Prove This Function is Finite Almost Everywhere












3















Let $F$ be a closed subset of $[0,1]$ of positive Lebesgue measure. Let $delta(x)$ be defined as $delta(x) = operatorname{dist}(x, F)$. Consider
$$M(x) = int_{0}^{1}frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dy$$
Prove that for almost every point $x in F$, $M(x) < infty$.




My thoughts so far are the following: We wish to show that $M in L^{1}(F)$, which is more than sufficient to complete the proof. Thus, consider
$$int_{F} int_{0}^{1}frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dy ,dx$$
From here, I would like to proceed by using Fubini Theorem to switch the order of integration to
$$int_{0}^{1}int_{F} frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dx ,dy$$
From here, I am not really sure what to do.






measure-theory lebesgue-measure







share|cite|improve this question





























    3















    Let $F$ be a closed subset of $[0,1]$ of positive Lebesgue measure. Let $delta(x)$ be defined as $delta(x) = operatorname{dist}(x, F)$. Consider
    $$M(x) = int_{0}^{1}frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dy$$
    Prove that for almost every point $x in F$, $M(x) < infty$.




    My thoughts so far are the following: We wish to show that $M in L^{1}(F)$, which is more than sufficient to complete the proof. Thus, consider
    $$int_{F} int_{0}^{1}frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dy ,dx$$
    From here, I would like to proceed by using Fubini Theorem to switch the order of integration to
    $$int_{0}^{1}int_{F} frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dx ,dy$$
    From here, I am not really sure what to do.






    measure-theory lebesgue-measure







    share|cite|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3


      3






      Let $F$ be a closed subset of $[0,1]$ of positive Lebesgue measure. Let $delta(x)$ be defined as $delta(x) = operatorname{dist}(x, F)$. Consider
      $$M(x) = int_{0}^{1}frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dy$$
      Prove that for almost every point $x in F$, $M(x) < infty$.




      My thoughts so far are the following: We wish to show that $M in L^{1}(F)$, which is more than sufficient to complete the proof. Thus, consider
      $$int_{F} int_{0}^{1}frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dy ,dx$$
      From here, I would like to proceed by using Fubini Theorem to switch the order of integration to
      $$int_{0}^{1}int_{F} frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dx ,dy$$
      From here, I am not really sure what to do.






      measure-theory lebesgue-measure







      share|cite|improve this question
















      Let $F$ be a closed subset of $[0,1]$ of positive Lebesgue measure. Let $delta(x)$ be defined as $delta(x) = operatorname{dist}(x, F)$. Consider
      $$M(x) = int_{0}^{1}frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dy$$
      Prove that for almost every point $x in F$, $M(x) < infty$.




      My thoughts so far are the following: We wish to show that $M in L^{1}(F)$, which is more than sufficient to complete the proof. Thus, consider
      $$int_{F} int_{0}^{1}frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dy ,dx$$
      From here, I would like to proceed by using Fubini Theorem to switch the order of integration to
      $$int_{0}^{1}int_{F} frac{delta(y)}{|x -y|^2} , dx ,dy$$
      From here, I am not really sure what to do.






      measure-theory lebesgue-measure




      measure-theory lebesgue-measure






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Chase Ryan Taylor

      4,38021530




      4,38021530










      asked 2 hours ago









      Bobo

      705




      705






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Note that
          $$
          M(x) = int_{F^ccap I}frac{delta(y)}{|x-y|^2}dy
          $$           where $I=[0,1]$. Hence by Tonelli's theorem, we have
          $$begin{eqnarray}
          int_F M(x)dx &=& int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_Ffrac{1}{|x-y|^2}dxright)dy\
          &le&int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_{|z|ge delta(y)}frac{1}{|z|^2}dzright)dy\
          &= &int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)frac{2}{delta(y)}dy= 2|F^c cap I| le 2.
          end{eqnarray}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I think you mean Tonelli as Fubini requires the integrand to be in $L^1$ already.
            – Guacho Perez
            1 hour ago










          • @GuachoPerez Thanks for the correction!
            – Song
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059145%2fprove-this-function-is-finite-almost-everywhere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Note that
          $$
          M(x) = int_{F^ccap I}frac{delta(y)}{|x-y|^2}dy
          $$           where $I=[0,1]$. Hence by Tonelli's theorem, we have
          $$begin{eqnarray}
          int_F M(x)dx &=& int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_Ffrac{1}{|x-y|^2}dxright)dy\
          &le&int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_{|z|ge delta(y)}frac{1}{|z|^2}dzright)dy\
          &= &int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)frac{2}{delta(y)}dy= 2|F^c cap I| le 2.
          end{eqnarray}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I think you mean Tonelli as Fubini requires the integrand to be in $L^1$ already.
            – Guacho Perez
            1 hour ago










          • @GuachoPerez Thanks for the correction!
            – Song
            1 hour ago
















          4














          Note that
          $$
          M(x) = int_{F^ccap I}frac{delta(y)}{|x-y|^2}dy
          $$           where $I=[0,1]$. Hence by Tonelli's theorem, we have
          $$begin{eqnarray}
          int_F M(x)dx &=& int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_Ffrac{1}{|x-y|^2}dxright)dy\
          &le&int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_{|z|ge delta(y)}frac{1}{|z|^2}dzright)dy\
          &= &int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)frac{2}{delta(y)}dy= 2|F^c cap I| le 2.
          end{eqnarray}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I think you mean Tonelli as Fubini requires the integrand to be in $L^1$ already.
            – Guacho Perez
            1 hour ago










          • @GuachoPerez Thanks for the correction!
            – Song
            1 hour ago














          4












          4








          4






          Note that
          $$
          M(x) = int_{F^ccap I}frac{delta(y)}{|x-y|^2}dy
          $$           where $I=[0,1]$. Hence by Tonelli's theorem, we have
          $$begin{eqnarray}
          int_F M(x)dx &=& int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_Ffrac{1}{|x-y|^2}dxright)dy\
          &le&int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_{|z|ge delta(y)}frac{1}{|z|^2}dzright)dy\
          &= &int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)frac{2}{delta(y)}dy= 2|F^c cap I| le 2.
          end{eqnarray}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Note that
          $$
          M(x) = int_{F^ccap I}frac{delta(y)}{|x-y|^2}dy
          $$           where $I=[0,1]$. Hence by Tonelli's theorem, we have
          $$begin{eqnarray}
          int_F M(x)dx &=& int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_Ffrac{1}{|x-y|^2}dxright)dy\
          &le&int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)left(int_{|z|ge delta(y)}frac{1}{|z|^2}dzright)dy\
          &= &int_{F^ccap I}delta(y)frac{2}{delta(y)}dy= 2|F^c cap I| le 2.
          end{eqnarray}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          Song

          4,910317




          4,910317












          • I think you mean Tonelli as Fubini requires the integrand to be in $L^1$ already.
            – Guacho Perez
            1 hour ago










          • @GuachoPerez Thanks for the correction!
            – Song
            1 hour ago


















          • I think you mean Tonelli as Fubini requires the integrand to be in $L^1$ already.
            – Guacho Perez
            1 hour ago










          • @GuachoPerez Thanks for the correction!
            – Song
            1 hour ago
















          I think you mean Tonelli as Fubini requires the integrand to be in $L^1$ already.
          – Guacho Perez
          1 hour ago




          I think you mean Tonelli as Fubini requires the integrand to be in $L^1$ already.
          – Guacho Perez
          1 hour ago












          @GuachoPerez Thanks for the correction!
          – Song
          1 hour ago




          @GuachoPerez Thanks for the correction!
          – Song
          1 hour ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059145%2fprove-this-function-is-finite-almost-everywhere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

          Image
          0 I recently upgraded an Ubuntu 16.04 virtual machine to 18.04. I regularly use this VM to run apt-mirror at school on their high-speed internet, then rsync these files to my rack-mount server at home for updating multiple computers at home without wasting the tiny amount of bandwidth I have there. Since updating I can't get apt-mirror to run on my VM. It keeps giving the error: flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror line 214 immediately followed by: apt-mirror is already running, exiting at /usr/bin/apt-mirror line 217 apt-mirror is NOT running, and does not have a cron job. I've tried rebooting, and even looked for the old-style lockfile to delete, but I guess that method is no longer used. Is there some way to force unlock this so I can run apt-mirror? UPDATE: So... I f...
          Read more

          Mangá

          Image
            Nota:  Não confundir com Manga. Mangás e Animes Mangá Mangaká • Tankōbon Film comic La nouvelle manga Mangá original em inglês Anime História Animação influenciada por animes • Filler • OVA • Seiyū Públicos Kodomo • Shōjo • Shōnen Josei • Seinen Gêneros Mahō shōjo • Mecha • Harém Ecchi • Hentai ( Yaoi • Yuri Futanari • Shotacon • Lolicon Toddlercon ) Termos Bishōjo • Chibi • Fan service Gaiden • Kawaii • Kaitō • Light novel Mahō shōnen • Moe (antropomorfismo • Kemonomimi Nekomimi ) • Super deformed Omake • Tsundere • Yonkoma Listas Mangás • Animes • Ecchi • Mangaka • Estúdios • Revistas Fãs ( otaku ) Anime Music Video Convenções • Cosplay Dōjinshi • Fansub • Fandub • Fujoshi OS-tan • Scanlation Portal de Anime e mangá v d e O mangá (português brasileiro) ou manga (português europeu) [ 1 ] (em japonês: 漫画 , manga ? , lit. “história em quadrinhos”) , é a ...
          Read more

          Eduardo VII do Reino Unido

          Image
          Eduardo VII Rei do Reino Unido da Grã-Bretanha e Irlanda e dos Domínios Britânicos de Além-mar Imperador da Índia Rei do Reino Unido e Imperador da Índia Reinado 22 de janeiro de 1901 a 6 de maio de 1910 Coroação 9 de agosto de 1902 Delhi Durbar 1 de janeiro de 1903 Predecessora Vitória Sucessor Jorge V   Esposa Alexandra da Dinamarca Descendência Alberto Vitor, Duque de Clarence e Avondale Jorge V do Reino Unido Luísa, Princesa Real Vitória de Gales Maud de Gales Alexandre João de Gales Casa Saxe-Coburgo-Gota Nome completo Alberto Eduardo Nascimento 9 de novembro de 1841   Palácio de Buckingham, Londres, Reino Unido Morte 6 de maio de 1910 (68 anos)   Palácio de Buckingham, Londres, Reino Unido Enterro Capela de São Jorge, Windsor, Berkshire, Reino Unido 20 de maio de 1910 Pai Alberto de Saxe-Coburgo-Gota Mãe Vitória do Reino Unido Assinatura ...
          Read more