Why does converting a m4a/wma to wav result in a ridiculously high bitrate file?
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
If I use the simple command ffmpeg -i file.m4a file.wav, the resulting file invariably seems to have a bitrate of around 750kbit/s (resulting in a 500mb file from a 100mb one my case).
I've already tried this answer (tldr: ffmpeg -i song.mp3 -acodec pcm_u8 -ar 22050 song.wav), among others, but the bitrate always turns out to be ridiculously large.
I like my files to be in wav format so that I can easily burn a CD from the file.
audio ffmpeg conversion bitrate
asked Nov 25 at 18:30
Matt M.
1034
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
If I use the simple command ffmpeg -i file.m4a file.wav, the resulting file invariably seems to have a bitrate of around 750kbit/s (resulting in a 500mb file from a 100mb one my case).
I've already tried this answer (tldr: ffmpeg -i song.mp3 -acodec pcm_u8 -ar 22050 song.wav), among others, but the bitrate always turns out to be ridiculously large.
I like my files to be in wav format so that I can easily burn a CD from the file.
audio ffmpeg conversion bitrate
asked Nov 25 at 18:30
Matt M.
1034
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
If I use the simple command ffmpeg -i file.m4a file.wav, the resulting file invariably seems to have a bitrate of around 750kbit/s (resulting in a 500mb file from a 100mb one my case).
I've already tried this answer (tldr: ffmpeg -i song.mp3 -acodec pcm_u8 -ar 22050 song.wav), among others, but the bitrate always turns out to be ridiculously large.
I like my files to be in wav format so that I can easily burn a CD from the file.
audio ffmpeg conversion bitrate
asked Nov 25 at 18:30
Matt M.
1034
If I use the simple command ffmpeg -i file.m4a file.wav, the resulting file invariably seems to have a bitrate of around 750kbit/s (resulting in a 500mb file from a 100mb one my case).
I've already tried this answer (tldr: ffmpeg -i song.mp3 -acodec pcm_u8 -ar 22050 song.wav), among others, but the bitrate always turns out to be ridiculously large.
I like my files to be in wav format so that I can easily burn a CD from the file.
audio ffmpeg conversion bitrate
audio ffmpeg conversion bitrate
asked Nov 25 at 18:30
Matt M.
1034
asked Nov 25 at 18:30
Matt M.
1034
edited Nov 25 at 18:59
asked Nov 25 at 18:30
Matt M.
1034
asked Nov 25 at 18:30
Matt M.
1034
asked Nov 25 at 18:30
Matt M.
1034
1034
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
wav is simply uncompressed audio. Its bitrate is simply the size that audio would be without some smart algorithm reducing the size using psychoacoustic modelling.
Your files are probably 16-bit 44.1kHz audio. that will end up at 16-bit (2 bytes) x dual channel (2) x 44.1kHz which will give a bitrate of about 1.44Mbit/s. Single channel audio would be half that at 720kBit/s, and similarly reducing 44.1kHz to 22.05kHz keeping 16 bit sampling will again be 720kBit/s.
Without knowing what your goal is, then I'd suggest you leave the files in their original format, or use an actual compressed output such as flac.
answered Nov 25 at 18:48
Mokubai♦
56k16131150
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
WAVs have uncompressed audio, so the file size is a linear function of duration, irrespective of content.
Formula is sample depth x sampling rate x channel count x duration (in seconds).
answered Nov 25 at 18:43
Gyan
14k21641
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
wav is simply uncompressed audio. Its bitrate is simply the size that audio would be without some smart algorithm reducing the size using psychoacoustic modelling.
Your files are probably 16-bit 44.1kHz audio. that will end up at 16-bit (2 bytes) x dual channel (2) x 44.1kHz which will give a bitrate of about 1.44Mbit/s. Single channel audio would be half that at 720kBit/s, and similarly reducing 44.1kHz to 22.05kHz keeping 16 bit sampling will again be 720kBit/s.
Without knowing what your goal is, then I'd suggest you leave the files in their original format, or use an actual compressed output such as flac.
answered Nov 25 at 18:48
Mokubai♦
56k16131150
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
wav is simply uncompressed audio. Its bitrate is simply the size that audio would be without some smart algorithm reducing the size using psychoacoustic modelling.
Your files are probably 16-bit 44.1kHz audio. that will end up at 16-bit (2 bytes) x dual channel (2) x 44.1kHz which will give a bitrate of about 1.44Mbit/s. Single channel audio would be half that at 720kBit/s, and similarly reducing 44.1kHz to 22.05kHz keeping 16 bit sampling will again be 720kBit/s.
Without knowing what your goal is, then I'd suggest you leave the files in their original format, or use an actual compressed output such as flac.
answered Nov 25 at 18:48
Mokubai♦
56k16131150
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
wav is simply uncompressed audio. Its bitrate is simply the size that audio would be without some smart algorithm reducing the size using psychoacoustic modelling.
Your files are probably 16-bit 44.1kHz audio. that will end up at 16-bit (2 bytes) x dual channel (2) x 44.1kHz which will give a bitrate of about 1.44Mbit/s. Single channel audio would be half that at 720kBit/s, and similarly reducing 44.1kHz to 22.05kHz keeping 16 bit sampling will again be 720kBit/s.
Without knowing what your goal is, then I'd suggest you leave the files in their original format, or use an actual compressed output such as flac.
answered Nov 25 at 18:48
Mokubai♦
56k16131150
wav is simply uncompressed audio. Its bitrate is simply the size that audio would be without some smart algorithm reducing the size using psychoacoustic modelling.
Your files are probably 16-bit 44.1kHz audio. that will end up at 16-bit (2 bytes) x dual channel (2) x 44.1kHz which will give a bitrate of about 1.44Mbit/s. Single channel audio would be half that at 720kBit/s, and similarly reducing 44.1kHz to 22.05kHz keeping 16 bit sampling will again be 720kBit/s.
Without knowing what your goal is, then I'd suggest you leave the files in their original format, or use an actual compressed output such as flac.
answered Nov 25 at 18:48
Mokubai♦
56k16131150
answered Nov 25 at 18:48
Mokubai♦
56k16131150
answered Nov 25 at 18:48
Mokubai♦
56k16131150
answered Nov 25 at 18:48
Mokubai♦
56k16131150
56k16131150
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
WAVs have uncompressed audio, so the file size is a linear function of duration, irrespective of content.
Formula is sample depth x sampling rate x channel count x duration (in seconds).
answered Nov 25 at 18:43
Gyan
14k21641
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
WAVs have uncompressed audio, so the file size is a linear function of duration, irrespective of content.
Formula is sample depth x sampling rate x channel count x duration (in seconds).
answered Nov 25 at 18:43
Gyan
14k21641
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
WAVs have uncompressed audio, so the file size is a linear function of duration, irrespective of content.
Formula is sample depth x sampling rate x channel count x duration (in seconds).
answered Nov 25 at 18:43
Gyan
14k21641
WAVs have uncompressed audio, so the file size is a linear function of duration, irrespective of content.
Formula is sample depth x sampling rate x channel count x duration (in seconds).
answered Nov 25 at 18:43
Gyan
14k21641
answered Nov 25 at 18:43
Gyan
14k21641
answered Nov 25 at 18:43
Gyan
14k21641
answered Nov 25 at 18:43
Gyan
14k21641
14k21641
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1378278%2fwhy-does-converting-a-m4a-wma-to-wav-result-in-a-ridiculously-high-bitrate-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
