How to find lower Riemann integral in given function?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












$f(x)$ defined on $[0,1]$ as following -
$$
begin{align}
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 & text{if $x=0$}\
frac{1}{n} & text{if $1/(n+1)<xle 1/n$}
end{cases}
end{align}
$$



How to find lower Riemann integral of $f(x)$ from $0$ to $1$.
My question is different from How to find the Riemann integral of following function?
Since we know $f(x)$ has countable number of discontinuities hence it is Riemann integrable and we can find it's upper integral for getting the answer .But how to find lower Riemann integral of this function ?



EDIT - I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Since it is Riemann integrable the lower integral is same as upper integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    58 mins ago










  • @ParamanandSingh I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.
    – Amit
    49 mins ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












$f(x)$ defined on $[0,1]$ as following -
$$
begin{align}
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 & text{if $x=0$}\
frac{1}{n} & text{if $1/(n+1)<xle 1/n$}
end{cases}
end{align}
$$



How to find lower Riemann integral of $f(x)$ from $0$ to $1$.
My question is different from How to find the Riemann integral of following function?
Since we know $f(x)$ has countable number of discontinuities hence it is Riemann integrable and we can find it's upper integral for getting the answer .But how to find lower Riemann integral of this function ?



EDIT - I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Since it is Riemann integrable the lower integral is same as upper integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    58 mins ago










  • @ParamanandSingh I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.
    – Amit
    49 mins ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











$f(x)$ defined on $[0,1]$ as following -
$$
begin{align}
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 & text{if $x=0$}\
frac{1}{n} & text{if $1/(n+1)<xle 1/n$}
end{cases}
end{align}
$$



How to find lower Riemann integral of $f(x)$ from $0$ to $1$.
My question is different from How to find the Riemann integral of following function?
Since we know $f(x)$ has countable number of discontinuities hence it is Riemann integrable and we can find it's upper integral for getting the answer .But how to find lower Riemann integral of this function ?



EDIT - I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.










share|cite|improve this question















$f(x)$ defined on $[0,1]$ as following -
$$
begin{align}
f(x) = begin{cases}
0 & text{if $x=0$}\
frac{1}{n} & text{if $1/(n+1)<xle 1/n$}
end{cases}
end{align}
$$



How to find lower Riemann integral of $f(x)$ from $0$ to $1$.
My question is different from How to find the Riemann integral of following function?
Since we know $f(x)$ has countable number of discontinuities hence it is Riemann integrable and we can find it's upper integral for getting the answer .But how to find lower Riemann integral of this function ?



EDIT - I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.







real-analysis measure-theory riemann-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 49 mins ago

























asked 1 hour ago









Amit

828




828












  • Since it is Riemann integrable the lower integral is same as upper integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    58 mins ago










  • @ParamanandSingh I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.
    – Amit
    49 mins ago


















  • Since it is Riemann integrable the lower integral is same as upper integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    58 mins ago










  • @ParamanandSingh I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.
    – Amit
    49 mins ago
















Since it is Riemann integrable the lower integral is same as upper integral.
– Paramanand Singh
58 mins ago




Since it is Riemann integrable the lower integral is same as upper integral.
– Paramanand Singh
58 mins ago












@ParamanandSingh I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.
– Amit
49 mins ago




@ParamanandSingh I know since $f(x)$ is Riemann integrable hence it's lower Riemann integral is same as upper Riemann integral.But how to find it by partitioning the domain or in other words by using definition of lower Riemann integral.
– Amit
49 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Consider the partitions $P_N={0}cup {frac{1}{n}: 1leq n leq N}$. Then the lower sum is $$L(f;P_N)=sum limits _{i=1}^N m_ileft(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)+m_0(frac{1}{N}-0)$$



Then given any partition $P$ you can find an $N$ such that $L(f;P)leq L(f,P_N)$ (why?)



And how $f$ is constant in each interval of the form $[1/(n+1),1/n]$ the infimum's $m_i$ are just $f(1/i)=1/i$ and $m_0=0$... We have
$$L(f;P)= sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)$$



Therefore,
$$sup _P L(f;P)leq sup _{P_N} L(f;P_N)= lim _{Nto infty} sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right) = sum limits _{i=1}^{infty} frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)=frac{pi^2}{6} -1$$



and you also can readly prove $geq$ to conclude equality.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    For every partition $P= {x_j}_0^n$ where $x_0 = 0, x_n = 1$, there is some $N$ s.t. $x_1 in (1/(N+1), 1/N]$. Then on $[0, x_1]$, the infimum is $0$. On $[1/(N+1), 1]$, $f$ is a step function, i.e. piecewise constant function, then the lower Riemann sum is easy to find:
    $$
    {underline int}_{x_1}^1 f leqslant underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = sum_1^N int_{1/(n+1)}^{1/n} f = sum_1^N left(frac 1n - frac 1{n+1}right) frac 1n = -1 + frac 1{N+1} +sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
    $$

    Thus
    $$
    -1 +frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f leqslant underline int_0^1 f leqslant underline int_0^{x_1} f +underline int_{x_1}^1 f leqslant x_1 + underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = x_1 - 1+frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
    $$



    Now let the mesh $delta$ of $P$ goes to $0$. Since $x_1 leqslant delta$, $x_1 to 0$ as well, hence $1/(N+1) to 0$, then $Nto infty$. Take the limit $delta to 0^+$ w.r.t. the inequalities, we have
    $$
    underline int_0^1 f = -1+sum_1^infty frac 1{n^2} =- 1 + frac {pi^2}6.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      The function $f$ is riemann integrable , so that the function $F:[0,1]rightarrow Bbb R$ defined by $F(x)={underline int}_x^1 f(t)dt $ is continuous. In particular, the limit $lim_{xrightarrow 0} F(x)$ exists and equals to $F(0)$. That is $$int_0^1f(x)dx=F(0)=lim_{nrightarrow infty} int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt.$$ Now notice that in the interval $[frac{1}{n+1},1]$ number of discontinuities of $f$ is finite, so that the riemann integral $int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k}(frac{1}{k}-frac{1}{k+1})=(sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k^2})-(1-frac{1}{n+1})$. Therefore , $$int_0^1f(t)dt=frac{pi^2}{6}-1.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer























        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022257%2fhow-to-find-lower-riemann-integral-in-given-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Consider the partitions $P_N={0}cup {frac{1}{n}: 1leq n leq N}$. Then the lower sum is $$L(f;P_N)=sum limits _{i=1}^N m_ileft(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)+m_0(frac{1}{N}-0)$$



        Then given any partition $P$ you can find an $N$ such that $L(f;P)leq L(f,P_N)$ (why?)



        And how $f$ is constant in each interval of the form $[1/(n+1),1/n]$ the infimum's $m_i$ are just $f(1/i)=1/i$ and $m_0=0$... We have
        $$L(f;P)= sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)$$



        Therefore,
        $$sup _P L(f;P)leq sup _{P_N} L(f;P_N)= lim _{Nto infty} sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right) = sum limits _{i=1}^{infty} frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)=frac{pi^2}{6} -1$$



        and you also can readly prove $geq$ to conclude equality.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Consider the partitions $P_N={0}cup {frac{1}{n}: 1leq n leq N}$. Then the lower sum is $$L(f;P_N)=sum limits _{i=1}^N m_ileft(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)+m_0(frac{1}{N}-0)$$



          Then given any partition $P$ you can find an $N$ such that $L(f;P)leq L(f,P_N)$ (why?)



          And how $f$ is constant in each interval of the form $[1/(n+1),1/n]$ the infimum's $m_i$ are just $f(1/i)=1/i$ and $m_0=0$... We have
          $$L(f;P)= sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)$$



          Therefore,
          $$sup _P L(f;P)leq sup _{P_N} L(f;P_N)= lim _{Nto infty} sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right) = sum limits _{i=1}^{infty} frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)=frac{pi^2}{6} -1$$



          and you also can readly prove $geq$ to conclude equality.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            Consider the partitions $P_N={0}cup {frac{1}{n}: 1leq n leq N}$. Then the lower sum is $$L(f;P_N)=sum limits _{i=1}^N m_ileft(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)+m_0(frac{1}{N}-0)$$



            Then given any partition $P$ you can find an $N$ such that $L(f;P)leq L(f,P_N)$ (why?)



            And how $f$ is constant in each interval of the form $[1/(n+1),1/n]$ the infimum's $m_i$ are just $f(1/i)=1/i$ and $m_0=0$... We have
            $$L(f;P)= sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)$$



            Therefore,
            $$sup _P L(f;P)leq sup _{P_N} L(f;P_N)= lim _{Nto infty} sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right) = sum limits _{i=1}^{infty} frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)=frac{pi^2}{6} -1$$



            and you also can readly prove $geq$ to conclude equality.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Consider the partitions $P_N={0}cup {frac{1}{n}: 1leq n leq N}$. Then the lower sum is $$L(f;P_N)=sum limits _{i=1}^N m_ileft(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)+m_0(frac{1}{N}-0)$$



            Then given any partition $P$ you can find an $N$ such that $L(f;P)leq L(f,P_N)$ (why?)



            And how $f$ is constant in each interval of the form $[1/(n+1),1/n]$ the infimum's $m_i$ are just $f(1/i)=1/i$ and $m_0=0$... We have
            $$L(f;P)= sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)$$



            Therefore,
            $$sup _P L(f;P)leq sup _{P_N} L(f;P_N)= lim _{Nto infty} sum limits _{i=1}^N frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right) = sum limits _{i=1}^{infty} frac{1}{i}left(frac{1}{i}-frac{1}{i+1}right)=frac{pi^2}{6} -1$$



            and you also can readly prove $geq$ to conclude equality.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 37 mins ago









            Robson

            751221




            751221






















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                For every partition $P= {x_j}_0^n$ where $x_0 = 0, x_n = 1$, there is some $N$ s.t. $x_1 in (1/(N+1), 1/N]$. Then on $[0, x_1]$, the infimum is $0$. On $[1/(N+1), 1]$, $f$ is a step function, i.e. piecewise constant function, then the lower Riemann sum is easy to find:
                $$
                {underline int}_{x_1}^1 f leqslant underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = sum_1^N int_{1/(n+1)}^{1/n} f = sum_1^N left(frac 1n - frac 1{n+1}right) frac 1n = -1 + frac 1{N+1} +sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
                $$

                Thus
                $$
                -1 +frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f leqslant underline int_0^1 f leqslant underline int_0^{x_1} f +underline int_{x_1}^1 f leqslant x_1 + underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = x_1 - 1+frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
                $$



                Now let the mesh $delta$ of $P$ goes to $0$. Since $x_1 leqslant delta$, $x_1 to 0$ as well, hence $1/(N+1) to 0$, then $Nto infty$. Take the limit $delta to 0^+$ w.r.t. the inequalities, we have
                $$
                underline int_0^1 f = -1+sum_1^infty frac 1{n^2} =- 1 + frac {pi^2}6.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer



























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  For every partition $P= {x_j}_0^n$ where $x_0 = 0, x_n = 1$, there is some $N$ s.t. $x_1 in (1/(N+1), 1/N]$. Then on $[0, x_1]$, the infimum is $0$. On $[1/(N+1), 1]$, $f$ is a step function, i.e. piecewise constant function, then the lower Riemann sum is easy to find:
                  $$
                  {underline int}_{x_1}^1 f leqslant underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = sum_1^N int_{1/(n+1)}^{1/n} f = sum_1^N left(frac 1n - frac 1{n+1}right) frac 1n = -1 + frac 1{N+1} +sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
                  $$

                  Thus
                  $$
                  -1 +frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f leqslant underline int_0^1 f leqslant underline int_0^{x_1} f +underline int_{x_1}^1 f leqslant x_1 + underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = x_1 - 1+frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
                  $$



                  Now let the mesh $delta$ of $P$ goes to $0$. Since $x_1 leqslant delta$, $x_1 to 0$ as well, hence $1/(N+1) to 0$, then $Nto infty$. Take the limit $delta to 0^+$ w.r.t. the inequalities, we have
                  $$
                  underline int_0^1 f = -1+sum_1^infty frac 1{n^2} =- 1 + frac {pi^2}6.
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    For every partition $P= {x_j}_0^n$ where $x_0 = 0, x_n = 1$, there is some $N$ s.t. $x_1 in (1/(N+1), 1/N]$. Then on $[0, x_1]$, the infimum is $0$. On $[1/(N+1), 1]$, $f$ is a step function, i.e. piecewise constant function, then the lower Riemann sum is easy to find:
                    $$
                    {underline int}_{x_1}^1 f leqslant underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = sum_1^N int_{1/(n+1)}^{1/n} f = sum_1^N left(frac 1n - frac 1{n+1}right) frac 1n = -1 + frac 1{N+1} +sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
                    $$

                    Thus
                    $$
                    -1 +frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f leqslant underline int_0^1 f leqslant underline int_0^{x_1} f +underline int_{x_1}^1 f leqslant x_1 + underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = x_1 - 1+frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
                    $$



                    Now let the mesh $delta$ of $P$ goes to $0$. Since $x_1 leqslant delta$, $x_1 to 0$ as well, hence $1/(N+1) to 0$, then $Nto infty$. Take the limit $delta to 0^+$ w.r.t. the inequalities, we have
                    $$
                    underline int_0^1 f = -1+sum_1^infty frac 1{n^2} =- 1 + frac {pi^2}6.
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    For every partition $P= {x_j}_0^n$ where $x_0 = 0, x_n = 1$, there is some $N$ s.t. $x_1 in (1/(N+1), 1/N]$. Then on $[0, x_1]$, the infimum is $0$. On $[1/(N+1), 1]$, $f$ is a step function, i.e. piecewise constant function, then the lower Riemann sum is easy to find:
                    $$
                    {underline int}_{x_1}^1 f leqslant underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = sum_1^N int_{1/(n+1)}^{1/n} f = sum_1^N left(frac 1n - frac 1{n+1}right) frac 1n = -1 + frac 1{N+1} +sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
                    $$

                    Thus
                    $$
                    -1 +frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f leqslant underline int_0^1 f leqslant underline int_0^{x_1} f +underline int_{x_1}^1 f leqslant x_1 + underline int_{1/(N+1)}^1 f = x_1 - 1+frac 1{N+1} + sum_1^N frac 1{n^2}.
                    $$



                    Now let the mesh $delta$ of $P$ goes to $0$. Since $x_1 leqslant delta$, $x_1 to 0$ as well, hence $1/(N+1) to 0$, then $Nto infty$. Take the limit $delta to 0^+$ w.r.t. the inequalities, we have
                    $$
                    underline int_0^1 f = -1+sum_1^infty frac 1{n^2} =- 1 + frac {pi^2}6.
                    $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 10 mins ago

























                    answered 26 mins ago









                    xbh

                    5,2491422




                    5,2491422






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        The function $f$ is riemann integrable , so that the function $F:[0,1]rightarrow Bbb R$ defined by $F(x)={underline int}_x^1 f(t)dt $ is continuous. In particular, the limit $lim_{xrightarrow 0} F(x)$ exists and equals to $F(0)$. That is $$int_0^1f(x)dx=F(0)=lim_{nrightarrow infty} int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt.$$ Now notice that in the interval $[frac{1}{n+1},1]$ number of discontinuities of $f$ is finite, so that the riemann integral $int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k}(frac{1}{k}-frac{1}{k+1})=(sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k^2})-(1-frac{1}{n+1})$. Therefore , $$int_0^1f(t)dt=frac{pi^2}{6}-1.$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer



























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          The function $f$ is riemann integrable , so that the function $F:[0,1]rightarrow Bbb R$ defined by $F(x)={underline int}_x^1 f(t)dt $ is continuous. In particular, the limit $lim_{xrightarrow 0} F(x)$ exists and equals to $F(0)$. That is $$int_0^1f(x)dx=F(0)=lim_{nrightarrow infty} int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt.$$ Now notice that in the interval $[frac{1}{n+1},1]$ number of discontinuities of $f$ is finite, so that the riemann integral $int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k}(frac{1}{k}-frac{1}{k+1})=(sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k^2})-(1-frac{1}{n+1})$. Therefore , $$int_0^1f(t)dt=frac{pi^2}{6}-1.$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            The function $f$ is riemann integrable , so that the function $F:[0,1]rightarrow Bbb R$ defined by $F(x)={underline int}_x^1 f(t)dt $ is continuous. In particular, the limit $lim_{xrightarrow 0} F(x)$ exists and equals to $F(0)$. That is $$int_0^1f(x)dx=F(0)=lim_{nrightarrow infty} int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt.$$ Now notice that in the interval $[frac{1}{n+1},1]$ number of discontinuities of $f$ is finite, so that the riemann integral $int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k}(frac{1}{k}-frac{1}{k+1})=(sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k^2})-(1-frac{1}{n+1})$. Therefore , $$int_0^1f(t)dt=frac{pi^2}{6}-1.$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            The function $f$ is riemann integrable , so that the function $F:[0,1]rightarrow Bbb R$ defined by $F(x)={underline int}_x^1 f(t)dt $ is continuous. In particular, the limit $lim_{xrightarrow 0} F(x)$ exists and equals to $F(0)$. That is $$int_0^1f(x)dx=F(0)=lim_{nrightarrow infty} int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt.$$ Now notice that in the interval $[frac{1}{n+1},1]$ number of discontinuities of $f$ is finite, so that the riemann integral $int_{frac{1}{n+1}}^1f(t)dt=sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k}(frac{1}{k}-frac{1}{k+1})=(sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k^2})-(1-frac{1}{n+1})$. Therefore , $$int_0^1f(t)dt=frac{pi^2}{6}-1.$$







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited 46 secs ago

























                            answered 40 mins ago









                            UserS

                            1,295112




                            1,295112






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022257%2fhow-to-find-lower-riemann-integral-in-given-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

                                Mangá

                                Eduardo VII do Reino Unido