Filesystem - No space left error, but there is space
I have a problem with a server running Ubuntu 16.04.05. After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files I have an error message saying that I have no space left:
12 zip -r 31.zip 31
zip I/O error: No space left on device
zip error: Could not create output file (31.zip)
I found some similar problems online: No space left on the device though there is space and No space left on device even though there is, but I think I have a different one. The solutions posted in these two answers are not working for me.
The following is the structure of the storage:
➜ 12 df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev 32963768 0 32963768 0% /dev
tmpfs 6597356 9244 6588112 1% /run
/dev/sda1 32895856 26382068 4819736 85% /
tmpfs 32935580 96 32935484 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 32935580 0 32935580 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sdb 1031992064 664288464 322578204 68% /media/hdd1
tmpfs 6587116 20 6587096 1% /run/user/118
tmpfs 6587116 0 6587116 0% /run/user/1001
I am working and trying to zip a folder in /media/hdd1 which should have plenty of space left. The dimension of the folder I am trying to zip is:
➜ 12 du -sh 31
49M 31
EDIT:
➜ 12 df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
udev 8240942 478 8240464 1% /dev
tmpfs 8246695 617 8246078 1% /run
/dev/sda1 2097152 500872 1596280 24% /
tmpfs 8233895 5 8233890 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 8233895 6 8233889 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 8233895 16 8233879 1% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sdb 65536000 65536000 0 100% /media/hdd1
tmpfs 8246695 15 8246680 1% /run/user/118
tmpfs 8246695 4 8246691 1% /run/user/1001
partitioning filesystem disk-usage
add a comment |
I have a problem with a server running Ubuntu 16.04.05. After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files I have an error message saying that I have no space left:
12 zip -r 31.zip 31
zip I/O error: No space left on device
zip error: Could not create output file (31.zip)
I found some similar problems online: No space left on the device though there is space and No space left on device even though there is, but I think I have a different one. The solutions posted in these two answers are not working for me.
The following is the structure of the storage:
➜ 12 df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev 32963768 0 32963768 0% /dev
tmpfs 6597356 9244 6588112 1% /run
/dev/sda1 32895856 26382068 4819736 85% /
tmpfs 32935580 96 32935484 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 32935580 0 32935580 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sdb 1031992064 664288464 322578204 68% /media/hdd1
tmpfs 6587116 20 6587096 1% /run/user/118
tmpfs 6587116 0 6587116 0% /run/user/1001
I am working and trying to zip a folder in /media/hdd1 which should have plenty of space left. The dimension of the folder I am trying to zip is:
➜ 12 du -sh 31
49M 31
EDIT:
➜ 12 df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
udev 8240942 478 8240464 1% /dev
tmpfs 8246695 617 8246078 1% /run
/dev/sda1 2097152 500872 1596280 24% /
tmpfs 8233895 5 8233890 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 8233895 6 8233889 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 8233895 16 8233879 1% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sdb 65536000 65536000 0 100% /media/hdd1
tmpfs 8246695 15 8246680 1% /run/user/118
tmpfs 8246695 4 8246691 1% /run/user/1001
partitioning filesystem disk-usage
add a comment |
I have a problem with a server running Ubuntu 16.04.05. After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files I have an error message saying that I have no space left:
12 zip -r 31.zip 31
zip I/O error: No space left on device
zip error: Could not create output file (31.zip)
I found some similar problems online: No space left on the device though there is space and No space left on device even though there is, but I think I have a different one. The solutions posted in these two answers are not working for me.
The following is the structure of the storage:
➜ 12 df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev 32963768 0 32963768 0% /dev
tmpfs 6597356 9244 6588112 1% /run
/dev/sda1 32895856 26382068 4819736 85% /
tmpfs 32935580 96 32935484 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 32935580 0 32935580 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sdb 1031992064 664288464 322578204 68% /media/hdd1
tmpfs 6587116 20 6587096 1% /run/user/118
tmpfs 6587116 0 6587116 0% /run/user/1001
I am working and trying to zip a folder in /media/hdd1 which should have plenty of space left. The dimension of the folder I am trying to zip is:
➜ 12 du -sh 31
49M 31
EDIT:
➜ 12 df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
udev 8240942 478 8240464 1% /dev
tmpfs 8246695 617 8246078 1% /run
/dev/sda1 2097152 500872 1596280 24% /
tmpfs 8233895 5 8233890 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 8233895 6 8233889 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 8233895 16 8233879 1% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sdb 65536000 65536000 0 100% /media/hdd1
tmpfs 8246695 15 8246680 1% /run/user/118
tmpfs 8246695 4 8246691 1% /run/user/1001
partitioning filesystem disk-usage
I have a problem with a server running Ubuntu 16.04.05. After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files I have an error message saying that I have no space left:
12 zip -r 31.zip 31
zip I/O error: No space left on device
zip error: Could not create output file (31.zip)
I found some similar problems online: No space left on the device though there is space and No space left on device even though there is, but I think I have a different one. The solutions posted in these two answers are not working for me.
The following is the structure of the storage:
➜ 12 df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev 32963768 0 32963768 0% /dev
tmpfs 6597356 9244 6588112 1% /run
/dev/sda1 32895856 26382068 4819736 85% /
tmpfs 32935580 96 32935484 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 32935580 0 32935580 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sdb 1031992064 664288464 322578204 68% /media/hdd1
tmpfs 6587116 20 6587096 1% /run/user/118
tmpfs 6587116 0 6587116 0% /run/user/1001
I am working and trying to zip a folder in /media/hdd1 which should have plenty of space left. The dimension of the folder I am trying to zip is:
➜ 12 du -sh 31
49M 31
EDIT:
➜ 12 df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
udev 8240942 478 8240464 1% /dev
tmpfs 8246695 617 8246078 1% /run
/dev/sda1 2097152 500872 1596280 24% /
tmpfs 8233895 5 8233890 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 8233895 6 8233889 1% /run/lock
tmpfs 8233895 16 8233879 1% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sdb 65536000 65536000 0 100% /media/hdd1
tmpfs 8246695 15 8246680 1% /run/user/118
tmpfs 8246695 4 8246691 1% /run/user/1001
partitioning filesystem disk-usage
partitioning filesystem disk-usage
edited Feb 12 at 23:30
Guido Muscioni
asked Feb 12 at 23:12
Guido MuscioniGuido Muscioni
1033
1033
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
As ByteCommander explained, you have a problem with inodes.
Another way to takle this problem is to look for the millions of little files that are consuming the inodes.
sudo du -a -x -d 1 --inodes /media/hdd1 | sort -nr | head -20
will show you the directories consuming the most inodes on /media/hdd1 - you can then travel down through the directories until you find one filled with a bunch of files.
Well, I know these files are not trash, I wrote the code. The point is if I can fix the problem without deleting the files. Otherwise I will change the code.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:17
@GuidoMuscioni Sorry for the implication - I will modify my post. Why do you need to create 65 M files?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:18
No problem, at a first glance is fine to think they are trash. It is a long story, but basically, I am dividing a set of song listened by a set of user. I am saving them base on year/month/day/hour_user.csv. I have more than 200000 users and 18 years, thus a maximum of: 200000*365*18*24=31536000000 files. In reality these files are less, but that the worst case scenario.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:47
@GuidoMuscioni I'm assuming you are doing this for some analysis purpose in the future - but wouldn't this information really be more readily accessed in a SQL database?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:49
@GuidoMuscioni And you do know that your potential number of files exceeds the theoretical number of files that an ext4 system can handle https://serverfault.com/a/104989
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:59
|
show 4 more comments
"After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files" here is your problem.
The ext4 file system Ubuntu uses has only a limited number of so-called "inodes", which is determined when you format a partition. You need at least one inode per file or directory on the file system.
Now if you create huge numbers of small files, you'll exhaust the available inodes faster than the available storage space. Both equally result in the same symptoms of a seemingly full disk though.
You will need to get rid of those tons of tiny files and e.g. put them on a different drive, in a zip file, or delete them altogether.
Unfortunately the number of inodes can not be changed dynamically, as far as I know. If you really need more on your current partition, you'll probably need to back up your data and reformat everything.
Related:
- Running out of inodes
- How can I create an EXT4 partition with an extra large number of inodes?
- Drawbacks of increasing number of inodes in EXT4
As there is still space, can I create a partition with more inodes on it? The python script returned correctly so I am wondering if the number of inodes was equal to the generated number of files (which I think, has a probability of 0).
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 12 at 23:31
1
Sure, if you have remaining unpartitioned space, you can make an additional partition there, possibly with increased inode ratio. Free space on your current partition is not suitable to create a new partition though. You could maybe shrink your current partition to make free unpartitioned space, but I don't know if/what effects shrinking might have on a file system exhausted of inodes. What you could also do instead might be to create a "file system image file" on your disk. Basically one large file that contains a whole virtual file system, which can be mounted separately.
– Byte Commander
Feb 12 at 23:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1117782%2ffilesystem-no-space-left-error-but-there-is-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As ByteCommander explained, you have a problem with inodes.
Another way to takle this problem is to look for the millions of little files that are consuming the inodes.
sudo du -a -x -d 1 --inodes /media/hdd1 | sort -nr | head -20
will show you the directories consuming the most inodes on /media/hdd1 - you can then travel down through the directories until you find one filled with a bunch of files.
Well, I know these files are not trash, I wrote the code. The point is if I can fix the problem without deleting the files. Otherwise I will change the code.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:17
@GuidoMuscioni Sorry for the implication - I will modify my post. Why do you need to create 65 M files?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:18
No problem, at a first glance is fine to think they are trash. It is a long story, but basically, I am dividing a set of song listened by a set of user. I am saving them base on year/month/day/hour_user.csv. I have more than 200000 users and 18 years, thus a maximum of: 200000*365*18*24=31536000000 files. In reality these files are less, but that the worst case scenario.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:47
@GuidoMuscioni I'm assuming you are doing this for some analysis purpose in the future - but wouldn't this information really be more readily accessed in a SQL database?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:49
@GuidoMuscioni And you do know that your potential number of files exceeds the theoretical number of files that an ext4 system can handle https://serverfault.com/a/104989
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:59
|
show 4 more comments
As ByteCommander explained, you have a problem with inodes.
Another way to takle this problem is to look for the millions of little files that are consuming the inodes.
sudo du -a -x -d 1 --inodes /media/hdd1 | sort -nr | head -20
will show you the directories consuming the most inodes on /media/hdd1 - you can then travel down through the directories until you find one filled with a bunch of files.
Well, I know these files are not trash, I wrote the code. The point is if I can fix the problem without deleting the files. Otherwise I will change the code.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:17
@GuidoMuscioni Sorry for the implication - I will modify my post. Why do you need to create 65 M files?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:18
No problem, at a first glance is fine to think they are trash. It is a long story, but basically, I am dividing a set of song listened by a set of user. I am saving them base on year/month/day/hour_user.csv. I have more than 200000 users and 18 years, thus a maximum of: 200000*365*18*24=31536000000 files. In reality these files are less, but that the worst case scenario.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:47
@GuidoMuscioni I'm assuming you are doing this for some analysis purpose in the future - but wouldn't this information really be more readily accessed in a SQL database?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:49
@GuidoMuscioni And you do know that your potential number of files exceeds the theoretical number of files that an ext4 system can handle https://serverfault.com/a/104989
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:59
|
show 4 more comments
As ByteCommander explained, you have a problem with inodes.
Another way to takle this problem is to look for the millions of little files that are consuming the inodes.
sudo du -a -x -d 1 --inodes /media/hdd1 | sort -nr | head -20
will show you the directories consuming the most inodes on /media/hdd1 - you can then travel down through the directories until you find one filled with a bunch of files.
As ByteCommander explained, you have a problem with inodes.
Another way to takle this problem is to look for the millions of little files that are consuming the inodes.
sudo du -a -x -d 1 --inodes /media/hdd1 | sort -nr | head -20
will show you the directories consuming the most inodes on /media/hdd1 - you can then travel down through the directories until you find one filled with a bunch of files.
edited Feb 13 at 0:19
answered Feb 12 at 23:58
Charles GreenCharles Green
13.9k73859
13.9k73859
Well, I know these files are not trash, I wrote the code. The point is if I can fix the problem without deleting the files. Otherwise I will change the code.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:17
@GuidoMuscioni Sorry for the implication - I will modify my post. Why do you need to create 65 M files?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:18
No problem, at a first glance is fine to think they are trash. It is a long story, but basically, I am dividing a set of song listened by a set of user. I am saving them base on year/month/day/hour_user.csv. I have more than 200000 users and 18 years, thus a maximum of: 200000*365*18*24=31536000000 files. In reality these files are less, but that the worst case scenario.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:47
@GuidoMuscioni I'm assuming you are doing this for some analysis purpose in the future - but wouldn't this information really be more readily accessed in a SQL database?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:49
@GuidoMuscioni And you do know that your potential number of files exceeds the theoretical number of files that an ext4 system can handle https://serverfault.com/a/104989
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:59
|
show 4 more comments
Well, I know these files are not trash, I wrote the code. The point is if I can fix the problem without deleting the files. Otherwise I will change the code.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:17
@GuidoMuscioni Sorry for the implication - I will modify my post. Why do you need to create 65 M files?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:18
No problem, at a first glance is fine to think they are trash. It is a long story, but basically, I am dividing a set of song listened by a set of user. I am saving them base on year/month/day/hour_user.csv. I have more than 200000 users and 18 years, thus a maximum of: 200000*365*18*24=31536000000 files. In reality these files are less, but that the worst case scenario.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:47
@GuidoMuscioni I'm assuming you are doing this for some analysis purpose in the future - but wouldn't this information really be more readily accessed in a SQL database?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:49
@GuidoMuscioni And you do know that your potential number of files exceeds the theoretical number of files that an ext4 system can handle https://serverfault.com/a/104989
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:59
Well, I know these files are not trash, I wrote the code. The point is if I can fix the problem without deleting the files. Otherwise I will change the code.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:17
Well, I know these files are not trash, I wrote the code. The point is if I can fix the problem without deleting the files. Otherwise I will change the code.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:17
@GuidoMuscioni Sorry for the implication - I will modify my post. Why do you need to create 65 M files?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:18
@GuidoMuscioni Sorry for the implication - I will modify my post. Why do you need to create 65 M files?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:18
No problem, at a first glance is fine to think they are trash. It is a long story, but basically, I am dividing a set of song listened by a set of user. I am saving them base on year/month/day/hour_user.csv. I have more than 200000 users and 18 years, thus a maximum of: 200000*365*18*24=31536000000 files. In reality these files are less, but that the worst case scenario.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:47
No problem, at a first glance is fine to think they are trash. It is a long story, but basically, I am dividing a set of song listened by a set of user. I am saving them base on year/month/day/hour_user.csv. I have more than 200000 users and 18 years, thus a maximum of: 200000*365*18*24=31536000000 files. In reality these files are less, but that the worst case scenario.
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 13 at 0:47
@GuidoMuscioni I'm assuming you are doing this for some analysis purpose in the future - but wouldn't this information really be more readily accessed in a SQL database?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:49
@GuidoMuscioni I'm assuming you are doing this for some analysis purpose in the future - but wouldn't this information really be more readily accessed in a SQL database?
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:49
@GuidoMuscioni And you do know that your potential number of files exceeds the theoretical number of files that an ext4 system can handle https://serverfault.com/a/104989
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:59
@GuidoMuscioni And you do know that your potential number of files exceeds the theoretical number of files that an ext4 system can handle https://serverfault.com/a/104989
– Charles Green
Feb 13 at 0:59
|
show 4 more comments
"After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files" here is your problem.
The ext4 file system Ubuntu uses has only a limited number of so-called "inodes", which is determined when you format a partition. You need at least one inode per file or directory on the file system.
Now if you create huge numbers of small files, you'll exhaust the available inodes faster than the available storage space. Both equally result in the same symptoms of a seemingly full disk though.
You will need to get rid of those tons of tiny files and e.g. put them on a different drive, in a zip file, or delete them altogether.
Unfortunately the number of inodes can not be changed dynamically, as far as I know. If you really need more on your current partition, you'll probably need to back up your data and reformat everything.
Related:
- Running out of inodes
- How can I create an EXT4 partition with an extra large number of inodes?
- Drawbacks of increasing number of inodes in EXT4
As there is still space, can I create a partition with more inodes on it? The python script returned correctly so I am wondering if the number of inodes was equal to the generated number of files (which I think, has a probability of 0).
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 12 at 23:31
1
Sure, if you have remaining unpartitioned space, you can make an additional partition there, possibly with increased inode ratio. Free space on your current partition is not suitable to create a new partition though. You could maybe shrink your current partition to make free unpartitioned space, but I don't know if/what effects shrinking might have on a file system exhausted of inodes. What you could also do instead might be to create a "file system image file" on your disk. Basically one large file that contains a whole virtual file system, which can be mounted separately.
– Byte Commander
Feb 12 at 23:44
add a comment |
"After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files" here is your problem.
The ext4 file system Ubuntu uses has only a limited number of so-called "inodes", which is determined when you format a partition. You need at least one inode per file or directory on the file system.
Now if you create huge numbers of small files, you'll exhaust the available inodes faster than the available storage space. Both equally result in the same symptoms of a seemingly full disk though.
You will need to get rid of those tons of tiny files and e.g. put them on a different drive, in a zip file, or delete them altogether.
Unfortunately the number of inodes can not be changed dynamically, as far as I know. If you really need more on your current partition, you'll probably need to back up your data and reformat everything.
Related:
- Running out of inodes
- How can I create an EXT4 partition with an extra large number of inodes?
- Drawbacks of increasing number of inodes in EXT4
As there is still space, can I create a partition with more inodes on it? The python script returned correctly so I am wondering if the number of inodes was equal to the generated number of files (which I think, has a probability of 0).
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 12 at 23:31
1
Sure, if you have remaining unpartitioned space, you can make an additional partition there, possibly with increased inode ratio. Free space on your current partition is not suitable to create a new partition though. You could maybe shrink your current partition to make free unpartitioned space, but I don't know if/what effects shrinking might have on a file system exhausted of inodes. What you could also do instead might be to create a "file system image file" on your disk. Basically one large file that contains a whole virtual file system, which can be mounted separately.
– Byte Commander
Feb 12 at 23:44
add a comment |
"After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files" here is your problem.
The ext4 file system Ubuntu uses has only a limited number of so-called "inodes", which is determined when you format a partition. You need at least one inode per file or directory on the file system.
Now if you create huge numbers of small files, you'll exhaust the available inodes faster than the available storage space. Both equally result in the same symptoms of a seemingly full disk though.
You will need to get rid of those tons of tiny files and e.g. put them on a different drive, in a zip file, or delete them altogether.
Unfortunately the number of inodes can not be changed dynamically, as far as I know. If you really need more on your current partition, you'll probably need to back up your data and reformat everything.
Related:
- Running out of inodes
- How can I create an EXT4 partition with an extra large number of inodes?
- Drawbacks of increasing number of inodes in EXT4
"After running a python script who created more than 65 million of files" here is your problem.
The ext4 file system Ubuntu uses has only a limited number of so-called "inodes", which is determined when you format a partition. You need at least one inode per file or directory on the file system.
Now if you create huge numbers of small files, you'll exhaust the available inodes faster than the available storage space. Both equally result in the same symptoms of a seemingly full disk though.
You will need to get rid of those tons of tiny files and e.g. put them on a different drive, in a zip file, or delete them altogether.
Unfortunately the number of inodes can not be changed dynamically, as far as I know. If you really need more on your current partition, you'll probably need to back up your data and reformat everything.
Related:
- Running out of inodes
- How can I create an EXT4 partition with an extra large number of inodes?
- Drawbacks of increasing number of inodes in EXT4
answered Feb 12 at 23:22
Byte CommanderByte Commander
65.7k27179304
65.7k27179304
As there is still space, can I create a partition with more inodes on it? The python script returned correctly so I am wondering if the number of inodes was equal to the generated number of files (which I think, has a probability of 0).
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 12 at 23:31
1
Sure, if you have remaining unpartitioned space, you can make an additional partition there, possibly with increased inode ratio. Free space on your current partition is not suitable to create a new partition though. You could maybe shrink your current partition to make free unpartitioned space, but I don't know if/what effects shrinking might have on a file system exhausted of inodes. What you could also do instead might be to create a "file system image file" on your disk. Basically one large file that contains a whole virtual file system, which can be mounted separately.
– Byte Commander
Feb 12 at 23:44
add a comment |
As there is still space, can I create a partition with more inodes on it? The python script returned correctly so I am wondering if the number of inodes was equal to the generated number of files (which I think, has a probability of 0).
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 12 at 23:31
1
Sure, if you have remaining unpartitioned space, you can make an additional partition there, possibly with increased inode ratio. Free space on your current partition is not suitable to create a new partition though. You could maybe shrink your current partition to make free unpartitioned space, but I don't know if/what effects shrinking might have on a file system exhausted of inodes. What you could also do instead might be to create a "file system image file" on your disk. Basically one large file that contains a whole virtual file system, which can be mounted separately.
– Byte Commander
Feb 12 at 23:44
As there is still space, can I create a partition with more inodes on it? The python script returned correctly so I am wondering if the number of inodes was equal to the generated number of files (which I think, has a probability of 0).
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 12 at 23:31
As there is still space, can I create a partition with more inodes on it? The python script returned correctly so I am wondering if the number of inodes was equal to the generated number of files (which I think, has a probability of 0).
– Guido Muscioni
Feb 12 at 23:31
1
1
Sure, if you have remaining unpartitioned space, you can make an additional partition there, possibly with increased inode ratio. Free space on your current partition is not suitable to create a new partition though. You could maybe shrink your current partition to make free unpartitioned space, but I don't know if/what effects shrinking might have on a file system exhausted of inodes. What you could also do instead might be to create a "file system image file" on your disk. Basically one large file that contains a whole virtual file system, which can be mounted separately.
– Byte Commander
Feb 12 at 23:44
Sure, if you have remaining unpartitioned space, you can make an additional partition there, possibly with increased inode ratio. Free space on your current partition is not suitable to create a new partition though. You could maybe shrink your current partition to make free unpartitioned space, but I don't know if/what effects shrinking might have on a file system exhausted of inodes. What you could also do instead might be to create a "file system image file" on your disk. Basically one large file that contains a whole virtual file system, which can be mounted separately.
– Byte Commander
Feb 12 at 23:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1117782%2ffilesystem-no-space-left-error-but-there-is-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown