How to stop explorer.exe outbound connections on Windows 8.1
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I've got this annoying outbound TCP connection from explorer.exe to 111.221.29.122 using port 443 (Windows 8.1). Apparently this is some kind of push notification service as describes here:
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/87505/why-is-windows-explorer-making-external-connections
I have disabled everything I could think of, including these notification things, automatic updates and what not. I even tried to brutally kill the outbound connection. Nothing helps. It's amazing how so many programmers work their keyboards to get us all into the cloud while some of us desperately want some basic privacy...
Rhetoric aside, how do I make explorer.exe stop opening sockets without my consent?
UPDATE: Attached below is what I see. Do you see this on your Windows 8.1?
networking windows-8.1 windows-explorer
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I've got this annoying outbound TCP connection from explorer.exe to 111.221.29.122 using port 443 (Windows 8.1). Apparently this is some kind of push notification service as describes here:
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/87505/why-is-windows-explorer-making-external-connections
I have disabled everything I could think of, including these notification things, automatic updates and what not. I even tried to brutally kill the outbound connection. Nothing helps. It's amazing how so many programmers work their keyboards to get us all into the cloud while some of us desperately want some basic privacy...
Rhetoric aside, how do I make explorer.exe stop opening sockets without my consent?
UPDATE: Attached below is what I see. Do you see this on your Windows 8.1?
networking windows-8.1 windows-explorer
Have a look at this site: windows8tricks.net/2011/12/… ... it has some registry tweaks you can do to turn off Push Notifications ..
– txtechhelp
Jun 15 '15 at 20:22
@txtechhelp, these instructions appear to be outdated as I don't have these registry keys, besides I've disabled all push notifications from "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", so it's probably not about notifications and something else lingering there.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:34
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I've got this annoying outbound TCP connection from explorer.exe to 111.221.29.122 using port 443 (Windows 8.1). Apparently this is some kind of push notification service as describes here:
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/87505/why-is-windows-explorer-making-external-connections
I have disabled everything I could think of, including these notification things, automatic updates and what not. I even tried to brutally kill the outbound connection. Nothing helps. It's amazing how so many programmers work their keyboards to get us all into the cloud while some of us desperately want some basic privacy...
Rhetoric aside, how do I make explorer.exe stop opening sockets without my consent?
UPDATE: Attached below is what I see. Do you see this on your Windows 8.1?
networking windows-8.1 windows-explorer
I've got this annoying outbound TCP connection from explorer.exe to 111.221.29.122 using port 443 (Windows 8.1). Apparently this is some kind of push notification service as describes here:
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/87505/why-is-windows-explorer-making-external-connections
I have disabled everything I could think of, including these notification things, automatic updates and what not. I even tried to brutally kill the outbound connection. Nothing helps. It's amazing how so many programmers work their keyboards to get us all into the cloud while some of us desperately want some basic privacy...
Rhetoric aside, how do I make explorer.exe stop opening sockets without my consent?
UPDATE: Attached below is what I see. Do you see this on your Windows 8.1?
networking windows-8.1 windows-explorer
networking windows-8.1 windows-explorer
edited Mar 17 '17 at 13:14
Community♦
1
1
asked Jun 15 '15 at 20:12
Dima
1661310
1661310
Have a look at this site: windows8tricks.net/2011/12/… ... it has some registry tweaks you can do to turn off Push Notifications ..
– txtechhelp
Jun 15 '15 at 20:22
@txtechhelp, these instructions appear to be outdated as I don't have these registry keys, besides I've disabled all push notifications from "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", so it's probably not about notifications and something else lingering there.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:34
add a comment |
Have a look at this site: windows8tricks.net/2011/12/… ... it has some registry tweaks you can do to turn off Push Notifications ..
– txtechhelp
Jun 15 '15 at 20:22
@txtechhelp, these instructions appear to be outdated as I don't have these registry keys, besides I've disabled all push notifications from "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", so it's probably not about notifications and something else lingering there.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:34
Have a look at this site: windows8tricks.net/2011/12/… ... it has some registry tweaks you can do to turn off Push Notifications ..
– txtechhelp
Jun 15 '15 at 20:22
Have a look at this site: windows8tricks.net/2011/12/… ... it has some registry tweaks you can do to turn off Push Notifications ..
– txtechhelp
Jun 15 '15 at 20:22
@txtechhelp, these instructions appear to be outdated as I don't have these registry keys, besides I've disabled all push notifications from "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", so it's probably not about notifications and something else lingering there.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:34
@txtechhelp, these instructions appear to be outdated as I don't have these registry keys, besides I've disabled all push notifications from "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", so it's probably not about notifications and something else lingering there.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If you search for "notifications" in your start screen, you will find the notifications settings page. Here you can turn off the notifications altogether or for specific apps.
As the other answer says, this is an internal Windows function and the IP address belongs to Microsoft.
Whilst you could indeed block all outbound access to that address, I think you will find that it is actually an inbound connection. That too can be blocked but it is easier to turn off notifications.
UPDATE: To actually block the connection, open Windows firewall and add 2 new rules. Inbound and Outbound. Create customer rules, accept the defaults until you get to the Scope page and set the remote IP address to
111.221.29.122
and the action to Block. Accept the rest of the defaults and give it a meaningful name and description so you can find what you did in the future to undo it again.
I've disabled all notifications through "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", I have also tried to disable an individual per app settings as well, no reaction. The connection stays active. Yes it is apparently a MS server.. So what, it is my computer after all. I tried to prevent exlorer.exe using public network by means of firewall, but that blocked all browsers as well. No luck so far.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:29
Regarding the UPDATE - I wish it was just one IP address to block.. The explorer.exe keeps connecting to a range of addresses and I don't know how big is this range. Right now it's hooked onto 111.221.29.76. I think it grabs a new address as soon as it gets hold of the public internet access. I think it's bizarre..
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 21:49
That isn't bizarre at all, it is common practice for a global service. You would have to block the whole subnet but that might well have other implications. I recommend that you forget about it and move on. Even if you spend loads of time trying to "fix" this, it is integral to Windows and might well change in the next release which is only a month and a half away.
– Julian Knight
Jun 16 '15 at 23:08
It's bizarre because it's against any common sense concerning privacy, not because they use the entire subnet to "ring home". This is what spyware and malware do..
– Dima
Jun 17 '15 at 6:08
It uses a large subnet to ensure continuity of service. That malware does the same thing is a convergence of design and not bizarre.
– Julian Knight
Jun 17 '15 at 6:11
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If you search for "notifications" in your start screen, you will find the notifications settings page. Here you can turn off the notifications altogether or for specific apps.
As the other answer says, this is an internal Windows function and the IP address belongs to Microsoft.
Whilst you could indeed block all outbound access to that address, I think you will find that it is actually an inbound connection. That too can be blocked but it is easier to turn off notifications.
UPDATE: To actually block the connection, open Windows firewall and add 2 new rules. Inbound and Outbound. Create customer rules, accept the defaults until you get to the Scope page and set the remote IP address to
111.221.29.122
and the action to Block. Accept the rest of the defaults and give it a meaningful name and description so you can find what you did in the future to undo it again.
I've disabled all notifications through "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", I have also tried to disable an individual per app settings as well, no reaction. The connection stays active. Yes it is apparently a MS server.. So what, it is my computer after all. I tried to prevent exlorer.exe using public network by means of firewall, but that blocked all browsers as well. No luck so far.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:29
Regarding the UPDATE - I wish it was just one IP address to block.. The explorer.exe keeps connecting to a range of addresses and I don't know how big is this range. Right now it's hooked onto 111.221.29.76. I think it grabs a new address as soon as it gets hold of the public internet access. I think it's bizarre..
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 21:49
That isn't bizarre at all, it is common practice for a global service. You would have to block the whole subnet but that might well have other implications. I recommend that you forget about it and move on. Even if you spend loads of time trying to "fix" this, it is integral to Windows and might well change in the next release which is only a month and a half away.
– Julian Knight
Jun 16 '15 at 23:08
It's bizarre because it's against any common sense concerning privacy, not because they use the entire subnet to "ring home". This is what spyware and malware do..
– Dima
Jun 17 '15 at 6:08
It uses a large subnet to ensure continuity of service. That malware does the same thing is a convergence of design and not bizarre.
– Julian Knight
Jun 17 '15 at 6:11
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
If you search for "notifications" in your start screen, you will find the notifications settings page. Here you can turn off the notifications altogether or for specific apps.
As the other answer says, this is an internal Windows function and the IP address belongs to Microsoft.
Whilst you could indeed block all outbound access to that address, I think you will find that it is actually an inbound connection. That too can be blocked but it is easier to turn off notifications.
UPDATE: To actually block the connection, open Windows firewall and add 2 new rules. Inbound and Outbound. Create customer rules, accept the defaults until you get to the Scope page and set the remote IP address to
111.221.29.122
and the action to Block. Accept the rest of the defaults and give it a meaningful name and description so you can find what you did in the future to undo it again.
I've disabled all notifications through "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", I have also tried to disable an individual per app settings as well, no reaction. The connection stays active. Yes it is apparently a MS server.. So what, it is my computer after all. I tried to prevent exlorer.exe using public network by means of firewall, but that blocked all browsers as well. No luck so far.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:29
Regarding the UPDATE - I wish it was just one IP address to block.. The explorer.exe keeps connecting to a range of addresses and I don't know how big is this range. Right now it's hooked onto 111.221.29.76. I think it grabs a new address as soon as it gets hold of the public internet access. I think it's bizarre..
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 21:49
That isn't bizarre at all, it is common practice for a global service. You would have to block the whole subnet but that might well have other implications. I recommend that you forget about it and move on. Even if you spend loads of time trying to "fix" this, it is integral to Windows and might well change in the next release which is only a month and a half away.
– Julian Knight
Jun 16 '15 at 23:08
It's bizarre because it's against any common sense concerning privacy, not because they use the entire subnet to "ring home". This is what spyware and malware do..
– Dima
Jun 17 '15 at 6:08
It uses a large subnet to ensure continuity of service. That malware does the same thing is a convergence of design and not bizarre.
– Julian Knight
Jun 17 '15 at 6:11
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you search for "notifications" in your start screen, you will find the notifications settings page. Here you can turn off the notifications altogether or for specific apps.
As the other answer says, this is an internal Windows function and the IP address belongs to Microsoft.
Whilst you could indeed block all outbound access to that address, I think you will find that it is actually an inbound connection. That too can be blocked but it is easier to turn off notifications.
UPDATE: To actually block the connection, open Windows firewall and add 2 new rules. Inbound and Outbound. Create customer rules, accept the defaults until you get to the Scope page and set the remote IP address to
111.221.29.122
and the action to Block. Accept the rest of the defaults and give it a meaningful name and description so you can find what you did in the future to undo it again.If you search for "notifications" in your start screen, you will find the notifications settings page. Here you can turn off the notifications altogether or for specific apps.
As the other answer says, this is an internal Windows function and the IP address belongs to Microsoft.
Whilst you could indeed block all outbound access to that address, I think you will find that it is actually an inbound connection. That too can be blocked but it is easier to turn off notifications.
UPDATE: To actually block the connection, open Windows firewall and add 2 new rules. Inbound and Outbound. Create customer rules, accept the defaults until you get to the Scope page and set the remote IP address to
111.221.29.122
and the action to Block. Accept the rest of the defaults and give it a meaningful name and description so you can find what you did in the future to undo it again.edited Jun 16 '15 at 5:43
answered Jun 15 '15 at 21:02
Julian Knight
12.8k11535
12.8k11535
I've disabled all notifications through "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", I have also tried to disable an individual per app settings as well, no reaction. The connection stays active. Yes it is apparently a MS server.. So what, it is my computer after all. I tried to prevent exlorer.exe using public network by means of firewall, but that blocked all browsers as well. No luck so far.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:29
Regarding the UPDATE - I wish it was just one IP address to block.. The explorer.exe keeps connecting to a range of addresses and I don't know how big is this range. Right now it's hooked onto 111.221.29.76. I think it grabs a new address as soon as it gets hold of the public internet access. I think it's bizarre..
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 21:49
That isn't bizarre at all, it is common practice for a global service. You would have to block the whole subnet but that might well have other implications. I recommend that you forget about it and move on. Even if you spend loads of time trying to "fix" this, it is integral to Windows and might well change in the next release which is only a month and a half away.
– Julian Knight
Jun 16 '15 at 23:08
It's bizarre because it's against any common sense concerning privacy, not because they use the entire subnet to "ring home". This is what spyware and malware do..
– Dima
Jun 17 '15 at 6:08
It uses a large subnet to ensure continuity of service. That malware does the same thing is a convergence of design and not bizarre.
– Julian Knight
Jun 17 '15 at 6:11
|
show 2 more comments
I've disabled all notifications through "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", I have also tried to disable an individual per app settings as well, no reaction. The connection stays active. Yes it is apparently a MS server.. So what, it is my computer after all. I tried to prevent exlorer.exe using public network by means of firewall, but that blocked all browsers as well. No luck so far.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:29
Regarding the UPDATE - I wish it was just one IP address to block.. The explorer.exe keeps connecting to a range of addresses and I don't know how big is this range. Right now it's hooked onto 111.221.29.76. I think it grabs a new address as soon as it gets hold of the public internet access. I think it's bizarre..
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 21:49
That isn't bizarre at all, it is common practice for a global service. You would have to block the whole subnet but that might well have other implications. I recommend that you forget about it and move on. Even if you spend loads of time trying to "fix" this, it is integral to Windows and might well change in the next release which is only a month and a half away.
– Julian Knight
Jun 16 '15 at 23:08
It's bizarre because it's against any common sense concerning privacy, not because they use the entire subnet to "ring home". This is what spyware and malware do..
– Dima
Jun 17 '15 at 6:08
It uses a large subnet to ensure continuity of service. That malware does the same thing is a convergence of design and not bizarre.
– Julian Knight
Jun 17 '15 at 6:11
I've disabled all notifications through "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", I have also tried to disable an individual per app settings as well, no reaction. The connection stays active. Yes it is apparently a MS server.. So what, it is my computer after all. I tried to prevent exlorer.exe using public network by means of firewall, but that blocked all browsers as well. No luck so far.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:29
I've disabled all notifications through "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", I have also tried to disable an individual per app settings as well, no reaction. The connection stays active. Yes it is apparently a MS server.. So what, it is my computer after all. I tried to prevent exlorer.exe using public network by means of firewall, but that blocked all browsers as well. No luck so far.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:29
Regarding the UPDATE - I wish it was just one IP address to block.. The explorer.exe keeps connecting to a range of addresses and I don't know how big is this range. Right now it's hooked onto 111.221.29.76. I think it grabs a new address as soon as it gets hold of the public internet access. I think it's bizarre..
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 21:49
Regarding the UPDATE - I wish it was just one IP address to block.. The explorer.exe keeps connecting to a range of addresses and I don't know how big is this range. Right now it's hooked onto 111.221.29.76. I think it grabs a new address as soon as it gets hold of the public internet access. I think it's bizarre..
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 21:49
That isn't bizarre at all, it is common practice for a global service. You would have to block the whole subnet but that might well have other implications. I recommend that you forget about it and move on. Even if you spend loads of time trying to "fix" this, it is integral to Windows and might well change in the next release which is only a month and a half away.
– Julian Knight
Jun 16 '15 at 23:08
That isn't bizarre at all, it is common practice for a global service. You would have to block the whole subnet but that might well have other implications. I recommend that you forget about it and move on. Even if you spend loads of time trying to "fix" this, it is integral to Windows and might well change in the next release which is only a month and a half away.
– Julian Knight
Jun 16 '15 at 23:08
It's bizarre because it's against any common sense concerning privacy, not because they use the entire subnet to "ring home". This is what spyware and malware do..
– Dima
Jun 17 '15 at 6:08
It's bizarre because it's against any common sense concerning privacy, not because they use the entire subnet to "ring home". This is what spyware and malware do..
– Dima
Jun 17 '15 at 6:08
It uses a large subnet to ensure continuity of service. That malware does the same thing is a convergence of design and not bizarre.
– Julian Knight
Jun 17 '15 at 6:11
It uses a large subnet to ensure continuity of service. That malware does the same thing is a convergence of design and not bizarre.
– Julian Knight
Jun 17 '15 at 6:11
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f928318%2fhow-to-stop-explorer-exe-outbound-connections-on-windows-8-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Have a look at this site: windows8tricks.net/2011/12/… ... it has some registry tweaks you can do to turn off Push Notifications ..
– txtechhelp
Jun 15 '15 at 20:22
@txtechhelp, these instructions appear to be outdated as I don't have these registry keys, besides I've disabled all push notifications from "Change PC Settings/Search and apps/Notifications", so it's probably not about notifications and something else lingering there.
– Dima
Jun 16 '15 at 5:34