How to restart samba server?
Sorry this is a little embarassing but I'm trying to set up my own server for the first time. I found great tutorial online.
http://www.intac.net/build-your-own-server/
I'm stuck at the 2nd to last line of step 4. Apparently there is no samba directory in init.d.
Why isn't there a samba directory in init.d?
Would the following work?
# sudo restart smbd
# sudo restart nmdb
samba
add a comment |
Sorry this is a little embarassing but I'm trying to set up my own server for the first time. I found great tutorial online.
http://www.intac.net/build-your-own-server/
I'm stuck at the 2nd to last line of step 4. Apparently there is no samba directory in init.d.
Why isn't there a samba directory in init.d?
Would the following work?
# sudo restart smbd
# sudo restart nmdb
samba
1
If your#
means you are logged in as superuser, then you don't need to run the commands withsudo
, else the commands you mentioned are fine.
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:10
If you're embarrassed as a first timer, what does that make me when I've had a server running for years and needed this question :)
– Sridhar-Sarnobat
Dec 18 '16 at 6:40
add a comment |
Sorry this is a little embarassing but I'm trying to set up my own server for the first time. I found great tutorial online.
http://www.intac.net/build-your-own-server/
I'm stuck at the 2nd to last line of step 4. Apparently there is no samba directory in init.d.
Why isn't there a samba directory in init.d?
Would the following work?
# sudo restart smbd
# sudo restart nmdb
samba
Sorry this is a little embarassing but I'm trying to set up my own server for the first time. I found great tutorial online.
http://www.intac.net/build-your-own-server/
I'm stuck at the 2nd to last line of step 4. Apparently there is no samba directory in init.d.
Why isn't there a samba directory in init.d?
Would the following work?
# sudo restart smbd
# sudo restart nmdb
samba
samba
edited Jan 25 '14 at 19:59
Braiam
52.3k20137223
52.3k20137223
asked Nov 14 '11 at 7:45
user784637user784637
3,580133653
3,580133653
1
If your#
means you are logged in as superuser, then you don't need to run the commands withsudo
, else the commands you mentioned are fine.
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:10
If you're embarrassed as a first timer, what does that make me when I've had a server running for years and needed this question :)
– Sridhar-Sarnobat
Dec 18 '16 at 6:40
add a comment |
1
If your#
means you are logged in as superuser, then you don't need to run the commands withsudo
, else the commands you mentioned are fine.
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:10
If you're embarrassed as a first timer, what does that make me when I've had a server running for years and needed this question :)
– Sridhar-Sarnobat
Dec 18 '16 at 6:40
1
1
If your
#
means you are logged in as superuser, then you don't need to run the commands with sudo
, else the commands you mentioned are fine.– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:10
If your
#
means you are logged in as superuser, then you don't need to run the commands with sudo
, else the commands you mentioned are fine.– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:10
If you're embarrassed as a first timer, what does that make me when I've had a server running for years and needed this question :)
– Sridhar-Sarnobat
Dec 18 '16 at 6:40
If you're embarrassed as a first timer, what does that make me when I've had a server running for years and needed this question :)
– Sridhar-Sarnobat
Dec 18 '16 at 6:40
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Start
sudo service smbd start
Stop
sudo service smbd stop
Restart
sudo service smbd restart
3
Why not use the Upstart syntax like mentioned by the user?
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:09
1
Nothing wrong with it. I'm just lazy andsudo <start|stop|status|restart|reload> <job>
is just shorter. ;)
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 18:55
@htorque I cant really remember why I made the recommendation like this also, maybe I seen something that ticked me off and I recommended this way, or its just my brain thinking about services all the time. Thx for the input! ;)
– Bruno Pereira
Feb 5 '12 at 19:08
2
FYI, I had to usesamba
instead ofsmbd
in my command line.
– Ross Rogers
Oct 31 '13 at 16:51
1
I am using Kali linux and I too, had to use samba instead of smbd
– GaurabDahal
Jul 29 '15 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
You can also do this way:
Start
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd start
Stop
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd stop
Restart
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd restart
If you got an error, try using these commends this nmbd instead.
add a comment |
you may also try this :
check the name of the service:
service --status-all
restart the service
sudo service samba restart
add a comment |
Starting with 15.04 and systemd, the command is systemctl restart smbd
3
the service is smbd, not smdb
– fireb86
Mar 11 '18 at 15:01
+1 for updating an old question. But Ubuntu 15.04 was first version to use systemd.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Mar 11 '18 at 21:41
Duh. Info online is so.. contradicting. I guess like it might be because back then it hadn't be a totally full 100% switch.
– mirh
Mar 13 '18 at 17:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f79078%2fhow-to-restart-samba-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Start
sudo service smbd start
Stop
sudo service smbd stop
Restart
sudo service smbd restart
3
Why not use the Upstart syntax like mentioned by the user?
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:09
1
Nothing wrong with it. I'm just lazy andsudo <start|stop|status|restart|reload> <job>
is just shorter. ;)
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 18:55
@htorque I cant really remember why I made the recommendation like this also, maybe I seen something that ticked me off and I recommended this way, or its just my brain thinking about services all the time. Thx for the input! ;)
– Bruno Pereira
Feb 5 '12 at 19:08
2
FYI, I had to usesamba
instead ofsmbd
in my command line.
– Ross Rogers
Oct 31 '13 at 16:51
1
I am using Kali linux and I too, had to use samba instead of smbd
– GaurabDahal
Jul 29 '15 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
Start
sudo service smbd start
Stop
sudo service smbd stop
Restart
sudo service smbd restart
3
Why not use the Upstart syntax like mentioned by the user?
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:09
1
Nothing wrong with it. I'm just lazy andsudo <start|stop|status|restart|reload> <job>
is just shorter. ;)
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 18:55
@htorque I cant really remember why I made the recommendation like this also, maybe I seen something that ticked me off and I recommended this way, or its just my brain thinking about services all the time. Thx for the input! ;)
– Bruno Pereira
Feb 5 '12 at 19:08
2
FYI, I had to usesamba
instead ofsmbd
in my command line.
– Ross Rogers
Oct 31 '13 at 16:51
1
I am using Kali linux and I too, had to use samba instead of smbd
– GaurabDahal
Jul 29 '15 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
Start
sudo service smbd start
Stop
sudo service smbd stop
Restart
sudo service smbd restart
Start
sudo service smbd start
Stop
sudo service smbd stop
Restart
sudo service smbd restart
edited Nov 14 '11 at 8:16
answered Nov 14 '11 at 7:49
Bruno PereiraBruno Pereira
60.4k26179208
60.4k26179208
3
Why not use the Upstart syntax like mentioned by the user?
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:09
1
Nothing wrong with it. I'm just lazy andsudo <start|stop|status|restart|reload> <job>
is just shorter. ;)
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 18:55
@htorque I cant really remember why I made the recommendation like this also, maybe I seen something that ticked me off and I recommended this way, or its just my brain thinking about services all the time. Thx for the input! ;)
– Bruno Pereira
Feb 5 '12 at 19:08
2
FYI, I had to usesamba
instead ofsmbd
in my command line.
– Ross Rogers
Oct 31 '13 at 16:51
1
I am using Kali linux and I too, had to use samba instead of smbd
– GaurabDahal
Jul 29 '15 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
3
Why not use the Upstart syntax like mentioned by the user?
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:09
1
Nothing wrong with it. I'm just lazy andsudo <start|stop|status|restart|reload> <job>
is just shorter. ;)
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 18:55
@htorque I cant really remember why I made the recommendation like this also, maybe I seen something that ticked me off and I recommended this way, or its just my brain thinking about services all the time. Thx for the input! ;)
– Bruno Pereira
Feb 5 '12 at 19:08
2
FYI, I had to usesamba
instead ofsmbd
in my command line.
– Ross Rogers
Oct 31 '13 at 16:51
1
I am using Kali linux and I too, had to use samba instead of smbd
– GaurabDahal
Jul 29 '15 at 11:38
3
3
Why not use the Upstart syntax like mentioned by the user?
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:09
Why not use the Upstart syntax like mentioned by the user?
– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:09
1
1
Nothing wrong with it. I'm just lazy and
sudo <start|stop|status|restart|reload> <job>
is just shorter. ;)– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 18:55
Nothing wrong with it. I'm just lazy and
sudo <start|stop|status|restart|reload> <job>
is just shorter. ;)– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 18:55
@htorque I cant really remember why I made the recommendation like this also, maybe I seen something that ticked me off and I recommended this way, or its just my brain thinking about services all the time. Thx for the input! ;)
– Bruno Pereira
Feb 5 '12 at 19:08
@htorque I cant really remember why I made the recommendation like this also, maybe I seen something that ticked me off and I recommended this way, or its just my brain thinking about services all the time. Thx for the input! ;)
– Bruno Pereira
Feb 5 '12 at 19:08
2
2
FYI, I had to use
samba
instead of smbd
in my command line.– Ross Rogers
Oct 31 '13 at 16:51
FYI, I had to use
samba
instead of smbd
in my command line.– Ross Rogers
Oct 31 '13 at 16:51
1
1
I am using Kali linux and I too, had to use samba instead of smbd
– GaurabDahal
Jul 29 '15 at 11:38
I am using Kali linux and I too, had to use samba instead of smbd
– GaurabDahal
Jul 29 '15 at 11:38
|
show 2 more comments
You can also do this way:
Start
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd start
Stop
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd stop
Restart
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd restart
If you got an error, try using these commends this nmbd instead.
add a comment |
You can also do this way:
Start
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd start
Stop
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd stop
Restart
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd restart
If you got an error, try using these commends this nmbd instead.
add a comment |
You can also do this way:
Start
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd start
Stop
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd stop
Restart
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd restart
If you got an error, try using these commends this nmbd instead.
You can also do this way:
Start
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd start
Stop
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd stop
Restart
sudo /etc/init.d/smbd restart
If you got an error, try using these commends this nmbd instead.
edited Jun 12 '17 at 2:13
Community♦
1
1
answered Feb 5 '12 at 12:01
One ZeroOne Zero
17.5k2272106
17.5k2272106
add a comment |
add a comment |
you may also try this :
check the name of the service:
service --status-all
restart the service
sudo service samba restart
add a comment |
you may also try this :
check the name of the service:
service --status-all
restart the service
sudo service samba restart
add a comment |
you may also try this :
check the name of the service:
service --status-all
restart the service
sudo service samba restart
you may also try this :
check the name of the service:
service --status-all
restart the service
sudo service samba restart
edited Aug 11 '14 at 1:32
Seth♦
34.9k27112165
34.9k27112165
answered Aug 10 '14 at 22:42
derdonnderdonn
10112
10112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Starting with 15.04 and systemd, the command is systemctl restart smbd
3
the service is smbd, not smdb
– fireb86
Mar 11 '18 at 15:01
+1 for updating an old question. But Ubuntu 15.04 was first version to use systemd.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Mar 11 '18 at 21:41
Duh. Info online is so.. contradicting. I guess like it might be because back then it hadn't be a totally full 100% switch.
– mirh
Mar 13 '18 at 17:30
add a comment |
Starting with 15.04 and systemd, the command is systemctl restart smbd
3
the service is smbd, not smdb
– fireb86
Mar 11 '18 at 15:01
+1 for updating an old question. But Ubuntu 15.04 was first version to use systemd.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Mar 11 '18 at 21:41
Duh. Info online is so.. contradicting. I guess like it might be because back then it hadn't be a totally full 100% switch.
– mirh
Mar 13 '18 at 17:30
add a comment |
Starting with 15.04 and systemd, the command is systemctl restart smbd
Starting with 15.04 and systemd, the command is systemctl restart smbd
edited Mar 13 '18 at 17:30
answered Jul 26 '17 at 19:19
mirhmirh
21924
21924
3
the service is smbd, not smdb
– fireb86
Mar 11 '18 at 15:01
+1 for updating an old question. But Ubuntu 15.04 was first version to use systemd.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Mar 11 '18 at 21:41
Duh. Info online is so.. contradicting. I guess like it might be because back then it hadn't be a totally full 100% switch.
– mirh
Mar 13 '18 at 17:30
add a comment |
3
the service is smbd, not smdb
– fireb86
Mar 11 '18 at 15:01
+1 for updating an old question. But Ubuntu 15.04 was first version to use systemd.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Mar 11 '18 at 21:41
Duh. Info online is so.. contradicting. I guess like it might be because back then it hadn't be a totally full 100% switch.
– mirh
Mar 13 '18 at 17:30
3
3
the service is smbd, not smdb
– fireb86
Mar 11 '18 at 15:01
the service is smbd, not smdb
– fireb86
Mar 11 '18 at 15:01
+1 for updating an old question. But Ubuntu 15.04 was first version to use systemd.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Mar 11 '18 at 21:41
+1 for updating an old question. But Ubuntu 15.04 was first version to use systemd.
– WinEunuuchs2Unix
Mar 11 '18 at 21:41
Duh. Info online is so.. contradicting. I guess like it might be because back then it hadn't be a totally full 100% switch.
– mirh
Mar 13 '18 at 17:30
Duh. Info online is so.. contradicting. I guess like it might be because back then it hadn't be a totally full 100% switch.
– mirh
Mar 13 '18 at 17:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f79078%2fhow-to-restart-samba-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
If your
#
means you are logged in as superuser, then you don't need to run the commands withsudo
, else the commands you mentioned are fine.– htorque
Feb 5 '12 at 12:10
If you're embarrassed as a first timer, what does that make me when I've had a server running for years and needed this question :)
– Sridhar-Sarnobat
Dec 18 '16 at 6:40