How do I switch back to python2 after Anaconda set python3 as the default?
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
Recently, I installed Anaconda3-2.5.0-Linux-x86_64.sh on my 15.04 and ended up with this!
:~$ python --version
Python 3.5.1 :: Anaconda 2.5.0 (64-bit)
:~$ python2 --version
Python 2.7.9
:~$ python3 --version
Python 3.5.1 :: Anaconda 2.5.0 (64-bit)
During the last moments of installation, I did enter something as yes
in hurry, and I suppose it had to do something with this. (Ok, my fault, I should have handled that carefully, but I need help now, not criticism).
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What do I do now?
What I think could work.
Can this be done using aliases?
alias python=python2
But I ain't sure.
python3 python-2.7 anaconda
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
Recently, I installed Anaconda3-2.5.0-Linux-x86_64.sh on my 15.04 and ended up with this!
:~$ python --version
Python 3.5.1 :: Anaconda 2.5.0 (64-bit)
:~$ python2 --version
Python 2.7.9
:~$ python3 --version
Python 3.5.1 :: Anaconda 2.5.0 (64-bit)
During the last moments of installation, I did enter something as yes
in hurry, and I suppose it had to do something with this. (Ok, my fault, I should have handled that carefully, but I need help now, not criticism).
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What do I do now?
What I think could work.
Can this be done using aliases?
alias python=python2
But I ain't sure.
python3 python-2.7 anaconda
Yes. usealias python=python2
– Mostafa Ahangarha
Mar 20 '16 at 9:41
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What makes you think so? If Anaconda sets Python 3 as the default, it's probably for a reason.
– fkraiem
Mar 20 '16 at 10:02
I already have ruined one of my projects that was written for 2.x, and converting default to 3.x is not encouraged especially since many packages work on 2.x!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 10:10
This is when you are very glad that you took the professional approach and had a clone of your pre-install boot drive to prevent this from becoming a big time-waster. Please see my answer below. I think your install method caused the glitch. So if this happened to me I would revert and retry. Total time would be less than a day to figure out whether it is viable. In my case, as you can see, I am at the end of verifications so can now progress to see if this is worth the effort in the first place. Took a couple days to make sure it hadn't caused a problem, and research work is on track.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:44
as for specifying the version of Python, be sure you know exactly the ripple effect this can have throughout your whole system. Unless you are just playing, it will really require a full verification process if you change the targets of the defaultwhich python
shebang results. It takes just a bit of time up front to prevent later discovering that you have painted yourself into the corner of needing to rewrite some of your utilities. Best is to leave things working with the defaults unless you have a lot of time on your hands.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:47
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
Recently, I installed Anaconda3-2.5.0-Linux-x86_64.sh on my 15.04 and ended up with this!
:~$ python --version
Python 3.5.1 :: Anaconda 2.5.0 (64-bit)
:~$ python2 --version
Python 2.7.9
:~$ python3 --version
Python 3.5.1 :: Anaconda 2.5.0 (64-bit)
During the last moments of installation, I did enter something as yes
in hurry, and I suppose it had to do something with this. (Ok, my fault, I should have handled that carefully, but I need help now, not criticism).
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What do I do now?
What I think could work.
Can this be done using aliases?
alias python=python2
But I ain't sure.
python3 python-2.7 anaconda
Recently, I installed Anaconda3-2.5.0-Linux-x86_64.sh on my 15.04 and ended up with this!
:~$ python --version
Python 3.5.1 :: Anaconda 2.5.0 (64-bit)
:~$ python2 --version
Python 2.7.9
:~$ python3 --version
Python 3.5.1 :: Anaconda 2.5.0 (64-bit)
During the last moments of installation, I did enter something as yes
in hurry, and I suppose it had to do something with this. (Ok, my fault, I should have handled that carefully, but I need help now, not criticism).
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What do I do now?
What I think could work.
Can this be done using aliases?
alias python=python2
But I ain't sure.
python3 python-2.7 anaconda
python3 python-2.7 anaconda
edited Mar 20 '16 at 12:09
muru
135k19289490
135k19289490
asked Mar 20 '16 at 9:05
sinister
75117
75117
Yes. usealias python=python2
– Mostafa Ahangarha
Mar 20 '16 at 9:41
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What makes you think so? If Anaconda sets Python 3 as the default, it's probably for a reason.
– fkraiem
Mar 20 '16 at 10:02
I already have ruined one of my projects that was written for 2.x, and converting default to 3.x is not encouraged especially since many packages work on 2.x!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 10:10
This is when you are very glad that you took the professional approach and had a clone of your pre-install boot drive to prevent this from becoming a big time-waster. Please see my answer below. I think your install method caused the glitch. So if this happened to me I would revert and retry. Total time would be less than a day to figure out whether it is viable. In my case, as you can see, I am at the end of verifications so can now progress to see if this is worth the effort in the first place. Took a couple days to make sure it hadn't caused a problem, and research work is on track.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:44
as for specifying the version of Python, be sure you know exactly the ripple effect this can have throughout your whole system. Unless you are just playing, it will really require a full verification process if you change the targets of the defaultwhich python
shebang results. It takes just a bit of time up front to prevent later discovering that you have painted yourself into the corner of needing to rewrite some of your utilities. Best is to leave things working with the defaults unless you have a lot of time on your hands.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:47
add a comment |
Yes. usealias python=python2
– Mostafa Ahangarha
Mar 20 '16 at 9:41
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What makes you think so? If Anaconda sets Python 3 as the default, it's probably for a reason.
– fkraiem
Mar 20 '16 at 10:02
I already have ruined one of my projects that was written for 2.x, and converting default to 3.x is not encouraged especially since many packages work on 2.x!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 10:10
This is when you are very glad that you took the professional approach and had a clone of your pre-install boot drive to prevent this from becoming a big time-waster. Please see my answer below. I think your install method caused the glitch. So if this happened to me I would revert and retry. Total time would be less than a day to figure out whether it is viable. In my case, as you can see, I am at the end of verifications so can now progress to see if this is worth the effort in the first place. Took a couple days to make sure it hadn't caused a problem, and research work is on track.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:44
as for specifying the version of Python, be sure you know exactly the ripple effect this can have throughout your whole system. Unless you are just playing, it will really require a full verification process if you change the targets of the defaultwhich python
shebang results. It takes just a bit of time up front to prevent later discovering that you have painted yourself into the corner of needing to rewrite some of your utilities. Best is to leave things working with the defaults unless you have a lot of time on your hands.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:47
Yes. use
alias python=python2
– Mostafa Ahangarha
Mar 20 '16 at 9:41
Yes. use
alias python=python2
– Mostafa Ahangarha
Mar 20 '16 at 9:41
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What makes you think so? If Anaconda sets Python 3 as the default, it's probably for a reason.
– fkraiem
Mar 20 '16 at 10:02
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What makes you think so? If Anaconda sets Python 3 as the default, it's probably for a reason.
– fkraiem
Mar 20 '16 at 10:02
I already have ruined one of my projects that was written for 2.x, and converting default to 3.x is not encouraged especially since many packages work on 2.x!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 10:10
I already have ruined one of my projects that was written for 2.x, and converting default to 3.x is not encouraged especially since many packages work on 2.x!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 10:10
This is when you are very glad that you took the professional approach and had a clone of your pre-install boot drive to prevent this from becoming a big time-waster. Please see my answer below. I think your install method caused the glitch. So if this happened to me I would revert and retry. Total time would be less than a day to figure out whether it is viable. In my case, as you can see, I am at the end of verifications so can now progress to see if this is worth the effort in the first place. Took a couple days to make sure it hadn't caused a problem, and research work is on track.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:44
This is when you are very glad that you took the professional approach and had a clone of your pre-install boot drive to prevent this from becoming a big time-waster. Please see my answer below. I think your install method caused the glitch. So if this happened to me I would revert and retry. Total time would be less than a day to figure out whether it is viable. In my case, as you can see, I am at the end of verifications so can now progress to see if this is worth the effort in the first place. Took a couple days to make sure it hadn't caused a problem, and research work is on track.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:44
as for specifying the version of Python, be sure you know exactly the ripple effect this can have throughout your whole system. Unless you are just playing, it will really require a full verification process if you change the targets of the default
which python
shebang results. It takes just a bit of time up front to prevent later discovering that you have painted yourself into the corner of needing to rewrite some of your utilities. Best is to leave things working with the defaults unless you have a lot of time on your hands.– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:47
as for specifying the version of Python, be sure you know exactly the ripple effect this can have throughout your whole system. Unless you are just playing, it will really require a full verification process if you change the targets of the default
which python
shebang results. It takes just a bit of time up front to prevent later discovering that you have painted yourself into the corner of needing to rewrite some of your utilities. Best is to leave things working with the defaults unless you have a lot of time on your hands.– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:47
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
I went through the installation in a VM, and the following happend.
- The installer asks for an install location. Default is
/home/myuser/anaconda3
.
At the end you'll be asked
Python 3.5.1 :: Continuum Analytics, Inc.
creating default environment...
installation finished.
Do you wish the installer to prepend the Anaconda3 install location
to PATH in your /home/myuser/.bashrc ? [yes|no]
[no] >>> yes
Prepending PATH=/home/myuser/anaconda3/bin to PATH in /home/myuser/.bashrc
A backup will be made to: /home/myuser/.bashrc-anaconda3.bak
To restore the old behavior, go to your home directory and do
mv .bashrc-anaconda3.bak .bashrc
then start a new shell.
As you suggest, you could alias python=python2
, but I find that a bit weird.
I would
- Restore the original
.bashrc
- Create (if it does not exist)
~/bin
- Link
ln -s ~/anaconda3/bin/python3 ~/bin/python3
- [Prepend
$HOME/bin
to$PATH
](Should already be set by default by~/.profile
) - Relogin.
That way, calling python3
will start the one from Anaconda.
An important point is, that the original
/usr/bin/python
is still there, and still points to python2.7
. The ramifications of having python->python3
in your path depend on how a specific script is called.If the shebang #!/usr/bin/python
is used, like it probably is in all executables that ship with Ubuntu, nothing will change.
On the other hand, for better portability #!/usr/bin/env python
is sometimes used, which will now cause python3.5
to be called.
3
"4. Prepend $HOME/bin to $PATH" .. already done by default~/.profile
- just a relogin is needed after creating~/bin
.
– muru
Mar 20 '16 at 11:15
@muru That's true, thanks. Added to the answer.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 11:28
okay, that worked, thanks! Just to put this into notice, that I had python 3.4.3 also installed previously (and pip and pip3 were both associated with it), now I have 2.7, 3.4, 3.5. Now I'm gonna re-install pip to point it to 3.5!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 12:17
Anaconda comes with its own package manager called conda. It also manages virtual environments. I use that to install packages instead of pip.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:36
1
See stackoverflow.com/questions/20994716/…
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:38
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
Good answer here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24405561/how-to-install-2-anacondas-python-2-7-and-3-4-on-mac-os-10-9
conda create -n python2 python=2.7 anaconda
then, to switch:
source activate python2
If you need this you could very well have much deeper problems. If your system is important, do a full verification of any Python-dependent commands and/or utilities. Fair warning.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:55
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
In case anyone is looking to change their python default version back to 2.7 after messing it up(by changing default one to: anaconda or python 3) and ending up with non-functional software, just follow this link: Link with instructions to change default python version.
If a system change goes awry, be sure you can roll it back. Make sure you have good system image backups so any major changes can be reversed quickly if they don't go as you plan. Think professional. If you use amateur techniques then you can't expect professional results.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:28
best answer! thanks.
– Hridaynath
Feb 9 at 11:23
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This worked for me but for Miniconda, it should also work for Anaconda but please correct me if I'm wrong.
First get your $PATH variable:
echo $PATH
It will probably look like this (miniconda path before everything else):
/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin:$PATH
Copy that path to the bottom of your ~/.bashrc file, but with Miniconda at the end instead of the beginning of the path like so:
export PATH="$PATH:/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin"
The system will look for programs at the start of the $PATH variable before the miniconda3/bin folder.
It should restore the versions for previous programs you had like python.
Starting in Conda 4.4, they changed the code added to ~/.bashrc. Now, to achieve the same thing, edit ~/.bashrc and comment out the line below like so to prevent the base layer (base environment) from activating in every terminal. No need to touch any other part of the new additions. I am uncertain what significance CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false
has, but haven't run into any issues so far.
# CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false conda activate base
And while you won't see the conda folder in the path anymore, the conda
command will still run fine, and your original python
, python3
, and pipenv
commands will as well.
Upvote because I think you are correct. This is good to have in the database. However, can I please ask that you be a tad more specific as to version numbers of the software involved?
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:23
Thank you, and I don't really think that the program version matters, this should always work. At the time my installer was at the following version however: Miniconda3 4.3.14. Does that help?
– ronalara
Jan 12 at 22:03
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Here is my answer, and it may or may not be the actual specific answer to what you have done to your own system.
However, I am in a similar situation and had the very same concern.
I am using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Python 2.7.12, and just recently installed Anaconda.
So now, when I go to the command line and type python
it still goes to my Python2 installation.
Confirmed by this sequesnce:
$which python
/usr/bin/python < Catch-all for max compatibility
$python
Python 2.7.12 . . etc
So in my case, anaconda
does NOT cause any problem with my default Python2 shebangs.
Ultimately, that is the question.
When you ask the system which python
you can trust that to be correct string to use in the first line of your command-line style Python programs.
In my situation, all my same Python command-line script files continue to execute just fine.
I tend to write Python in a 3-compatible mode. Such as using parentheses around my print statements. But I am actively resisting a major change to the system that might cause hard-fought Python 2 programs to encounter glitches. Python 3 sounds great but unnecessary for my needs. Python 2 is an amazing language.
My computing environment does not allow me to go back and re-engineer past processes that have been tuned to work correctly without taking a mjor time hit since I would have to go back and figure out where I used it in the first place.
Bottom line for me: Upon install anaconda
for future use, I have not had any speed bumps nor problems.
That is the point where I am in the process... Just finished re-certifying all the past software.
Next step is to actually use some of the cool stuff that is promised in the package.
So, I must suspect that other simply installing anaconda
there must be more to your situation.
From my experience it is not a problem at all.
FYI, I have a complete Scientific workstation, working on solar dynamics. Also about ephemerals and satellite interactions. It MUST work. SO I am not just a one-trick-pony in all this. I install one thing at a time, and then verify that everything before that works. Then I move on to the next. SciPy, Matplotlab, etc. (My preference for plotting is gnuplot). So please understand that I am submitting this answer as a datapoint from a live 24x7 working system in an academic research environment. This is not a test environment - it is daily production.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:05
Also, as I alluded to in a comment above, THINK PROFESSIONAL. These systems are in use by very high-level researchers all over the world. -->Make sure your boot drive has a clone before you make any major system upgrades. Thedd
command is quick and easy, and SATA connections are easy. There is no reason to avoid protecting your system. Just be careful that at each step you can revert any and all changes that might happen. Hard rives are a lot less expensive than your time. (unless you don't think that's true). Grant funds plus a time crunch should be enough incentive.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:31
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f748069%2fhow-do-i-switch-back-to-python2-after-anaconda-set-python3-as-the-default%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
I went through the installation in a VM, and the following happend.
- The installer asks for an install location. Default is
/home/myuser/anaconda3
.
At the end you'll be asked
Python 3.5.1 :: Continuum Analytics, Inc.
creating default environment...
installation finished.
Do you wish the installer to prepend the Anaconda3 install location
to PATH in your /home/myuser/.bashrc ? [yes|no]
[no] >>> yes
Prepending PATH=/home/myuser/anaconda3/bin to PATH in /home/myuser/.bashrc
A backup will be made to: /home/myuser/.bashrc-anaconda3.bak
To restore the old behavior, go to your home directory and do
mv .bashrc-anaconda3.bak .bashrc
then start a new shell.
As you suggest, you could alias python=python2
, but I find that a bit weird.
I would
- Restore the original
.bashrc
- Create (if it does not exist)
~/bin
- Link
ln -s ~/anaconda3/bin/python3 ~/bin/python3
- [Prepend
$HOME/bin
to$PATH
](Should already be set by default by~/.profile
) - Relogin.
That way, calling python3
will start the one from Anaconda.
An important point is, that the original
/usr/bin/python
is still there, and still points to python2.7
. The ramifications of having python->python3
in your path depend on how a specific script is called.If the shebang #!/usr/bin/python
is used, like it probably is in all executables that ship with Ubuntu, nothing will change.
On the other hand, for better portability #!/usr/bin/env python
is sometimes used, which will now cause python3.5
to be called.
3
"4. Prepend $HOME/bin to $PATH" .. already done by default~/.profile
- just a relogin is needed after creating~/bin
.
– muru
Mar 20 '16 at 11:15
@muru That's true, thanks. Added to the answer.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 11:28
okay, that worked, thanks! Just to put this into notice, that I had python 3.4.3 also installed previously (and pip and pip3 were both associated with it), now I have 2.7, 3.4, 3.5. Now I'm gonna re-install pip to point it to 3.5!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 12:17
Anaconda comes with its own package manager called conda. It also manages virtual environments. I use that to install packages instead of pip.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:36
1
See stackoverflow.com/questions/20994716/…
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:38
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
I went through the installation in a VM, and the following happend.
- The installer asks for an install location. Default is
/home/myuser/anaconda3
.
At the end you'll be asked
Python 3.5.1 :: Continuum Analytics, Inc.
creating default environment...
installation finished.
Do you wish the installer to prepend the Anaconda3 install location
to PATH in your /home/myuser/.bashrc ? [yes|no]
[no] >>> yes
Prepending PATH=/home/myuser/anaconda3/bin to PATH in /home/myuser/.bashrc
A backup will be made to: /home/myuser/.bashrc-anaconda3.bak
To restore the old behavior, go to your home directory and do
mv .bashrc-anaconda3.bak .bashrc
then start a new shell.
As you suggest, you could alias python=python2
, but I find that a bit weird.
I would
- Restore the original
.bashrc
- Create (if it does not exist)
~/bin
- Link
ln -s ~/anaconda3/bin/python3 ~/bin/python3
- [Prepend
$HOME/bin
to$PATH
](Should already be set by default by~/.profile
) - Relogin.
That way, calling python3
will start the one from Anaconda.
An important point is, that the original
/usr/bin/python
is still there, and still points to python2.7
. The ramifications of having python->python3
in your path depend on how a specific script is called.If the shebang #!/usr/bin/python
is used, like it probably is in all executables that ship with Ubuntu, nothing will change.
On the other hand, for better portability #!/usr/bin/env python
is sometimes used, which will now cause python3.5
to be called.
3
"4. Prepend $HOME/bin to $PATH" .. already done by default~/.profile
- just a relogin is needed after creating~/bin
.
– muru
Mar 20 '16 at 11:15
@muru That's true, thanks. Added to the answer.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 11:28
okay, that worked, thanks! Just to put this into notice, that I had python 3.4.3 also installed previously (and pip and pip3 were both associated with it), now I have 2.7, 3.4, 3.5. Now I'm gonna re-install pip to point it to 3.5!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 12:17
Anaconda comes with its own package manager called conda. It also manages virtual environments. I use that to install packages instead of pip.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:36
1
See stackoverflow.com/questions/20994716/…
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:38
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
I went through the installation in a VM, and the following happend.
- The installer asks for an install location. Default is
/home/myuser/anaconda3
.
At the end you'll be asked
Python 3.5.1 :: Continuum Analytics, Inc.
creating default environment...
installation finished.
Do you wish the installer to prepend the Anaconda3 install location
to PATH in your /home/myuser/.bashrc ? [yes|no]
[no] >>> yes
Prepending PATH=/home/myuser/anaconda3/bin to PATH in /home/myuser/.bashrc
A backup will be made to: /home/myuser/.bashrc-anaconda3.bak
To restore the old behavior, go to your home directory and do
mv .bashrc-anaconda3.bak .bashrc
then start a new shell.
As you suggest, you could alias python=python2
, but I find that a bit weird.
I would
- Restore the original
.bashrc
- Create (if it does not exist)
~/bin
- Link
ln -s ~/anaconda3/bin/python3 ~/bin/python3
- [Prepend
$HOME/bin
to$PATH
](Should already be set by default by~/.profile
) - Relogin.
That way, calling python3
will start the one from Anaconda.
An important point is, that the original
/usr/bin/python
is still there, and still points to python2.7
. The ramifications of having python->python3
in your path depend on how a specific script is called.If the shebang #!/usr/bin/python
is used, like it probably is in all executables that ship with Ubuntu, nothing will change.
On the other hand, for better portability #!/usr/bin/env python
is sometimes used, which will now cause python3.5
to be called.
I went through the installation in a VM, and the following happend.
- The installer asks for an install location. Default is
/home/myuser/anaconda3
.
At the end you'll be asked
Python 3.5.1 :: Continuum Analytics, Inc.
creating default environment...
installation finished.
Do you wish the installer to prepend the Anaconda3 install location
to PATH in your /home/myuser/.bashrc ? [yes|no]
[no] >>> yes
Prepending PATH=/home/myuser/anaconda3/bin to PATH in /home/myuser/.bashrc
A backup will be made to: /home/myuser/.bashrc-anaconda3.bak
To restore the old behavior, go to your home directory and do
mv .bashrc-anaconda3.bak .bashrc
then start a new shell.
As you suggest, you could alias python=python2
, but I find that a bit weird.
I would
- Restore the original
.bashrc
- Create (if it does not exist)
~/bin
- Link
ln -s ~/anaconda3/bin/python3 ~/bin/python3
- [Prepend
$HOME/bin
to$PATH
](Should already be set by default by~/.profile
) - Relogin.
That way, calling python3
will start the one from Anaconda.
An important point is, that the original
/usr/bin/python
is still there, and still points to python2.7
. The ramifications of having python->python3
in your path depend on how a specific script is called.If the shebang #!/usr/bin/python
is used, like it probably is in all executables that ship with Ubuntu, nothing will change.
On the other hand, for better portability #!/usr/bin/env python
is sometimes used, which will now cause python3.5
to be called.
edited Mar 20 '16 at 11:36
answered Mar 20 '16 at 10:59
Nephente
3,73611020
3,73611020
3
"4. Prepend $HOME/bin to $PATH" .. already done by default~/.profile
- just a relogin is needed after creating~/bin
.
– muru
Mar 20 '16 at 11:15
@muru That's true, thanks. Added to the answer.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 11:28
okay, that worked, thanks! Just to put this into notice, that I had python 3.4.3 also installed previously (and pip and pip3 were both associated with it), now I have 2.7, 3.4, 3.5. Now I'm gonna re-install pip to point it to 3.5!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 12:17
Anaconda comes with its own package manager called conda. It also manages virtual environments. I use that to install packages instead of pip.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:36
1
See stackoverflow.com/questions/20994716/…
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:38
|
show 1 more comment
3
"4. Prepend $HOME/bin to $PATH" .. already done by default~/.profile
- just a relogin is needed after creating~/bin
.
– muru
Mar 20 '16 at 11:15
@muru That's true, thanks. Added to the answer.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 11:28
okay, that worked, thanks! Just to put this into notice, that I had python 3.4.3 also installed previously (and pip and pip3 were both associated with it), now I have 2.7, 3.4, 3.5. Now I'm gonna re-install pip to point it to 3.5!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 12:17
Anaconda comes with its own package manager called conda. It also manages virtual environments. I use that to install packages instead of pip.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:36
1
See stackoverflow.com/questions/20994716/…
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:38
3
3
"4. Prepend $HOME/bin to $PATH" .. already done by default
~/.profile
- just a relogin is needed after creating ~/bin
.– muru
Mar 20 '16 at 11:15
"4. Prepend $HOME/bin to $PATH" .. already done by default
~/.profile
- just a relogin is needed after creating ~/bin
.– muru
Mar 20 '16 at 11:15
@muru That's true, thanks. Added to the answer.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 11:28
@muru That's true, thanks. Added to the answer.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 11:28
okay, that worked, thanks! Just to put this into notice, that I had python 3.4.3 also installed previously (and pip and pip3 were both associated with it), now I have 2.7, 3.4, 3.5. Now I'm gonna re-install pip to point it to 3.5!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 12:17
okay, that worked, thanks! Just to put this into notice, that I had python 3.4.3 also installed previously (and pip and pip3 were both associated with it), now I have 2.7, 3.4, 3.5. Now I'm gonna re-install pip to point it to 3.5!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 12:17
Anaconda comes with its own package manager called conda. It also manages virtual environments. I use that to install packages instead of pip.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:36
Anaconda comes with its own package manager called conda. It also manages virtual environments. I use that to install packages instead of pip.
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:36
1
1
See stackoverflow.com/questions/20994716/…
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:38
See stackoverflow.com/questions/20994716/…
– Nephente
Mar 20 '16 at 12:38
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
Good answer here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24405561/how-to-install-2-anacondas-python-2-7-and-3-4-on-mac-os-10-9
conda create -n python2 python=2.7 anaconda
then, to switch:
source activate python2
If you need this you could very well have much deeper problems. If your system is important, do a full verification of any Python-dependent commands and/or utilities. Fair warning.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:55
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Good answer here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24405561/how-to-install-2-anacondas-python-2-7-and-3-4-on-mac-os-10-9
conda create -n python2 python=2.7 anaconda
then, to switch:
source activate python2
If you need this you could very well have much deeper problems. If your system is important, do a full verification of any Python-dependent commands and/or utilities. Fair warning.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:55
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Good answer here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24405561/how-to-install-2-anacondas-python-2-7-and-3-4-on-mac-os-10-9
conda create -n python2 python=2.7 anaconda
then, to switch:
source activate python2
Good answer here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24405561/how-to-install-2-anacondas-python-2-7-and-3-4-on-mac-os-10-9
conda create -n python2 python=2.7 anaconda
then, to switch:
source activate python2
edited May 23 '17 at 12:39
Community♦
1
1
answered Oct 21 '16 at 21:18
Patrick Dolan
7111
7111
If you need this you could very well have much deeper problems. If your system is important, do a full verification of any Python-dependent commands and/or utilities. Fair warning.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:55
add a comment |
If you need this you could very well have much deeper problems. If your system is important, do a full verification of any Python-dependent commands and/or utilities. Fair warning.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:55
If you need this you could very well have much deeper problems. If your system is important, do a full verification of any Python-dependent commands and/or utilities. Fair warning.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:55
If you need this you could very well have much deeper problems. If your system is important, do a full verification of any Python-dependent commands and/or utilities. Fair warning.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:55
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
In case anyone is looking to change their python default version back to 2.7 after messing it up(by changing default one to: anaconda or python 3) and ending up with non-functional software, just follow this link: Link with instructions to change default python version.
If a system change goes awry, be sure you can roll it back. Make sure you have good system image backups so any major changes can be reversed quickly if they don't go as you plan. Think professional. If you use amateur techniques then you can't expect professional results.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:28
best answer! thanks.
– Hridaynath
Feb 9 at 11:23
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
In case anyone is looking to change their python default version back to 2.7 after messing it up(by changing default one to: anaconda or python 3) and ending up with non-functional software, just follow this link: Link with instructions to change default python version.
If a system change goes awry, be sure you can roll it back. Make sure you have good system image backups so any major changes can be reversed quickly if they don't go as you plan. Think professional. If you use amateur techniques then you can't expect professional results.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:28
best answer! thanks.
– Hridaynath
Feb 9 at 11:23
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
In case anyone is looking to change their python default version back to 2.7 after messing it up(by changing default one to: anaconda or python 3) and ending up with non-functional software, just follow this link: Link with instructions to change default python version.
In case anyone is looking to change their python default version back to 2.7 after messing it up(by changing default one to: anaconda or python 3) and ending up with non-functional software, just follow this link: Link with instructions to change default python version.
answered Feb 15 '17 at 6:54
Ubdus Samad
1607
1607
If a system change goes awry, be sure you can roll it back. Make sure you have good system image backups so any major changes can be reversed quickly if they don't go as you plan. Think professional. If you use amateur techniques then you can't expect professional results.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:28
best answer! thanks.
– Hridaynath
Feb 9 at 11:23
add a comment |
If a system change goes awry, be sure you can roll it back. Make sure you have good system image backups so any major changes can be reversed quickly if they don't go as you plan. Think professional. If you use amateur techniques then you can't expect professional results.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:28
best answer! thanks.
– Hridaynath
Feb 9 at 11:23
If a system change goes awry, be sure you can roll it back. Make sure you have good system image backups so any major changes can be reversed quickly if they don't go as you plan. Think professional. If you use amateur techniques then you can't expect professional results.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:28
If a system change goes awry, be sure you can roll it back. Make sure you have good system image backups so any major changes can be reversed quickly if they don't go as you plan. Think professional. If you use amateur techniques then you can't expect professional results.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:28
best answer! thanks.
– Hridaynath
Feb 9 at 11:23
best answer! thanks.
– Hridaynath
Feb 9 at 11:23
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This worked for me but for Miniconda, it should also work for Anaconda but please correct me if I'm wrong.
First get your $PATH variable:
echo $PATH
It will probably look like this (miniconda path before everything else):
/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin:$PATH
Copy that path to the bottom of your ~/.bashrc file, but with Miniconda at the end instead of the beginning of the path like so:
export PATH="$PATH:/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin"
The system will look for programs at the start of the $PATH variable before the miniconda3/bin folder.
It should restore the versions for previous programs you had like python.
Starting in Conda 4.4, they changed the code added to ~/.bashrc. Now, to achieve the same thing, edit ~/.bashrc and comment out the line below like so to prevent the base layer (base environment) from activating in every terminal. No need to touch any other part of the new additions. I am uncertain what significance CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false
has, but haven't run into any issues so far.
# CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false conda activate base
And while you won't see the conda folder in the path anymore, the conda
command will still run fine, and your original python
, python3
, and pipenv
commands will as well.
Upvote because I think you are correct. This is good to have in the database. However, can I please ask that you be a tad more specific as to version numbers of the software involved?
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:23
Thank you, and I don't really think that the program version matters, this should always work. At the time my installer was at the following version however: Miniconda3 4.3.14. Does that help?
– ronalara
Jan 12 at 22:03
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This worked for me but for Miniconda, it should also work for Anaconda but please correct me if I'm wrong.
First get your $PATH variable:
echo $PATH
It will probably look like this (miniconda path before everything else):
/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin:$PATH
Copy that path to the bottom of your ~/.bashrc file, but with Miniconda at the end instead of the beginning of the path like so:
export PATH="$PATH:/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin"
The system will look for programs at the start of the $PATH variable before the miniconda3/bin folder.
It should restore the versions for previous programs you had like python.
Starting in Conda 4.4, they changed the code added to ~/.bashrc. Now, to achieve the same thing, edit ~/.bashrc and comment out the line below like so to prevent the base layer (base environment) from activating in every terminal. No need to touch any other part of the new additions. I am uncertain what significance CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false
has, but haven't run into any issues so far.
# CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false conda activate base
And while you won't see the conda folder in the path anymore, the conda
command will still run fine, and your original python
, python3
, and pipenv
commands will as well.
Upvote because I think you are correct. This is good to have in the database. However, can I please ask that you be a tad more specific as to version numbers of the software involved?
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:23
Thank you, and I don't really think that the program version matters, this should always work. At the time my installer was at the following version however: Miniconda3 4.3.14. Does that help?
– ronalara
Jan 12 at 22:03
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This worked for me but for Miniconda, it should also work for Anaconda but please correct me if I'm wrong.
First get your $PATH variable:
echo $PATH
It will probably look like this (miniconda path before everything else):
/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin:$PATH
Copy that path to the bottom of your ~/.bashrc file, but with Miniconda at the end instead of the beginning of the path like so:
export PATH="$PATH:/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin"
The system will look for programs at the start of the $PATH variable before the miniconda3/bin folder.
It should restore the versions for previous programs you had like python.
Starting in Conda 4.4, they changed the code added to ~/.bashrc. Now, to achieve the same thing, edit ~/.bashrc and comment out the line below like so to prevent the base layer (base environment) from activating in every terminal. No need to touch any other part of the new additions. I am uncertain what significance CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false
has, but haven't run into any issues so far.
# CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false conda activate base
And while you won't see the conda folder in the path anymore, the conda
command will still run fine, and your original python
, python3
, and pipenv
commands will as well.
This worked for me but for Miniconda, it should also work for Anaconda but please correct me if I'm wrong.
First get your $PATH variable:
echo $PATH
It will probably look like this (miniconda path before everything else):
/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin:$PATH
Copy that path to the bottom of your ~/.bashrc file, but with Miniconda at the end instead of the beginning of the path like so:
export PATH="$PATH:/home/your_user/miniconda3/bin"
The system will look for programs at the start of the $PATH variable before the miniconda3/bin folder.
It should restore the versions for previous programs you had like python.
Starting in Conda 4.4, they changed the code added to ~/.bashrc. Now, to achieve the same thing, edit ~/.bashrc and comment out the line below like so to prevent the base layer (base environment) from activating in every terminal. No need to touch any other part of the new additions. I am uncertain what significance CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false
has, but haven't run into any issues so far.
# CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false conda activate base
And while you won't see the conda folder in the path anymore, the conda
command will still run fine, and your original python
, python3
, and pipenv
commands will as well.
edited Dec 3 at 16:19
Toruitas
32
32
answered May 18 '17 at 21:59
ronalara
114
114
Upvote because I think you are correct. This is good to have in the database. However, can I please ask that you be a tad more specific as to version numbers of the software involved?
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:23
Thank you, and I don't really think that the program version matters, this should always work. At the time my installer was at the following version however: Miniconda3 4.3.14. Does that help?
– ronalara
Jan 12 at 22:03
add a comment |
Upvote because I think you are correct. This is good to have in the database. However, can I please ask that you be a tad more specific as to version numbers of the software involved?
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:23
Thank you, and I don't really think that the program version matters, this should always work. At the time my installer was at the following version however: Miniconda3 4.3.14. Does that help?
– ronalara
Jan 12 at 22:03
Upvote because I think you are correct. This is good to have in the database. However, can I please ask that you be a tad more specific as to version numbers of the software involved?
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:23
Upvote because I think you are correct. This is good to have in the database. However, can I please ask that you be a tad more specific as to version numbers of the software involved?
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:23
Thank you, and I don't really think that the program version matters, this should always work. At the time my installer was at the following version however: Miniconda3 4.3.14. Does that help?
– ronalara
Jan 12 at 22:03
Thank you, and I don't really think that the program version matters, this should always work. At the time my installer was at the following version however: Miniconda3 4.3.14. Does that help?
– ronalara
Jan 12 at 22:03
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Here is my answer, and it may or may not be the actual specific answer to what you have done to your own system.
However, I am in a similar situation and had the very same concern.
I am using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Python 2.7.12, and just recently installed Anaconda.
So now, when I go to the command line and type python
it still goes to my Python2 installation.
Confirmed by this sequesnce:
$which python
/usr/bin/python < Catch-all for max compatibility
$python
Python 2.7.12 . . etc
So in my case, anaconda
does NOT cause any problem with my default Python2 shebangs.
Ultimately, that is the question.
When you ask the system which python
you can trust that to be correct string to use in the first line of your command-line style Python programs.
In my situation, all my same Python command-line script files continue to execute just fine.
I tend to write Python in a 3-compatible mode. Such as using parentheses around my print statements. But I am actively resisting a major change to the system that might cause hard-fought Python 2 programs to encounter glitches. Python 3 sounds great but unnecessary for my needs. Python 2 is an amazing language.
My computing environment does not allow me to go back and re-engineer past processes that have been tuned to work correctly without taking a mjor time hit since I would have to go back and figure out where I used it in the first place.
Bottom line for me: Upon install anaconda
for future use, I have not had any speed bumps nor problems.
That is the point where I am in the process... Just finished re-certifying all the past software.
Next step is to actually use some of the cool stuff that is promised in the package.
So, I must suspect that other simply installing anaconda
there must be more to your situation.
From my experience it is not a problem at all.
FYI, I have a complete Scientific workstation, working on solar dynamics. Also about ephemerals and satellite interactions. It MUST work. SO I am not just a one-trick-pony in all this. I install one thing at a time, and then verify that everything before that works. Then I move on to the next. SciPy, Matplotlab, etc. (My preference for plotting is gnuplot). So please understand that I am submitting this answer as a datapoint from a live 24x7 working system in an academic research environment. This is not a test environment - it is daily production.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:05
Also, as I alluded to in a comment above, THINK PROFESSIONAL. These systems are in use by very high-level researchers all over the world. -->Make sure your boot drive has a clone before you make any major system upgrades. Thedd
command is quick and easy, and SATA connections are easy. There is no reason to avoid protecting your system. Just be careful that at each step you can revert any and all changes that might happen. Hard rives are a lot less expensive than your time. (unless you don't think that's true). Grant funds plus a time crunch should be enough incentive.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:31
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Here is my answer, and it may or may not be the actual specific answer to what you have done to your own system.
However, I am in a similar situation and had the very same concern.
I am using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Python 2.7.12, and just recently installed Anaconda.
So now, when I go to the command line and type python
it still goes to my Python2 installation.
Confirmed by this sequesnce:
$which python
/usr/bin/python < Catch-all for max compatibility
$python
Python 2.7.12 . . etc
So in my case, anaconda
does NOT cause any problem with my default Python2 shebangs.
Ultimately, that is the question.
When you ask the system which python
you can trust that to be correct string to use in the first line of your command-line style Python programs.
In my situation, all my same Python command-line script files continue to execute just fine.
I tend to write Python in a 3-compatible mode. Such as using parentheses around my print statements. But I am actively resisting a major change to the system that might cause hard-fought Python 2 programs to encounter glitches. Python 3 sounds great but unnecessary for my needs. Python 2 is an amazing language.
My computing environment does not allow me to go back and re-engineer past processes that have been tuned to work correctly without taking a mjor time hit since I would have to go back and figure out where I used it in the first place.
Bottom line for me: Upon install anaconda
for future use, I have not had any speed bumps nor problems.
That is the point where I am in the process... Just finished re-certifying all the past software.
Next step is to actually use some of the cool stuff that is promised in the package.
So, I must suspect that other simply installing anaconda
there must be more to your situation.
From my experience it is not a problem at all.
FYI, I have a complete Scientific workstation, working on solar dynamics. Also about ephemerals and satellite interactions. It MUST work. SO I am not just a one-trick-pony in all this. I install one thing at a time, and then verify that everything before that works. Then I move on to the next. SciPy, Matplotlab, etc. (My preference for plotting is gnuplot). So please understand that I am submitting this answer as a datapoint from a live 24x7 working system in an academic research environment. This is not a test environment - it is daily production.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:05
Also, as I alluded to in a comment above, THINK PROFESSIONAL. These systems are in use by very high-level researchers all over the world. -->Make sure your boot drive has a clone before you make any major system upgrades. Thedd
command is quick and easy, and SATA connections are easy. There is no reason to avoid protecting your system. Just be careful that at each step you can revert any and all changes that might happen. Hard rives are a lot less expensive than your time. (unless you don't think that's true). Grant funds plus a time crunch should be enough incentive.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:31
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Here is my answer, and it may or may not be the actual specific answer to what you have done to your own system.
However, I am in a similar situation and had the very same concern.
I am using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Python 2.7.12, and just recently installed Anaconda.
So now, when I go to the command line and type python
it still goes to my Python2 installation.
Confirmed by this sequesnce:
$which python
/usr/bin/python < Catch-all for max compatibility
$python
Python 2.7.12 . . etc
So in my case, anaconda
does NOT cause any problem with my default Python2 shebangs.
Ultimately, that is the question.
When you ask the system which python
you can trust that to be correct string to use in the first line of your command-line style Python programs.
In my situation, all my same Python command-line script files continue to execute just fine.
I tend to write Python in a 3-compatible mode. Such as using parentheses around my print statements. But I am actively resisting a major change to the system that might cause hard-fought Python 2 programs to encounter glitches. Python 3 sounds great but unnecessary for my needs. Python 2 is an amazing language.
My computing environment does not allow me to go back and re-engineer past processes that have been tuned to work correctly without taking a mjor time hit since I would have to go back and figure out where I used it in the first place.
Bottom line for me: Upon install anaconda
for future use, I have not had any speed bumps nor problems.
That is the point where I am in the process... Just finished re-certifying all the past software.
Next step is to actually use some of the cool stuff that is promised in the package.
So, I must suspect that other simply installing anaconda
there must be more to your situation.
From my experience it is not a problem at all.
Here is my answer, and it may or may not be the actual specific answer to what you have done to your own system.
However, I am in a similar situation and had the very same concern.
I am using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Python 2.7.12, and just recently installed Anaconda.
So now, when I go to the command line and type python
it still goes to my Python2 installation.
Confirmed by this sequesnce:
$which python
/usr/bin/python < Catch-all for max compatibility
$python
Python 2.7.12 . . etc
So in my case, anaconda
does NOT cause any problem with my default Python2 shebangs.
Ultimately, that is the question.
When you ask the system which python
you can trust that to be correct string to use in the first line of your command-line style Python programs.
In my situation, all my same Python command-line script files continue to execute just fine.
I tend to write Python in a 3-compatible mode. Such as using parentheses around my print statements. But I am actively resisting a major change to the system that might cause hard-fought Python 2 programs to encounter glitches. Python 3 sounds great but unnecessary for my needs. Python 2 is an amazing language.
My computing environment does not allow me to go back and re-engineer past processes that have been tuned to work correctly without taking a mjor time hit since I would have to go back and figure out where I used it in the first place.
Bottom line for me: Upon install anaconda
for future use, I have not had any speed bumps nor problems.
That is the point where I am in the process... Just finished re-certifying all the past software.
Next step is to actually use some of the cool stuff that is promised in the package.
So, I must suspect that other simply installing anaconda
there must be more to your situation.
From my experience it is not a problem at all.
edited Dec 19 '17 at 8:18
answered Dec 19 '17 at 7:55
SDsolar
1,48941337
1,48941337
FYI, I have a complete Scientific workstation, working on solar dynamics. Also about ephemerals and satellite interactions. It MUST work. SO I am not just a one-trick-pony in all this. I install one thing at a time, and then verify that everything before that works. Then I move on to the next. SciPy, Matplotlab, etc. (My preference for plotting is gnuplot). So please understand that I am submitting this answer as a datapoint from a live 24x7 working system in an academic research environment. This is not a test environment - it is daily production.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:05
Also, as I alluded to in a comment above, THINK PROFESSIONAL. These systems are in use by very high-level researchers all over the world. -->Make sure your boot drive has a clone before you make any major system upgrades. Thedd
command is quick and easy, and SATA connections are easy. There is no reason to avoid protecting your system. Just be careful that at each step you can revert any and all changes that might happen. Hard rives are a lot less expensive than your time. (unless you don't think that's true). Grant funds plus a time crunch should be enough incentive.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:31
add a comment |
FYI, I have a complete Scientific workstation, working on solar dynamics. Also about ephemerals and satellite interactions. It MUST work. SO I am not just a one-trick-pony in all this. I install one thing at a time, and then verify that everything before that works. Then I move on to the next. SciPy, Matplotlab, etc. (My preference for plotting is gnuplot). So please understand that I am submitting this answer as a datapoint from a live 24x7 working system in an academic research environment. This is not a test environment - it is daily production.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:05
Also, as I alluded to in a comment above, THINK PROFESSIONAL. These systems are in use by very high-level researchers all over the world. -->Make sure your boot drive has a clone before you make any major system upgrades. Thedd
command is quick and easy, and SATA connections are easy. There is no reason to avoid protecting your system. Just be careful that at each step you can revert any and all changes that might happen. Hard rives are a lot less expensive than your time. (unless you don't think that's true). Grant funds plus a time crunch should be enough incentive.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:31
FYI, I have a complete Scientific workstation, working on solar dynamics. Also about ephemerals and satellite interactions. It MUST work. SO I am not just a one-trick-pony in all this. I install one thing at a time, and then verify that everything before that works. Then I move on to the next. SciPy, Matplotlab, etc. (My preference for plotting is gnuplot). So please understand that I am submitting this answer as a datapoint from a live 24x7 working system in an academic research environment. This is not a test environment - it is daily production.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:05
FYI, I have a complete Scientific workstation, working on solar dynamics. Also about ephemerals and satellite interactions. It MUST work. SO I am not just a one-trick-pony in all this. I install one thing at a time, and then verify that everything before that works. Then I move on to the next. SciPy, Matplotlab, etc. (My preference for plotting is gnuplot). So please understand that I am submitting this answer as a datapoint from a live 24x7 working system in an academic research environment. This is not a test environment - it is daily production.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 8:05
Also, as I alluded to in a comment above, THINK PROFESSIONAL. These systems are in use by very high-level researchers all over the world. -->Make sure your boot drive has a clone before you make any major system upgrades. The
dd
command is quick and easy, and SATA connections are easy. There is no reason to avoid protecting your system. Just be careful that at each step you can revert any and all changes that might happen. Hard rives are a lot less expensive than your time. (unless you don't think that's true). Grant funds plus a time crunch should be enough incentive.– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:31
Also, as I alluded to in a comment above, THINK PROFESSIONAL. These systems are in use by very high-level researchers all over the world. -->Make sure your boot drive has a clone before you make any major system upgrades. The
dd
command is quick and easy, and SATA connections are easy. There is no reason to avoid protecting your system. Just be careful that at each step you can revert any and all changes that might happen. Hard rives are a lot less expensive than your time. (unless you don't think that's true). Grant funds plus a time crunch should be enough incentive.– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f748069%2fhow-do-i-switch-back-to-python2-after-anaconda-set-python3-as-the-default%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Yes. use
alias python=python2
– Mostafa Ahangarha
Mar 20 '16 at 9:41
AFAIK this is definitely going to break other programs. What makes you think so? If Anaconda sets Python 3 as the default, it's probably for a reason.
– fkraiem
Mar 20 '16 at 10:02
I already have ruined one of my projects that was written for 2.x, and converting default to 3.x is not encouraged especially since many packages work on 2.x!
– sinister
Mar 20 '16 at 10:10
This is when you are very glad that you took the professional approach and had a clone of your pre-install boot drive to prevent this from becoming a big time-waster. Please see my answer below. I think your install method caused the glitch. So if this happened to me I would revert and retry. Total time would be less than a day to figure out whether it is viable. In my case, as you can see, I am at the end of verifications so can now progress to see if this is worth the effort in the first place. Took a couple days to make sure it hadn't caused a problem, and research work is on track.
– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:44
as for specifying the version of Python, be sure you know exactly the ripple effect this can have throughout your whole system. Unless you are just playing, it will really require a full verification process if you change the targets of the default
which python
shebang results. It takes just a bit of time up front to prevent later discovering that you have painted yourself into the corner of needing to rewrite some of your utilities. Best is to leave things working with the defaults unless you have a lot of time on your hands.– SDsolar
Dec 19 '17 at 9:47