Can't show equation tag properly
2
begin{align*}
sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1},(-1)^{j-1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{substack{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j+2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \ k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1 }}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq
boldsymbol{ell}, } tag(3) label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation eqref{eq:3} with equation eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$ts{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$ts{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ...
end{document}
I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:
The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the eqref{eq:3} are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2 and eq:1.)
tags
edited 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
asked 3 hours ago
HankY
111
New contributor
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
2
begin{align*}
sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1},(-1)^{j-1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{substack{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j+2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \ k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1 }}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq
boldsymbol{ell}, } tag(3) label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation eqref{eq:3} with equation eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$ts{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$ts{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ...
end{document}
I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:
The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the eqref{eq:3} are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2 and eq:1.)
tags
edited 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
asked 3 hours ago
HankY
111
New contributor
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to TeX.SE! Replacetag(3)bytag{3}(curly brackets around3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you meantag{(}.
– marmot
2 hours ago
It worked, thank you!
– HankY
2 hours ago
You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma afterboldsymbol{ell}out of the subscript, and not to abbreviatetextsuperscriptbytsif you ever plan to share your documents with others.
– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
2
2
begin{align*}
sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1},(-1)^{j-1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{substack{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j+2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \ k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1 }}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq
boldsymbol{ell}, } tag(3) label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation eqref{eq:3} with equation eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$ts{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$ts{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ...
end{document}
I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:
The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the eqref{eq:3} are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2 and eq:1.)
tags
edited 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
asked 3 hours ago
HankY
111
New contributor
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
begin{align*}
sum_{j=1}^{m_0-1},(-1)^{j-1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{substack{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j+2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \ k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1 }}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 +1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq
boldsymbol{ell}, } tag(3) label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation eqref{eq:2}.
Comparing equation eqref{eq:3} with equation eqref{eq:2}, we discover that both have the identical 1ts{st} through $(m_0 -2)$ts{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0-2$).
The only difference of the two is that the $(m_0 -1)$ts{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ...
end{document}
I try to put a tag next to the equation, but the result comes out as:
The tag is not displayed correctly. Also, the eqref{eq:3} are displayed in the same, wrong way. (I omit the code having eq:2 and eq:1.)
tags
tags
edited 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
asked 3 hours ago
HankY
111
New contributor
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
asked 3 hours ago
HankY
111
New contributor
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
edited 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
edited 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
437k649581648
asked 3 hours ago
HankY
111
New contributor
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
HankY
111
asked 3 hours ago
HankY
111
111
New contributor
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
HankY is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to TeX.SE! Replacetag(3)bytag{3}(curly brackets around3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you meantag{(}.
– marmot
2 hours ago
It worked, thank you!
– HankY
2 hours ago
You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma afterboldsymbol{ell}out of the subscript, and not to abbreviatetextsuperscriptbytsif you ever plan to share your documents with others.
– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Welcome to TeX.SE! Replacetag(3)bytag{3}(curly brackets around3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you meantag{(}.
– marmot
2 hours ago
It worked, thank you!
– HankY
2 hours ago
You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma afterboldsymbol{ell}out of the subscript, and not to abbreviatetextsuperscriptbytsif you ever plan to share your documents with others.
– marmot
2 hours ago
1
1
Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace
tag(3) by tag{3} (curly brackets around 3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean tag{(}.– marmot
2 hours ago
Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace
tag(3) by tag{3} (curly brackets around 3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you mean tag{(}.– marmot
2 hours ago
It worked, thank you!
– HankY
2 hours ago
It worked, thank you!
– HankY
2 hours ago
You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after
boldsymbol{ell} out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate textsuperscript by ts if you ever plan to share your documents with others.– marmot
2 hours ago
You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after
boldsymbol{ell} out of the subscript, and not to abbreviate textsuperscript by ts if you ever plan to share your documents with others.– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
3
tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.
In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{
substack
{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
}
}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
$(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots
end{document}
answered 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467870%2fcant-show-equation-tag-properly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
3
tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.
In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{
substack
{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
}
}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
$(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots
end{document}
answered 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
add a comment |
3
tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.
In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{
substack
{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
}
}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
$(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots
end{document}
answered 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
add a comment |
3
3
3
tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.
In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{
substack
{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
}
}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
$(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots
end{document}
answered 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
tag{<tag>} takes a mandatory argument. If you don't supply the surrounding braces, then it takes the next token as the argument.
In your case, tag(3) doesn't use the suggested format tag{<tag>}, so it turns into tag{(}3), numbering the equation with ( and leaving 3) in the input stream. You're looking for tag{3}:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{j = 1}^{m_0 - 1},(-1)^{j - 1}hspace{-3ex}
sum_{
substack
{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_{j + 2} leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} \
k_2 < cdots < k_j < k_{j+1} leq k_1
}
}
= sum_{ k_{m_0 + 1} leq k_{m_0} leq cdots leq k_2 leq k_1 leq boldsymbol{ell} }, tag{3} label{eq:3}
end{align*}
which is very close to our goal, equation~(2). Comparing equation~eqref{eq:3} with equation~(2), we discover that both have the identical
1textsuperscript{st} through $(m_0 - 2)$textsuperscript{th} terms ($1 leq j leq m_0 - 2$). The only difference of the two is that the
$(m_0 - 1)$textsuperscript{th} term in equation eqref{eq:3} is ldots
end{document}
answered 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
answered 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
answered 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
answered 2 hours ago
Werner
437k649581648
437k649581648
add a comment |
add a comment |
HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
HankY is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467870%2fcant-show-equation-tag-properly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to TeX.SE! Replace
tag(3)bytag{3}(curly brackets around3). Otherwise LaTeX thinks you meantag{(}.– marmot
2 hours ago
It worked, thank you!
– HankY
2 hours ago
You're welcome! BTW, I'd recommend to move the comma after
boldsymbol{ell}out of the subscript, and not to abbreviatetextsuperscriptbytsif you ever plan to share your documents with others.– marmot
2 hours ago