Is it ok to have both a swap partition and swap file on an Ubuntu 18.04 system?
Could having both a swap file and swap partition cause errors? Should I keep one over the other?
18.04 swap
edited Feb 27 at 7:14
Zanna
51.1k13138242
asked Feb 27 at 2:45
TobyToby
112
add a comment |
Could having both a swap file and swap partition cause errors? Should I keep one over the other?
18.04 swap
edited Feb 27 at 7:14
Zanna
51.1k13138242
asked Feb 27 at 2:45
TobyToby
112
No, it's a common practice to have a partition, and dynamically increase swap via swap files. Errors can result from improper formatting of swap file, or if it has been unlinked but not removed from/etc/fstab, stuff like that. Short answer is OK
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 2:59
1
@SergiyKolodyazhnyy your answer is in the wrong box... ;)
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 7:12
@Zanna The comment is in the right box,but a true answer is now posted
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 19:26
As it's a popular misconception then I'll mention that comments are not for incomplete answers
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 20:40
add a comment |
Could having both a swap file and swap partition cause errors? Should I keep one over the other?
18.04 swap
edited Feb 27 at 7:14
Zanna
51.1k13138242
asked Feb 27 at 2:45
TobyToby
112
Could having both a swap file and swap partition cause errors? Should I keep one over the other?
18.04 swap
18.04 swap
edited Feb 27 at 7:14
Zanna
51.1k13138242
asked Feb 27 at 2:45
TobyToby
112
edited Feb 27 at 7:14
Zanna
51.1k13138242
asked Feb 27 at 2:45
TobyToby
112
edited Feb 27 at 7:14
Zanna
51.1k13138242
edited Feb 27 at 7:14
Zanna
51.1k13138242
edited Feb 27 at 7:14
Zanna
51.1k13138242
51.1k13138242
asked Feb 27 at 2:45
TobyToby
112
asked Feb 27 at 2:45
TobyToby
112
asked Feb 27 at 2:45
TobyToby
112
112
No, it's a common practice to have a partition, and dynamically increase swap via swap files. Errors can result from improper formatting of swap file, or if it has been unlinked but not removed from/etc/fstab, stuff like that. Short answer is OK
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 2:59
1
@SergiyKolodyazhnyy your answer is in the wrong box... ;)
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 7:12
@Zanna The comment is in the right box,but a true answer is now posted
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 19:26
As it's a popular misconception then I'll mention that comments are not for incomplete answers
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 20:40
add a comment |
No, it's a common practice to have a partition, and dynamically increase swap via swap files. Errors can result from improper formatting of swap file, or if it has been unlinked but not removed from/etc/fstab, stuff like that. Short answer is OK
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 2:59
1
@SergiyKolodyazhnyy your answer is in the wrong box... ;)
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 7:12
@Zanna The comment is in the right box,but a true answer is now posted
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 19:26
As it's a popular misconception then I'll mention that comments are not for incomplete answers
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 20:40
No, it's a common practice to have a partition, and dynamically increase swap via swap files. Errors can result from improper formatting of swap file, or if it has been unlinked but not removed from
/etc/fstab , stuff like that. Short answer is OK– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 2:59
No, it's a common practice to have a partition, and dynamically increase swap via swap files. Errors can result from improper formatting of swap file, or if it has been unlinked but not removed from
/etc/fstab , stuff like that. Short answer is OK– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 2:59
1
1
@SergiyKolodyazhnyy your answer is in the wrong box... ;)
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 7:12
@SergiyKolodyazhnyy your answer is in the wrong box... ;)
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 7:12
@Zanna The comment is in the right box,but a true answer is now posted
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 19:26
@Zanna The comment is in the right box,but a true answer is now posted
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 19:26
As it's a popular misconception then I'll mention that comments are not for incomplete answers
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 20:40
As it's a popular misconception then I'll mention that comments are not for incomplete answers
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 20:40
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There will be no errors in you use them both. I personally use partition as a first swap device and file as second.
You can find many religious discussions advocating one over another. Partition should be a little faster as it does not have filesystem overhead, but file is much more flexible.
answered Feb 27 at 7:04
marosgmarosg
44437
add a comment |
It's a common practice to have a partition and dynamically increase swap via swap files. It is an accepted method among others on How to increase swap space? and in fact I have implemented a script to add swap files to make the steps even easier. In fact, keeping original partition and adding/removing a swap file is far easier and safer than increasing partition size, since during partitioning improper steps can lead to loss of data on the main partition, where as swap file concerns only with one file and does not touch partitioning layout or other data located on hard drive.
Errors with having both swap file and partition can result from improper formatting of swap file (think data corruption, file truncated or overwritten by privileged process), if it has been deleted ( unlinked ) or moved but corresponding entry in /etc/fstab has not been updated (if you use /etc/fstab to mount the swap file on boot). However, these aren't directly related to having both swap file and partition, and as far as swap file it is easy to deal with such issues. When it comes to failing hardware, hardware issues aren't directly related to having partition or file, and there's also no good alternative aside from replacing the hardware as soon as possible. It is often recommended that you only use swap file on SSDs, since SSDs have shorter life compared HDDs. But in my research I've so far found no evidence that having a partition on SSD dramatically decreases SSD lifespan and there's other factors to consider.
If you have large amount of RAM (above 4 GB), it might be advisable to keep either small partition (1 GB) or swap file on SSD, since it would be a waste of disk space. ( Note: there's couple other low level hardware considerations which need to be addressed, but I currently cannot recover the sources needed for such discussion)
See also Waren Young's answer on swap reliability.
answered Feb 27 at 19:26
Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy
74.6k9155325
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1121570%2fis-it-ok-to-have-both-a-swap-partition-and-swap-file-on-an-ubuntu-18-04-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There will be no errors in you use them both. I personally use partition as a first swap device and file as second.
You can find many religious discussions advocating one over another. Partition should be a little faster as it does not have filesystem overhead, but file is much more flexible.
answered Feb 27 at 7:04
marosgmarosg
44437
add a comment |
There will be no errors in you use them both. I personally use partition as a first swap device and file as second.
You can find many religious discussions advocating one over another. Partition should be a little faster as it does not have filesystem overhead, but file is much more flexible.
answered Feb 27 at 7:04
marosgmarosg
44437
add a comment |
There will be no errors in you use them both. I personally use partition as a first swap device and file as second.
You can find many religious discussions advocating one over another. Partition should be a little faster as it does not have filesystem overhead, but file is much more flexible.
answered Feb 27 at 7:04
marosgmarosg
44437
There will be no errors in you use them both. I personally use partition as a first swap device and file as second.
You can find many religious discussions advocating one over another. Partition should be a little faster as it does not have filesystem overhead, but file is much more flexible.
answered Feb 27 at 7:04
marosgmarosg
44437
answered Feb 27 at 7:04
marosgmarosg
44437
answered Feb 27 at 7:04
marosgmarosg
44437
answered Feb 27 at 7:04
marosgmarosg
44437
44437
add a comment |
add a comment |
It's a common practice to have a partition and dynamically increase swap via swap files. It is an accepted method among others on How to increase swap space? and in fact I have implemented a script to add swap files to make the steps even easier. In fact, keeping original partition and adding/removing a swap file is far easier and safer than increasing partition size, since during partitioning improper steps can lead to loss of data on the main partition, where as swap file concerns only with one file and does not touch partitioning layout or other data located on hard drive.
Errors with having both swap file and partition can result from improper formatting of swap file (think data corruption, file truncated or overwritten by privileged process), if it has been deleted ( unlinked ) or moved but corresponding entry in /etc/fstab has not been updated (if you use /etc/fstab to mount the swap file on boot). However, these aren't directly related to having both swap file and partition, and as far as swap file it is easy to deal with such issues. When it comes to failing hardware, hardware issues aren't directly related to having partition or file, and there's also no good alternative aside from replacing the hardware as soon as possible. It is often recommended that you only use swap file on SSDs, since SSDs have shorter life compared HDDs. But in my research I've so far found no evidence that having a partition on SSD dramatically decreases SSD lifespan and there's other factors to consider.
If you have large amount of RAM (above 4 GB), it might be advisable to keep either small partition (1 GB) or swap file on SSD, since it would be a waste of disk space. ( Note: there's couple other low level hardware considerations which need to be addressed, but I currently cannot recover the sources needed for such discussion)
See also Waren Young's answer on swap reliability.
answered Feb 27 at 19:26
Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy
74.6k9155325
add a comment |
It's a common practice to have a partition and dynamically increase swap via swap files. It is an accepted method among others on How to increase swap space? and in fact I have implemented a script to add swap files to make the steps even easier. In fact, keeping original partition and adding/removing a swap file is far easier and safer than increasing partition size, since during partitioning improper steps can lead to loss of data on the main partition, where as swap file concerns only with one file and does not touch partitioning layout or other data located on hard drive.
Errors with having both swap file and partition can result from improper formatting of swap file (think data corruption, file truncated or overwritten by privileged process), if it has been deleted ( unlinked ) or moved but corresponding entry in /etc/fstab has not been updated (if you use /etc/fstab to mount the swap file on boot). However, these aren't directly related to having both swap file and partition, and as far as swap file it is easy to deal with such issues. When it comes to failing hardware, hardware issues aren't directly related to having partition or file, and there's also no good alternative aside from replacing the hardware as soon as possible. It is often recommended that you only use swap file on SSDs, since SSDs have shorter life compared HDDs. But in my research I've so far found no evidence that having a partition on SSD dramatically decreases SSD lifespan and there's other factors to consider.
If you have large amount of RAM (above 4 GB), it might be advisable to keep either small partition (1 GB) or swap file on SSD, since it would be a waste of disk space. ( Note: there's couple other low level hardware considerations which need to be addressed, but I currently cannot recover the sources needed for such discussion)
See also Waren Young's answer on swap reliability.
answered Feb 27 at 19:26
Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy
74.6k9155325
add a comment |
It's a common practice to have a partition and dynamically increase swap via swap files. It is an accepted method among others on How to increase swap space? and in fact I have implemented a script to add swap files to make the steps even easier. In fact, keeping original partition and adding/removing a swap file is far easier and safer than increasing partition size, since during partitioning improper steps can lead to loss of data on the main partition, where as swap file concerns only with one file and does not touch partitioning layout or other data located on hard drive.
Errors with having both swap file and partition can result from improper formatting of swap file (think data corruption, file truncated or overwritten by privileged process), if it has been deleted ( unlinked ) or moved but corresponding entry in /etc/fstab has not been updated (if you use /etc/fstab to mount the swap file on boot). However, these aren't directly related to having both swap file and partition, and as far as swap file it is easy to deal with such issues. When it comes to failing hardware, hardware issues aren't directly related to having partition or file, and there's also no good alternative aside from replacing the hardware as soon as possible. It is often recommended that you only use swap file on SSDs, since SSDs have shorter life compared HDDs. But in my research I've so far found no evidence that having a partition on SSD dramatically decreases SSD lifespan and there's other factors to consider.
If you have large amount of RAM (above 4 GB), it might be advisable to keep either small partition (1 GB) or swap file on SSD, since it would be a waste of disk space. ( Note: there's couple other low level hardware considerations which need to be addressed, but I currently cannot recover the sources needed for such discussion)
See also Waren Young's answer on swap reliability.
answered Feb 27 at 19:26
Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy
74.6k9155325
It's a common practice to have a partition and dynamically increase swap via swap files. It is an accepted method among others on How to increase swap space? and in fact I have implemented a script to add swap files to make the steps even easier. In fact, keeping original partition and adding/removing a swap file is far easier and safer than increasing partition size, since during partitioning improper steps can lead to loss of data on the main partition, where as swap file concerns only with one file and does not touch partitioning layout or other data located on hard drive.
Errors with having both swap file and partition can result from improper formatting of swap file (think data corruption, file truncated or overwritten by privileged process), if it has been deleted ( unlinked ) or moved but corresponding entry in /etc/fstab has not been updated (if you use /etc/fstab to mount the swap file on boot). However, these aren't directly related to having both swap file and partition, and as far as swap file it is easy to deal with such issues. When it comes to failing hardware, hardware issues aren't directly related to having partition or file, and there's also no good alternative aside from replacing the hardware as soon as possible. It is often recommended that you only use swap file on SSDs, since SSDs have shorter life compared HDDs. But in my research I've so far found no evidence that having a partition on SSD dramatically decreases SSD lifespan and there's other factors to consider.
If you have large amount of RAM (above 4 GB), it might be advisable to keep either small partition (1 GB) or swap file on SSD, since it would be a waste of disk space. ( Note: there's couple other low level hardware considerations which need to be addressed, but I currently cannot recover the sources needed for such discussion)
See also Waren Young's answer on swap reliability.
answered Feb 27 at 19:26
Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy
74.6k9155325
answered Feb 27 at 19:26
Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy
74.6k9155325
answered Feb 27 at 19:26
Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy
74.6k9155325
answered Feb 27 at 19:26
Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy
74.6k9155325
74.6k9155325
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1121570%2fis-it-ok-to-have-both-a-swap-partition-and-swap-file-on-an-ubuntu-18-04-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
No, it's a common practice to have a partition, and dynamically increase swap via swap files. Errors can result from improper formatting of swap file, or if it has been unlinked but not removed from
/etc/fstab, stuff like that. Short answer is OK– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 2:59
1
@SergiyKolodyazhnyy your answer is in the wrong box... ;)
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 7:12
@Zanna The comment is in the right box,but a true answer is now posted
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Feb 27 at 19:26
As it's a popular misconception then I'll mention that comments are not for incomplete answers
– Zanna
Feb 27 at 20:40