=yes
comment=Attached printers
browseable=no
printable=yes
path=/var/spool/samba
use client driver=yes
[global]
log file=/var/log/samba/log.all
guest account=nobody
load printers=yes
obey pam restrictions=yes
socket options=TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
interfaces=br0
map to guest=Bad User
show add printer wizard=no
encrypt passwords=true
passdb backend=tdbsam
unix extensions=no
dns proxy=no
wide links=yes
printing=cups
server string=%h Miniserver
invalid users=root
workgroup = sharefamily
printcap name=cups
#syslog=0
security=user
preferred master=yes
max log size=1000
disable spoolss=Yes
bind interfaces only=yes
client min protocol = SMB3
[home]
hide dotfiles=yes
browseable=yes
writable=yes
admin users=darren
path=/home
write list=darren
hide files=/lost+found/
guest ok=no
create mask=0764
directory mask=0775
comment=Home Directories
hide special files=yes
public=no
[storage]
browseable=yes
inherit owner=yes
inherit permissions=yes
admin users=darren
write list=darren
path=/home/storage
hide files=/lost+found/
guest ok=no
comment=Common storage
read only=yes
hide special files=yes
public=no
update
Another client I tested (an iPhone app) is successfully negotiating SMB2 so it appears to be a limitation of gvfs. I found this related question that suggests it’s limited to SMB1 in order to be able to browse networks by host. Will try the suggested workaround and update accordingly.
ubuntu debian samba
I have a Debian server running smbd (Debian 9.3, samba 4.5.12) and an Ubuntu 17.10 client with which I mount samba shares using the gio mount (previously gvfs-mount) commmand: gio mount smb://server/storage
As both server and client are up to date, I would expect them to negotiate mounts with SMB3, or SMB2 at the least, but if I run smbstatus on the server the mount is using NT1 (which AFAIK is SMB1):
Samba version 4.5.12-Debian
PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12164 darren darren 192.168.10.86 (ipv4:192.168.10.86:34052) NT1 - -
Service pid Machine Connected at Encryption Signing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
storage 12164 192.168.10.86 Thu Dec 21 22:49:30 2017 GMT - -
No locked files
If I add client min protocol = SMB3 to smb.conf, I can confirm that the change takes affect with testparm -v | grep protocol:
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section "[printers]"
Processing section "[home]"
Processing section "[storage]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
client ipc max protocol = default
client ipc min protocol = default
client max protocol = default
client min protocol = SMB3
server max protocol = SMB3
server min protocol = LANMAN1
But the output of smbstatus is the same, and the mounts are still using NT1 (have umounted and remounted). How can I force the gio mount command to use a later protocol, and why isn't it working by default?
Here is my smb.conf:
[printers]
guest ok=yes
comment=Attached printers
browseable=no
printable=yes
path=/var/spool/samba
use client driver=yes
[global]
log file=/var/log/samba/log.all
guest account=nobody
load printers=yes
obey pam restrictions=yes
socket options=TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY
interfaces=br0
map to guest=Bad User
show add printer wizard=no
encrypt passwords=true
passdb backend=tdbsam
unix extensions=no
dns proxy=no
wide links=yes
printing=cups
server string=%h Miniserver
invalid users=root
workgroup = sharefamily
printcap name=cups
#syslog=0
security=user
preferred master=yes
max log size=1000
disable spoolss=Yes
bind interfaces only=yes
client min protocol = SMB3
[home]
hide dotfiles=yes
browseable=yes
writable=yes
admin users=darren
path=/home
write list=darren
hide files=/lost+found/
guest ok=no
create mask=0764
directory mask=0775
comment=Home Directories
hide special files=yes
public=no
[storage]
browseable=yes
inherit owner=yes
inherit permissions=yes
admin users=darren
write list=darren
path=/home/storage
hide files=/lost+found/
guest ok=no
comment=Common storage
read only=yes
hide special files=yes
public=no
update
Another client I tested (an iPhone app) is successfully negotiating SMB2 so it appears to be a limitation of gvfs. I found this related question that suggests it’s limited to SMB1 in order to be able to browse networks by host. Will try the suggested workaround and update accordingly.
ubuntu debian samba
ubuntu debian samba
edited Dec 22 '17 at 0:27
Darren
asked Dec 21 '17 at 23:05
DarrenDarren
2,0201123
2,0201123
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
min protocol = SMB2
NOT
client min protocol = SMB3
Got an extra word in there.
1
I’ve found documentation suggesting either way (I wonder if it’s version specific), but will try it like you suggest.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:09
Actually,min protocolis a synonym forserver min protocol.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1279243%2fcant-force-samba-to-use-smb2-or-smb3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
min protocol = SMB2
NOT
client min protocol = SMB3
Got an extra word in there.
1
I’ve found documentation suggesting either way (I wonder if it’s version specific), but will try it like you suggest.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:09
Actually,min protocolis a synonym forserver min protocol.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:13
add a comment |
min protocol = SMB2
NOT
client min protocol = SMB3
Got an extra word in there.
1
I’ve found documentation suggesting either way (I wonder if it’s version specific), but will try it like you suggest.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:09
Actually,min protocolis a synonym forserver min protocol.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:13
add a comment |
min protocol = SMB2
NOT
client min protocol = SMB3
Got an extra word in there.
min protocol = SMB2
NOT
client min protocol = SMB3
Got an extra word in there.
answered Dec 22 '17 at 0:07
cybernardcybernard
10k31525
10k31525
1
I’ve found documentation suggesting either way (I wonder if it’s version specific), but will try it like you suggest.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:09
Actually,min protocolis a synonym forserver min protocol.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:13
add a comment |
1
I’ve found documentation suggesting either way (I wonder if it’s version specific), but will try it like you suggest.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:09
Actually,min protocolis a synonym forserver min protocol.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:13
1
1
I’ve found documentation suggesting either way (I wonder if it’s version specific), but will try it like you suggest.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:09
I’ve found documentation suggesting either way (I wonder if it’s version specific), but will try it like you suggest.
– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:09
Actually,
min protocol is a synonym for server min protocol.– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:13
Actually,
min protocol is a synonym for server min protocol.– Darren
Dec 22 '17 at 0:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1279243%2fcant-force-samba-to-use-smb2-or-smb3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown