Do I need to turn on VT-x in order to make a virtual machine using Oracle VM?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Do I really have to turn on VT-x in BIOS to make a virtual machine? I keep
getting the error about VT-x not being turned on but I feel like turning it
on could have a negative impact on my computer. I heard it can be a security risk.
Is there any way I can make a VM without using VT-x?
virtualbox virtual-machine virtualization vmware vt-x
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Do I really have to turn on VT-x in BIOS to make a virtual machine? I keep
getting the error about VT-x not being turned on but I feel like turning it
on could have a negative impact on my computer. I heard it can be a security risk.
Is there any way I can make a VM without using VT-x?
virtualbox virtual-machine virtualization vmware vt-x
What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
– Allen Howard
Dec 4 at 16:11
Windows 10 32-bit version
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:17
1
VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
– Ramhound
Dec 4 at 16:20
I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:30
Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:37
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Do I really have to turn on VT-x in BIOS to make a virtual machine? I keep
getting the error about VT-x not being turned on but I feel like turning it
on could have a negative impact on my computer. I heard it can be a security risk.
Is there any way I can make a VM without using VT-x?
virtualbox virtual-machine virtualization vmware vt-x
Do I really have to turn on VT-x in BIOS to make a virtual machine? I keep
getting the error about VT-x not being turned on but I feel like turning it
on could have a negative impact on my computer. I heard it can be a security risk.
Is there any way I can make a VM without using VT-x?
virtualbox virtual-machine virtualization vmware vt-x
virtualbox virtual-machine virtualization vmware vt-x
edited Dec 5 at 1:22
phuclv
8,88063788
8,88063788
asked Dec 4 at 16:05
Yokool
31
31
What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
– Allen Howard
Dec 4 at 16:11
Windows 10 32-bit version
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:17
1
VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
– Ramhound
Dec 4 at 16:20
I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:30
Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:37
|
show 1 more comment
What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
– Allen Howard
Dec 4 at 16:11
Windows 10 32-bit version
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:17
1
VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
– Ramhound
Dec 4 at 16:20
I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:30
Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:37
What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
– Allen Howard
Dec 4 at 16:11
What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
– Allen Howard
Dec 4 at 16:11
Windows 10 32-bit version
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:17
Windows 10 32-bit version
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:17
1
1
VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
– Ramhound
Dec 4 at 16:20
VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
– Ramhound
Dec 4 at 16:20
I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:30
I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:30
Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:37
Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:37
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?
Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance
32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower
I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer
That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?
They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380755%2fdo-i-need-to-turn-on-vt-x-in-order-to-make-a-virtual-machine-using-oracle-vm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?
Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance
32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower
I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer
That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?
They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?
Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance
32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower
I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer
That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?
They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?
Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance
32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower
I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer
That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?
Is there any way I can make a VM without using vt-x?
Yes. VT-x is not a necessity for running a virtual machine. However without it a software solution is needed, which won't be good in performance
32-bit virtual machines can be run with binary translation, which is not much slower than a hardware-assisted solution, but 64-bit VMs can only be run inside an emulator (like qemu or Bochs) if VT-x is not available, because isolation of the virtual machine would be impossible without it. That's far worse than running native code, maybe even 10 times slower
I feel like turning it on could have a negative impact on my computer
That's just nonsense. If you don't run a VM then nothing is consumed by the VT-x feature. See Does disabling VT-x enhance stability/performance?
answered Dec 4 at 17:14
phuclv
8,88063788
8,88063788
They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28
add a comment |
They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28
They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28
They are some vulnerabilities that were discovered this year that involves VT-x. The author’s concern isn’t completely unwarranted, but they can’t have hardware virtualization, without enabling it (which is required to run a 64-bit VM within a 32-bit host)
– Ramhound
Dec 5 at 1:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1380755%2fdo-i-need-to-turn-on-vt-x-in-order-to-make-a-virtual-machine-using-oracle-vm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What OS are you trying to install into the VM?
– Allen Howard
Dec 4 at 16:11
Windows 10 32-bit version
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:17
1
VT-x should only be required if you are attempting to run a 64-bit OS within a VM on a 32-bit OS.
– Ramhound
Dec 4 at 16:20
I have a 64bit system. If I attempt to run the 32bit VM I get the error but I can still turn the VM on. I get this screen imgur.com/a/SGx6Wn0 I am stuck at this screen even when I wait for about a hour.
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:30
Also I can't make a 64bit VM since the option for that isn't there. The only fix I could find for that is turning on vt-x..
– Yokool
Dec 4 at 16:37