How to draw Micrometer scale using TikZ
How to draw these two figures in TikZ?
I have gone as far as
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0)--(-2,0);
draw (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)--(1.5,1)--(3.5,1);
draw (0,-2)--(1.5,-3)--(3.5,-3);
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
but I got stuck when I tried to insert the numbers and the small lines. They should have accurate slopes, and,
the red line and the blue line should not meet the green line at the same point.
These criterias are too difficult and complicated for me to overpass.
Can you help me? Any help is very appreciated.
tikz-pgf
New contributor
|
show 1 more comment
How to draw these two figures in TikZ?
I have gone as far as
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0)--(-2,0);
draw (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)--(1.5,1)--(3.5,1);
draw (0,-2)--(1.5,-3)--(3.5,-3);
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
but I got stuck when I tried to insert the numbers and the small lines. They should have accurate slopes, and,
the red line and the blue line should not meet the green line at the same point.
These criterias are too difficult and complicated for me to overpass.
Can you help me? Any help is very appreciated.
tikz-pgf
New contributor
2
Welcome to TeX.SX! It's good that you provided a minimal working example (MWE), but your title could be more descriptive.
– dexteritas
yesterday
2
Title is amended
– KJO
yesterday
1
@JerryCoffin I know, but it was more eye catching on the tongue than simply how to draw "this" and sleeve and thimble was too wieldy but I can change it if you think its best to aim for finer precision :-)
– KJO
yesterday
I agree with @JerryCoffin. An accurate title would be "micrometer". For an example of a Vernier micrometer, see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_scale
– Dithermaster
5 hours ago
@Dithermaster OK Micrometer scale it is
– KJO
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
How to draw these two figures in TikZ?
I have gone as far as
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0)--(-2,0);
draw (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)--(1.5,1)--(3.5,1);
draw (0,-2)--(1.5,-3)--(3.5,-3);
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
but I got stuck when I tried to insert the numbers and the small lines. They should have accurate slopes, and,
the red line and the blue line should not meet the green line at the same point.
These criterias are too difficult and complicated for me to overpass.
Can you help me? Any help is very appreciated.
tikz-pgf
New contributor
How to draw these two figures in TikZ?
I have gone as far as
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0)--(-2,0);
draw (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)--(1.5,1)--(3.5,1);
draw (0,-2)--(1.5,-3)--(3.5,-3);
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
but I got stuck when I tried to insert the numbers and the small lines. They should have accurate slopes, and,
the red line and the blue line should not meet the green line at the same point.
These criterias are too difficult and complicated for me to overpass.
Can you help me? Any help is very appreciated.
tikz-pgf
tikz-pgf
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
KJO
2,1221118
2,1221118
New contributor
asked yesterday
SomeoneSomeone
1162
1162
New contributor
New contributor
2
Welcome to TeX.SX! It's good that you provided a minimal working example (MWE), but your title could be more descriptive.
– dexteritas
yesterday
2
Title is amended
– KJO
yesterday
1
@JerryCoffin I know, but it was more eye catching on the tongue than simply how to draw "this" and sleeve and thimble was too wieldy but I can change it if you think its best to aim for finer precision :-)
– KJO
yesterday
I agree with @JerryCoffin. An accurate title would be "micrometer". For an example of a Vernier micrometer, see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_scale
– Dithermaster
5 hours ago
@Dithermaster OK Micrometer scale it is
– KJO
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2
Welcome to TeX.SX! It's good that you provided a minimal working example (MWE), but your title could be more descriptive.
– dexteritas
yesterday
2
Title is amended
– KJO
yesterday
1
@JerryCoffin I know, but it was more eye catching on the tongue than simply how to draw "this" and sleeve and thimble was too wieldy but I can change it if you think its best to aim for finer precision :-)
– KJO
yesterday
I agree with @JerryCoffin. An accurate title would be "micrometer". For an example of a Vernier micrometer, see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_scale
– Dithermaster
5 hours ago
@Dithermaster OK Micrometer scale it is
– KJO
3 hours ago
2
2
Welcome to TeX.SX! It's good that you provided a minimal working example (MWE), but your title could be more descriptive.
– dexteritas
yesterday
Welcome to TeX.SX! It's good that you provided a minimal working example (MWE), but your title could be more descriptive.
– dexteritas
yesterday
2
2
Title is amended
– KJO
yesterday
Title is amended
– KJO
yesterday
1
1
@JerryCoffin I know, but it was more eye catching on the tongue than simply how to draw "this" and sleeve and thimble was too wieldy but I can change it if you think its best to aim for finer precision :-)
– KJO
yesterday
@JerryCoffin I know, but it was more eye catching on the tongue than simply how to draw "this" and sleeve and thimble was too wieldy but I can change it if you think its best to aim for finer precision :-)
– KJO
yesterday
I agree with @JerryCoffin. An accurate title would be "micrometer". For an example of a Vernier micrometer, see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_scale
– Dithermaster
5 hours ago
I agree with @JerryCoffin. An accurate title would be "micrometer". For an example of a Vernier micrometer, see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_scale
– Dithermaster
5 hours ago
@Dithermaster OK Micrometer scale it is
– KJO
3 hours ago
@Dithermaster OK Micrometer scale it is
– KJO
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Adaptions:
- I set the orign to the "0" of the horizontal scale.
Description:
- added 3 parameters:
lenx
is the horizontal length
xscale
is the scaling of one horizontal length unit
startrange
is the starting number of the vertical scale
- for loops and modulo calculations are used for drawing the scales
Code:
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
newcommand{lenx}{5.3} % e.g.: 0.4 or 5.3
newcommand{xscale}{.2}
newcommand{startrange}{0} % e.g.: 0 or 7
begin{tikzpicture}
% scale right
foreach i in {1, ..., 18} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i-1+startrange,5)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
% long line with number
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.5, -1+i*2.5/19 -.25) node[right]{pgfmathparse{int(i-1+startrange)}pgfmathresult};%
else
% short line
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.25, -1+i*2.25/19 -.125);
fi
}
% horizontal scale (left)
draw[red] (0,0) -- (lenx*xscale,0);
draw[thick] (0,.3) -- (0,-.15) node[below]{0};
pgfmathparse{int(lenx)}
foreach i in {0, ..., pgfmathresult} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i,2)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,.15);
else
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,-.15);
fi
}
% borders
draw[thin, green] (lenx*xscale,1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (-.5,1)--(lenx*xscale,1);
draw (-.5,-1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (lenx*xscale,1)--++(1.5,1)--++(2,0);
draw (lenx*xscale,-1)--++(1.5,-1)--++(2,0);
draw[thin] (lenx*xscale+1.5,2)--++(0,-4);
% curvy lines (left and right)
draw (-.5,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,0) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,1);
draw[very thin] (-.5,0) to[out=50,in=-50] (-.5,1);
draw (lenx*xscale+3.5,2) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
draw[very thin] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-130,in=130] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Results:
add a comment |
This is an attempt of a 3d answer. I acknowledge and appreciate comments by KJO that made me realize that this is not really realistic and by Raaja that made me choose a perhaps more intuitive offset. ;-)
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
usetikzlibrary{3d,calc}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{00}{00}
foreach Z in {1.5,3,...,30,28.5,27,...,3}
{tdplotsetrotatedcoords{0}{Z}{00}
pgfmathsetmacro{VernierLength}{Z/2} % <- this is the length in mm you want to show
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_rotated_coords,font=sffamily]
% begin{scope}[xshift=-5cm]
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (1,0,0) node[pos=1.1]{$x$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,1,0) node[pos=1.1]{$y$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,1) node[pos=1.1]{$z$};
% end{scope}
path[tdplot_screen_coords,use as bounding box] (-3,-3) rectangle (5,3);
path[tdplot_screen_coords] (5,3) node[anchor=north east]
{$mathsf{L}=VernierLength$};
begin{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=0]
path (0,0) coordinate (M1);
draw (180:1) arc(180:0:1);
end{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=1.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M2);
draw let p1=($(M2)-(M1)$),n1={0*atan2(y1,x1)+atan2(1,1.5)/2.5} in
($(M1)+(-n1/2:1)$) coordinate (TL) -- ($(M2)+(-n1/2:2)$) coordinate (TR)
($(M1)+(180+n1/2:1)$) coordinate (BL) -- ($(M2)+(180+n1/2:2)$) coordinate (BR)
(BR) arc(180+n1/2:-n1/2:2);
end{scope}
begin{scope}
draw plot[variable=t,domain=0:360,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
draw[clip] plot[variable=t,domain=0:180,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)})
-- plot[variable=t,domain=180:0,smooth]
(0,{cos(t)},{sin(t)}) -- cycle;
draw[thick] (-VernierLength/10,0,1) -- (0,0,1)
plot[variable=t,domain=60:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
path let
p1=($(-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{0};
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{VernierLength/2}
ifnumXmax>0
foreach X in {1,...,Xmax}
{ifoddX
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
% n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
else
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:70,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(70)},{sin(70)})$),
% n1={-90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
fi
}
fi
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=3.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M3);
draw (180:2) arc(180:0:2);
draw ($(M2)+(0:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(0:2)$)
($(M2)+(180:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(180:2)$);
end{scope}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Offset}{180+10*VernierLength*7.2-12.5*7.2}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmin}{10*VernierLength+1-12.5}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{Xmin+23}
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))},
evaluate=X as LX using {int(mod(X,50))}] in {Xmin,...,Xmax}
{ifnumY=0
draw[thin] let
p1=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})$),
p2=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2+1)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2+1)})$),
p3=($(0.6,{0},{(1+0.4)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(91)},{(1+0.4)*sin(91)})$),
n1={atan2(y1,x1)},n2={veclen(x2,y2)/veclen(x3,y3)} in
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
node[pos=1.5,rotate=n1,yscale={n2},transform shape]{LX};
else
draw[thin] (0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.3,{(1+0.2)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.2)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)});
fi}
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
And here is a trick to draw the ticks. Call the point where the diagonal points intersect P
. Then the ticks point to this point. Of course, in the end you want to remove the excess lines by clipping.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
draw (0,0)--(-2,0) (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)coordinate (TL) --(1.5,1) coordinate (TR) --(3.5,1) ;
draw (0,-2) coordinate (BL)--(1.5,-3) coordinate (BR) --(3.5,-3) ;
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
path (intersection cs:first line={(TL)--(TR)}, second line={(BL)--(BR)})
coordinate (P);
clip (TL) -- (TR) -- (BR) -- (BL) -- cycle;
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))}] in {1,...,17}
{ifnumY=0
draw[shorten >=-20pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9) node[pos=1.65]{X};
else
draw[shorten >=-7pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9);
fi }
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
1
@marmot I didnt thought about clipping part :/ I was looking to make it grow alongy-axis
and failed miserably (sob!).
– Raaja
yesterday
1
Its a truncated cone for reality check commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:578metric-micrometer.jpg#/media/…
– KJO
yesterday
4
@marmot Naaice!
– Raaja
yesterday
1
@KJO I think Ulrike Fischer will be in charge of the weather ;-)
– marmot
yesterday
1
@KJO Yes, getting old.
– marmot
4 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes. I focus on the scale. The aesthetic aspects are too trivial.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{multido}
usepackage[nomessages]{fp}
makeatletter
defvernier#1{%
begingroup
psset{yunit=2mm,xunit=1mm,linecolor=red,linewidth=.8pt,linecap=0}
pspolygon[fillcolor=yellow,fillstyle=solid,opacity=.9,linestyle=none,linewidth=.8pt,linearc=1pt](0,-6)(0,6)(6,7.5)(10,7.5)(10,-7.5)(6,-7.5)
multido{iy=-5+1,in={numexpr#1-5relax}+1}{11}{%
pst@modin{50}lbl
pst@modlbl{5}tmp
psline(0,iy)(!tmpspace 0 ne {2} {5} ifelse iyspace)
ifnumtmp=0uput[0](3.5,iy){textcolor{red}{$lbl$}}fi
}
psline(.5pslinewidth,-5)(.5pslinewidth,5)
endgroup
}
newcommandmicrometer[1]{%
bgroup
psset{xunit=.2mm,yunit=1cm,linewidth=1.6pt}
begin{pspicture}[linecolor=black,linecap=2](0,-1.3)(150,1.7)
FPevalargs{trunc(#1*100:0)}
pst@mod{args}{100}position
FPevallbl{trunc(args/100:0)}
multido{ix=0+50}{4}{%
pst@modix{100}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-17pt)(ix,17pt)
uput[90](ix,16pt){lbl}
FPevallbl{trunc(lbl+1:0)}
else
pst@modix{50}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-5pt)(ix,5pt)
fi
fi}
psline(150,0)
rput(dimexprpositionpsxunit-.4ptrelax,0){vernier{args}}
rput(75,1.75){scriptsize#1}
end{pspicture}
egroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
multido{n=3.00+0.01}{100}{micrometer{n}}
%micrometer{2.34}
end{document}
3
+1. However, I think the OP only asks how to draw the figures :)
– JouleV
yesterday
3
@JouleV: I was not trying to answer the OP question. :-)
– Artificial Stupidity
yesterday
6
... as usual ;-).
– AlexG
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Someone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472876%2fhow-to-draw-micrometer-scale-using-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Adaptions:
- I set the orign to the "0" of the horizontal scale.
Description:
- added 3 parameters:
lenx
is the horizontal length
xscale
is the scaling of one horizontal length unit
startrange
is the starting number of the vertical scale
- for loops and modulo calculations are used for drawing the scales
Code:
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
newcommand{lenx}{5.3} % e.g.: 0.4 or 5.3
newcommand{xscale}{.2}
newcommand{startrange}{0} % e.g.: 0 or 7
begin{tikzpicture}
% scale right
foreach i in {1, ..., 18} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i-1+startrange,5)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
% long line with number
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.5, -1+i*2.5/19 -.25) node[right]{pgfmathparse{int(i-1+startrange)}pgfmathresult};%
else
% short line
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.25, -1+i*2.25/19 -.125);
fi
}
% horizontal scale (left)
draw[red] (0,0) -- (lenx*xscale,0);
draw[thick] (0,.3) -- (0,-.15) node[below]{0};
pgfmathparse{int(lenx)}
foreach i in {0, ..., pgfmathresult} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i,2)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,.15);
else
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,-.15);
fi
}
% borders
draw[thin, green] (lenx*xscale,1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (-.5,1)--(lenx*xscale,1);
draw (-.5,-1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (lenx*xscale,1)--++(1.5,1)--++(2,0);
draw (lenx*xscale,-1)--++(1.5,-1)--++(2,0);
draw[thin] (lenx*xscale+1.5,2)--++(0,-4);
% curvy lines (left and right)
draw (-.5,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,0) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,1);
draw[very thin] (-.5,0) to[out=50,in=-50] (-.5,1);
draw (lenx*xscale+3.5,2) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
draw[very thin] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-130,in=130] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Results:
add a comment |
Adaptions:
- I set the orign to the "0" of the horizontal scale.
Description:
- added 3 parameters:
lenx
is the horizontal length
xscale
is the scaling of one horizontal length unit
startrange
is the starting number of the vertical scale
- for loops and modulo calculations are used for drawing the scales
Code:
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
newcommand{lenx}{5.3} % e.g.: 0.4 or 5.3
newcommand{xscale}{.2}
newcommand{startrange}{0} % e.g.: 0 or 7
begin{tikzpicture}
% scale right
foreach i in {1, ..., 18} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i-1+startrange,5)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
% long line with number
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.5, -1+i*2.5/19 -.25) node[right]{pgfmathparse{int(i-1+startrange)}pgfmathresult};%
else
% short line
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.25, -1+i*2.25/19 -.125);
fi
}
% horizontal scale (left)
draw[red] (0,0) -- (lenx*xscale,0);
draw[thick] (0,.3) -- (0,-.15) node[below]{0};
pgfmathparse{int(lenx)}
foreach i in {0, ..., pgfmathresult} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i,2)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,.15);
else
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,-.15);
fi
}
% borders
draw[thin, green] (lenx*xscale,1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (-.5,1)--(lenx*xscale,1);
draw (-.5,-1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (lenx*xscale,1)--++(1.5,1)--++(2,0);
draw (lenx*xscale,-1)--++(1.5,-1)--++(2,0);
draw[thin] (lenx*xscale+1.5,2)--++(0,-4);
% curvy lines (left and right)
draw (-.5,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,0) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,1);
draw[very thin] (-.5,0) to[out=50,in=-50] (-.5,1);
draw (lenx*xscale+3.5,2) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
draw[very thin] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-130,in=130] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Results:
add a comment |
Adaptions:
- I set the orign to the "0" of the horizontal scale.
Description:
- added 3 parameters:
lenx
is the horizontal length
xscale
is the scaling of one horizontal length unit
startrange
is the starting number of the vertical scale
- for loops and modulo calculations are used for drawing the scales
Code:
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
newcommand{lenx}{5.3} % e.g.: 0.4 or 5.3
newcommand{xscale}{.2}
newcommand{startrange}{0} % e.g.: 0 or 7
begin{tikzpicture}
% scale right
foreach i in {1, ..., 18} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i-1+startrange,5)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
% long line with number
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.5, -1+i*2.5/19 -.25) node[right]{pgfmathparse{int(i-1+startrange)}pgfmathresult};%
else
% short line
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.25, -1+i*2.25/19 -.125);
fi
}
% horizontal scale (left)
draw[red] (0,0) -- (lenx*xscale,0);
draw[thick] (0,.3) -- (0,-.15) node[below]{0};
pgfmathparse{int(lenx)}
foreach i in {0, ..., pgfmathresult} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i,2)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,.15);
else
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,-.15);
fi
}
% borders
draw[thin, green] (lenx*xscale,1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (-.5,1)--(lenx*xscale,1);
draw (-.5,-1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (lenx*xscale,1)--++(1.5,1)--++(2,0);
draw (lenx*xscale,-1)--++(1.5,-1)--++(2,0);
draw[thin] (lenx*xscale+1.5,2)--++(0,-4);
% curvy lines (left and right)
draw (-.5,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,0) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,1);
draw[very thin] (-.5,0) to[out=50,in=-50] (-.5,1);
draw (lenx*xscale+3.5,2) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
draw[very thin] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-130,in=130] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Results:
Adaptions:
- I set the orign to the "0" of the horizontal scale.
Description:
- added 3 parameters:
lenx
is the horizontal length
xscale
is the scaling of one horizontal length unit
startrange
is the starting number of the vertical scale
- for loops and modulo calculations are used for drawing the scales
Code:
documentclass[margin=3mm,tikz]{standalone}
begin{document}
newcommand{lenx}{5.3} % e.g.: 0.4 or 5.3
newcommand{xscale}{.2}
newcommand{startrange}{0} % e.g.: 0 or 7
begin{tikzpicture}
% scale right
foreach i in {1, ..., 18} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i-1+startrange,5)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
% long line with number
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.5, -1+i*2.5/19 -.25) node[right]{pgfmathparse{int(i-1+startrange)}pgfmathresult};%
else
% short line
draw[blue] (lenx*xscale, -1+i*2/19) -- (lenx*xscale+.25, -1+i*2.25/19 -.125);
fi
}
% horizontal scale (left)
draw[red] (0,0) -- (lenx*xscale,0);
draw[thick] (0,.3) -- (0,-.15) node[below]{0};
pgfmathparse{int(lenx)}
foreach i in {0, ..., pgfmathresult} {
pgfmathparse{Mod(i,2)==0?1:0}
ifnumpgfmathresult>0
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,.15);
else
draw (i*xscale,0) -- (i*xscale,-.15);
fi
}
% borders
draw[thin, green] (lenx*xscale,1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (-.5,1)--(lenx*xscale,1);
draw (-.5,-1)--(lenx*xscale,-1);
draw (lenx*xscale,1)--++(1.5,1)--++(2,0);
draw (lenx*xscale,-1)--++(1.5,-1)--++(2,0);
draw[thin] (lenx*xscale+1.5,2)--++(0,-4);
% curvy lines (left and right)
draw (-.5,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,0) to[out=130,in=-130] (-.5,1);
draw[very thin] (-.5,0) to[out=50,in=-50] (-.5,1);
draw (lenx*xscale+3.5,2) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-50,in=50] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
draw[very thin] (lenx*xscale+3.5,0) to[out=-130,in=130] (lenx*xscale+3.5,-2);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Results:
answered yesterday
dexteritasdexteritas
3,647927
3,647927
add a comment |
add a comment |
This is an attempt of a 3d answer. I acknowledge and appreciate comments by KJO that made me realize that this is not really realistic and by Raaja that made me choose a perhaps more intuitive offset. ;-)
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
usetikzlibrary{3d,calc}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{00}{00}
foreach Z in {1.5,3,...,30,28.5,27,...,3}
{tdplotsetrotatedcoords{0}{Z}{00}
pgfmathsetmacro{VernierLength}{Z/2} % <- this is the length in mm you want to show
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_rotated_coords,font=sffamily]
% begin{scope}[xshift=-5cm]
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (1,0,0) node[pos=1.1]{$x$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,1,0) node[pos=1.1]{$y$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,1) node[pos=1.1]{$z$};
% end{scope}
path[tdplot_screen_coords,use as bounding box] (-3,-3) rectangle (5,3);
path[tdplot_screen_coords] (5,3) node[anchor=north east]
{$mathsf{L}=VernierLength$};
begin{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=0]
path (0,0) coordinate (M1);
draw (180:1) arc(180:0:1);
end{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=1.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M2);
draw let p1=($(M2)-(M1)$),n1={0*atan2(y1,x1)+atan2(1,1.5)/2.5} in
($(M1)+(-n1/2:1)$) coordinate (TL) -- ($(M2)+(-n1/2:2)$) coordinate (TR)
($(M1)+(180+n1/2:1)$) coordinate (BL) -- ($(M2)+(180+n1/2:2)$) coordinate (BR)
(BR) arc(180+n1/2:-n1/2:2);
end{scope}
begin{scope}
draw plot[variable=t,domain=0:360,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
draw[clip] plot[variable=t,domain=0:180,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)})
-- plot[variable=t,domain=180:0,smooth]
(0,{cos(t)},{sin(t)}) -- cycle;
draw[thick] (-VernierLength/10,0,1) -- (0,0,1)
plot[variable=t,domain=60:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
path let
p1=($(-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{0};
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{VernierLength/2}
ifnumXmax>0
foreach X in {1,...,Xmax}
{ifoddX
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
% n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
else
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:70,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(70)},{sin(70)})$),
% n1={-90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
fi
}
fi
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=3.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M3);
draw (180:2) arc(180:0:2);
draw ($(M2)+(0:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(0:2)$)
($(M2)+(180:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(180:2)$);
end{scope}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Offset}{180+10*VernierLength*7.2-12.5*7.2}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmin}{10*VernierLength+1-12.5}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{Xmin+23}
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))},
evaluate=X as LX using {int(mod(X,50))}] in {Xmin,...,Xmax}
{ifnumY=0
draw[thin] let
p1=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})$),
p2=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2+1)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2+1)})$),
p3=($(0.6,{0},{(1+0.4)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(91)},{(1+0.4)*sin(91)})$),
n1={atan2(y1,x1)},n2={veclen(x2,y2)/veclen(x3,y3)} in
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
node[pos=1.5,rotate=n1,yscale={n2},transform shape]{LX};
else
draw[thin] (0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.3,{(1+0.2)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.2)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)});
fi}
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
And here is a trick to draw the ticks. Call the point where the diagonal points intersect P
. Then the ticks point to this point. Of course, in the end you want to remove the excess lines by clipping.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
draw (0,0)--(-2,0) (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)coordinate (TL) --(1.5,1) coordinate (TR) --(3.5,1) ;
draw (0,-2) coordinate (BL)--(1.5,-3) coordinate (BR) --(3.5,-3) ;
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
path (intersection cs:first line={(TL)--(TR)}, second line={(BL)--(BR)})
coordinate (P);
clip (TL) -- (TR) -- (BR) -- (BL) -- cycle;
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))}] in {1,...,17}
{ifnumY=0
draw[shorten >=-20pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9) node[pos=1.65]{X};
else
draw[shorten >=-7pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9);
fi }
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
1
@marmot I didnt thought about clipping part :/ I was looking to make it grow alongy-axis
and failed miserably (sob!).
– Raaja
yesterday
1
Its a truncated cone for reality check commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:578metric-micrometer.jpg#/media/…
– KJO
yesterday
4
@marmot Naaice!
– Raaja
yesterday
1
@KJO I think Ulrike Fischer will be in charge of the weather ;-)
– marmot
yesterday
1
@KJO Yes, getting old.
– marmot
4 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
This is an attempt of a 3d answer. I acknowledge and appreciate comments by KJO that made me realize that this is not really realistic and by Raaja that made me choose a perhaps more intuitive offset. ;-)
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
usetikzlibrary{3d,calc}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{00}{00}
foreach Z in {1.5,3,...,30,28.5,27,...,3}
{tdplotsetrotatedcoords{0}{Z}{00}
pgfmathsetmacro{VernierLength}{Z/2} % <- this is the length in mm you want to show
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_rotated_coords,font=sffamily]
% begin{scope}[xshift=-5cm]
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (1,0,0) node[pos=1.1]{$x$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,1,0) node[pos=1.1]{$y$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,1) node[pos=1.1]{$z$};
% end{scope}
path[tdplot_screen_coords,use as bounding box] (-3,-3) rectangle (5,3);
path[tdplot_screen_coords] (5,3) node[anchor=north east]
{$mathsf{L}=VernierLength$};
begin{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=0]
path (0,0) coordinate (M1);
draw (180:1) arc(180:0:1);
end{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=1.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M2);
draw let p1=($(M2)-(M1)$),n1={0*atan2(y1,x1)+atan2(1,1.5)/2.5} in
($(M1)+(-n1/2:1)$) coordinate (TL) -- ($(M2)+(-n1/2:2)$) coordinate (TR)
($(M1)+(180+n1/2:1)$) coordinate (BL) -- ($(M2)+(180+n1/2:2)$) coordinate (BR)
(BR) arc(180+n1/2:-n1/2:2);
end{scope}
begin{scope}
draw plot[variable=t,domain=0:360,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
draw[clip] plot[variable=t,domain=0:180,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)})
-- plot[variable=t,domain=180:0,smooth]
(0,{cos(t)},{sin(t)}) -- cycle;
draw[thick] (-VernierLength/10,0,1) -- (0,0,1)
plot[variable=t,domain=60:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
path let
p1=($(-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{0};
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{VernierLength/2}
ifnumXmax>0
foreach X in {1,...,Xmax}
{ifoddX
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
% n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
else
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:70,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(70)},{sin(70)})$),
% n1={-90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
fi
}
fi
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=3.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M3);
draw (180:2) arc(180:0:2);
draw ($(M2)+(0:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(0:2)$)
($(M2)+(180:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(180:2)$);
end{scope}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Offset}{180+10*VernierLength*7.2-12.5*7.2}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmin}{10*VernierLength+1-12.5}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{Xmin+23}
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))},
evaluate=X as LX using {int(mod(X,50))}] in {Xmin,...,Xmax}
{ifnumY=0
draw[thin] let
p1=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})$),
p2=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2+1)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2+1)})$),
p3=($(0.6,{0},{(1+0.4)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(91)},{(1+0.4)*sin(91)})$),
n1={atan2(y1,x1)},n2={veclen(x2,y2)/veclen(x3,y3)} in
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
node[pos=1.5,rotate=n1,yscale={n2},transform shape]{LX};
else
draw[thin] (0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.3,{(1+0.2)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.2)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)});
fi}
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
And here is a trick to draw the ticks. Call the point where the diagonal points intersect P
. Then the ticks point to this point. Of course, in the end you want to remove the excess lines by clipping.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
draw (0,0)--(-2,0) (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)coordinate (TL) --(1.5,1) coordinate (TR) --(3.5,1) ;
draw (0,-2) coordinate (BL)--(1.5,-3) coordinate (BR) --(3.5,-3) ;
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
path (intersection cs:first line={(TL)--(TR)}, second line={(BL)--(BR)})
coordinate (P);
clip (TL) -- (TR) -- (BR) -- (BL) -- cycle;
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))}] in {1,...,17}
{ifnumY=0
draw[shorten >=-20pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9) node[pos=1.65]{X};
else
draw[shorten >=-7pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9);
fi }
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
1
@marmot I didnt thought about clipping part :/ I was looking to make it grow alongy-axis
and failed miserably (sob!).
– Raaja
yesterday
1
Its a truncated cone for reality check commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:578metric-micrometer.jpg#/media/…
– KJO
yesterday
4
@marmot Naaice!
– Raaja
yesterday
1
@KJO I think Ulrike Fischer will be in charge of the weather ;-)
– marmot
yesterday
1
@KJO Yes, getting old.
– marmot
4 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
This is an attempt of a 3d answer. I acknowledge and appreciate comments by KJO that made me realize that this is not really realistic and by Raaja that made me choose a perhaps more intuitive offset. ;-)
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
usetikzlibrary{3d,calc}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{00}{00}
foreach Z in {1.5,3,...,30,28.5,27,...,3}
{tdplotsetrotatedcoords{0}{Z}{00}
pgfmathsetmacro{VernierLength}{Z/2} % <- this is the length in mm you want to show
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_rotated_coords,font=sffamily]
% begin{scope}[xshift=-5cm]
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (1,0,0) node[pos=1.1]{$x$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,1,0) node[pos=1.1]{$y$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,1) node[pos=1.1]{$z$};
% end{scope}
path[tdplot_screen_coords,use as bounding box] (-3,-3) rectangle (5,3);
path[tdplot_screen_coords] (5,3) node[anchor=north east]
{$mathsf{L}=VernierLength$};
begin{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=0]
path (0,0) coordinate (M1);
draw (180:1) arc(180:0:1);
end{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=1.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M2);
draw let p1=($(M2)-(M1)$),n1={0*atan2(y1,x1)+atan2(1,1.5)/2.5} in
($(M1)+(-n1/2:1)$) coordinate (TL) -- ($(M2)+(-n1/2:2)$) coordinate (TR)
($(M1)+(180+n1/2:1)$) coordinate (BL) -- ($(M2)+(180+n1/2:2)$) coordinate (BR)
(BR) arc(180+n1/2:-n1/2:2);
end{scope}
begin{scope}
draw plot[variable=t,domain=0:360,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
draw[clip] plot[variable=t,domain=0:180,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)})
-- plot[variable=t,domain=180:0,smooth]
(0,{cos(t)},{sin(t)}) -- cycle;
draw[thick] (-VernierLength/10,0,1) -- (0,0,1)
plot[variable=t,domain=60:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
path let
p1=($(-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{0};
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{VernierLength/2}
ifnumXmax>0
foreach X in {1,...,Xmax}
{ifoddX
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
% n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
else
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:70,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(70)},{sin(70)})$),
% n1={-90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
fi
}
fi
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=3.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M3);
draw (180:2) arc(180:0:2);
draw ($(M2)+(0:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(0:2)$)
($(M2)+(180:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(180:2)$);
end{scope}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Offset}{180+10*VernierLength*7.2-12.5*7.2}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmin}{10*VernierLength+1-12.5}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{Xmin+23}
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))},
evaluate=X as LX using {int(mod(X,50))}] in {Xmin,...,Xmax}
{ifnumY=0
draw[thin] let
p1=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})$),
p2=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2+1)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2+1)})$),
p3=($(0.6,{0},{(1+0.4)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(91)},{(1+0.4)*sin(91)})$),
n1={atan2(y1,x1)},n2={veclen(x2,y2)/veclen(x3,y3)} in
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
node[pos=1.5,rotate=n1,yscale={n2},transform shape]{LX};
else
draw[thin] (0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.3,{(1+0.2)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.2)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)});
fi}
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
And here is a trick to draw the ticks. Call the point where the diagonal points intersect P
. Then the ticks point to this point. Of course, in the end you want to remove the excess lines by clipping.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
draw (0,0)--(-2,0) (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)coordinate (TL) --(1.5,1) coordinate (TR) --(3.5,1) ;
draw (0,-2) coordinate (BL)--(1.5,-3) coordinate (BR) --(3.5,-3) ;
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
path (intersection cs:first line={(TL)--(TR)}, second line={(BL)--(BR)})
coordinate (P);
clip (TL) -- (TR) -- (BR) -- (BL) -- cycle;
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))}] in {1,...,17}
{ifnumY=0
draw[shorten >=-20pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9) node[pos=1.65]{X};
else
draw[shorten >=-7pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9);
fi }
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
This is an attempt of a 3d answer. I acknowledge and appreciate comments by KJO that made me realize that this is not really realistic and by Raaja that made me choose a perhaps more intuitive offset. ;-)
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
usetikzlibrary{3d,calc}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{00}{00}
foreach Z in {1.5,3,...,30,28.5,27,...,3}
{tdplotsetrotatedcoords{0}{Z}{00}
pgfmathsetmacro{VernierLength}{Z/2} % <- this is the length in mm you want to show
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_rotated_coords,font=sffamily]
% begin{scope}[xshift=-5cm]
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (1,0,0) node[pos=1.1]{$x$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,1,0) node[pos=1.1]{$y$};
% draw[-latex] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,1) node[pos=1.1]{$z$};
% end{scope}
path[tdplot_screen_coords,use as bounding box] (-3,-3) rectangle (5,3);
path[tdplot_screen_coords] (5,3) node[anchor=north east]
{$mathsf{L}=VernierLength$};
begin{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=0]
path (0,0) coordinate (M1);
draw (180:1) arc(180:0:1);
end{scope}
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=1.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M2);
draw let p1=($(M2)-(M1)$),n1={0*atan2(y1,x1)+atan2(1,1.5)/2.5} in
($(M1)+(-n1/2:1)$) coordinate (TL) -- ($(M2)+(-n1/2:2)$) coordinate (TR)
($(M1)+(180+n1/2:1)$) coordinate (BL) -- ($(M2)+(180+n1/2:2)$) coordinate (BR)
(BR) arc(180+n1/2:-n1/2:2);
end{scope}
begin{scope}
draw plot[variable=t,domain=0:360,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
draw[clip] plot[variable=t,domain=0:180,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10-0.5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)})
-- plot[variable=t,domain=180:0,smooth]
(0,{cos(t)},{sin(t)}) -- cycle;
draw[thick] (-VernierLength/10,0,1) -- (0,0,1)
plot[variable=t,domain=60:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
path let
p1=($(-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{0};
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{VernierLength/2}
ifnumXmax>0
foreach X in {1,...,Xmax}
{ifoddX
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:110,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(110)},{sin(110)})$),
% n1={90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(120)},{sin(120)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
else
draw plot[variable=t,domain=90:70,smooth]
(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(t)},{sin(t)});
% path let
% p1=($(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})-(-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(70)},{sin(70)})$),
% n1={-90+atan2(y1,x1)} in (-VernierLength/10+X/5,{cos(60)},{sin(60)})
% node[rotate=n1,yscale={cos(30)},transform shape]{X};
fi
}
fi
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is yz plane at x=3.5]
path (0,0) coordinate (M3);
draw (180:2) arc(180:0:2);
draw ($(M2)+(0:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(0:2)$)
($(M2)+(180:2)$) -- ($(M3)+(180:2)$);
end{scope}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Offset}{180+10*VernierLength*7.2-12.5*7.2}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmin}{10*VernierLength+1-12.5}
pgfmathtruncatemacro{Xmax}{Xmin+23}
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))},
evaluate=X as LX using {int(mod(X,50))}] in {Xmin,...,Xmax}
{ifnumY=0
draw[thin] let
p1=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})$),
p2=($(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2+1)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2+1)})$),
p3=($(0.6,{0},{(1+0.4)})-
(0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(91)},{(1+0.4)*sin(91)})$),
n1={atan2(y1,x1)},n2={veclen(x2,y2)/veclen(x3,y3)} in
(0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.6,{(1+0.4)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.4)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
node[pos=1.5,rotate=n1,yscale={n2},transform shape]{LX};
else
draw[thin] (0,{cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{sin(Offset-X*7.2)})
-- (0.3,{(1+0.2)*cos(Offset-X*7.2)},{(1+0.2)*sin(Offset-X*7.2)});
fi}
end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}}
end{document}
And here is a trick to draw the ticks. Call the point where the diagonal points intersect P
. Then the ticks point to this point. Of course, in the end you want to remove the excess lines by clipping.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily]
draw (0,0)--(-2,0) (0,-2)--(-2,-2);
draw[thin] (0,0)--(0,-2);
draw (0,0)coordinate (TL) --(1.5,1) coordinate (TR) --(3.5,1) ;
draw (0,-2) coordinate (BL)--(1.5,-3) coordinate (BR) --(3.5,-3) ;
draw[thin] (1.5,1)--(1.5,-3);
draw (-2,-2) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,-1) to[out=130,in=-130] (-2,0);
draw[very thin] (-2,-1) to[out=50,in=-50] (-2,0);
draw (3.5,1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-1) to[out=-50,in=50] (3.5,-3);
draw[very thin] (3.5,-1) to[out=-130,in=130] (3.5,-3);
path (intersection cs:first line={(TL)--(TR)}, second line={(BL)--(BR)})
coordinate (P);
clip (TL) -- (TR) -- (BR) -- (BL) -- cycle;
foreach X [evaluate=X as Y using {int(mod(X,5))}] in {1,...,17}
{ifnumY=0
draw[shorten >=-20pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9) node[pos=1.65]{X};
else
draw[shorten >=-7pt] (P) -- (0,-2+X/9);
fi }
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
edited 6 hours ago
answered yesterday
marmotmarmot
96.6k4111213
96.6k4111213
1
@marmot I didnt thought about clipping part :/ I was looking to make it grow alongy-axis
and failed miserably (sob!).
– Raaja
yesterday
1
Its a truncated cone for reality check commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:578metric-micrometer.jpg#/media/…
– KJO
yesterday
4
@marmot Naaice!
– Raaja
yesterday
1
@KJO I think Ulrike Fischer will be in charge of the weather ;-)
– marmot
yesterday
1
@KJO Yes, getting old.
– marmot
4 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
1
@marmot I didnt thought about clipping part :/ I was looking to make it grow alongy-axis
and failed miserably (sob!).
– Raaja
yesterday
1
Its a truncated cone for reality check commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:578metric-micrometer.jpg#/media/…
– KJO
yesterday
4
@marmot Naaice!
– Raaja
yesterday
1
@KJO I think Ulrike Fischer will be in charge of the weather ;-)
– marmot
yesterday
1
@KJO Yes, getting old.
– marmot
4 hours ago
1
1
@marmot I didnt thought about clipping part :/ I was looking to make it grow along
y-axis
and failed miserably (sob!).– Raaja
yesterday
@marmot I didnt thought about clipping part :/ I was looking to make it grow along
y-axis
and failed miserably (sob!).– Raaja
yesterday
1
1
Its a truncated cone for reality check commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:578metric-micrometer.jpg#/media/…
– KJO
yesterday
Its a truncated cone for reality check commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:578metric-micrometer.jpg#/media/…
– KJO
yesterday
4
4
@marmot Naaice!
– Raaja
yesterday
@marmot Naaice!
– Raaja
yesterday
1
1
@KJO I think Ulrike Fischer will be in charge of the weather ;-)
– marmot
yesterday
@KJO I think Ulrike Fischer will be in charge of the weather ;-)
– marmot
yesterday
1
1
@KJO Yes, getting old.
– marmot
4 hours ago
@KJO Yes, getting old.
– marmot
4 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes. I focus on the scale. The aesthetic aspects are too trivial.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{multido}
usepackage[nomessages]{fp}
makeatletter
defvernier#1{%
begingroup
psset{yunit=2mm,xunit=1mm,linecolor=red,linewidth=.8pt,linecap=0}
pspolygon[fillcolor=yellow,fillstyle=solid,opacity=.9,linestyle=none,linewidth=.8pt,linearc=1pt](0,-6)(0,6)(6,7.5)(10,7.5)(10,-7.5)(6,-7.5)
multido{iy=-5+1,in={numexpr#1-5relax}+1}{11}{%
pst@modin{50}lbl
pst@modlbl{5}tmp
psline(0,iy)(!tmpspace 0 ne {2} {5} ifelse iyspace)
ifnumtmp=0uput[0](3.5,iy){textcolor{red}{$lbl$}}fi
}
psline(.5pslinewidth,-5)(.5pslinewidth,5)
endgroup
}
newcommandmicrometer[1]{%
bgroup
psset{xunit=.2mm,yunit=1cm,linewidth=1.6pt}
begin{pspicture}[linecolor=black,linecap=2](0,-1.3)(150,1.7)
FPevalargs{trunc(#1*100:0)}
pst@mod{args}{100}position
FPevallbl{trunc(args/100:0)}
multido{ix=0+50}{4}{%
pst@modix{100}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-17pt)(ix,17pt)
uput[90](ix,16pt){lbl}
FPevallbl{trunc(lbl+1:0)}
else
pst@modix{50}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-5pt)(ix,5pt)
fi
fi}
psline(150,0)
rput(dimexprpositionpsxunit-.4ptrelax,0){vernier{args}}
rput(75,1.75){scriptsize#1}
end{pspicture}
egroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
multido{n=3.00+0.01}{100}{micrometer{n}}
%micrometer{2.34}
end{document}
3
+1. However, I think the OP only asks how to draw the figures :)
– JouleV
yesterday
3
@JouleV: I was not trying to answer the OP question. :-)
– Artificial Stupidity
yesterday
6
... as usual ;-).
– AlexG
yesterday
add a comment |
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes. I focus on the scale. The aesthetic aspects are too trivial.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{multido}
usepackage[nomessages]{fp}
makeatletter
defvernier#1{%
begingroup
psset{yunit=2mm,xunit=1mm,linecolor=red,linewidth=.8pt,linecap=0}
pspolygon[fillcolor=yellow,fillstyle=solid,opacity=.9,linestyle=none,linewidth=.8pt,linearc=1pt](0,-6)(0,6)(6,7.5)(10,7.5)(10,-7.5)(6,-7.5)
multido{iy=-5+1,in={numexpr#1-5relax}+1}{11}{%
pst@modin{50}lbl
pst@modlbl{5}tmp
psline(0,iy)(!tmpspace 0 ne {2} {5} ifelse iyspace)
ifnumtmp=0uput[0](3.5,iy){textcolor{red}{$lbl$}}fi
}
psline(.5pslinewidth,-5)(.5pslinewidth,5)
endgroup
}
newcommandmicrometer[1]{%
bgroup
psset{xunit=.2mm,yunit=1cm,linewidth=1.6pt}
begin{pspicture}[linecolor=black,linecap=2](0,-1.3)(150,1.7)
FPevalargs{trunc(#1*100:0)}
pst@mod{args}{100}position
FPevallbl{trunc(args/100:0)}
multido{ix=0+50}{4}{%
pst@modix{100}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-17pt)(ix,17pt)
uput[90](ix,16pt){lbl}
FPevallbl{trunc(lbl+1:0)}
else
pst@modix{50}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-5pt)(ix,5pt)
fi
fi}
psline(150,0)
rput(dimexprpositionpsxunit-.4ptrelax,0){vernier{args}}
rput(75,1.75){scriptsize#1}
end{pspicture}
egroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
multido{n=3.00+0.01}{100}{micrometer{n}}
%micrometer{2.34}
end{document}
3
+1. However, I think the OP only asks how to draw the figures :)
– JouleV
yesterday
3
@JouleV: I was not trying to answer the OP question. :-)
– Artificial Stupidity
yesterday
6
... as usual ;-).
– AlexG
yesterday
add a comment |
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes. I focus on the scale. The aesthetic aspects are too trivial.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{multido}
usepackage[nomessages]{fp}
makeatletter
defvernier#1{%
begingroup
psset{yunit=2mm,xunit=1mm,linecolor=red,linewidth=.8pt,linecap=0}
pspolygon[fillcolor=yellow,fillstyle=solid,opacity=.9,linestyle=none,linewidth=.8pt,linearc=1pt](0,-6)(0,6)(6,7.5)(10,7.5)(10,-7.5)(6,-7.5)
multido{iy=-5+1,in={numexpr#1-5relax}+1}{11}{%
pst@modin{50}lbl
pst@modlbl{5}tmp
psline(0,iy)(!tmpspace 0 ne {2} {5} ifelse iyspace)
ifnumtmp=0uput[0](3.5,iy){textcolor{red}{$lbl$}}fi
}
psline(.5pslinewidth,-5)(.5pslinewidth,5)
endgroup
}
newcommandmicrometer[1]{%
bgroup
psset{xunit=.2mm,yunit=1cm,linewidth=1.6pt}
begin{pspicture}[linecolor=black,linecap=2](0,-1.3)(150,1.7)
FPevalargs{trunc(#1*100:0)}
pst@mod{args}{100}position
FPevallbl{trunc(args/100:0)}
multido{ix=0+50}{4}{%
pst@modix{100}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-17pt)(ix,17pt)
uput[90](ix,16pt){lbl}
FPevallbl{trunc(lbl+1:0)}
else
pst@modix{50}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-5pt)(ix,5pt)
fi
fi}
psline(150,0)
rput(dimexprpositionpsxunit-.4ptrelax,0){vernier{args}}
rput(75,1.75){scriptsize#1}
end{pspicture}
egroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
multido{n=3.00+0.01}{100}{micrometer{n}}
%micrometer{2.34}
end{document}
A PSTricks solution just for fun purposes. I focus on the scale. The aesthetic aspects are too trivial.
documentclass[pstricks,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{multido}
usepackage[nomessages]{fp}
makeatletter
defvernier#1{%
begingroup
psset{yunit=2mm,xunit=1mm,linecolor=red,linewidth=.8pt,linecap=0}
pspolygon[fillcolor=yellow,fillstyle=solid,opacity=.9,linestyle=none,linewidth=.8pt,linearc=1pt](0,-6)(0,6)(6,7.5)(10,7.5)(10,-7.5)(6,-7.5)
multido{iy=-5+1,in={numexpr#1-5relax}+1}{11}{%
pst@modin{50}lbl
pst@modlbl{5}tmp
psline(0,iy)(!tmpspace 0 ne {2} {5} ifelse iyspace)
ifnumtmp=0uput[0](3.5,iy){textcolor{red}{$lbl$}}fi
}
psline(.5pslinewidth,-5)(.5pslinewidth,5)
endgroup
}
newcommandmicrometer[1]{%
bgroup
psset{xunit=.2mm,yunit=1cm,linewidth=1.6pt}
begin{pspicture}[linecolor=black,linecap=2](0,-1.3)(150,1.7)
FPevalargs{trunc(#1*100:0)}
pst@mod{args}{100}position
FPevallbl{trunc(args/100:0)}
multido{ix=0+50}{4}{%
pst@modix{100}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-17pt)(ix,17pt)
uput[90](ix,16pt){lbl}
FPevallbl{trunc(lbl+1:0)}
else
pst@modix{50}rem
ifnumrem=0
psline(ix,-5pt)(ix,5pt)
fi
fi}
psline(150,0)
rput(dimexprpositionpsxunit-.4ptrelax,0){vernier{args}}
rput(75,1.75){scriptsize#1}
end{pspicture}
egroup
}
makeatother
begin{document}
multido{n=3.00+0.01}{100}{micrometer{n}}
%micrometer{2.34}
end{document}
answered yesterday
Artificial StupidityArtificial Stupidity
5,49011040
5,49011040
3
+1. However, I think the OP only asks how to draw the figures :)
– JouleV
yesterday
3
@JouleV: I was not trying to answer the OP question. :-)
– Artificial Stupidity
yesterday
6
... as usual ;-).
– AlexG
yesterday
add a comment |
3
+1. However, I think the OP only asks how to draw the figures :)
– JouleV
yesterday
3
@JouleV: I was not trying to answer the OP question. :-)
– Artificial Stupidity
yesterday
6
... as usual ;-).
– AlexG
yesterday
3
3
+1. However, I think the OP only asks how to draw the figures :)
– JouleV
yesterday
+1. However, I think the OP only asks how to draw the figures :)
– JouleV
yesterday
3
3
@JouleV: I was not trying to answer the OP question. :-)
– Artificial Stupidity
yesterday
@JouleV: I was not trying to answer the OP question. :-)
– Artificial Stupidity
yesterday
6
6
... as usual ;-).
– AlexG
yesterday
... as usual ;-).
– AlexG
yesterday
add a comment |
Someone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Someone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Someone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Someone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472876%2fhow-to-draw-micrometer-scale-using-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Welcome to TeX.SX! It's good that you provided a minimal working example (MWE), but your title could be more descriptive.
– dexteritas
yesterday
2
Title is amended
– KJO
yesterday
1
@JerryCoffin I know, but it was more eye catching on the tongue than simply how to draw "this" and sleeve and thimble was too wieldy but I can change it if you think its best to aim for finer precision :-)
– KJO
yesterday
I agree with @JerryCoffin. An accurate title would be "micrometer". For an example of a Vernier micrometer, see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_scale
– Dithermaster
5 hours ago
@Dithermaster OK Micrometer scale it is
– KJO
3 hours ago