Why are energy weapons seen as more acceptable in children's shows than guns that fire bullets?












4















This is a question about the real-world factors that have influenced the development of science fiction and television for children.



In children's television (as well as movies), especially animation, there is a strong tendency toward using science fiction (or sometimes fantasy) energy weapons instead of more realistic weapons that fire projectiles. The leads to things like DC superhero cartoons, such as Superman (1988), featuring villains with laster pistols, even when the rest of the shows' technology is quite realistic; or Hank the ranger of the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon shooting yellow energy bolts from his bow, rather than arrows. (The fact that He-Man never seems to actually attack anybody with his magical sword, instead using it to deflect enemies' energy beams, is probably related.)



I know that this the energy weapons appear because they were considered less violent or disturbing than realistic slug-throwing weapons. But I would like to have a clearer picture of how it was decided that guns with bullets were worse. Was it because there would be more blood and body wounds with guns? Was it because there were worries that children would imitate characters they saw using guns? And how was the decision made that these were important concerns?










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

    – Robert Columbia
    32 mins ago


















4















This is a question about the real-world factors that have influenced the development of science fiction and television for children.



In children's television (as well as movies), especially animation, there is a strong tendency toward using science fiction (or sometimes fantasy) energy weapons instead of more realistic weapons that fire projectiles. The leads to things like DC superhero cartoons, such as Superman (1988), featuring villains with laster pistols, even when the rest of the shows' technology is quite realistic; or Hank the ranger of the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon shooting yellow energy bolts from his bow, rather than arrows. (The fact that He-Man never seems to actually attack anybody with his magical sword, instead using it to deflect enemies' energy beams, is probably related.)



I know that this the energy weapons appear because they were considered less violent or disturbing than realistic slug-throwing weapons. But I would like to have a clearer picture of how it was decided that guns with bullets were worse. Was it because there would be more blood and body wounds with guns? Was it because there were worries that children would imitate characters they saw using guns? And how was the decision made that these were important concerns?










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

    – Robert Columbia
    32 mins ago
















4












4








4








This is a question about the real-world factors that have influenced the development of science fiction and television for children.



In children's television (as well as movies), especially animation, there is a strong tendency toward using science fiction (or sometimes fantasy) energy weapons instead of more realistic weapons that fire projectiles. The leads to things like DC superhero cartoons, such as Superman (1988), featuring villains with laster pistols, even when the rest of the shows' technology is quite realistic; or Hank the ranger of the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon shooting yellow energy bolts from his bow, rather than arrows. (The fact that He-Man never seems to actually attack anybody with his magical sword, instead using it to deflect enemies' energy beams, is probably related.)



I know that this the energy weapons appear because they were considered less violent or disturbing than realistic slug-throwing weapons. But I would like to have a clearer picture of how it was decided that guns with bullets were worse. Was it because there would be more blood and body wounds with guns? Was it because there were worries that children would imitate characters they saw using guns? And how was the decision made that these were important concerns?










share|improve this question














This is a question about the real-world factors that have influenced the development of science fiction and television for children.



In children's television (as well as movies), especially animation, there is a strong tendency toward using science fiction (or sometimes fantasy) energy weapons instead of more realistic weapons that fire projectiles. The leads to things like DC superhero cartoons, such as Superman (1988), featuring villains with laster pistols, even when the rest of the shows' technology is quite realistic; or Hank the ranger of the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon shooting yellow energy bolts from his bow, rather than arrows. (The fact that He-Man never seems to actually attack anybody with his magical sword, instead using it to deflect enemies' energy beams, is probably related.)



I know that this the energy weapons appear because they were considered less violent or disturbing than realistic slug-throwing weapons. But I would like to have a clearer picture of how it was decided that guns with bullets were worse. Was it because there would be more blood and body wounds with guns? Was it because there were worries that children would imitate characters they saw using guns? And how was the decision made that these were important concerns?







tv science-fiction-genre






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 38 mins ago









BuzzBuzz

37.2k6126203




37.2k6126203








  • 2





    Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

    – Robert Columbia
    32 mins ago
















  • 2





    Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

    – Robert Columbia
    32 mins ago










2




2





Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

– Robert Columbia
32 mins ago







Another good example: All Dogs Go to Heaven (1989), a story about anthropomorphic Depression-era mobsters, uses a "thermal atomic ray gun" instead of a "real" gun, even though it otherwise features murder by blunt-force trauma, slavery, and torture.

– Robert Columbia
32 mins ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














The Comic Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s.



Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work. I have no doubt that merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistols replicas.



Well after the heyday of the CCA, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in sci-fi comics.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205557%2fwhy-are-energy-weapons-seen-as-more-acceptable-in-childrens-shows-than-guns-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    The Comic Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s.



    Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work. I have no doubt that merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistols replicas.



    Well after the heyday of the CCA, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in sci-fi comics.






    share|improve this answer




























      4














      The Comic Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s.



      Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work. I have no doubt that merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistols replicas.



      Well after the heyday of the CCA, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in sci-fi comics.






      share|improve this answer


























        4












        4








        4







        The Comic Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s.



        Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work. I have no doubt that merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistols replicas.



        Well after the heyday of the CCA, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in sci-fi comics.






        share|improve this answer













        The Comic Code Authority restricted the amount of blood and gore that could be depicted, starting in the mid-1950s.



        Thus, it was simpler in comics to have an energy weapon that vaporized enemies than a kinetic one that splattered them. And remember, this was also the dawn of the atomic age when we thought we’d all be flying personal atomic airplanes to work. I have no doubt that merchandising also played a role, there are more possibilities for selling fancy energy weapon toys than boring old pistols replicas.



        Well after the heyday of the CCA, we still feel energy weapons are superior to slug throwers due to their extensive use in sci-fi comics.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 29 mins ago









        RoboKarenRoboKaren

        1,75811235




        1,75811235






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205557%2fwhy-are-energy-weapons-seen-as-more-acceptable-in-childrens-shows-than-guns-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

            Mangá

            Eduardo VII do Reino Unido