Why the various definitions of the thin space ,?
Knuths definition of ,
is mskipthinmuskip
.
LaTeX changes this definition to
DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
}
defthinspace{kern .16667em }
amsmath.sty
says it's
DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
I might understand LaTeX's point to make a command usable also in text mode. But what's the point of the redefinition by amsmath?
spacing amsmath
add a comment |
Knuths definition of ,
is mskipthinmuskip
.
LaTeX changes this definition to
DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
}
defthinspace{kern .16667em }
amsmath.sty
says it's
DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
I might understand LaTeX's point to make a command usable also in text mode. But what's the point of the redefinition by amsmath?
spacing amsmath
add a comment |
Knuths definition of ,
is mskipthinmuskip
.
LaTeX changes this definition to
DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
}
defthinspace{kern .16667em }
amsmath.sty
says it's
DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
I might understand LaTeX's point to make a command usable also in text mode. But what's the point of the redefinition by amsmath?
spacing amsmath
Knuths definition of ,
is mskipthinmuskip
.
LaTeX changes this definition to
DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
}
defthinspace{kern .16667em }
amsmath.sty
says it's
DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
I might understand LaTeX's point to make a command usable also in text mode. But what's the point of the redefinition by amsmath?
spacing amsmath
spacing amsmath
edited 4 hours ago
Sebastiano
11.1k42164
11.1k42164
asked 5 hours ago
user49915user49915
617121
617121
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You should look at the full picture:
152 │ ifxleavevmode@ifvmode@undefined
153 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
154 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
155 │ else
156 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
157 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elseleavevmode@ifvmodekern#1#3firelax}
158 │ fi
159 │ renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
160 │ letthinspace,
161 │ renewcommand{!}{tmspace-thinmuskip{.1667em}}
162 │ letnegthinspace!
163 │ renewcommand{:}{tmspace+medmuskip{.2222em}}
164 │ letmedspace:
165 │ newcommand{negmedspace}{tmspace-medmuskip{.2222em}}
166 │ renewcommand{;}{tmspace+thickmuskip{.2777em}}
167 │ letthickspace;
168 │ newcommand{negthickspace}{tmspace-thickmuskip{.2777em}}
The two definitions of tmspace
are due to recent decisions to make such commands start paragraph mode anyway. With a recent LaTeX kernel the second one will be used.
Contrast this with the code in the LaTeX kernel:
1619 │ DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
1620 │ relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
1621 │ }
1630 │ defthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern .16667em }
1631 │ defnegthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern-.16667em }
4543 │ def>{mskipmedmuskip}
4544 │ def;{mskipthickmuskip}
4545 │ def!{mskip-thinmuskip}
4547 │ let:=>
The approach of amsmath
is much more rational and cleaner. They also provide text mode equivalent of all macros, whereas !
cannot be used in text mode if amsmath
is not loaded, and similarly for the others. The final result will be essentially the same. However, a ,
command will be translated into tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}
when written in an auxiliary file, instead of ,
. Not really a big deal.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480575%2fwhy-the-various-definitions-of-the-thin-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You should look at the full picture:
152 │ ifxleavevmode@ifvmode@undefined
153 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
154 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
155 │ else
156 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
157 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elseleavevmode@ifvmodekern#1#3firelax}
158 │ fi
159 │ renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
160 │ letthinspace,
161 │ renewcommand{!}{tmspace-thinmuskip{.1667em}}
162 │ letnegthinspace!
163 │ renewcommand{:}{tmspace+medmuskip{.2222em}}
164 │ letmedspace:
165 │ newcommand{negmedspace}{tmspace-medmuskip{.2222em}}
166 │ renewcommand{;}{tmspace+thickmuskip{.2777em}}
167 │ letthickspace;
168 │ newcommand{negthickspace}{tmspace-thickmuskip{.2777em}}
The two definitions of tmspace
are due to recent decisions to make such commands start paragraph mode anyway. With a recent LaTeX kernel the second one will be used.
Contrast this with the code in the LaTeX kernel:
1619 │ DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
1620 │ relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
1621 │ }
1630 │ defthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern .16667em }
1631 │ defnegthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern-.16667em }
4543 │ def>{mskipmedmuskip}
4544 │ def;{mskipthickmuskip}
4545 │ def!{mskip-thinmuskip}
4547 │ let:=>
The approach of amsmath
is much more rational and cleaner. They also provide text mode equivalent of all macros, whereas !
cannot be used in text mode if amsmath
is not loaded, and similarly for the others. The final result will be essentially the same. However, a ,
command will be translated into tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}
when written in an auxiliary file, instead of ,
. Not really a big deal.
add a comment |
You should look at the full picture:
152 │ ifxleavevmode@ifvmode@undefined
153 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
154 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
155 │ else
156 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
157 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elseleavevmode@ifvmodekern#1#3firelax}
158 │ fi
159 │ renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
160 │ letthinspace,
161 │ renewcommand{!}{tmspace-thinmuskip{.1667em}}
162 │ letnegthinspace!
163 │ renewcommand{:}{tmspace+medmuskip{.2222em}}
164 │ letmedspace:
165 │ newcommand{negmedspace}{tmspace-medmuskip{.2222em}}
166 │ renewcommand{;}{tmspace+thickmuskip{.2777em}}
167 │ letthickspace;
168 │ newcommand{negthickspace}{tmspace-thickmuskip{.2777em}}
The two definitions of tmspace
are due to recent decisions to make such commands start paragraph mode anyway. With a recent LaTeX kernel the second one will be used.
Contrast this with the code in the LaTeX kernel:
1619 │ DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
1620 │ relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
1621 │ }
1630 │ defthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern .16667em }
1631 │ defnegthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern-.16667em }
4543 │ def>{mskipmedmuskip}
4544 │ def;{mskipthickmuskip}
4545 │ def!{mskip-thinmuskip}
4547 │ let:=>
The approach of amsmath
is much more rational and cleaner. They also provide text mode equivalent of all macros, whereas !
cannot be used in text mode if amsmath
is not loaded, and similarly for the others. The final result will be essentially the same. However, a ,
command will be translated into tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}
when written in an auxiliary file, instead of ,
. Not really a big deal.
add a comment |
You should look at the full picture:
152 │ ifxleavevmode@ifvmode@undefined
153 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
154 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
155 │ else
156 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
157 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elseleavevmode@ifvmodekern#1#3firelax}
158 │ fi
159 │ renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
160 │ letthinspace,
161 │ renewcommand{!}{tmspace-thinmuskip{.1667em}}
162 │ letnegthinspace!
163 │ renewcommand{:}{tmspace+medmuskip{.2222em}}
164 │ letmedspace:
165 │ newcommand{negmedspace}{tmspace-medmuskip{.2222em}}
166 │ renewcommand{;}{tmspace+thickmuskip{.2777em}}
167 │ letthickspace;
168 │ newcommand{negthickspace}{tmspace-thickmuskip{.2777em}}
The two definitions of tmspace
are due to recent decisions to make such commands start paragraph mode anyway. With a recent LaTeX kernel the second one will be used.
Contrast this with the code in the LaTeX kernel:
1619 │ DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
1620 │ relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
1621 │ }
1630 │ defthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern .16667em }
1631 │ defnegthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern-.16667em }
4543 │ def>{mskipmedmuskip}
4544 │ def;{mskipthickmuskip}
4545 │ def!{mskip-thinmuskip}
4547 │ let:=>
The approach of amsmath
is much more rational and cleaner. They also provide text mode equivalent of all macros, whereas !
cannot be used in text mode if amsmath
is not loaded, and similarly for the others. The final result will be essentially the same. However, a ,
command will be translated into tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}
when written in an auxiliary file, instead of ,
. Not really a big deal.
You should look at the full picture:
152 │ ifxleavevmode@ifvmode@undefined
153 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
154 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elsekern#1#3firelax}
155 │ else
156 │ DeclareRobustCommand{tmspace}[3]{%
157 │ ifmmodemskip#1#2elseleavevmode@ifvmodekern#1#3firelax}
158 │ fi
159 │ renewcommand{,}{tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}}
160 │ letthinspace,
161 │ renewcommand{!}{tmspace-thinmuskip{.1667em}}
162 │ letnegthinspace!
163 │ renewcommand{:}{tmspace+medmuskip{.2222em}}
164 │ letmedspace:
165 │ newcommand{negmedspace}{tmspace-medmuskip{.2222em}}
166 │ renewcommand{;}{tmspace+thickmuskip{.2777em}}
167 │ letthickspace;
168 │ newcommand{negthickspace}{tmspace-thickmuskip{.2777em}}
The two definitions of tmspace
are due to recent decisions to make such commands start paragraph mode anyway. With a recent LaTeX kernel the second one will be used.
Contrast this with the code in the LaTeX kernel:
1619 │ DeclareRobustCommand{,}{%
1620 │ relaxifmmodemskipthinmuskipelsethinspacefi
1621 │ }
1630 │ defthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern .16667em }
1631 │ defnegthinspace{leavevmode@ifvmodekern-.16667em }
4543 │ def>{mskipmedmuskip}
4544 │ def;{mskipthickmuskip}
4545 │ def!{mskip-thinmuskip}
4547 │ let:=>
The approach of amsmath
is much more rational and cleaner. They also provide text mode equivalent of all macros, whereas !
cannot be used in text mode if amsmath
is not loaded, and similarly for the others. The final result will be essentially the same. However, a ,
command will be translated into tmspace+thinmuskip{.1667em}
when written in an auxiliary file, instead of ,
. Not really a big deal.
answered 4 hours ago
egregegreg
728k8819233233
728k8819233233
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480575%2fwhy-the-various-definitions-of-the-thin-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown