files created then deleted at every second in tmp directory
By mistake I noticed that in /tmp directory are continuously created some files then immediately deleted. Using a succession of ls -l /tmp
I managed to catch the created files:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 YlOmPA069G
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 l74jZzbcs6
or another example:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 AwVhWakvQ_
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 RpRGl__cIM
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 S0e72nkpBl
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 emxIQQMSy2
It's about Ubuntu 18.10 with 4.18.0-16-generic. This is an almost fresh install: I added some server software (nginx, mysql, php7.2-fpm) but even with those closed the problem persists.
What are the files created and why?
How would I stop this behaviour? a very undesirable one on a SSD
Thank you!
UPDATE
The guilty software is x2goserver.service.
files tmp tmpfs
add a comment |
By mistake I noticed that in /tmp directory are continuously created some files then immediately deleted. Using a succession of ls -l /tmp
I managed to catch the created files:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 YlOmPA069G
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 l74jZzbcs6
or another example:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 AwVhWakvQ_
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 RpRGl__cIM
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 S0e72nkpBl
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 emxIQQMSy2
It's about Ubuntu 18.10 with 4.18.0-16-generic. This is an almost fresh install: I added some server software (nginx, mysql, php7.2-fpm) but even with those closed the problem persists.
What are the files created and why?
How would I stop this behaviour? a very undesirable one on a SSD
Thank you!
UPDATE
The guilty software is x2goserver.service.
files tmp tmpfs
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
2 hours ago
1
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
2 hours ago
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why/tmp
is normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.
– Peter Cordes
27 mins ago
add a comment |
By mistake I noticed that in /tmp directory are continuously created some files then immediately deleted. Using a succession of ls -l /tmp
I managed to catch the created files:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 YlOmPA069G
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 l74jZzbcs6
or another example:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 AwVhWakvQ_
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 RpRGl__cIM
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 S0e72nkpBl
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 emxIQQMSy2
It's about Ubuntu 18.10 with 4.18.0-16-generic. This is an almost fresh install: I added some server software (nginx, mysql, php7.2-fpm) but even with those closed the problem persists.
What are the files created and why?
How would I stop this behaviour? a very undesirable one on a SSD
Thank you!
UPDATE
The guilty software is x2goserver.service.
files tmp tmpfs
By mistake I noticed that in /tmp directory are continuously created some files then immediately deleted. Using a succession of ls -l /tmp
I managed to catch the created files:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 YlOmPA069G
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:37 l74jZzbcs6
or another example:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 AwVhWakvQ_
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 RpRGl__cIM
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 S0e72nkpBl
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 2 19:44 emxIQQMSy2
It's about Ubuntu 18.10 with 4.18.0-16-generic. This is an almost fresh install: I added some server software (nginx, mysql, php7.2-fpm) but even with those closed the problem persists.
What are the files created and why?
How would I stop this behaviour? a very undesirable one on a SSD
Thank you!
UPDATE
The guilty software is x2goserver.service.
files tmp tmpfs
files tmp tmpfs
edited 2 hours ago
adrhc
asked 2 hours ago
adrhcadrhc
12517
12517
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
2 hours ago
1
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
2 hours ago
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why/tmp
is normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.
– Peter Cordes
27 mins ago
add a comment |
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
2 hours ago
1
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
2 hours ago
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why/tmp
is normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.
– Peter Cordes
27 mins ago
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
2 hours ago
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
2 hours ago
1
1
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
2 hours ago
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
2 hours ago
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why
/tmp
is normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.– Peter Cordes
27 mins ago
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why
/tmp
is normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.– Peter Cordes
27 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
add a comment |
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof
to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha
).
Put /tmp
into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp
directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper
(sometimes tmpwatch
) to be more aggressive.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1130673%2ffiles-created-then-deleted-at-every-second-in-tmp-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
add a comment |
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
add a comment |
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
I suggest installing and running fnotifystat to detect the process that is creating these files:
sudo apt-get install fnotifystat
sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
You will see process that is doing the open/close/read/write activity something like the following:
Total Open Close Read Write PID Process Pathname
3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-input (deleted)
2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 18135 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5748 firefox /tmp/cubeb-shm-5748-output (deleted)
answered 2 hours ago
Colin Ian KingColin Ian King
12.4k13747
12.4k13747
add a comment |
add a comment |
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof
to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha
).
Put /tmp
into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp
directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper
(sometimes tmpwatch
) to be more aggressive.
add a comment |
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof
to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha
).
Put /tmp
into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp
directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper
(sometimes tmpwatch
) to be more aggressive.
add a comment |
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof
to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha
).
Put /tmp
into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp
directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper
(sometimes tmpwatch
) to be more aggressive.
Determine which program/process is touching files
You can use tools such as lsof
to determine which processes and binaries are touching/opening which files. This could become troublesome if the files change frequently, so you can instead set up a watch to notify you:
$ sudo fnotifystat -i /tmp
Sometimes, simply looking at the user or group owner gives you a good hint (ie: ls -lsha
).
Put /tmp
into RAM instead of disk
If you desire, you can put your /tmp
directory into RAM. You will have to determine if this is a smart move based on available RAM, as well as the size and frequency of read/writes.
$ sudo vim /etc/fstab
...
# tmpfs in RAM
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
...
$ sudo mount /tmp
$ mount | grep tmp # Check /tmp is in RAM
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,noatime)
If you have enough RAM, this can be considered a very good thing to do for both the longevity of your SSD, as well as the speed of your system. You can even accomplish this with smaller amounts of RAM if you tweak tmpreaper
(sometimes tmpwatch
) to be more aggressive.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
earthmeLonearthmeLon
6,5231951
6,5231951
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1130673%2ffiles-created-then-deleted-at-every-second-in-tmp-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"a very undesirable one on a SSD" explain this please? You don't have /tmp as a tmpfs? why not? why would files in memory damage a ssd?
– Rinzwind
2 hours ago
1
/tmp may not necessarily be tmpfs, so it's a valid question
– Colin Ian King
2 hours ago
Yes, it would be undesirable on a SSD, at least if the directory metadata actually got written back to disk instead of just staying hot in cache. This is why
/tmp
is normally on tmpfs (a ramdisk filesystem that uses the pagecache as its backing store); you tagged your question with the tmpfs, so your comments about SSDs seem out of place.– Peter Cordes
27 mins ago